| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1421. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Just so people are aware. A Tank Destroyer historically referred to an Armoured Fighting Vehicle expressly designed to fight other tanks. Basically the Tank Destroyer was an incredibly large calibre self propelled artillery piece armed with a fix...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 08:07:00
|
1422. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: True Adamance wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Yeah I mean honestly the existing blasters in my mind....are AutoCannons. They perform like an AutoCannon should, not like how a Blaster should. Blasters should be more like ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 02:38:00
|
1423. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DeathwindRising wrote: BL4CKST4R wrote: Tanks = expensive (1M+) =hard to kill Tanks = cheap (less than 1M) = easy to kill So because something is expensive, it should be hard to kill? I don't see that happening with dropsuits. I kill p...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 01:04:00
|
1424. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Luther Mandrix wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Gunnlogi (2 Complex Hardener + 1 Complex Extender) Hardener Dowtime 45s (60s Base) Hardener Upline 30s (24s Base) Assumed Pure Shield Tanking (Atypical) Optimal Hardener eHP Cycle 60s Uptime =...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 00:46:00
|
1425. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Yeah I mean honestly the existing blasters in my mind....are AutoCannons. They perform like an AutoCannon should, not like how a Blaster should. Blasters should be more like shotguns or Plasma Cannons. But regardless we're s...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 00:18:00
|
1426. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: True Adamance wrote: Parity would be a wonderful thing but how well can it be achieved? Remember they aren't place holders if they are the final version....... Obviously we've spoken on this before, but for posterity s...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 00:07:00
|
1427. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Parity would be a wonderful thing but how well can it be achieved? Remember they aren't place holders if they are the final version.......
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.15 23:59:00
|
1428. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Rattati, in general you have the over arcing concepts correct in my book. I would stress that these key issues need to tackled in order to properly implement this, and preferably in this order. Address disparity betwee...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.15 22:12:00
|
1429. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Luther Mandrix wrote: Luther Mandrix wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: I think the Enforcers should be AI, and marauders AV. Echoing the sentiments above, there's no point in killing vehicles if they don't threaten infantry. How about a v...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.15 21:52:00
|
1430. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Cat Merc wrote: I think the generalist tanks should have more slots, while the specialized tanks get fewer. The generalists will build their tank exactly how they like it, while the specialists will have the tank pr...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.15 20:00:00
|
1431. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Just to get some things early in the thread for Rattati's eyes to see I'll throw down some links to specific vehicle suggestions threads and can update them as required as more are posted. Pokey Dravon's Vehicle Rebalance https://docs.google.com...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.15 10:45:00
|
1432. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Keep the "sidegrade, not an upgrade" mentality when coming up with prices. No need to make them super overpriced. That's honestly debatable. One thing I think most pilots and AV liked about Marauders was the cost...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.15 10:29:00
|
1433. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
You will get a lot of opinion on this one and I certainly appreciate this thread of engaging the vehicle community. Do you have an idea on how many slots you are looking at returning to. That would definitely help us present more informed feed ba...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.15 09:38:00
|
1434. New Large Turret - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Hector Carson wrote: Meeko Fent wrote: What about turret turn rate? CCP can decide that, tell Jigga Whaaa I said hi If its a Beam Laser it will be slow as hell and require Tracking Computers to operate at peak efficiency.
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.15 07:26:00
|
1435. [REQUEST] Light Damage Mods on Low Slots as well as high slots... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
All damage based modules are in the Low Slots if you go by EVE examples.
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.15 07:24:00
|
1436. [Idea] Making Commandos useful (and moar) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Just have the Khanid make our Commando suits.
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.15 03:54:00
|
1437. [REQUEST] Suggestion to increase loyalty to factions in Fac. Warfare - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Piercing Serenity wrote: True Adamance wrote: I like that you used us in an example...... I just want to officially join the Amarr Militia. Question why do I have to pay for a resource I've never used? ((Genuine Question and not sarcastic)...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.15 03:53:00
|
1438. [REQUEST] Suggestion to increase loyalty to factions in Fac. Warfare - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I like that you used us in an example...... I just want to officially join the Amarr Militia.
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.15 03:48:00
|
1439. If the assault rifle worked like the ion pistol, would it better? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lightning35 Delta514 wrote: Ion rifle- the same exact thing as the ion pistol Looks like an assault rifle but has extended barrel like combat rifle. 10 round clip Mid to high damge per shot (stronger than scrambler rifle) Mid to high range ri...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.15 02:03:00
|
1440. Module Discussion Return of the 180mm Reinforced Armour Plate - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Dauth Jenkins wrote: SgtMajSquish MLBJ wrote: OMG i would love to fit one of those in my Grimsnes. I currently have an Enhanced 120mm squeezed in there if you can barely fit a 120, your never going to fit a180. I Like the idea of returnin...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.14 19:00:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |