| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1401. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: True Adamance wrote: Dergle wrote: There needs to be a vehicle for taking out infantry, otherwise there is no real point for vehicles. Of course there is. -Anti Tank -Siege and Suppression -Direct Infantry Sup...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.17 02:16:00
|
1402. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Dergle wrote: There needs to be a vehicle for taking out infantry, otherwise there is no real point for vehicles. Of course there is. -Anti Tank -Siege and Suppression -Direct Infantry Support -Bombardment -Field Demolition
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.17 00:44:00
|
1403. A Comparison of Armor and Shield HAV Regeneration - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lazer Fo Cused wrote: 1. Gunlogi can dual tank 2. Madrugar depends on fit can barely put owt in the high slots unless tank is weakened to an extent 3. Madrugar has better depression 4. Madrugar is faster, nitro added even better 5. Armor...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.17 00:33:00
|
1404. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: True Adamance wrote: Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: My idea for bonuses to these tech 2 (Specialized) HAVs: Marauders - 6 passenger slots (1 pilot, 2 gunners, 3 passengers) serve as a Frontline bastion to support infan...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.17 00:12:00
|
1405. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: My idea for bonuses to these tech 2 (Specialized) HAVs: Marauders - 6 passenger slots (1 pilot, 2 gunners, 3 passengers) serve as a Frontline bastion to support infantry, and give people a reason to want bring in enfor...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 23:54:00
|
1406. AV - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Atiim wrote: If you think Swarm Launchers are the most popular AV weapon due to their ease of use, you're heavily misinformed. The real reason why they're so popular is because only 1/5 of the classes in DUST can actually FGs, and PLCs while gr...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 23:24:00
|
1407. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DarthJT5 wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: DarthJT5 wrote: What if we don't reduce hardener effectiveness, but just add a speed reduction when using them? Like say, 50% damage for 50% speed. This could also be applied to active damage mods. I a...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 23:23:00
|
1408. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DarthJT5 wrote: True Adamance wrote: DarthJT5 wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Yeah not a huge fan of 3/3 unless it was Minmatar. Hmmm so you're looking at a +1 to main rack for both Enforcers and Marauders? so 4/2 and 2/4 for Cal & Gal?...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 23:19:00
|
1409. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: DarthJT5 wrote: I'm thinking that std tanks get an extra high or low like old times, 4/2 on a caldari for example, then giving the enforcers that same layout with the extra off rack mod, 4/3 on caldari for example. The...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 23:17:00
|
1410. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: True Adamance wrote: It wouldn't have any PG and CPU increase in fact it would have significantly less PG and CPU than a standard hull. So as to fit less eHP modules for its static role bonus, but allowing it to have jus...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 23:11:00
|
1411. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: True Adamance wrote: Increasing Main stack +1 like the other "side grades" but ensure that that slot is not going to be fitted with an eHP module or if a fitting modules one that does not provide too potent benefits due ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 23:00:00
|
1412. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DarthJT5 wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Yeah not a huge fan of 3/3 unless it was Minmatar. Hmmm so you're looking at a +1 to main rack for both Enforcers and Marauders? so 4/2 and 2/4 for Cal & Gal? Only an increase to torque is fine, tanks...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 22:59:00
|
1413. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Yeah not a huge fan of 3/3 unless it was Minmatar. Hmmm so you're looking at a +1 to main rack for both Enforcers and Marauders? so 4/2 and 2/4 for Cal & Gal? Only an increase to torque is fine, tanks are pretty fast as...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 22:45:00
|
1414. AV - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lightning35 Delta514 wrote: Ok so with the news that we are getting our tanks back I'd like to give a word. With these new tanks, we will see a new load of swarms everywhere. I personally think that AV will need to be looked at. We can all ag...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 22:17:00
|
1415. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: True Adamance wrote: Not really sure how that would affect the use of Enforcers since most tankers would be forgoing small turrets to fit the better tiered ones anyway...... Moreover the Turret Upgrades skills probably...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 22:12:00
|
1416. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: True Adamance wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: Something I need to add; if we are talking side grades like not objectively better than basic tanks, or side grade in how the assault suit is a "side ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 21:25:00
|
1417. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: Something I need to add; if we are talking side grades like not objectively better than basic tanks, or side grade in how the assault suit is a "side grade" to the medium frame? Or the sentinel is ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 21:05:00
|
1418. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: I tested a Gunnlogi with an extender and 2 hardeners vs ADV missiles with no damage mods in a PC last night. The missile took off half the shield of the Gunnlogi. PRO missile with a damage would melt...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 20:54:00
|
1419. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jadd Hatchen wrote: True Adamance wrote: CommanderBolt wrote: MINA Longstrike wrote: ^there are problems with fitting small turrets. 1) they take away from fitting more tank 2) small turrets have always been kind of glitchy 3) people a...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 17:59:00
|
1420. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CommanderBolt wrote: MINA Longstrike wrote: ^there are problems with fitting small turrets. 1) they take away from fitting more tank 2) small turrets have always been kind of glitchy 3) people afk in vehicles or are otherwise useless 4) ther...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 08:27:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |