| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1061. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Update: Changed Nanofiber plates to polycrystalline plates, renamed the third tier of plates Rolled Tungsten. Re-adding nanofiber plates as the ferroscale analogs as soon as my brain is up to kit-bashing them. Unless anyo...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.21 21:05:00
|
1062. Nova Sword & Amarrian Blade - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Fizzer XCIV wrote: Amarr: Some sort of electrical lance/spear. Maybe a double-ended spear like this weapon? Gallente: Plasma Mace. Like a Plasma Cannon slug, but on the end of a stick. Given that maces are trad...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.21 20:33:00
|
1063. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Never drove in Chrome. I spend all my time in armour tanked Assault Suits learning to be Amarr before Uprising. The only Enforcer Build that I was planning to skill into was one another player built before a couple of tankers talked down the Enfo...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.21 20:12:00
|
1064. make shield AV weapons.......or - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
taxi bastard wrote: we need anti shield AV, this is obvious but for some reason has not even been discussed. or alternatively make all AV +/- neutral on shields and Armour and apply proficiency to both shields and Armour Perhaps it can be...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.21 20:01:00
|
1065. Nova Sword & Amarrian Blade - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
BLOOD Ruler wrote: Like nova knives but only one slash instead of two. Has full damage of a knova knive with and without charge . Takes 1.4 secs to slash and 2.7 secs to charge slash,.+4% decrease to charge as you lv up. Nova sword looks like ...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.21 06:00:00
|
1066. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Hi everyone, can someone link/create "undebatable" prototype fits for both HAVs and Dropships. I need this for the next steps. Just for clarification, what do you mean by...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.21 04:02:00
|
1067. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: True Adamance wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: And due to actual updated lore plus game mechanics plus just physics, yes, they actuually do need to be short ranged. Otherwise you would be changing generally how Galle...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.21 03:04:00
|
1068. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: And due to actual updated lore plus game mechanics plus just physics, yes, they actuually do need to be short ranged. Otherwise you would be changing generally how Gallente as a WHOLE does combat, generally. Not re...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.21 02:19:00
|
1069. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: True Adamance wrote: Tesfa Alem wrote: True Adamance wrote: Considering the size of the Dust 514 Tank being designed to 2.5m Tall Super Soldiers I doubt the sizes of turret are vastly different in terms of ou...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.21 01:39:00
|
1070. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tesfa Alem wrote: True Adamance wrote: Considering the size of the Dust 514 Tank being designed to 2.5m Tall Super Soldiers I doubt the sizes of turret are vastly different in terms of our Large = EVE's small. . just for something ane...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.20 23:44:00
|
1071. Sticky:[Feedback] Planetary Conquest - Timers - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: And, as anyone who is actually active in PC currently knows, RAIDS do very much exist and have ever since PC isk payouts were changed a couple months back. Put simply, RAIDING is committed by attacking corps fielding a team, ...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.20 20:41:00
|
1072. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Maybe I LIKE HAVs that can fight back when I jam my forge up their tailpipe. I like tanks. Shame Dust doesn't have any.
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.20 11:04:00
|
1073. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: True Adamance wrote: Even if that wasn't the case then it would still make more sense to store the charges on board the tank, heat them to plasma state rapidly then fire the charge and use that charge to direct the p...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.20 05:38:00
|
1074. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: True Adamance wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: True Adamance wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: If only the forums had a face palm emoticon. Do you realize that blasters are only good in close, right? They don'...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.20 04:21:00
|
1075. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Fizzer XCIV wrote: True Adamance wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: True Adamance wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: If only the forums had a face palm emoticon. Do you realize that blasters are only good in close, right? They don't ha...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.20 02:52:00
|
1076. CCP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Golden Day wrote: Make taking distrcits and loosing districts in FW make a bigger impact If you did so EVE players will care about US more! No....they'll dislike us more that an arbitrary affect/penalty is being enforced on their operations...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.20 02:43:00
|
1077. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: True Adamance wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: If only the forums had a face palm emoticon. Do you realize that blasters are only good in close, right? They don't have to be limited too greatly in that manner Du...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.20 02:35:00
|
1078. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: If only the forums had a face palm emoticon. Do you realize that blasters are only good in close, right? They don't have to be limited too greatly in that manner Dust side. As I've said before the Blaster is simpl...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.20 00:45:00
|
1079. The swarm turn radius did nothing for dropships - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Fizzer XCIV wrote: That would make vehicles immune to swarms. And since vehicles can already practically ignore Plasma Cannons, AV nades and Prox mines, they would become essentially immune. There would be forge guns. That's it. Never EVER...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.19 20:18:00
|
1080. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tesfa Alem wrote: You know since you've been away this thread has been a much better place. comprimise, people working together, sharing data. Just please, please, just leave it alone. Go back to GD or something. There must be somewhere else...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.19 20:06:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |