| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1921. What If Tankers Are Doing Us A Favor? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lol.... Ok well I'll admit there are a handful that are equally as good on foot as they are in tanks and some even better on foot than they are in tanks. But those people aren't really tankers; they're swiss army knives. They just good all around ...
- by Thumb Green - at 2014.02.15 18:05:00
|
1922. Why fight over the null cannons? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Debacle Nano wrote: When I can just call an OB in on top of the enemy MCC and auto win? Wouldn't that be more logical than spending money on suits and vehicles to fight over points? Just delving into the world of logic. This is New Eden, t...
- by Thumb Green - at 2014.02.14 23:58:00
|
1923. its official, we need to nerf remote explosives - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: @NK Scout It cannot be used for contact grenading because of it's arm times. In order for it to be a contact grenade, it would have to: Explode on contact.
Explode without user interference
The only explosive that could ...
- by Thumb Green - at 2014.02.13 22:28:00
|
1924. I'm Sorry, But Someone Had To Say It... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Press Secretary wrote: This poster is now under investigation for stealing popular players signatures. I already supply Spkr4TheDead with royalties on the signature. Every-time I use it, I pay him 1 ISK I could have sworn...
- by Thumb Green - at 2014.02.13 22:19:00
|
1925. its official, we need to nerf remote explosives - in General Discussions [original thread]
calisk galern wrote: Thumb Green wrote: You can tell who in this thread genuinely believe RE's a perfectly fine and who in this thread are scrubs that rely on their mega-contact grenades as a crutch (hint: they're the ones getting angry and ...
- by Thumb Green - at 2014.02.13 20:41:00
|
1926. its official, we need to nerf remote explosives - in General Discussions [original thread]
You can tell who in this thread genuinely believe RE's a perfectly fine and who in this thread are scrubs that rely on their mega-contact grenades as a crutch (hint: they're the ones getting angry and hurling insults). I agree mostly with the form...
- by Thumb Green - at 2014.02.13 20:29:00
|
1927. its official, we need to nerf remote explosives - in General Discussions [original thread]
NK Scout wrote: Increase the time it takes to arm the remote by 1 second or 2 All the other stuff is fine as is by me; however this one is a must. The damn things are practically contact grenades that do more damage and have a larger blast r...
- by Thumb Green - at 2014.02.13 19:58:00
|
1928. Tanks? OP? I see QQ!!!!!!!!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'd really like to know where you people get the idea that a tank shouldn't be able to be destroyed by one person. There's no precedent for it in any multiplayer game I know of and it's not as if these are M1A2's being shot at by Cold War weaponry...
- by Thumb Green - at 2014.02.13 17:10:00
|
1929. Let me show you how much MM is not "fixed" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Xander Mercy wrote: to many variables for what you want for instance if you go by say 1)war points could be "skilled" or they could just be a vet that never got good but just likes to play 2) KDR could be a "skilled" player or a red line snip...
- by Thumb Green - at 2014.02.13 14:56:00
|
1930. Let me show you how much MM is not "fixed" - in General Discussions [original thread]
I want to point out that these isn't what CCP's matchmaking bug fix was meant to fix but I also want everyone to keep getting angry over this so they actually do something about it, so.... carry on. Edit: Shut up people that are pointing out what...
- by Thumb Green - at 2014.02.12 22:32:00
|
1931. Hey CCP no respec to infantry looks like discrimination. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Delta 749 wrote: PO0KY wrote: Wut? Vehicle skills were respecced because the entire tree was changed. As far as i know, the infantry skill tree isn't being completely altered. That being said, I still believe infantry should get a respec. ...
- by Thumb Green - at 2014.02.12 21:24:00
|
1932. where is your god npw - in General Discussions [original thread]
Well don't come in here bragging about killing Rain Man in a shitfit tank with a starter fit. It only strengthens some peoples belief that tanks aren't OP and AV isn't UP.
- by Thumb Green - at 2014.02.12 18:20:00
|
1933. where is your god npw - in General Discussions [original thread]
There's absolutely no legitimate way you solo'd a tank with the starter AV. The only way you could have solo'd any tank with that fit was if the guy just sat there in an armor tank letting you shoot him in the @ss without activating any modules an...
- by Thumb Green - at 2014.02.12 18:13:00
|
1934. 1.8 FotM?? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Knight Solitaire wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Vulpes Dolosus wrote: I really do have a bad feeling about Cal heavies, as far as dropships are concerned. High/Fast regenning shields, another -25% to explosive damage, 4 highs for damage mods, a...
- by Thumb Green - at 2014.02.12 17:05:00
|
1935. how can people jump around all over the place and shoot you? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Patrick57 wrote: Back before aim assist, keyboard and mouse used to be king. You could jump, strafe left and right faster than any DS3 user, and have perfect aim. Now, it is highly outclassed by aim assist on DS3. Aim assist has little to do...
- by Thumb Green - at 2014.02.12 05:11:00
|
1936. Just created an alt character and... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Patrick57 wrote: Should've used a Tank Yeah, I created an alt and spent all the sp on getting the large blaster & rail to Std and then shield & armor to Std. Made a blaster sica and put on 2 small missile launchers. Called it in at...
- by Thumb Green - at 2014.02.12 04:07:00
|
1937. Why Do Scanners Even Exist? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Well on the bright side for you, we used to have passive scanning that was on par if not better than the scanners and that's before you include the fact that passive scanning is always scanning. Seriously we used to be able to see people spawn in ...
- by Thumb Green - at 2014.02.12 03:15:00
|
1938. New hotfix to matchmaking - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ander Thedas wrote: Ares 514 wrote: Ander Thedas wrote: Ares 514 wrote: Ander Thedas wrote: I've got a fix for it. Take all players with all 4 faction warfare boxes checked and turn off all factions besides their starting race. If...
- by Thumb Green - at 2014.02.11 19:06:00
|
1939. New hotfix to matchmaking - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Thumb Green wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: No spkr MLT aren't flavour of the Month, tanks in general are flavour of the month. 20mil SP vehicle is FOTM lolno It doesn't take 20 mil s...
- by Thumb Green - at 2014.02.11 18:46:00
|
1940. New hotfix to matchmaking - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: No spkr MLT aren't flavour of the Month, tanks in general are flavour of the month. 20mil SP vehicle is FOTM lolno It doesn't take 20 mil sp to roll around in a madruger or gunlogi.
- by Thumb Green - at 2014.02.11 18:16:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |