| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
5221. The Mythical need for an ISK sink - in General Discussions [original thread]
I also discount the vibrancy of the secondary market for officer gear and FW variants of weapons and gear. 1) most people don't run and can't afford to run a ton of proto very often. 2) the people who can are good enough that they won't burn thr...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2013.10.21 02:45:00
|
5222. The Mythical need for an ISK sink - in General Discussions [original thread]
The reason I bring this up is that I see an ISK sink in FW will lead to an even bigger incentive to play passive in pub matches as people grind for ISK to support their FW habit.
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2013.10.21 02:44:00
|
5223. The Mythical need for an ISK sink - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm going to try and keep this simple as I'm typing this on an iPad. First off you can run ADV gear in a pub match and die 6 times and fail to turn a profit. I think this is bullshit. Especially when I win the match meanwhile some dude on the op...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2013.10.21 02:42:00
|
5224. Thanks to CCP, I'll likely go broke - in General Discussions [original thread]
hgghyujh wrote: uuummmm you buy from the LP store and sell at a huge mark up, Thats how it works in EVE. Faction variants go for many time the price of T1 and tend to be more expensive then T2(think proto) gear in eve. So you won't be hurting f...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2013.10.21 01:45:00
|
5225. Thanks to CCP, I'll likely go broke - in General Discussions [original thread]
TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote: I quite like the idea. Game has needed an ISK sink for a while. Then why do people complain about players using proto in pub matches? Why do people stop pushing objectives at the first sign of resistance? I don't ...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2013.10.21 00:58:00
|
5226. Thanks to CCP, I'll likely go broke - in General Discussions [original thread]
With the LP items costing ISK as well I don't think the market will be as vibrant for these goods as you imagine. I hope they take Hanz's advice and wait until they release the market, but I still think they are misjudging the ISK sink thing. LO...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2013.10.21 00:49:00
|
5227. Sticky:Factional Contract Match Changes - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I think a squad leader with proper standing should be able to bring in whomever they choose into a battle. It just shouldn't let a player with under let's say 100,000 WP queue in solo.
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2013.10.21 00:40:00
|
5228. Sticky:Factional Contract Match Changes - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: There should be no FF penalty among squads, the squad leaders can deal with it if it becomes a problem by kicking the TKing member from the squad (so the TKer will suffer penalty if he does it again). This is act...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2013.10.20 18:20:00
|
5229. Announcement:Factional Contract Changes Introduction - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spectre-M wrote: I'm a mercenary. I won't fight if you don't pay me when the job is done. You need the LP market or trade for ISK when you implement the changes, not just LP with no isk. I don't want to be wasting ADV suits getting killed by bl...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2013.10.20 03:43:00
|
5230. Sticky:Factional Contract Loyalty Points and Loyalty Store - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jastad wrote: hurrayy we heavy get somoe love in the lp stor...... Oh.... Nevermind. Amarr won't have to worry about facing any heavies in their battles.
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2013.10.20 03:33:00
|
5231. Sticky:Factional Contract Loyalty Points and Loyalty Store - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Beren Hurin wrote: Zeylon Rho wrote: I don't know that better-fitting is a great incentive, for me anyway. Unique stats is a step in the right direction, it's just... there's nothing there that I look at and think "I NEED that". I'm reall...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2013.10.20 03:31:00
|
5232. Announcement:Factional Contract Changes Introduction - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The Robot Devil wrote: I understand that people want ISK for fighting but I think that LP only is good. It creates an opening for player driven content. Corps should be paying their mercs for doing FW and the high cost to individuals is also a ...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2013.10.20 02:42:00
|
5233. Announcement:Factional Contract Changes Introduction - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Maken Tosch wrote: Aero Yassavi wrote: Maken Tosch wrote: Arrach Sarkal wrote: The sentence about there being a lot of ISK in Dust and FW items being a motivation to spend it is irrelevant as far as the actual issue goes. There being t...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2013.10.19 19:19:00
|
5234. Announcement:Factional Contract Changes Introduction - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Nullarbor wrote: Aero Yassavi wrote: CCP Nullarbor wrote: No ISK Faction warfare right now will not be a sustainable career on its own. There will be objections to this of course but we are doing it on purpose for some good reasons. ...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2013.10.19 19:15:00
|
5235. 10 suggestions for the new Faction Warfare - in General Discussions [original thread]
Asirius Medaius wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: But I think the community would essentially kill pub skirmish matches if FW gave Loyalty Points and didn't reduce payouts for isk. That's why i'm in favor or reducing it, but not eliminating it. ...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2013.10.19 19:08:00
|
5236. Announcement:Factional Contract Changes Introduction - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Heinrich Jagerblitzen wrote: They've arrived! Needless to say I'll have a lot to say about these changes, I'm going to likely throw them up on my blog. We saw them posted internally only briefly before they went public, and I've been so busy pu...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2013.10.19 04:43:00
|
5237. Sticky:Factional Contract Match Changes - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Quil Evrything wrote: Thor Odinson42 wrote: Quil Evrything wrote: With the new "squad finder", that doesnt really guarantee anything. It's still better than completely random. I still don't understand your hostility toward people br...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2013.10.19 04:06:00
|
5238. Sticky:Factional Contract Match Changes - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ares 514 wrote: Have you considered charging the player who kills an ally the cost of the suit? So if my fit is 100000 ISK and a blueberry team kills me he looses that much ISK and I gain it. In the battle summary you could see the fines you go...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2013.10.19 02:31:00
|
5239. Sticky:Factional Contract Match Changes - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Quil Evrything wrote: Magpie Raven wrote: FW needs to have more of an organized feel to it and be fought by mercs of a higher level than regular blueberries. Maybe make it so only full squads can join FW With the new "squad finder", tha...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2013.10.19 02:29:00
|
5240. Sticky:Factional Contract Match Changes - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
OSGR Valdez wrote: Integrating the Eve Pilots with comms and oribitals is going to be sick! And the post battle screen, we'll actually see the influence we make. cannot wait for these updates. You guys really out did yourself, way to go CCP! ...
- by Thor Odinson42 - at 2013.10.19 00:56:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |