| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
1. CPM0 Betrayed Us. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Soldner VonKuechle wrote: much better, sorry for being crass, i deal with CA/NDAs everyday of my life. ******* blows, but yay inside knowledge? I've stated it before in this thread. But NDA's are a necessary to get a CPM/CSM thing to work. B...
- by TheGoebel - at 2014.05.06 04:30:00
|
2. CPM0 Betrayed Us. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Soldner VonKuechle wrote: TheGoebel wrote: First, lets again be clear. I have no actual idea how serious breaking a CA/NDA is. You're not really good at grasping the concept of: Corporate Espionage Conflict of Interests Breach of Cont...
- by TheGoebel - at 2014.05.06 04:25:00
|
3. CPM0 Betrayed Us. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: TheGoebel wrote: I don't quite understand the word 'possibly' here. I think its because I don't have trust in CCP. Anything that hasn't happened yet can not be predicted. The effort IWS and CPM have put in, have they b...
- by TheGoebel - at 2014.05.06 03:40:00
|
4. Attempts at Rationality - An Open Letter - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't understand these arguments on how much manpower CCP needs to put on legion. As far I understand, and I say that because I could be wrong, dust had 100% of CCP shanghai on Dust. So 100% is dust, what's 80% for legion going to be? Oh god, ...
- by TheGoebel - at 2014.05.05 14:32:00
|
5. CPM0 Betrayed Us. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Garrett Blacknova wrote: You guys are meant to be representing the community. Part of the problem was probably that CCP made it hard for you to meet that responsibility. There was probably also something you could have done but didn't see at t...
- by TheGoebel - at 2014.05.05 14:15:00
|
6. [Vid] Dust isn't dead, its evolving. we can bring our stuff over... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Look, I watched the whole video and I came to say two things. One, when it comes to long term plans, you must remember dust had long term plans too. Second, title is misleading. 1:45 in the video, you say "they are killing dust."
- by TheGoebel - at 2014.05.05 04:58:00
|
7. Attempts at Rationality - An Open Letter - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maken Tosch wrote: dent 308 wrote: OP has a good post with one serious flaw. Legion isn't done, not by a long shot. It will have a beta period, fighting this is dumb. Major advantage for PC dev is no patch middleman, so builds / changes / fi...
- by TheGoebel - at 2014.05.05 04:42:00
|
8. CPM0 Betrayed Us. - in General Discussions [original thread]
I couldn't sleep, this thread is bothering me and I have yet to post anything on any forum related to this issue but I couldn't shake this. I am happy the CPM didn't break NDA. The NDA is an integral part of what makes a construction like the CPM/...
- by TheGoebel - at 2014.05.05 04:12:00
|
9. An analysis of the GÇÿexpanding the arsenalGÇÖ devblog and TTK in 1.8 - in General Discussions [original thread]
I was thinking about WyrmspireGÇÖs focus on the damage/range ratio over all other factors. IGÇÖm trying to figure out a way that fitting requirements could be used to balance but I canGÇÖt get past the idea that the best all around performing rifl...
- by TheGoebel - at 2014.03.13 15:00:00
|
10. An analysis of the GÇÿexpanding the arsenalGÇÖ devblog and TTK in 1.8 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: TheGoebel wrote: So how long did it take from when you posted your first armor dissertation till actual armor change? I do think this turnaround will be faster, but no sense in not collecting data. EDIT: Maybe we sho...
- by TheGoebel - at 2014.03.12 09:24:00
|
11. An analysis of the GÇÿexpanding the arsenalGÇÖ devblog and TTK in 1.8 - in General Discussions [original thread]
So how long did it take from when you posted your first armor dissertation till actual armor change? I do think this turnaround will be faster, but no sense in not collecting data. EDIT: Maybe we should look between change and meaningful change a...
- by TheGoebel - at 2014.03.12 03:18:00
|
12. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
BL4CKST4R wrote: Because they cry about losing their shields instantly, my counter argument is well you should of used a core locus grenade. The logibro argument well anybody with a brain can realize that since almost everybody shield tanks tr...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.24 15:11:00
|
13. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
D legendary hero wrote: TheGoebel wrote: D legendary hero wrote: BL4CKST4R wrote: D legendary hero wrote: fear anger hate Yissss, let it your hate make your more powerful. Seriously, this issue is better but not resolved. T...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.24 14:53:00
|
14. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
D legendary hero wrote: BL4CKST4R wrote: D legendary hero wrote: fear anger hate Yissss, let it your hate make your more powerful. Seriously, this issue is better but not resolved. The armor tank still requires more SP. They need...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.24 14:47:00
|
15. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
BL4CKST4R wrote: Madagascan Eagle wrote: Do we know if they are changing the current speed penalty bug where the ferroscale plates negate movement speed penalties? If they fix that to work as intended what do you guys project will be the NE...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.22 16:26:00
|
16. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: TheGoebel wrote: So it looks like we've taken a wait and see attitude here but I'm unsure we should rest. One, the problem isn't resolved. Two, we don't have a road map to its resolution. Maybe I'm a sore winner but...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.22 03:30:00
|
17. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
So it looks like we've taken a wait and see attitude here but I'm unsure we should rest. One, the problem isn't resolved. Two, we don't have a road map to its resolution. Maybe I'm a sore winner but I'm happy, not satisfied.
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.21 19:26:00
|
18. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
BL4CKST4R wrote: TheGoebel wrote: So plates and ferro are soon to be in a reasonable place. Now we can continue to push for reactives to not suck and get us some racial bonuses to help with regen. They are going to be okay but not as a mo...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.15 04:04:00
|
19. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
So plates and ferro are soon to be in a reasonable place. Now we can continue to push for reactives to not suck and get us some racial bonuses to help with regen.
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.15 03:47:00
|
20. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cross Atu wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Cross Atu wrote: Madagascan Eagle wrote: What about some kind of nerf to shields? The time to kill is too long in this game (current explosives excluded). Limit the amount of shield extenders yo...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.13 21:55:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |