| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 |
21. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
BL4CKST4R wrote: 100 likes for Goebel! YAY! Considering I only signed onto the forums to post here, I'm pretty proud of myself. Also, Thank you.
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.12 01:12:00
|
22. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: TheGoebel wrote: BL4CKST4R wrote: TheGoebel wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: It's actually slowing down quite a bit now. I'm fairly certain that they've taken note - my work is done, at least until the next r...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.12 01:06:00
|
23. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
BL4CKST4R wrote: TheGoebel wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Arc-08 wrote: this is one of the most popular threads recently.... where are the DEV'S??? they need to be HERE agreeing with you!!! telling you that this will happen It's ...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.11 23:09:00
|
24. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Arc-08 wrote: this is one of the most popular threads recently.... where are the DEV'S??? they need to be HERE agreeing with you!!! telling you that this will happen It's actually slowing down quite a bit now. I...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.11 22:41:00
|
25. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cross Atu wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: SponkSponkSponk wrote: high-slot Armor modules have to be force multipliers rather than pure +ehp, IMO (otherwise just put on complex shield extenders since they regen by themselves anyway). So, s...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.11 20:19:00
|
26. To those who say that shields aren't OP because of the Flux grenade - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yes. Let the hate flow through you... come to the darkside
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.09 16:36:00
|
27. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Please, please, please stop coming up with new module ideas. I'm not saying the ideas aren't creative, because they are, or have no use, because they could, but they sideline examining the actual problem. The problem is that those who spec into sh...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.07 18:08:00
|
28. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Text Grant wrote: Explosive dampening isn't enough. A resistance to damage added to the plates or put in a high slot would be happily accepted. Yes, sign me up for using all my low slots and some of my mid slots for my tank. Honestly, more ...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.05 12:31:00
|
29. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I'm beginning to wonder/worry that the flaylock nerf is all the armor balance we're going to get. Maybe CCP thinks their new modules are fine if not for that dastardly flaylock.
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.07.31 13:30:00
|
30. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
D legendary hero wrote: still no dev response... I too would enjoy some news on this subject. They've put out twice as many dev blogs this year then the last two years combined so I know they are communicating finally but why the silence on t...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.07.30 00:53:00
|
31. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Mobius Wyvern wrote: TheGoebel wrote: Text Grant wrote: Gorgoth24Reborn wrote: The problem is that overpowered gets balanced before underpowered. CCP is still balancing flaylocks, log suits, contact nades, murder taxis, etc. trying to...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.07.28 04:07:00
|
32. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Text Grant wrote: Gorgoth24Reborn wrote: Text Grant wrote: Are the devs just in denial about how much armor sucks or do they hate us? The problem is that overpowered gets balanced before underpowered. CCP is still balancing flaylocks, ...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.07.26 16:58:00
|
33. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
xSir Campsalotx wrote: Make shield extenders enlarge hit box size but once shields go down they return back to original size. I would say this solution would be fine but I propose another idea. How about we don't punish either tank?
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.07.25 05:01:00
|
34. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
SponkSponkSponk wrote: I've been thinking. I think armor isn't hard enough to skill into a good fit with. Consider shield extenders. 22hp, 33hp, 66hp at complex. It really encourages you to use complex extenders. Consider armor plates: 65hp, ...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.07.23 19:39:00
|
35. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
zzZaXxx wrote: DildoMcnutz wrote: BL4CKST4R wrote: TheGoebel wrote: BL4CKST4R wrote: Thats bs didnt even do anything for the Gallente except nerf the logistics suit. I don't understand why they felt they had to keep the bonus in ...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.07.20 15:01:00
|
36. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
BL4CKST4R wrote: TheGoebel wrote: BL4CKST4R wrote: TheGoebel wrote: Yay! New dev blog! Double Yay! Caldari Logi changes! Oh, the caldari assault gets that bonus? Instead of hybrid reloading speed? Uh. Wut? Thats bs didnt even do ...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.07.18 16:46:00
|
37. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
BL4CKST4R wrote: TheGoebel wrote: Yay! New dev blog! Double Yay! Caldari Logi changes! Oh, the caldari assault gets that bonus? Instead of hybrid reloading speed? Uh. Wut? Thats bs didnt even do anything for the Gallente except nerf th...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.07.18 16:40:00
|
38. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Yay! New dev blog! Double Yay! Caldari Logi changes! Oh, the caldari assault gets that bonus? Instead of hybrid reloading speed? Uh. Wut?
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.07.18 15:53:00
|
39. What does it take to get a dev response? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm of two minds when it comes to the usefulness of a Dev response. The previous thread had a response that suggested the solution were the new armor modules and we know now that those modules are like fixing a pogo stick by adding wheels. Aeon...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.07.16 20:23:00
|
40. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Galvan Nized wrote: Shields MUST have a penalty, right now they run around unhampered. Armor tanking is best done as a group, your power multiplies greatly if you have more than 1 person. .. shields have no such benefit. You do not bring up r...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.07.14 04:16:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |