| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
161. To Rattati: Help the logis PLEASE - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: DDx77 wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: Logis need so much work and haven't been touched in months. They have VERY low health, low speed, high profile, no sidearm, the list goes on. Whule they need a major overhaul, all ...
- by Thaddeus Reynolds - at 2015.03.03 23:33:00
|
162. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Doc DDD wrote: For example, I am making some rediculous marduk fits with shield extenders and shield hardeners with a nitro, 2 complex light armor repairers and 2 basic plates... proto blaster with 2 small basic rails... ...
- by Thaddeus Reynolds - at 2015.03.03 01:09:00
|
163. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ofc all this AV discussion is irrelevant to the topic of the thread itself... The proposed HAVs are almost good...both need a resource buff, and we need some utility for the lows (That way you can actually have the intended opportunity cost of fi...
- by Thaddeus Reynolds - at 2015.03.02 21:55:00
|
164. New Grenade Slot Item - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
actually...a pretty good idea...and an interesting slot choice for it... I'll +1 it
- by Thaddeus Reynolds - at 2015.02.27 17:08:00
|
165. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Not really when rattati is seriously thinking about limiting the hardener to 1 and nerfing PG/CPU modules or creating various fits on protofits. The creating various fits on protofits is part of the community feed...
- by Thaddeus Reynolds - at 2015.02.27 16:57:00
|
166. In regards to Minnmandos and Swarms - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sequal's Back wrote: Minmando is made to use use swarm, such as amarr are maint to use laser weapons and caldari to use rail weapons. Stop debating about the obvious efficiency of a suit using its weapon, it's absolutely normal if does better t...
- by Thaddeus Reynolds - at 2015.02.27 16:53:00
|
167. Large Blaster Turret Proposition - Re-designation of Role - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Whatever changes come to the blaster, blapsters got to blap... PLC and Shotgun style are preferable to the autocannon/.50 cal we have now...turrets on whatever is considered an MBT need to feel like an MBT turret ...hmm Blaster as a short range...
- by Thaddeus Reynolds - at 2015.02.26 17:18:00
|
168. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: True Adamance wrote: Specific kinds of hardeners? Low all round resistance hardeners vs powerful damage type specific ones? For example players might choose to stack say 20% hardeners and one explosive damage resistanc...
- by Thaddeus Reynolds - at 2015.02.22 23:52:00
|
169. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
duster 35000 wrote: Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Ok...Starting to do some comparisons for people to reference I use two General Defense types for Gunnlogi fits Type 1s are dual extender, single hardener Type 1 R/R Type 1 R/B Type 1 R/D T...
- by Thaddeus Reynolds - at 2015.02.21 18:57:00
|
170. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ok...Starting to do some comparisons for people to reference I use two General Defense types for Gunnlogi fits Type 1s are dual extender, single hardener Type 1 R/R Type 1 R/B Type 1 R/D These are the three I run most often, mostly because...
- by Thaddeus Reynolds - at 2015.02.21 15:53:00
|
171. In regards to Minnmandos and Swarms - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Doc DDD wrote: Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: gibberish Of course you completely ignore his point, which is exactly what you do with people you don't agree with, most especially me. The reason Pok...
- by Thaddeus Reynolds - at 2015.02.20 02:47:00
|
172. In regards to Minnmandos and Swarms - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: gibberish Of course you completely ignore his point, which is exactly what you do with people you don't agree with, most especially me. The reason Pokey ignored his point, was because that was not...
- by Thaddeus Reynolds - at 2015.02.20 02:15:00
|
173. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Oh I found out you can't interrupt shield boosters. they only get one pulse for the listed amount. if you take damage, it just eats part (or all) of that benefit entirely. so instead of 5 pulses that result in say 1950 HP...
- by Thaddeus Reynolds - at 2015.02.19 21:31:00
|
174. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Doc DDD wrote: Not most people, just 3 people that spend more time posting on the forums then calling in a tank in- game. With one hardener, for 24 seconds shield hardners need the old 60% reduction, and armor tankers ne...
- by Thaddeus Reynolds - at 2015.02.18 01:20:00
|
175. Can we have inertia now? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Mass and Inertia would solve a lot of things...both infantry and vehicle side
- by Thaddeus Reynolds - at 2015.02.17 23:17:00
|
176. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
On the subject of shield regeneration. It needs to have a way to happen to where at all times, it is more worth it to leave the vehicle on the field to self-repair than to recall it and then call in it back in again. This is in no way advocating f...
- by Thaddeus Reynolds - at 2015.02.17 23:00:00
|
177. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Rattati, you may want to tone back the costs associated with the fitting mods...as has been stated, ADSs are almost entirely dependent on them...(The unfortunate part of a rebalance of the system the way you have it is you hit everything that uses...
- by Thaddeus Reynolds - at 2015.02.17 16:44:00
|
178. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cyrus Grevare wrote: Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Cyrus Grevare wrote: Happy to help o7, If something's broken let me know, I'll get on it ASAP. both a question for you and Rattati...What is the real 80GJ Particle Cannon Damage...the clie...
- by Thaddeus Reynolds - at 2015.02.17 07:01:00
|
179. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cyrus Grevare wrote: Happy to help o7, If something's broken let me know, I'll get on it ASAP. both a question for you and Rattati...What is the real 80GJ Particle Cannon Damage...the client lists it as a lower value than what is listed on ...
- by Thaddeus Reynolds - at 2015.02.17 06:52:00
|
180. Why are ADS's acting as if they are Gunships? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Kallas Hallytyr wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: A question to all: Why is it bad to not want to have to rely on teamwork? Why, when several HAV operators have said otherwise, do you think this is an issue for everyone and not just you? Mult...
- by Thaddeus Reynolds - at 2015.02.14 00:08:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |