| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
1361. [request] Concentric, graduated passive suit scanning - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
In earlier builds, the scanner was a lot bigger range so I don't think it would be a huge server load to increase it again.
- by SponkSponkSponk - at 2013.07.09 11:04:00
|
1362. KB/M Request: WASD centric menu controls - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Do you have tooltips on? I find that helps.
- by SponkSponkSponk - at 2013.07.09 07:34:00
|
1363. LAV Scan profile is too low. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cross-referenced to [request] Concentric, graduated passive suit scanning .
- by SponkSponkSponk - at 2013.07.09 03:03:00
|
1364. [request] Concentric, graduated passive suit scanning - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cross-referenced to LAV Scan profile is too low .
- by SponkSponkSponk - at 2013.07.09 03:03:00
|
1365. [request] Concentric, graduated passive suit scanning - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Currently, the passive suit scanner is base 10m at 45, 55 or 60dB precision (vs suits at 45, 50 and 65) By design, that gives you only a small window to notice people sneaking up on you. but it also gives you zero warning when fast-moving vehicle...
- by SponkSponkSponk - at 2013.07.09 01:46:00
|
1366. AV nades - in General Discussions [original thread]
Knight SoIaire wrote: Doesn't the HAV have a weakspot under it? HAVs should have their weak spot on top. LAVs should have their weak spot underneath.
- by SponkSponkSponk - at 2013.07.08 11:00:00
|
1367. My female character - in General Discussions [original thread]
5aEKUXeRJGJ27kCDnDVYak4 wrote: But I've never seen the new moves myself unfortunately. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBXHBzQrKdY
- by SponkSponkSponk - at 2013.07.08 03:08:00
|
1368. Shield-Armor Balance Proposal - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I don't get it. Increasing penalties on higher-level armor plates is fundamentally ridiculous. Why propagate this insanity?
- by SponkSponkSponk - at 2013.07.08 03:02:00
|
1369. Ferroscale Issue? [I want to share a secret + please fix as soon as possible] - in Technical Support/Bugs [original thread]
No; just adding a ferroscale to an existing fit (taking off an unrelated module) is enough to increase your speed towards your base speed. The higher level and more plates you fit, the more you notice the difference.
- by SponkSponkSponk - at 2013.07.07 07:48:00
|
1370. [REQUEST] CCP - ASSAULT SCRAMBLE RIFLE needs help - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I would endorse less kick on the AScram when scoped. Alternatively, give more kick to the AR when scoped.
- by SponkSponkSponk - at 2013.07.07 05:15:00
|
1371. Making Prototype weapons worth the price without increasing performance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I think most weapon costs are in a good place. Each tier gets 5% more damage and ~5% more range for higher cost and fitting. It's not always a good idea to drop with prototype weapons unless it's an important match, and I'm okay with that. Frankl...
- by SponkSponkSponk - at 2013.07.06 11:11:00
|
1372. [Bug] Scrambler Rifle auto-overheat - in Technical Support/Bugs [original thread]
Hmm that may be the reason I've been overheating way, way more often in uprising 1.2 compared to pre-patch. The overheating cooldown seems to be a lot longer than I remember, too - did this change?
- by SponkSponkSponk - at 2013.07.05 14:27:00
|
1373. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: https://twitter.com/lolerk53/status/352058561611837443 Maybe use her CCP twitter account next time.
- by SponkSponkSponk - at 2013.07.04 23:57:00
|
1374. [Feedback] Uplink Spam vs Needle spam - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Mavado V Noriega wrote: Sgt Kirk wrote: you dont play this game a lot do you? not corp battle wise at least judging by the response Uplink spam is very difficult to combat - it's entirely possible for respawning players to drop uplinks...
- by SponkSponkSponk - at 2013.07.04 23:45:00
|
1375. Ferroscale Issue? [I want to share a secret + please fix as soon as possible] - in Technical Support/Bugs [original thread]
Imp Smash wrote: Wierd that the bug actually makes armor a bit more balanced o.O It counteracts the shield delay bug :)
- by SponkSponkSponk - at 2013.07.04 07:38:00
|
1376. [Suggestion] Overheating for all weapons - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I don't mind AR overheating - I think it would be fine to have a rate-limiter kick in after you've just blown through 80% of your clip in one burst, but if you heat manage it by burst firing you should be able to get through a full clip. Having s...
- by SponkSponkSponk - at 2013.07.04 05:54:00
|
1377. [Feedback] Why is overheat so stupidly important? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Has heat buildup changed since 1.2? Seems like I overheat more in my ak suit.
- by SponkSponkSponk - at 2013.07.04 05:07:00
|
1378. Ferroscale Issue? [I want to share a secret + please fix as soon as possible] - in Technical Support/Bugs [original thread]
It's a stacking penalty bug. Stacking penalties work fine when the numbers are positive (e.g. +10% damage, then +8.6% damage etc) For negative numbers like -10% speed, it sorts them in the wrong order so if you add a lot of -0% or -1% plates, t...
- by SponkSponkSponk - at 2013.07.04 02:44:00
|
1379. If the TAR is made to mimic the function of the Scrambler Rifle... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Zeylon Rho wrote: It also doesn't overheat and has access to a skill that tightens its spread. A few head shots with a TAR will drop someone quickly, and without 1.5 second charge in the middle of it. Those are balancing measures without even c...
- by SponkSponkSponk - at 2013.07.04 02:33:00
|
1380. If the TAR is made to mimic the function of the Scrambler Rifle... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Even the assault scrambler is worse than the standard AR at range, due to higher kick when scoped (i.e. the exact situation where a scrambler is meant to be better than an AR)
- by SponkSponkSponk - at 2013.07.04 02:31:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |