| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
461. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: I'd love to add Swarm Pods as a Small Turret...and Guided Missiles as a Large Turret (Guided missiles being controlled by where you are pointed, while swarm pods are lo...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.15 01:14:00
|
462. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: I'd love to add Swarm Pods as a Small Turret...and Guided Missiles as a Large Turret (Guided missiles being controlled by where you are pointed, while swarm pods are lock-on) but swarm pods seem like they'd be a bit aw...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.14 16:47:00
|
463. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: your scaling is only fine if you want it to require a squad to kill it. The Surya's EHP was the sticking point in chrome that pissed people off. The sagaris was manageable, but the Surya's tank was both inordinate and exce...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.14 16:46:00
|
464. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: 1. Rattati would like a 35000+ Laser strike to get rid of a marauder Right, you want it to be kittens and rainbows. What part of his own words don't you understand? 2. You buff what is weak to make it strong a...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.14 16:42:00
|
465. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Viper and Gorgon: +15% buff to base PG/CPU lolwut. Buff that by a lot, but nothing else? lol Sica and Soma should retain current speeds in uprising 1.10 build Gunnlogi and madrugar: since I don't have data on moement, ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.14 16:31:00
|
466. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: he wants to double the EHP of marauders from their chrome stats. Rattati wanted proposals, now he's working on his own. We don't know what modules he's considering, or slot layouts, or the bonuses the vehicles will have....
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.14 05:44:00
|
467. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: the HP bonus to the Sagaris compounded would almost double it's EHP from chrome levels Laser strike = Rattati's own words. That's not a justification for making them ov...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.14 05:06:00
|
468. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: the HP bonus to the Sagaris compounded would almost double it's EHP from chrome levels Laser strike = Rattati's own words.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.14 04:34:00
|
469. HAVs: Roles, Gains, and Sacrifices - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: Vehicles currently suffer from a lack of having well defined roles. HAVs are currently best at blowing up other vehicles. Skirmish 1.0 That would be an okay role if there was a good reason to need vehicles on the field. S...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.12 16:42:00
|
470. Turret Spreadsheet - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DarthJT5 wrote: Can the accelerated actually have accelerated (high velocity) missiles like before? I used accelerated as a name only, so the time to come up with a name for it can be better used elsewhere.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.12 15:55:00
|
471. Turret Spreadsheet - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: I think you've got the wrong idea on fragmented missiles. Punishing direct hits? Rather, have direct damage only slightly higher than splash, and slow ROF to prevent their use against vehicles. By trading higher splash d...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.12 15:54:00
|
472. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: how can you guys ignore the incredible potency of these weapons? Experience
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.12 07:10:00
|
473. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DeathwindRising wrote: True Adamance wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: True Adamance wrote: I don't want to nerf them at all but unfortunately what we have in Dust I have come to understand are not tanks. Large Missiles if you can call th...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.12 06:58:00
|
474. Railguns need splash damage - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: If you think that missile Gunnlogis are unbeatable, you are mistaken. I've been beaten by Madrugars that have been cleverly fit with a fuel injector which makes them zip back and forth constantly and causing the majority o...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.12 06:09:00
|
475. [Suggestion] Reduce Squad Size - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: The CPM is very vocally split on this topic. I think it is one of the simplest way to alleviate pubstomping but I do understand that 4 is limiting when you have an active corp and want to play with y...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.12 05:16:00
|
476. Turret Spreadsheet - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Don't go to the light. Slightly nerfed MLT turret stats all around. Proposed small fragmented and AV missiles. I guess the AV can be called the old accelerated missile launcher just so a new name doesn't have to be made up. Fragmented: a ton...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.12 05:11:00
|
477. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: True Adamance wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: True Adamance wrote: I don't want to nerf them at all but unfortunately what we have in Dust I have come to understand are not tanks. Large Missile...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.12 05:06:00
|
478. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: True Adamance wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: True Adamance wrote: I don't want to nerf them at all but unfortunately what we have in Dust I have come to understand are not tanks. Large Missiles if you can call them t...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.12 05:03:00
|
479. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: True Adamance wrote: I don't want to nerf them at all but unfortunately what we have in Dust I have come to understand are not tanks. Large Missiles if you can call them that since they are act...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.12 05:02:00
|
480. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: I don't want to nerf them at all but unfortunately what we have in Dust I have come to understand are not tanks. Large Missiles if you can call them that since they are actually more akin to Rocket Launchers not only ha...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.12 04:40:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |