| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
481. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: True Adamance wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: leave the splash alone, I don't think Rattati's going to give you back the infantry bashing potency without some serious begging. Let's not poke the ho...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.11 22:23:00
|
482. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: leave the splash alone, I don't think Rattati's going to give you back the infantry bashing potency without some serious begging. Let's not poke the hornet's nest immediately, there are better times...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.11 20:59:00
|
483. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: But people like me, Atiim, and a few others know how to wreck the chrome vehicles. That's why hulls and modules were removed and vehicles overall nerfed, right?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.11 18:45:00
|
484. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
KalOfTheRathi wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: If you look at the old Chrome stats, the biggest plate that we had was less CPU than PRO AV was. As of now we have terrible fitting capability, and the shield vehicles have more CPU than the armor veh...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.11 04:00:00
|
485. Railguns need splash damage - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Finn Colman wrote: Forever ETC wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Buwaro Draemon wrote: Fit in small blasters or missiles. You're welcome. Near impossible to fit a small turret without gimping the whole tank, yet I can fit two PRO weapons o...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.11 03:57:00
|
486. Railguns need splash damage - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Forever ETC wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Buwaro Draemon wrote: Fit in small blasters or missiles. You're welcome. Near impossible to fit a small turret without gimping the whole tank, yet I can fit two PRO weapons on a PRO suit. Double...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.11 01:58:00
|
487. Railguns need splash damage - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: You're not supposed to kill infantry with a railgun... If you wanna kill infantry use a blaster. Blaster is terrible. Do you even tank? And with all my experience, do ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.11 01:49:00
|
488. Railguns need splash damage - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Buwaro Draemon wrote: Fit in small blasters or missiles. You're welcome. Near impossible to fit a small turret without gimping the whole tank, yet I can fit two PRO weapons on a PRO suit. Double standards as always.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.11 01:49:00
|
489. Railguns need splash damage - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Toobar Zoobar wrote: Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: You're not supposed to kill infantry with a railgun... If you wanna kill infantry use a blaster. Every large gun should be somewhat effective at killing infantry how e...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.11 01:48:00
|
490. Railguns need splash damage - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: You're not supposed to kill infantry with a railgun... If you wanna kill infantry use a blaster. Blaster is terrible. Do you even tank? And with all my experience, do you really mean to say that I shouldn't be allowe...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.11 00:37:00
|
491. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Maddy's PG/CPU seems a little low (also, probably typo, but you have it labeled as having a 4th low slot right now bt...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.10 23:11:00
|
492. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Maddy's PG/CPU seems a little low (also, probably typo, but you have it labeled as having a 4th low slot right now btw). I deliberately lowered the base stats of ever...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.10 23:02:00
|
493. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: leave the splash alone, I don't think Rattati's going to give you back the infantry bashing potency without some serious begging....
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.10 22:53:00
|
494. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Maddy's PG/CPU seems a little low (also, probably typo, but you have it labeled as having a 4th low slot right now btw). I deliberately lowered the base stats of everything so that at level 5, they have higher stats t...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.10 22:52:00
|
495. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: leave the splash alone, I don't think Rattati's going to give you back the infantry bashing potency without some serious begging. Let's not poke the hornet's nest immediately,...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.10 22:47:00
|
496. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: leave the splash alone, I don't think Rattati's going to give you back the infantry bashing potency without some serious begging. Let's not poke the hornet's nest immediately, there are better times for that, and all of th...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.10 22:31:00
|
497. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Bonus to fitting is a good generalist bonus that is both offensive and defensive (PG/CPU per level) If 5% PG, CPU, shield and armor is good for infantry, then it's go...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.10 18:54:00
|
498. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! I f*cking found it. Skill list located. So post it so we can work from it.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.10 18:45:00
|
499. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
pegasis prime wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: pegasis prime wrote: If you guys are working on what sort of fits both shield and armour tankers used to run before the changes made through uprising then I'd recommend searching uo void echos old...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.10 18:41:00
|
500. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Bonus to fitting is a good generalist bonus that is both offensive and defensive (PG/CPU per level) If 5% PG, CPU, shield and armor is good for infantry, then it's good for vehicles too.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.01.10 18:39:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |