| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
221. [Feedback] Gallente scouts - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spartan MK420 wrote: maybe we should just designate slots for ewar modules?, hp modules couldnt be put in them :P example gall scout 2 highs, 2 ewar, 3 lows cal 3 highs 2 ewar 2 lows strictly examples.
- by Spartan MK420 - at 2014.05.22 16:16:00
|
222. [Feedback] Gallente scouts - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
maybe we should just designate slots for ewar modules?, hp modules couldnt be put in them :P
- by Spartan MK420 - at 2014.05.22 16:14:00
|
223. [Feedback] Gallente scouts - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
my proto gall ewar suit has 394 hp :( less if i take away the 2 complex shield extenders for prec. enhancers.
- by Spartan MK420 - at 2014.05.22 16:11:00
|
224. [Feedback] Gallente scouts - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Adipem Nothi wrote: Spartan MK420 wrote: because that would be too hard for them. THey like to nerf ****, then de-nerf it 4 months later. 4 months? It was a nearly a year last time. How soon we forget. FoTM "slayers" prefer the GalScout...
- by Spartan MK420 - at 2014.05.22 15:52:00
|
225. [Feedback] Gallente scouts - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Adipem Nothi wrote: @ Scouts Gal will remain PC viable, though they'll likely become less common. Cal will remain PC viable, due primarily to shared squad sight . Why aren't we discussing how to make the other Scouts PC viable? Why are we disc...
- by Spartan MK420 - at 2014.05.22 15:22:00
|
226. [Feedback] Gallente scouts - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
raise their base precision so they only pick up commando's/heavies without putting precision enhancers :p
- by Spartan MK420 - at 2014.05.22 14:54:00
|
227. [Feedback] Gallente scouts - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spartan MK420 wrote: Spectral Clone wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: Spectral Clone wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: Too many people to respond to. Anyway, as in my edit I re-evaluated some of my perspectives and while I still think that Active S...
- by Spartan MK420 - at 2014.05.22 14:38:00
|
228. [Feedback] Gallente scouts - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spectral Clone wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: Spectral Clone wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: Too many people to respond to. Anyway, as in my edit I re-evaluated some of my perspectives and while I still think that Active Scanners should focus on ...
- by Spartan MK420 - at 2014.05.22 14:37:00
|
229. [Feedback] Gallente scouts - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
give amar or matari 5% reduction to pg cost of shield extenders
- by Spartan MK420 - at 2014.05.22 14:32:00
|
230. [Suggestion] More Specialized FW/LP Mods - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
i think the minmatar would benefit better from the reduced pg on shield extenders
- by Spartan MK420 - at 2014.05.22 14:31:00
|
231. [Feedback] Gallente scouts - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Master Smurf wrote: Spectral Clone wrote: Regis Blackbird wrote: They should remove the squad sharing passive scans (as was the idea in the first place) Scouts do recon. Its their job to scan for the squad, just like logis ress/resuppl...
- by Spartan MK420 - at 2014.05.22 14:27:00
|
232. [Feedback] Gallente scouts - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
another option is to make the base gallante suit a bit slower than the others, so they have to put a speed mod in a slot to compensate.
- by Spartan MK420 - at 2014.05.22 14:21:00
|
233. [Feedback] Gallente scouts - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spectral Clone wrote: To all these stupid people trying to reduce the scan range of scouts - go DIAF. agreed
- by Spartan MK420 - at 2014.05.22 14:17:00
|
234. [Feedback] Gallente scouts - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I remember back in the day we talked about giving the ability hack enemy equipment, maybe toss that in to the amar :p
- by Spartan MK420 - at 2014.05.22 14:15:00
|
235. [Feedback] Gallente scouts - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jadek Menaheim wrote: I would support the plan put out by Revo and Jebus McKing. i like everything but the amar layout tbh.
- by Spartan MK420 - at 2014.05.22 13:15:00
|
236. [Suggestion] Squad-Free Game Modes - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spartan MK420 wrote: I like the idea, but then again.... You wouldn't need team orientated game modes if you were running solo...... an ffa match would be the best choice. No squads, every man for himself. Just imagine, an ambush, without ...
- by Spartan MK420 - at 2014.05.22 13:03:00
|
237. [Suggestion] Squad-Free Game Modes - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I like the idea, but then again.... You wouldn't need team orientated game modes if you were running solo...... an ffa match would be the best choice. No squads, every man for himself. Just imagine, an ambush, without teams. :)
- by Spartan MK420 - at 2014.05.22 13:00:00
|
238. Domination (feedback) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
TechMechMeds wrote: That sounds quality. Or have it so after a point has been held for say 2 mins, it changes but randomly. this. would be a shame if all the equipment spammers couldn't put all their **** in one place.
- by Spartan MK420 - at 2014.05.22 12:53:00
|
239. [Feedback] Gallente scouts - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Varoth Drac wrote: I was always against removing the cloak dampening as I always knew it would mess up the meta, particularly for the already underused min and Am scouts, I was also quite vocal about it. If it has to be done I suggest this: Si...
- by Spartan MK420 - at 2014.05.22 12:51:00
|
240. [Request] Medium frame (basic/assault/logistics) changes - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spartan MK420 wrote: i like the idea of assaults having the same layout as their logi counter-part. with their racial weapon bonus, it should be promising. minus the equipment slots i should add.
- by Spartan MK420 - at 2014.05.22 12:48:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |