| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1761. Infantry AV is now a full time class of its own. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: Ryme Intrinseca wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: Ryme Intrinseca wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: its not that rock is OP, its that nobody wants to play paper and everyone wants to play scizors and rock. My recollection...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2013.12.23 02:00:00
|
1762. Infantry AV is now a full time class of its own. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: Ryme Intrinseca wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: its not that rock is OP, its that nobody wants to play paper and everyone wants to play scizors and rock. My recollection of rock-paper-scissors is that paper is better ...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2013.12.23 01:49:00
|
1763. Who'd be down with getting rid of Auto-Aim? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bethhy wrote: Ryme Intrinseca wrote: The only PS3 shooter without aim assist I ever heard of was Dust 514 (after they removed the original AA and before they introduced the new version). It was also the worst PS3 shooter in terms of the aimi...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2013.12.23 01:29:00
|
1764. Infantry AV is now a full time class of its own. - in General Discussions [original thread]
medomai grey wrote: I have an anti-tank fit... It's called a tank. The problem with swarms and AV grenades is that they're not effective against vehicles on their cool down, when vehicles are suppose to be vulnerable. Theses weapons have troub...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2013.12.23 00:37:00
|
1765. Infantry AV is now a full time class of its own. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: its not that rock is OP, its that nobody wants to play paper and everyone wants to play scizors and rock. My recollection of rock-paper-scissors is that paper is better at beating rock than rock is. Can you honestly say...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2013.12.23 00:32:00
|
1766. I went from preparing to stick $100 on DUST to not playing in 1 week - in General Discussions [original thread]
Psyon Sebiestor wrote: I'd been putting off purchasing Aurum because I wanted to know what direction this game was going in, 1 day before the 1.7 patch I was about to buy 200k Aurum but I thought that i'd better wait to see what 1.7 was like ...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2013.12.23 00:08:00
|
1767. CCP HOTFIX THE RAILGUN AND ASSAULT DROPSHIP PROBLEM ALREADY!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
A competent pilot is virtually invulnerable to infantry AV as things stand. If rails were much less of a threat, DSs would be God mode. I'm not opposed to a dropship buff or rail nerf per se, but it would have to come in alongside a major AV buff.
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2013.12.22 23:42:00
|
1768. Next expansion name? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Valmorgan Aubaris wrote: godmode lottery Nice, going to use this.
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2013.12.22 19:21:00
|
1769. Winmatar assault - in General Discussions [original thread]
You must play a lot of FW to be putting LP weapons on such a weak suit.
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2013.12.22 19:19:00
|
1770. Next expansion name? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tank of Tanks: The Tankening.
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2013.12.22 18:56:00
|
1771. A VOTE FOR FULL RESPECT (Yay or Nay) - in General Discussions [original thread]
THE DRiZZLE AQUA TEEN wrote: IrishWebster wrote: THE DRiZZLE AQUA TEEN wrote: Im not getting into semantics but just doing a vehicle respec and not a full is bs. Also dropping new weapons as well is another reason ,but I don't need this I...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2013.12.22 18:43:00
|
1772. A VOTE FOR FULL RESPECT (Yay or Nay) - in General Discussions [original thread]
I would probably come back to the game if they did a respec. So I have to say 'nay'
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2013.12.22 18:35:00
|
1773. Who'd be down with getting rid of Auto-Aim? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: Ryme Intrinseca wrote: The only PS3 shooter without aim assist I ever heard of was Dust 514 (after they removed the original AA and before they introduced the new version). It was also the worst PS3 shooter in terms of the ai...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2013.12.22 18:27:00
|
1774. I hate to be so final but Rail Tanks are COMPLETELY BROKEN - in General Discussions [original thread]
Whatever problem there is with dropships, the fix is not to remove large rail turrets. If you did that blaster tanks would be even more OP than they are already.
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2013.12.22 17:38:00
|
1775. Who'd be down with getting rid of Auto-Aim? - in General Discussions [original thread]
The only PS3 shooter without aim assist I ever heard of was Dust 514 (after they removed the original AA and before they introduced the new version). It was also the worst PS3 shooter in terms of the aiming mechanics. So basically NO.
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2013.12.22 17:26:00
|
1776. How to counter Nyan SANs research faciliy strat - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't play the game anymore, partly due to lag, in PC especially. There are really two issues: 1. The lag itself. The problem is mostly due to tons of equipment sound effects and animations piled on top of one another. A hotfix is therefore ...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2013.12.22 17:05:00
|
1777. Tanks vs AV - A Couple Clarifications - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clarification: if you think a tank should not be soloable by AV you are a scrub tanker with no faith in your own ability, who went into tanking because they couldn't win a fair fight.
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2013.12.20 21:58:00
|
1778. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Large blasters should not be as effective as they are versus infantry and tanks. It's like having an AR that can take down tanks as easily as it can infantry. My solution would be to radically reduce ROF, to something like 12RPM - around a thirt...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2013.12.20 16:45:00
|
1779. I'm quitting, here's why - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aikuchi Tomaru wrote: Ryme Intrinseca wrote: Aikuchi Tomaru wrote: PC matches not at convenient times for you? Look for another corp or do FW. Our timers are more or less as good as they could be for me. My point is that the whole thin...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2013.12.13 15:59:00
|
1780. I'm quitting, here's why - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aikuchi Tomaru wrote: PC matches not at convenient times for you? Look for another corp or do FW. Our timers are more or less as good as they could be for me. My point is that the whole thing of having to play at a specific time if you want ...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2013.12.13 15:35:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |