| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
1301. So CCP, You know there is a problem with tanks. What are you doing ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
KenKaniff69 wrote: Ryme Intrinseca wrote: The basic point is that AV needs to be better at AV than a rail tank is. AV is vulnerable to everything - every tank and every infantry unit. A rail tank is only vulnerable to a small minority of u...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2014.02.13 17:05:00
|
1302. So CCP, You know there is a problem with tanks. What are you doing ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: Ryme Intrinseca wrote: abarkrishna wrote: There is no way to balance large blasters. If you nerf them they will be useless against tanks. If you do not nerf it they will be way to OP against infan...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2014.02.13 16:55:00
|
1303. So CCP, You know there is a problem with tanks. What are you doing ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: Ryme Intrinseca wrote: I don't think blasters themselves are a problem. They only seem like a problem now because you can ALWAYS get them in range, as there is no effective AV threat. Easy solution: buff AV. May...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2014.02.13 16:46:00
|
1304. Tank Spam vs Protostomping - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: Thor Odinson42 wrote: You aren't seeing the bigger picture. Everything you said is true, but consider this. My AV suit costs around 250K. If I decide to deal with tanks I will lose at least two of them. In othe...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2014.02.13 16:34:00
|
1305. So CCP, You know there is a problem with tanks. What are you doing ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
abarkrishna wrote: There is no way to balance large blasters. If you nerf them they will be useless against tanks. If you do not nerf it they will be way to OP against infantry like we have currently. There is no middle ground. I am open to t...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2014.02.13 16:21:00
|
1306. Spawn camping buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
Stinker Butt wrote: I don't play ambush, and 99% of the time I spawn in my own redline to avoid insta-dieing. I've accepted spawn camping as part of the game and am even guilty of doing it myself. There needs to be some risk to spawning in what...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2014.02.13 15:58:00
|
1307. Spawn camping buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
Prior to 1.7, when you chose a spawn point, you could see if there were reds around a CRU. So if it was being camped by half a dozen reds, you could choose a different spawn point. CCP noticed that this made the job of the spawn camper that bit h...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2014.02.13 14:50:00
|
1308. Tank Spam vs Protostomping - in General Discussions [original thread]
Justicar Karnellia wrote: I feel your pain and many threads have been devoted to this subject... my own included. :) CCP , the CPM and most of the community have confirmed and acknowledged the issue - all we can do is wait for 1.8 for their po...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2014.02.13 11:12:00
|
1309. Tank Spam vs Protostomping - in General Discussions [original thread]
Piraten Hovnoret wrote: Thor Odinson42 wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Thor Odinson42 wrote: True Adamance wrote: Does calling in a Tank to counter those 4-5 HAV count as ruining the match? Frankly speaking I'm cool with 3 HAV per sid...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2014.02.13 10:59:00
|
1310. 30-Day Booster Pack - Buy it Now! - in General Discussions [original thread]
OP=CCP's new head of monetization
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2014.02.13 10:05:00
|
1311. Tank Spam vs Protostomping - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Ryme Intrinseca wrote: Thor Odinson42 wrote: Where are all the lists of people who call in 4 or 5 tanks and ruin matches? There hasn't been a time I've played in two or three weeks when I didn't just end up turning Du...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2014.02.13 08:32:00
|
1312. CCP SP RESPEC -official statement- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Beck Weathers wrote: Ryme Intrinseca wrote: Namirial Kensai wrote: major faux-pas wrote: Dear CCP, Can we have an official statement? It seems that: 1) BLACK AND WHITE: Refund of dropsuit tree could not be argued against (rationally)...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2014.02.12 22:23:00
|
1313. Hey CCP no respec to infantry looks like discrimination. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: A long time ago I witnessed when folks were made to ride in the back of the bus, no service at dinners, clubs, etc. It was a time of discrimination with no real basis other than Jim Crow "laws".. Be it right or wrong the...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2014.02.12 22:15:00
|
1314. Tank Spam vs Protostomping - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thor Odinson42 wrote: Where are all the lists of people who call in 4 or 5 tanks and ruin matches? There hasn't been a time I've played in two or three weeks when I didn't just end up turning Dust off because of tanks. It really bothers me bec...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2014.02.12 22:05:00
|
1315. how can people jump around all over the place and shoot you? - in General Discussions [original thread]
snazzbear wrote: Reav Hannari wrote: snazzbear wrote: play unreal tournament and come back here. Honestly how often do you ADS? About 90%. You? For the most part I just use hip fire. Works well enough with an AR, and well most weap...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2014.02.12 21:48:00
|
1316. Cr&p Player Asks Questions Shock - in General Discussions [original thread]
al nize mk2 wrote: So I have some questions for veterans that I would love to hear the answers to as the Forum's are full of this stuff but I can't seem to work out who to believe and who to ignore! 1) What's with all the tanks? How do I escap...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2014.02.12 14:50:00
|
1317. My Final Message To The AV Community.(Maybe) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vehicles are out of control. Rail tanks and suicide LAVs are just a symptom of that. If conventional AV is going to be in the game at all it needs to be a viable 1 vs 1 threat, which it really is not at present.
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2014.02.12 14:38:00
|
1318. Tryharding 101 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: No no no noooo... You're using a Quafe suit. With a Balac's. So you're at serious risk. That's respectable. This is tryharding. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnXa5GZszk8 Nice, but for maximum tryhard points you rea...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2014.02.12 14:30:00
|
1319. Minmatar assault. Mass Driver. - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Logibro wrote: Well, that's not the only thing the Mass Driver is getting in 1.8 Increased base direct/splash damage from 242/116 to 300/145 I thought you were supposed to be reducing TTK? Combined with the rifle nerfs, these changes w...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2014.02.12 14:16:00
|
1320. CCP SP RESPEC -official statement- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Namirial Kensai wrote: major faux-pas wrote: Dear CCP, Can we have an official statement? It seems that: 1) BLACK AND WHITE: Refund of dropsuit tree could not be argued against (rationally) 2) GREY AREA: refund of upgrade and weapons trees...
- by Ryme Intrinseca - at 2014.02.12 09:36:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |