| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
161. Updating the frontline starter fittings - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
sabre prime wrote: Sorry I haven't looked at your spreadsheet yet Ripley. Will try to later. I like the idea of a "baby logi" starter fitting a lot actually. I have updated the spreadsheet with another scenario: Support w/ 2 Equipment.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.26 20:00:00
|
162. Updating the frontline starter fittings - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
sabre prime wrote: There should be a proper militia logistics suit for each race in the starter fits. Not a hack job medium suit labelled as 'Medic'. Without a shield transporter or some kind of militia armor repair hive, how would you create ...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.26 19:23:00
|
163. Updating the frontline starter fittings - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I-Shayz-I wrote: Why do mlt medium frames have less slots than mlt light frames? Scouts, and their mlt counterparts both have the same number of slots. assaults and starter suits should be the same way. Amarr 1/3 Caldari 3/1 Gallente 1/3 Minm...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.26 17:53:00
|
164. Updating the frontline starter fittings - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Logi Bro wrote: I made a thread on this a month or so ago, I just made five starter fits per race in protofits. Here is the link if you want to use anything I made as a reference point. As long as we are talking about starter fits, I think t...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.26 17:09:00
|
165. Updating the frontline starter fittings - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Grand Master Kubo wrote: I think that if you really want to benefit the new player then you should consider giving them all the frontlines with a militia racial equipment. Interesting. For example... Amarr - drop uplinks Gallente - active sca...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.26 15:05:00
|
166. Updating the frontline starter fittings - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
A new player's first experience playing Dust 514 should be with the starter fittings. The frontline fitting is meant to offer a view of a race's tanking style and weapon choices. For half of these dropsuits, this is true. For the other half... not...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.26 14:05:00
|
167. strafe penalties on HP mods - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Extenders were thrown into the mix because of the HP=Mass idea. I still don't understand the hubbub, obviously it would be less than plates, and similar as reactives as they give similar HP. When extenders give the exact sam...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.25 16:11:00
|
168. Assault Suit feedback. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Buffing the core infantry rifles (RR, CR, ScR, AR) will also buff scouts and logis, though indirectly. I see light-assault scouts with CRs and ARs amassing stupid high kills already; giving their weapon a buff would only make matters worse. If a ...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.24 13:19:00
|
169. Automatic removal from match for multiple suicides - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Soraya Xel wrote: The reason these sorts of tactics can be allowed in EVE, but need to be regulated in DUST, is that players in DUST have no control over what people get put into a match with them, and they cannot recruit additional forces to h...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.19 21:26:00
|
170. [New equipment] Passive scan module - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sharing scans means we "see" each other's TACNET data. The shared scan equipment would have a range to prevent us from sharing scans from across the map. If I had the standard module fitted, but you were 31m away then we would not share passive s...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.19 21:12:00
|
171. [New equipment] Passive scan module - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The jury is still out on the "OP"edness of shared passive scans, that is, passive scans that your squad can see. Why not tie it to a piece of equipment? This will force players to sacrifice a slot to share their "vision" with their squad mates. ...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.19 20:18:00
|
172. Sticky:[Feedback] HP Modules and Strafe Speed - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
HP modules, as in, shield extenders and armor plating?
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.19 16:16:00
|
173. Automatic removal from match for multiple suicides - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
This is a variation of the AWOX tactic: "In EVE Online, a hysterically bad short-term spy who joins your corp as an agent of a hostile corp. His intent is to kill your corp's PvEers, or otherwise sow as much havoc and distrust as possible before b...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.19 13:33:00
|
174. CPM Input Request: Corporation UI and Governance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Fully support an upgrade of the existing corp UI and functionality. My top picks: Corporate hangar Wallet management Ability to purchase things from the market with corporate funds Roles to facilitate the above Corporate mailing lists
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 20:04:00
|
175. small requests regarding restocking fits - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
"Restock to:" would be so so so nice. To expand upon that idea, a post-match "restock to starting values" button would be incredible.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 14:59:00
|
176. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: I see you posted these preliminary numbers and I think this would be a better set of numbers Also, I see the Commandos' scan precision is 60dB. I think this would be better if it were 55dB. The commando fulfills a similar ...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 14:25:00
|
177. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jebus McKing wrote: I'm sorry that you are disappoint. I did my very best. Please, stop shouting. *lies down, tries not to cry, cries a lot* /me glares at Rattati... LOOK WHAT YOU DID! You are tearing this family apart!
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 14:14:00
|
178. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: "I see you posted these preliminary numbers and I think this would be a better set of numbers" Okay then I see you posted that the assault scan range is going to be 10m. I think this would be better if it was made 15m. 10m...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 13:51:00
|
179. Sentinel spam request - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Reduction of the HMG'S overall DPS by the average of the amount of DPS lost by the rifles I'm in favor of this. Removing the rifle nerfs is taking a step backwards in terms of balancing progress. The HMG needs its damage c...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 13:40:00
|
180. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
This is interesting and will certainly help to remove the 'black and white' nature of passive scans. Good stuff. Are we not going to see adjustments to the base dropsuit passive scans then? I was looking forward to my assault being slightly less ...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 13:17:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |