| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
741. Legion - Proposed Skill Progression System - in General Discussions [original thread]
Byozuma Kegawa wrote: I honestly don't mind equipment being specific to certain trees, but given that dropsuits are going to be this permanent thing I don't want to be wearing General Specific Dropsuit n008 when I'm an Amarr. I'd like to wear a...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.05.07 19:31:00
|
742. Legion - Proposed Skill Progression System - in General Discussions [original thread]
Byozuma Kegawa wrote: Honestly the tree proposed for Legion seems more confusing than what we presently have by alot. Racial specific skills also occur AFTER you've chosen a specialty... so one can only assume that that means we're stuck in a g...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.05.07 18:11:00
|
743. Legion - Proposed Skill Progression System - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kaughst wrote: The problem with the new progression system I heard is that you can go into one skill tree but if you want to diversify with a different weapon you need to climb up another tree, this is supposedly remedied with having a 'wildcar...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.05.07 17:19:00
|
744. Legion - Proposed Skill Progression System - in General Discussions [original thread]
As you are all aware CCP Z, is propsing a shake up to the skill tree in Project Legion. Unfortunately I don't like where it is headed. Before I truly begin I would like to draw your attention to the following Video This was something that brought...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.05.07 10:30:00
|
745. New Sniper Tactic - in General Discussions [original thread]
More cowards griefing the hell out of people, get in a team and drop an orby on them. Is hilarious watching the hate mail roll in. If they didn't hide in the redline like a ****** I wouldn't go out of my way to find and kill them. It's not the ve...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.05.07 08:51:00
|
746. UK/EU consumer protection regulations - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ryme Intrinseca wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Nothing was misleading about you spending 20 bucks for AUR. I'm going to bed now, but I'll leave a challenge for anyone who wants to come into this thread and dispute the basis for a claim under U...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.05.07 00:18:00
|
747. UK/EU consumer protection regulations - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ryme Intrinseca wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Ryme Intrinseca wrote: UK government guidance on the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, section 7.3 wrote: A misleading action occurs when a practice misleads through the ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.05.07 00:10:00
|
748. To CCP Z and progression team (A lesson from SWG's NPE failure) - in General Discussions [original thread]
zzZaXxx wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: zzZaXxx wrote: Yes, they should definitely learn from others' mistakes. As for the skill tree, what I heard and saw of it looked anything but streamlined. It looked more complex than the current system. Ho...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.05.06 23:46:00
|
749. Legion : Domination 2.0 - in General Discussions [original thread]
da GAND wrote: It's different and a bit interesting however they're gonna have to give reasons for holding these objectives. If one is a null cannon damaging your MCC or something else in the planets atmosphere or something on the ground. Anoth...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.05.06 23:11:00
|
750. UK/EU consumer protection regulations - in General Discussions [original thread]
xxwhitedevilxx M wrote: decreto legislativo 206/2005 wrote: ci si riferisce a pubblicit+á ingannevole come qualsiasi pubblicit+á che in qualunque modo, compresa la sua presentazione, sia idonea ad indurre in errore le persone fisiche o giu...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.05.06 23:05:00
|
751. To CCP Z and progression team (A lesson from SWG's NPE failure) - in General Discussions [original thread]
zzZaXxx wrote: Yes, they should definitely learn from others' mistakes. As for the skill tree, what I heard and saw of it looked anything but streamlined. It looked more complex than the current system. How does it seem to be worse? Because ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.05.06 22:42:00
|
752. URGENT: regarding ccp Z's character progression!!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Persoanally, I don't think forcing someone to play an Assault Suit just to get an Assault Rifle is a good idea. I can understand if I have to use a Combat Rifle before I can have an Assault Rifle.
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.05.06 22:35:00
|
753. UK/EU consumer protection regulations - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ryme Intrinseca wrote: UK government guidance on the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, section 7.3 wrote: A misleading action occurs when a practice misleads through the information it contains, or its deceptive prese...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.05.06 22:28:00
|
754. Legion : Domination 2.0 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Louis Domi wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: - Capture and Hold the Objective - The objective changes position every 5 minutes http://i.imgur.com/xnGxZkP.jpg It's an interesting concept, at least. What do you guys think? (also, check out dem envi...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.05.06 22:08:00
|
755. Legion : Domination 2.0 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Well it will certainly stop people ants nesting right on top ofmthe objective. What's that? They have 400 hybrid nanohovrs, 35 Uplinks, 7 heavies, a tank parked on the objective amd a LAV blocking access to the panel? Great It means you haven...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.05.06 22:06:00
|
756. CCP Z's fanfest presentation about character progression... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I must admit, I rather worried too. Some things do make sense, such as categorising weapons into roles. For example Tree 1: Assault Lvl 1: Non-factional Specific (Concord) Assault Rifle Unlocks access to all level 2 Rifles Lvl 2: 4 Options - R...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.05.06 17:10:00
|
757. To those old vets, I salute you - in General Discussions [original thread]
March 2013, enough for me to consider myself a vet, not that I actually play anymore, though I will continue to skulk around the forums. Honour those that completly left in the face of the entitled ***holes who believe they own the game now. They...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.05.06 07:51:00
|
758. Please help me push for - in General Discussions [original thread]
Operative 1125 Lokaas wrote: Titles! Yes, that nifty little vanity thing that WoW introduced. The main reason would be to reward DUSTers who helped develop the game. Some titles I'd like to see are: Templar Architect Judge General Veteran ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.05.05 23:09:00
|
759. Please help me push for - in General Discussions [original thread]
Well with titles there should always be some that fall into archetypal categories. Category 1: The loyalist For those in Corps like PIE who are full-on amarrian what smacks loyalty like being a General of the Royal Guard or some such. Imperial G...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.05.05 23:01:00
|
760. Sorry we broke the forums - in General Discussions [original thread]
Don't worry about it, I thought we had overloaded the forums with FF complaint threads.
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.05.05 20:19:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |