| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 |
161. Prone - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
SGTFunyoun THEFIRST wrote: ThePlayerkyle13 wrote: Korvin Lomont wrote: Well we definatly need more movement options lke vaulting and going prone, or sneaking around corners firing from cover etc. All his alongside with new animations (why...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2014.02.26 09:26:00
|
162. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Since the thread subject seems to morph into "Are FOTM chasers the devil who feasts on your children" i'll just re-post a recent piece of mine that focuses on the subject at hand. Preface: The following is exclusively about a proper on-demand r...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2014.02.26 04:45:00
|
163. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spectral Clone wrote: Exactly. Respecs are in line with the continuous improvement/agile work methods that I certainly hope CCP are using. They're not and they don't. CCP calls respecs "disruptive" for the community and developers alike. I c...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2014.02.25 17:54:00
|
164. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spectral Clone wrote: Ah, swarm launchers did not stay OP for a long time? Forge guns easymode splash damage OHK infantry since beta? Gallente assault rifles best weapon since closed beta (in one shape or another: First burst, then TAC, then r...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2014.02.25 08:36:00
|
165. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spectral Clone wrote: Crimson ShieId wrote: ...seeing huge amounts of FoTM fittings after a respec... Well, if items stay OP for a long time (which is the REAL FOTM PROBLEM) players will just grind SP to get that OP sh*t . Increase in ...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2014.02.25 08:20:00
|
166. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Crimson ShieId wrote: [...] It's probably not the best thing though that my biggest reason for not wanting a full respec is so that the FoTM chasers will suffer for abusing certain aspects in the game that are/were unbalanced... There's no ...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2014.02.25 00:19:00
|
167. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Crimson ShieId wrote: *Glances up at quote length* Well, this is getting long... Honestly, I like the fact that CCP is trying to help the logi suit actually fulfill it's roll. The logi's right now are essentially better than the assaults in...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2014.02.24 23:40:00
|
168. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Crimson ShieId wrote: Malkai Inos wrote: So you chose a logistics suit for a bonus that didn't make any sense in the face of its intended role, of which there was a general consensus among players that it shouldn't have been there in the f...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2014.02.24 22:37:00
|
169. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Crimson ShieId wrote: Tallen Ellecon wrote: Eldest Dragon wrote: After all the new suits and weapons added we deserve a respec. Please. You deserve a respec because there is new free content? I don't get this mindset. If a res...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2014.02.24 20:15:00
|
170. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: The Robot Devil wrote: Agreed, this thread is for stubborn know it alls and whiners. It is only here to vent and stop RESPEC threads. It is a good place to keep all this garbage. This thread isnt for you, though I am sorr...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2014.02.24 17:12:00
|
171. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Just a little food for thought This poll by CPM Jenza asked participants to order several features according to their own priorities, among which an aurum respec feature could be found. It goes without saying that online polls are generally pr...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2014.02.24 08:49:00
|
172. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
D legendary hero wrote: 28 pages later and no response. Im starting a REAL respec discusion thread in general discusion. As long as people don't spam the general discusion forum with these threads it won't get locked. Since, CCP doesn't want to...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2014.02.24 06:09:00
|
173. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sam Tektzby wrote: Guess what boyos, Logibro was on forum, but he completely ignore this thread. Im done with CCPs ignorance. No one has even implied that this thread would do anything but streamline the discussion. You should re-read the OP...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2014.02.24 04:01:00
|
174. Un-nerf the TAR's hipfire - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Awry Barux wrote: Mobius Kaethis wrote: Clearly the OP was one of those people who exploited the TAR when it was 'the" weapon. I'm voting for no as well. I didn't even start playing this game until after the TAR nerf. 30 Bullets 789...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2014.02.24 03:53:00
|
175. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Brian LaFleur wrote: Really? Every time, huh? Yeah, I can't recall the last time they changed dropsuit functions. I've been around since 1.4 and this is the first time it's happened to me. You said changes in meta. Every balance change or co...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2014.02.23 21:08:00
|
176. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Brian LaFleur wrote: Ghost Steps wrote: i think we whould get 1 last respec (being warned that is the last). Also the respec option with aur is a good idea 4 days to come as it is a name change (is not like u cant get an identity change in t...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2014.02.23 20:08:00
|
177. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Malkai Inos wrote: What i'm arguing against is the notion that respecs are a worthwhile feature in and on themselves. See, I am and I'm not torn at the same time. First and foremost, I accept that CCP wants to have a p...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2014.02.23 08:06:00
|
178. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Most players with over 10 million SP don't really have too much "wasted" SP. Most vets know where to put their sp and specifically planned out builds to avoid any needless waste. It's the newer players who tend to waste that ...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2014.02.23 03:35:00
|
179. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Awry Barux wrote: Scout Registry wrote: Chase FoTM. Keep FoTM. Not in favor of respec. - 32 million SP (some in bad places, but I own my decisions) Time to address the FoTM argument for the millionth time. *yawn* Vets are sitting on ...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2014.02.23 02:09:00
|
180. Why does everyone assume the next update will be 1.8 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ulysses Knapse wrote: Paran Tadec wrote: And not the next full expansion? You all have your wishlists but its far too much for a simple point update. Its been what, 6-7 months since uprising dropped so its about that time CCP. It's alread...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.12.21 22:13:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |