| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 |
181. Quick Question: Is it still possible to call in tanks on the towers? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jadek Menaheim wrote: Lanius Pulvis wrote: Damn, I was hoping you were going for a "Yurtle the turtle". Y'know, how many can we stack before they topple. That's actually quite brilliant. I'm trying to figure out how to stack them in the fi...
- by Lanius Pulvis - at 2014.03.25 00:30:00
|
182. Quick Question: Is it still possible to call in tanks on the towers? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Damn, I was hoping you were going for a "Yurtle the turtle". Y'know, how many can we stack before they topple.
- by Lanius Pulvis - at 2014.03.25 00:23:00
|
183. dropships ramming - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dauth Jenkins wrote: Skihids wrote: I can avoid militia ships in my ADS, so they have to be pretty good to make it work. I'd say the folks who call in a free LAV hoping to get the RDV to ram me are more guilty. Lol, I've been rammed by i...
- by Lanius Pulvis - at 2014.03.24 21:12:00
|
184. SAY NO MORE TO TANK 514 in 1.8!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Skihids wrote: Rynoceros wrote: I would like to take a moment to thank you selfish tank pricks for trashing all of the friendly CA Railgun Installations so that we can't easily help against enemy vehicles. It's smart and classy. GG, dipshit...
- by Lanius Pulvis - at 2014.03.24 20:47:00
|
185. Another encounter with redline railgunners - in General Discussions [original thread]
BAD FURRY wrote: XxGhazbaranxX wrote: Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote: XxGhazbaranxX wrote: This time we tried to fight back But... Well the picture in the link explains everything LINK LINK LINK LINK So you didn't actually ...
- by Lanius Pulvis - at 2014.03.24 16:03:00
|
186. Okay I'm getting a bit scared... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't know whether you're a shield or armor based assault, but it looks on the surface like the longer TTK might make shield tanking viable (you might actually make it to cover to recharge). I figure I'll try actually being a hit and run flanker...
- by Lanius Pulvis - at 2014.03.24 15:47:00
|
187. The Reason This Is Happening . - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: Delta 749 wrote: I like how you rant about people not using AV when AV is broken and I dont mean UP I mean some of it is fundamentally broken and then you whine about people using militia tanks inste...
- by Lanius Pulvis - at 2014.03.23 15:42:00
|
188. goodbye to our Russia players? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Auris Lionesse wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: Auris Lionesse wrote: We can always impose our own economic sanctions across dust and eve on any and all known Russian players. If Ccp tries to stop us they hate freedom. do you hate freedom Ccp...
- by Lanius Pulvis - at 2014.03.22 05:29:00
|
189. DustNews24 launches (+giveaway) - in General Discussions [original thread]
I look forward to seeing how this develops. Are you sticking to strictly factual news, or going for more role-playing and fiction. Or a combination of the 2.
- by Lanius Pulvis - at 2014.03.22 01:32:00
|
190. JudgeRhadamanthus | Airbourne DUST - The Problem With Swarms - in General Discussions [original thread]
The issue Judge is addressing in this video is not a direct result of the range and damage nerf that the most vocal in the community, including myself, asked for. The damage swarms claim to have now, coupled with current range and improving the mi...
- by Lanius Pulvis - at 2014.03.21 21:08:00
|
191. JudgeRhadamanthus | Airbourne DUST - The Problem With Swarms - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: Ansiiis The Trustworthy wrote: The sad fact is that I did not even notice those swarms... They need to hire Judge . Yea hire the guy who was all about the swarm nerf, range and damage but now is singing a different tun...
- by Lanius Pulvis - at 2014.03.21 16:14:00
|
192. Shield extenders on Assault Dropship - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: I run double hardeners with an afterburner on my own ADS. This though limits my engagement time to the active time of my hardeners, but makes me damn near invincible to swarms and forge guns, and allows me to take that initial ...
- by Lanius Pulvis - at 2014.03.20 20:41:00
|
193. I think we can all agree 1.6 AV vs vehicles was way better - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thumb Green wrote: Delanus Turgias wrote: Pre 1.6, AV versus HAV balance was ****, one person could smash 3 tanks without even blinking, and tanks were horribly expensive. I personally want a return to Chromosome-era tanking. It was great ...
- by Lanius Pulvis - at 2014.03.20 18:12:00
|
194. Shield extenders on Assault Dropship - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sir Snugglz wrote: I shield tank my python. With the way I fly, my tanked python has a higher survivability rating than my fittings with hardeners. 3244 shields. Out of curiosity, do you run a booster too?
- by Lanius Pulvis - at 2014.03.20 17:35:00
|
195. CCP! WHY you make me use self control - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zirzo Valcyn wrote: capped off vehicle shield regen to 5, small missile prof 3- more rotation for my gunners, gal assault dropship 3- more ROF for my small rail nose cannon which is seeing more use now that ADS seems to be a current FOTM. i''m ...
- by Lanius Pulvis - at 2014.03.20 15:55:00
|
196. Shield extenders on Assault Dropship - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm just curious if anyone finds extenders useful on their ADS. I primarily use my Python as I believe it was intended, for in and out lightning strikes. I typically run 2 hardeners and a booster, but I want to know if others have seen a signifiga...
- by Lanius Pulvis - at 2014.03.20 15:48:00
|
197. Get rid off 3rd person view on tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Skihids wrote: First person would be fantastic on dropships if done right. Start with a wide FoV via a virtual view constructed from a series of hull mounted cameras. Add the ability to turn your virtual head without yawing the ship by adding...
- by Lanius Pulvis - at 2014.03.20 12:09:00
|
198. Tank thoughts from a tanker. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: Well done. Also, inb4 "tiericide," because that's not the way to go while dropsuits and weapons are still tiered (nor does CCP even hint at tiericide for them) Oh before I forget, I think 60% shield resistance should be at prot...
- by Lanius Pulvis - at 2014.03.19 15:46:00
|
199. CCP I am very disappointed with you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Hynox Xitio wrote: I read the patch notes six times, and not once did I see anything about dinosaurs being added to the game. How dare you not respond to our belligerent, incoherent, and ultimately irrational demands. I'm sorry to say that this...
- by Lanius Pulvis - at 2014.03.19 14:34:00
|
200. Get rid off 3rd person view on tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Medic 1879 wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: The dark cloud wrote: There is no reason for tanks to have a 3rd person view. That camera makes it near impossible to sneak up on a tank cause he can see you clearly from the side and at a certain deg...
- by Lanius Pulvis - at 2014.03.19 14:28:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |