Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
21. CPM Feedback Requestion - Myofibril Stimulant - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Primary play mode(s) - Domination Top role(s) used since the change - Rubber Assault since the change Have you tried the Myofibril Stimulant since the change? - Extensively. - Do you currently have a Myofibril Stimulant based fitting? - Yes - ...
- by Joseph Ridgeson - at 2015.04.14 17:09:00
|
22. jumping god scouts, hvys r ****** now! thanks so much ccp!! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
WarRavens convention. Scouts and Assaults are the roles that are most easily able to make use of Myofibrils. They trade HP and heavy weapons from Sentinels in favor of having greater mobility. Potential balance concerns aside, I will say this th...
- by Joseph Ridgeson - at 2015.04.03 08:57:00
|
23. [Idea] More EOM data - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I like that there is a timeline of kills and deaths. That graph gives you an idea how well you did. "I got 15 kills!" doesn't tell you as much of a story as the graph does if 6 of the kills are vertical. You might have just gotten lucky. I like it...
- by Joseph Ridgeson - at 2015.04.03 08:52:00
|
24. Extend the Objective Bonus to both teams - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: it's a good idea Thanks for that. Now if only there were someone who could do something about it. *bats eyelashes*
- by Joseph Ridgeson - at 2015.04.02 09:35:00
|
25. Extend the Objective Bonus to both teams - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
LOOKMOM NOHANDS wrote: I say make it an objective attack bonus by making it apply when the enemy controls the letter. What gives more incentive to fight back against a full stomp, bonuses for camping the letter or bonuses for attacking when t...
- by Joseph Ridgeson - at 2015.04.02 05:37:00
|
26. Extend the Objective Bonus to both teams - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DRT 99 wrote: why isnt this done already? only issue i see is that then people might care less about capping. maybe give a 20% bonus to the team with the objective and a 15% bonus to the team without the objective? If people don't care about...
- by Joseph Ridgeson - at 2015.04.01 23:26:00
|
27. Extend the Objective Bonus to both teams - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vesta Opalus wrote: Joseph Ridgeson wrote: Thoughts, suggestions, opinions? Its my thought, opinion, and suggestion that this thread should go to the top of the heap. That's kind of you. Devs, it is post FanFest; can I at least get a "...
- by Joseph Ridgeson - at 2015.03.30 00:58:00
|
28. Extend the Objective Bonus to both teams - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ech-
- by Joseph Ridgeson - at 2015.03.21 20:30:00
|
29. Next Hotfix ( Hotfix Fred???) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Fandango Sounds... *sunglasses* Grim.
- by Joseph Ridgeson - at 2015.03.17 03:09:00
|
30. Extend the Objective Bonus to both teams - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Anyone else? I want to know what people think and if this can be done.
- by Joseph Ridgeson - at 2015.03.15 20:10:00
|
31. Extend the Objective Bonus to both teams - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
*cough*
- by Joseph Ridgeson - at 2015.03.13 07:18:00
|
32. Extend the Objective Bonus to both teams - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
LOOKMOM NOHANDS wrote: No Also Joseph Ridgeson wrote: 1. In Domination, you can often see where teams just give up. You can notice it as a stomp of any side. It will be 5 minutes into the game and suddenly none on your team are moving fo...
- by Joseph Ridgeson - at 2015.03.12 20:40:00
|
33. Extend the Objective Bonus to both teams - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thanks for the bumps and support. Is there any potential problem I missed that I could possibly attempt to rectify? I know this isn't as sexy as jump guys but I believe this to be a change that could make this game a little bit more enjoyable to ...
- by Joseph Ridgeson - at 2015.03.12 18:06:00
|
34. Extend the Objective Bonus to both teams - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Currently, there is a 20% bonus for being within a certain distance of a Primary Objective while it is in your team's control. This was put forth in hopes that more people would push for the objective or at least congregate around it in order to s...
- by Joseph Ridgeson - at 2015.03.11 22:00:00
|
35. vehicle shield fitting optimization - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
It is the same with Armor. My Madrugar is CPU starved and swimming in PG. Guess what Armor Optimization saves me.
- by Joseph Ridgeson - at 2015.02.20 02:36:00
|
36. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance gave the Gunnlogi's fits that are pretty much "use these as they are simply better." There are also Glass Cannon fits but they are far, far less common than the more standard Double Extender-Hardener or Double Hardener-Extender with ...
- by Joseph Ridgeson - at 2015.01.21 10:29:00
|
37. Sticky:[Feedback] Experimental and Specialist Weapons - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Okay, I am confused. What is your exact definition of a specialist and experimental? Is this new stuff that is going to be added or is this stuff that currently exists and is going to be moved? IE, we have these three different items: Viziam D...
- by Joseph Ridgeson - at 2015.01.18 10:03:00
|
38. Sticky:[Feedback] Warbarge Designs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: The Uprising is over. Mercenaries have taken to the skies in makeshift or stolen Warbarges. Joseph's head canon: Stolen Gallente Warbarge that resembles the EVE version of The African Queen . Proudly named The Rat Bastard.
- by Joseph Ridgeson - at 2015.01.14 01:10:00
|
39. Sticky:[Feedback] Awarding Skill Points - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
It is a good idea, like all things, in theory . I can see some huge potential problems. Current System: SP = (2X + 5Y) * 1 +.5A + B X = WP Y = Time in battle (seconds) A = Active Booster B = Omega Booster. I'll ignore A and B for now. This mean...
- by Joseph Ridgeson - at 2015.01.14 01:00:00
|
40. Give 20% WP for attacking the objective as well - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The Defend Order is gone and has been replaced with a 20% WP buff if you have a Point and earn any WP within like 60 meters or so. This is good as it pushes more people to the objective and gives a bonus to WP without needing to get in a Squad. ...
- by Joseph Ridgeson - at 2015.01.10 01:37:00
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |