| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
1. Sticky:[Feedback] Hotfix Alpha Numbers - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I like that you seem to be tweaking the Gal Scout, not rearranging it. I can live with that.
- by J'Hiera - at 2014.05.27 07:10:00
|
2. Question about Unreal engine 3 to CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Why not Carbon?
- by J'Hiera - at 2014.05.07 21:39:00
|
3. CCP Z's fanfest presentation about character progression... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Use the EVE/current dust model and use this "progression" system as certificates/ISIS (from EVE). Certificates/ISIS in EVE gives players a good indication as to what skills and modules touch their ship's role, so you don't run blindly into the sk...
- by J'Hiera - at 2014.05.06 21:20:00
|
4. Going to be doing a quick one on one video with CCP rouge - in General Discussions [original thread]
Why not use Carbon for Legion? Carbon seems like something you'll have much more control over in terms of breaking limitations.
- by J'Hiera - at 2014.05.03 10:12:00
|
5. [Balance Issue] assault suits vs scouts - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Give Assaults a third bonus, aside from their Role. Role Bonus Bonus 1 Bonus 2 Bonus 3 What that would be, I don't know. Could be tank related that doesn't affect direct HP buffer. Ie. increased armor rep, reduction to speed penalty (or doesn't ...
- by J'Hiera - at 2014.03.27 13:51:00
|
6. [Req] Last logged in char becomes next logins autoselect - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
EVE Online Rubicon has this. Can we too? Its a nuisance to have to select my main, which happens to be my third created character.
- by J'Hiera - at 2014.03.22 22:32:00
|
7. BPOs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
With EVEs paintjobs, Im pretty sure they will be turned into never expiring paint jobs you apply to a suit of the same value. While BPOs will be reintroduced as schematics for production instead.
- by J'Hiera - at 2014.03.22 20:15:00
|
8. Ran an AA Experiment - in General Discussions [original thread]
People make it sound like autoaim. You give it way too much credit. Aim assist just slightly follow the target if it hits your crosshairs. And if they move faster than the tracking, it stops working. You have to do some tracking yourself. I think ...
- by J'Hiera - at 2014.03.12 07:23:00
|
9. Your top 3 weapon choices for 1.8 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Plasma Rifle Combat Rifle Ion Pistol Cause I love Gallente, and Minnie weapons are Minnie weapons.
- by J'Hiera - at 2014.03.07 18:42:00
|
10. No incentive for Proficiency ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Hagintora wrote: That's odd, Why is the CR different from the rest? Shouldn't it be the weakest weapon against shields? Not if assuming the CR uses Depleted Uranium for ammunition. In EVE, that is High Explosive, Medium Kinetic and High Th...
- by J'Hiera - at 2014.03.07 18:26:00
|
11. If 1.8 Is Perfect... - in General Discussions [original thread]
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: There is no way 1.8 will have item trading. I wonder if its a decision thing, or if its a coding obstacle thing. Either way, These are MY wishes, but I would love for 1.9 to be the big PvE update. Introduce ind...
- by J'Hiera - at 2014.02.22 14:08:00
|
12. Take a page from Eve: Less Tier-ish Dropsuits. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
This is just me, and I'm sure plenty would disagree, but I really wouldn't mind if all tiers of a suit, had the same slot layout, but as you progress, the CPU and PG output increases. What I foresee this do, is enable ie. a Gallente Assault G-1 t...
- by J'Hiera - at 2014.01.29 14:04:00
|
13. [Screenshots from Singularity] I just chanced on the mother lode. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Not sure if I like the Gallente Scout bonus. It just seems... ineffective. Feels more like something that should be built into that suit in the first place.
- by J'Hiera - at 2014.01.09 18:27:00
|
14. Please don't change the Gallente Assault bonus - in General Discussions [original thread]
My advanced Gal suit is at 54/55 PG, forgot CPU, but think 275/276 or something. Maxed assault and core fittings, just the 2 fitting on assault rifles, and I do believe it was 5 light weapons CPU reduction. Gal suits are pretty tight. However, I...
- by J'Hiera - at 2014.01.09 18:16:00
|
15. [Screenshots from Singularity] I just chanced on the mother lode. - in General Discussions [original thread]
I like the bonuses, especially the gallente ones (as a Gallente player). I also like what I see with the other suits. Dat Minmatar Assault... But I don't see why the gun bonuses on ie. the assault suits, aren't geared towards the racial weapons. ...
- by J'Hiera - at 2014.01.09 08:26:00
|
16. So what's this deal with the mic bug. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dust 514 uses EVE Online's voice system (and has to use it, as said by CCP at EVE Las Vegas.) This voice system has been bugged with pretty much the same effects for almost 11 years now in EVE. Its why EVE players hardly ever use EVE Voice and ...
- by J'Hiera - at 2013.12.27 17:49:00
|
17. [Req] Remote Sensor Dampener - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I took the name from EVE Online, figured it sort of fitting since it is sort of range dampening, which is what the sensor dampener does in EVE; lower your targeting range or locking speed. But yeah, Active Jammer would probably fit better.
- by J'Hiera - at 2013.12.25 13:48:00
|
18. Myofibril Stimulants - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Should exist purposely for movement speed increase. Would be a nice counter to speed penalty on plates. Having them high slot makes sense, dont make them low. Remenber that high and low isnt arms and legs. Melee damage bomus is a nice addon, but...
- by J'Hiera - at 2013.12.25 13:44:00
|
19. [Req] Remote Sensor Dampener - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Opposite of Active scanner. Removes targets that are not in view. Always works on passive scanners. Has to beat the dB of the Active Scanner. Proto Rsd is stronger than proto Active scanner. Discuss.
- by J'Hiera - at 2013.12.24 14:17:00
|
20. Suggestion for Factional Warfare: Giving incentive to fight for losing Factions - in General Discussions [original thread]
"...players will be forced..." You had me, but you lost me there. The ONLY extra bonus you should get, the only difference there would be, for fighting for the "losing" faction, is ISK reward in addition to LP. Suddenly youre hired by the facti...
- by J'Hiera - at 2013.12.23 08:20:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |