| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
221. [Request] Range buff - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
PEW JACKSON wrote: Fizzer94 wrote: The HMG just got fixed, heavies recently got 300+ more HP, and you are getting huge resistance bonuses in 1.8 that translate to "roughly 200 more HP at prototype" The HMG is fine. Heavy suits are fine. You...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2014.01.21 11:17:00
|
222. [Request] Range buff - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The HMG just got fixed, heavies recently got 300+ more HP, and you are getting huge resistance bonuses in 1.8 that translate to "roughly 200 more HP at prototype" The HMG is fine. Heavy suits are fine. You'll be fine.
- by Fizzer94 - at 2014.01.21 10:55:00
|
223. [Video] Tac AR vs Scrambler Rifle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ulysses Knapse wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Ulysses Knapse wrote: Honestly, I don't see why either of them even need to have such high rates of fire. 400 RPM on the TAR is not a high rate of fire. That's still almost seven rounds ...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2014.01.21 10:06:00
|
224. [Video] Tac AR vs Scrambler Rifle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Magnus Amadeuss wrote: I kinda-- agree with the OP, let me explain. The tac AR has a RPM of 400, giving it a RPS of 6.667 The ScR has a RPM of 705, giving it a RPS of 12.5 (about) Now NO ONE can fire at 12.5 rounds per second without the ass...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2014.01.21 10:04:00
|
225. Tag for the weapons - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Great idea. +1 Would clear up a lot of confusion that I've noticed others having...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2014.01.20 10:31:00
|
226. More Heavy Weapons !!! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Be hopeful. After we get all the suit frames, they are the only baseline thing that will be missing. Expect them soon.
- by Fizzer94 - at 2014.01.20 09:55:00
|
227. About the plasma cannon - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Mordecai Sanguine wrote: Tonka Legacy wrote: I really want to find a good use for that thing, I really do. BUT WHAT CAN IT DO? It barely scratches vehicles, its dece on unsuspecting infantry, and it only shoots one before you reload. Fortun...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2014.01.19 21:16:00
|
228. [Request] New Loading Screen Tips - post your suggestions - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
GÇó Be aware that the Laser Rifle isn't able to do much damage at close range, but works very well at long range. GÇó Don't forget to restock your fittings in between battles. GÇó Active scanners can be countered with Profile Dampeners. GÇó Object...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2014.01.19 18:27:00
|
229. Request: Jove attack event - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spademan wrote: Fizzer94 wrote: How about a Sansha Incursion? They would use lightly defended dropsuits, probably a light frame of some sort, their small amount of defences would be shield based. Their weapons would output massive sustained...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2014.01.18 23:05:00
|
230. Request: Jove attack event - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
How about a Sansha Incursion? They would use lightly defended dropsuits, probably a light frame of some sort, their small amount of defences would be shield based. Their weapons would output massive sustained DPS at long ranges, and they would be...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2014.01.18 22:16:00
|
231. [FEEDBACK] Plasma Cannon - An AV perspective from a PLC advocate. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Stefan Stahl wrote: I'm thinking 300 dps against vehicles would be in order. With my math a normal forgegun with operation 5 runs at about 350 DPS including the reload after 4 shots. From the top of my head it deals something like 1350 damage, ...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2014.01.18 21:57:00
|
232. [FEEDBACK] Plasma Cannon - An AV perspective from a PLC advocate. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
XxGhazbaranxX wrote: Fizzer94 wrote: You have to remember that after a certain point, increasing its direct damage has no affect on infantry, because it will always be a OHK(which isn't unbalanced, considering the difficulty of direct hits)...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2014.01.18 21:48:00
|
233. [FEEDBACK] Plasma Cannon - An AV perspective from a PLC advocate. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
XxGhazbaranxX wrote: Fizzer94 wrote: Okay. Back to the topic at hand then. Sorry for derailing How do we balance the Plasma Cannon? The way I see it, so long as it always has a long reload, is single fire, and the projectile flies in an arc...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2014.01.18 21:31:00
|
234. [FEEDBACK] Plasma Cannon - An AV perspective from a PLC advocate. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Denn Maell wrote: Personally, I Think that either the PLC needs some kind of Vehicle Lockon(like swarms) or extend the splash damage to a decent Flux Nade. It won't be OP against infantry because of its 1 shot clip and massive reload time (and ...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2014.01.18 21:21:00
|
235. [FEEDBACK] Plasma Cannon - An AV perspective from a PLC advocate. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Okay. Back to the topic at hand then. Sorry for derailing How do we balance the Plasma Cannon? The way I see it, so long as it always has a long reload, is single fire, and the projectile flies in an arc; it won't be OP against infantry. It hones...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2014.01.18 21:12:00
|
236. [Idea] Khanid Missile Launcher - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Arx Ardashir wrote: Fizzer94 wrote: If it was single fire like the Plasma Cannon, it would be fine. No more than 1 shot per mag, and at least 4.5 second reload time. Any better, and it would be horrendously unbalanced against infantry. Dumbf...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2014.01.18 20:48:00
|
237. [FEEDBACK] Plasma Cannon - An AV perspective from a PLC advocate. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
XxGhazbaranxX wrote: Fizzer94 wrote: Wow. I admire your bravery. I have to disagree however. The Plasma Cannon doesn't belong in the Heavy Class. The position of Gallente Heavy weapon should go to some sort of Flame(Plasma)thrower. The Amar...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2014.01.18 20:45:00
|
238. [FEEDBACK] Plasma Cannon - An AV perspective from a PLC advocate. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Kigurosaka Laaksonen wrote: Fizzer94 wrote: The Amarr Heavy weapon should be the Sheild-based Heavy AV weapon. What does this mean? That the Amarr Heavy weapon,whatever that may be, ought to be a primarily AV weapon, much like the Forge...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2014.01.18 20:41:00
|
239. [Idea] Khanid Missile Launcher - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Arx Ardashir wrote: Fizzer94 wrote: Plasma Cannon DPS is about 200 at prototype level. You want to give this thing 1000 DPS at prototype level. That not low compared to other AV. Also this thing sounds like a noon tube, that would OHK most i...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2014.01.18 20:39:00
|
240. [FEEDBACK] Plasma Cannon - An AV perspective from a PLC advocate. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Wow. I admire your bravery. It takes truly testicular magnificence to say your favorite weapon shouldn't even be usable on the suit that you use it on. I have to disagree however. The Plasma Cannon doesn't belong in the Heavy Class. The positio...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2014.01.18 20:32:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |