| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
601. Is the reason Dust is holding off on more Game Modes because - in General Discussions [original thread]
It's a secret...
- by Crash Monster - at 2013.09.24 19:54:00
|
602. what of av got wp for damaging tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
I think this idea has been proposed a few times in the last couple of days...
- by Crash Monster - at 2013.09.24 18:17:00
|
603. your squares intrigue me sir - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mortedeamor wrote: also if i were using "squares" as a derogatory term i would have used the phrase "you squares" not "your squares" ..it is very obvious by my title that word squares was not used in a derogatory way. it is no assumption to exp...
- by Crash Monster - at 2013.09.24 17:09:00
|
604. Sniping in the Red Zone - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rush Inamras wrote: ...I am a sniper/ Shot gun main, and when I'm sniping... I find it hard to fathom that a sniper would have to complain about redline snipers.
- by Crash Monster - at 2013.09.24 17:03:00
|
605. Sniping in the Red Zone - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rush Inamras wrote: Yes the point of a sniper is to be unseen and unreachable, and yeah a sniper is doing their job...but at the same time thats like saying spawn camping is the best thing to do cus the game is about killing the other players.....
- by Crash Monster - at 2013.09.24 16:55:00
|
606. It's Ok Now - in General Discussions [original thread]
If infantry thinks tanks are OP they are welcome to spec into them as the FOTM.
- by Crash Monster - at 2013.09.24 07:41:00
|
607. So why does my AR have 60 bullets per magazine?? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Why do protos need more ammo? They are proto -- they should be able to do more with less... give them higher damage and lower ammo (bigger bullets y'know). It's the newbs that can't hit anything and need all the spare bullets.
- by Crash Monster - at 2013.09.24 07:38:00
|
608. anti-vehicle and tankers alike, let me enlighten you - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dunk Mujunk wrote: WASHINGTON GÇö The U.S. military's Abrams tank, designed during the Cold War to withstand the fiercest blows from the best Soviet tanks, is getting knocked out at surprising rates by the low-tech bombs and rocket-propelled gr...
- by Crash Monster - at 2013.09.23 20:34:00
|
609. [Suggestion] Ending Tank vs. AV threads until further notice. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alright, I take exception to the image. It is perfectly fine to have more than one item in your arsenal, find one to be defective, and keep on fighting. This applies to both conversations and combat!
- by Crash Monster - at 2013.09.23 19:01:00
|
610. anti-vehicle and tankers alike, let me enlighten you - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dunk Mujunk wrote: AVers should pretty much be able to dominate a lone tank that doesn't have infantry support. Maybe, and I say MAYBE 2 AVers should be required to take down a decent, lone tank. I'll say that a rough ballpark of 1-3 AVers shou...
- by Crash Monster - at 2013.09.23 18:49:00
|
611. I had a nightmare - in General Discussions [original thread]
I have no problem with respecs... as long as there is pain in getting them. Heck, if cryhards need to buy a respec once per release that too would fund the game... win-win.
- by Crash Monster - at 2013.09.23 18:14:00
|
612. anti-vehicle and tankers alike, let me enlighten you - in General Discussions [original thread]
Okay, for the effort of adding a couple blank lines I do like the idea of giving some WP for amounts of damage to vehicles... as long as CCP builds in some protection against abuse. Though, this isn't the first time I've seen the idea.
- by Crash Monster - at 2013.09.23 18:13:00
|
613. what are we dieing for .. - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm dying for a good game... zing.
- by Crash Monster - at 2013.09.23 18:09:00
|
614. anti-vehicle and tankers alike, let me enlighten you - in General Discussions [original thread]
chase rowland wrote: do you know the definition of enlighten? besides, only ccp could fix this mess.... I suspect it means the opposite of bludgeoning your opponents with a fortress of text.
- by Crash Monster - at 2013.09.23 18:07:00
|
615. Reydients respec rumor will. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Are you tards metagaming or something?
- by Crash Monster - at 2013.09.23 18:04:00
|
616. anti-vehicle and tankers alike, let me enlighten you - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shoot, I was looking for the post to end the war... and all I got was a wall of text.
- by Crash Monster - at 2013.09.23 17:58:00
|
617. To non-pilots making tank threads - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: *HEAD EXPLODES* I'll say it again: weaponry 3, light weapon operation 3, swarm operation 3. How many times must I say that 'Haywire' is the Aurum variant? No level 5, no proficiency, no explosives, no grenadier. Just ...
- by Crash Monster - at 2013.09.23 16:25:00
|
618. How to win Faction Warfare. - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP FoxFour wrote: I think we have a design that is getting closer and closer to satisfying both sides. Hopefully I will have something to post later this week. How about giving people higher SP (to some bonus like the daily system) unless t...
- by Crash Monster - at 2013.09.23 16:23:00
|
619. Tankers- mabe high ISK cost for tanks= high KDR - in General Discussions [original thread]
straya fox wrote: Read the thread derp, i clearly state that it is a tank, and is and should be destructive, and that in exchange for such power you gotta pay big ISK for it. I also read you saying that tankers are paying for a high KDR.
- by Crash Monster - at 2013.09.23 16:12:00
|
620. CCP - Plans for linking DUST 514 + EVE - in General Discussions [original thread]
Hellkeizer wrote: That's a smart move by CCP. Worry about getting new players and not worry about something that they wouldn't know/understand/care about once they start playing. I'd suggest that an appropriate and meaningful form of linkage...
- by Crash Monster - at 2013.09.23 16:11:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |