| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
5621. Tanks need to be adjusted. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tanks need to be buffed to the point that we start seeing "ZOMG! Nerf Tanks! My MILITIA Swarms can't KIll them Solo!" threads again.
- by Cosgar - at 2013.05.12 23:37:00
|
5622. Incoming Logi Nerf - in General Discussions [original thread]
Keyser Soze VerbalKint wrote: Cosgar wrote: We've been doing this nerf witch hunt for 2 years. Look at how ****ed up Dust 514 is right now. Isn't it time we did something different. Logis are where they need to be and I wish I could meet Rem...
- by Cosgar - at 2013.05.12 23:32:00
|
5623. Incoming Logi Nerf - in General Discussions [original thread]
We've been doing this nerf witch hunt for 2 years. Look at how ****ed up Dust 514 is right now. Isn't it time we did something different. Logis are where they need to be and I wish I could meet Remnant and shake his hand. After the 14th, watch how...
- by Cosgar - at 2013.05.12 23:06:00
|
5624. [QUESTION] Who balances the weapons in dust 514??? - in General Discussions [original thread]
The same guy that after 2 years of beta testing feedback decides to nerf a weapon based off of an office LAN party.
- by Cosgar - at 2013.05.12 22:50:00
|
5625. MD a summery 11 points, All together fatal, separate meh. - in General Discussions [original thread]
You know, I'm starting to warm up to the new trajectory now. If they add a bit more falloff after say 20m, lower direct hit damage, raise splash damage and give 1-1.1m splash radius back to the standard and assault, we'd be good to go. Well, after...
- by Cosgar - at 2013.05.12 22:37:00
|
5626. Why does the entire Logistics class have to be nerfed? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Here's a true sign that you're wrong this time IWS. I'm agreeing with Keyser. @.@
- by Cosgar - at 2013.05.12 22:21:00
|
5627. Broken Legs 514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
I cringe and gag every time I hear it.
- by Cosgar - at 2013.05.12 22:15:00
|
5628. Why does the entire Logistics class have to be nerfed? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Cosgar wrote: I use the Minmatar logi and the bottom line is if they nerf the entire logistics class just because the Caldari (which the scrambler rifle was designed for) doesn't have a sustainable effective counter ye...
- by Cosgar - at 2013.05.12 22:12:00
|
5629. an idea to help resolve OP issues for weapons - in General Discussions [original thread]
The big issue is that everything but the AR has been significantly nerfed to the point that they're all novelties now in comparison. The other weapons should be buffed back up so they can at least compete with the AR without all of them out shinin...
- by Cosgar - at 2013.05.12 22:04:00
|
5630. Why does the entire Logistics class have to be nerfed? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I use the Minmatar logi and the bottom line is if they nerf the entire logistics class just because the Caldari (which the scrambler rifle was designed for) doesn't have a sustainable effective counter yet and the assault bonuses pale in compariso...
- by Cosgar - at 2013.05.12 21:58:00
|
5631. New racial bonus ideas - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP, listen to this guy!
- by Cosgar - at 2013.05.12 21:41:00
|
5632. New Blog: Tuning the Tac AR - in General Discussions [original thread]
Limit it's CQC so user has to resort to sidearm.
- by Cosgar - at 2013.05.12 13:09:00
|
5633. just gonna waste a few years on dust514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Seriously, nobody remembers what EVE looked like on release compared to now?
- by Cosgar - at 2013.05.12 13:07:00
|
5634. plz un-nerf some weaps - in General Discussions [original thread]
Eisen Sonnet wrote: Cosgar wrote: Eisen Sonnet wrote: Part of the problem is people who used those other weapons pretty much stopped playing already or changed to Assault AR . So, for there to be more of a variety of builds and weapons be...
- by Cosgar - at 2013.05.12 12:52:00
|
5635. just gonna waste a few years on dust514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vrain Matari wrote: Years? Whatever. I'm in, i'm staying in. We're still working through core mechanics but we're getting closer. They've addressed a hella lotta points in Uprising and go most of it right. I think we're maybe 6 months away fr...
- by Cosgar - at 2013.05.12 12:40:00
|
5636. Any chance of seeing 2 equip slots on the Aassault proto suit? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kleanur Guy wrote: Honestly, it should be the scout that gets 2x Equipment now, have you seen the scout suit? I feel rediculously sorry for those guys, its too bad they don't have as vocal members as the heavy community because IMO they are in ...
- by Cosgar - at 2013.05.12 12:38:00
|
5637. plz un-nerf some weaps - in General Discussions [original thread]
Eisen Sonnet wrote: Part of the problem is people who used those other weapons pretty much stopped playing already or changed to Assault AR . So, for there to be more of a variety of builds and weapons being used we really need to get that prev...
- by Cosgar - at 2013.05.12 12:34:00
|
5638. just gonna waste a few years on dust514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
ITT: Nobody saw how bad EVE Online was on release. CCP's games age like fine wine.
- by Cosgar - at 2013.05.12 12:27:00
|
5639. plz un-nerf some weaps - in General Discussions [original thread]
p q wrote: With the new patch, there was a ton of nerfs. I am a "medium" level player. I play in an assualt style militia suit right now, but I'm more of a logi style player; not to great at killing, my niche is drop uplinks and upscale nanohiv...
- by Cosgar - at 2013.05.12 12:23:00
|
5640. just gonna waste a few years on dust514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Smoky The Bear wrote: Cosgar wrote: UK-Shots wrote: Cosgar wrote: You know, nobody is twisting your arm to play. Really, just go biomass yourself and move on. I'd rather have people that actually give a **** and are positive in our com...
- by Cosgar - at 2013.05.12 12:19:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |