| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
81. True Tankers aren't tank stomping - in General Discussions [original thread]
Darken-Sol wrote: CharCharOdell wrote: Darken-Sol wrote: You are easily popping "crap fits" and you want them nerfed. You belong in new Eden. What a guy I'm easily popping crap fits because I'm a very capable tanker in a very good fit....
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.12.19 05:36:00
|
82. True Tankers aren't tank stomping - in General Discussions [original thread]
Garrett Blacknova wrote: CharCharOdell wrote: Garrett Blacknova wrote: I agree Militia tanks need PG and CPU nerf, but think a (very) small HP nerf would be more appropriate than a speed nerf. Also, there should be a nerf to the current ...
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.12.19 05:29:00
|
83. True Tankers aren't tank stomping - in General Discussions [original thread]
Garrett Blacknova wrote: I agree Militia tanks need PG and CPU nerf, but think a (very) small HP nerf would be more appropriate than a speed nerf. Also, there should be a nerf to the current PG and CPU level on Standard tanks, to make room for...
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.12.19 05:23:00
|
84. True Tankers aren't tank stomping - in General Discussions [original thread]
Darken-Sol wrote: You are easily popping "crap fits" and you want them nerfed. You belong in new Eden. What a guy I'm easily popping crap fits because I'm a very capable tanker in a very good fit. Proto AV isn't even denting militia tanks pi...
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.12.19 05:22:00
|
85. Militia Tanks =/= Militia Dropsuits - in General Discussions [original thread]
mlt tanks need a pg/cpu + speed nerf. The expensive fully specced and fitted tanks are right where they should be.
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.12.19 05:13:00
|
86. True Tankers aren't tank stomping - in General Discussions [original thread]
i have yet to see on of the true tankers running 4-man tank squads like people claim. No. I see 4-5 man militia tank squads who stomp infantry with crap fits, but when a real tanker shows up (myself), they somehow all explode in about 5 minutes. ...
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.12.19 05:12:00
|
87. My love for tank is gone - in General Discussions [original thread]
u could be a dedicated tank hunter like me. it's hilarious how after killing 4 tanks, 2 dropships, 4 lavs, and 3 bolas, the enemy team will stop calling in vehicles. true tankers shine in odds like that ;)
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.12.19 05:07:00
|
88. O'Dell's QQ on 1.7 Tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
I finally downloaded 1.7 last night and it was an odd experience. Tanks from Chrome through 1.6 were a highly isk/sp/skill based career choice. Being one of the last great tankers was a title the community gave you because 1.0-1.6, tanks sucked u...
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.12.18 17:10:00
|
89. Don't worry infantry, I will save you! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Just like in chromosome, I'll be the terror of the battlefield. I will stack 2 damage mods and a nitro on my gunlogi and go to town on Newberry tanks! I have heard yall r being slaughtered like we were last build and I cannot allow that! I fight f...
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.12.12 22:41:00
|
90. I haven't played 1.7 yet - in General Discussions [original thread]
I hope tanks become more popular...nothing is more satisfying than smashing 3 cocky pubstomping tanks with a sica?
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.12.12 22:38:00
|
91. AV'ers and infantry men. Rally behind me against VEHICLES.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Cosgar wrote: Why not work with vehicles. All this drama splits our community apart. Yeah why didnt VEHICLE DRIVERS/PILOTS do that instead of whining for months? Double standards.... We did but then yall would ...
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.12.12 22:36:00
|
92. I haven't played 1.7 yet - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: I don't know. But what I do know is that I can make a Sica in 10 seconds that can both withstand PRO AV, while also being the best AV. I do know however that I am going to have some fun times with my Sica. I also know that HAVs...
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.12.12 22:33:00
|
93. I haven't played 1.7 yet - in General Discussions [original thread]
Is it true? I've heard the assault ct is new OP ar. Heard tanks are logi lav with turrets...so are nooks in so mas really unstoppable now? How would a tank vet like myself be doing? How OP will I be? Heard av tickles and only tanks can solo tanks....
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.12.12 22:29:00
|
94. To CCP Wolfman: Triple Shotgun Damage - in General Discussions [original thread]
i support. it's the only way to make the shotgun better than the AR at close range
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.12.04 04:59:00
|
95. Scouts Need To Be Nerfed - in General Discussions [original thread]
You had me at 'nerf' :')
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.12.03 05:06:00
|
96. Why infantry doesn't want tankers to get a full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm a tanker and I want everyone to get a respec because it is fair. I could fully spec 2 suits or 5 weapons with the so I'll get back. You bet your ass I'll get the new FOTM so why can't the infantry?
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.12.02 21:37:00
|
97. Change shield extender fitting cost - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maybe back when armor was garbage, it made sense, but now a basic armor plate is more protective than a basic extender. The tradeoff is passive shield regen. With this in mind, their costs need to be equalized because its putting MN and CA at a di...
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.12.02 21:35:00
|
98. Why are Damage Modules High-Slot Items? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Because every race has their specific 'perfect build'. GA: damage mods and armor plates CA: Shields and biotics/electronics MN: damage mods and biotics/electronics AM: shields and armor Changing the location of these would mess with the entire ba...
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.12.02 21:32:00
|
99. Remove Weapon Proficiency Skills - in General Discussions [original thread]
N7 Operative Anthony wrote: This is the most dumbest thing I've heard of. It took me a long time to skill into Proficiency 5, and now you want to replace it with 5% total additional passive damage and some weapon skins? Hell No! Someone posted ...
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.12.02 21:26:00
|
100. Fat guys holding light weapons? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rogue Saint wrote: Been discussed, too many heavies QQ'd and said it was because they couldn't win with HMG/FG. Personally, and as I said before, if anyone needs that much EHP to be competitive they must suck hard. EHP doesn't mean anything...
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.12.02 21:19:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |