| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1541. Why not just make passive scanning as strong as active? - in General Discussions [original thread]
((To be clear, this is referring to one module being as strong as the standard level counterpart active scanner, not the variants {lvl 1 mod= lvl 1 scanner, lvl 3 mod = lvl 3 scanner})) The scan radius of all the dropsuits in this game is so smal...
- by Baal Omniscient - at 2013.12.21 23:57:00
|
1542. Good job with the combat rifle CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Crimson Cerberes wrote: 1) In order to stutter the fire pattern of a CR(assuming this actually happens), you must be mashing the button faster than 6.6667 times per second, something you and your counter-parts deem unlikely. 2) I can unload t...
- by Baal Omniscient - at 2013.12.21 23:19:00
|
1543. Good job with the combat rifle CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Crimson Cerberes wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Crimson Cerberes wrote: Actually it is 1003.9 DPS. Someone did the math before, 35.2 (base dmg for proto CR) X 1.15 (proficiency 5) X 1.24 (3 complex damage mods) X 20 (rounds per second...
- by Baal Omniscient - at 2013.12.20 21:01:00
|
1544. Let's talk dust: Dev invasion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
L.O.T.I.S. was successful in all four matches we entered with a full squad. We successfully defeated them in 2 ambush's and a domination which was heavily lagged and had stacked teams on both sides. We also successfully defended the devs in a diff...
- by Baal Omniscient - at 2013.12.20 20:15:00
|
1545. Swarms dont stop shields from recharging - in General Discussions [original thread]
Garrett Blacknova wrote: Not only is this a terrible idea at its base when literally every other module, active or otherwise, is allowed multiples fitted, but it also doesn't solve the problem because one hardener is enough to literally turn Sw...
- by Baal Omniscient - at 2013.12.20 12:19:00
|
1546. Swarms dont stop shields from recharging - in General Discussions [original thread]
The dark cloud wrote: Another day, another issue who woulda have guessed it? We all know that tanks have now a pretty high passive recharge rate but can be stopped by using "AV". This is not correct, in fact its terribly wrong and i call it exp...
- by Baal Omniscient - at 2013.12.20 08:44:00
|
1547. Who'd be down with getting rid of Auto-Aim? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Sgt Kirk wrote: With fixed hit detection and the 10% all light weapons received some time ago it might be time for Auto-Aim to be shown the door. Rather see 10% damage nerf removed first. Do you mean the 10% dam...
- by Baal Omniscient - at 2013.12.20 08:34:00
|
1548. HP re-gen limit for vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
It makes some sense, but it would be easily overcome by simply recalling the tank when things got too dicey and calling it out again. Also, I REALLY don't see tankers going for it. Would be interesting for ME as an AV player, but as a tanker.... y...
- by Baal Omniscient - at 2013.12.20 08:23:00
|
1549. Aim assist tone down - in General Discussions [original thread]
((AA users)): REEEEAAARRRRROOOWWWW!!! FFFFTTTTT FFFFTTTT!
- by Baal Omniscient - at 2013.12.19 10:49:00
|
1550. [Clarification] Fixed aggressive friendly fire damage tracking. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Just wanted to say: Thank you Nullarbor for clarifying so many technicalities for us. For lack of a better means of thanking you, I shall now go through this thread and like each of your posts. Thank you very much.
- by Baal Omniscient - at 2013.12.19 10:44:00
|
1551. No "HMG IS OP!" Threads?... Something Must be Wrong... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: I was expecting it... maybe the buff wasn't go(o)d enough. Maybe after a week of HMG molestation, assault players will start to chime in. I was thinking the same thing. However, right now, heavies are FINALLY exac...
- by Baal Omniscient - at 2013.12.19 03:43:00
|
1552. Let's Discuss Webifiers! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spectral Clone wrote: Realistically speaking: Game is scrapped before this is implementedGäó. Realistically speaking, pessimism accomplishes nothing.
- by Baal Omniscient - at 2013.12.18 20:11:00
|
1553. LOLTank Brigade Wants Swarm Launchers Nerfed? Again?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Atiim wrote: I know what you guys want to see, so here are the links. These people want Swarm Launchers (and technically PLCs) nerfed to the point where they can only destroy LAVs. Thread #1: https://forums.dust51...
- by Baal Omniscient - at 2013.12.18 00:12:00
|
1554. LOLTank Brigade Wants Swarm Launchers Nerfed? Again?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: On an additional note, can anyone for the life of me please tell my why anyone should use AV over a MLT HAV? I'll give 1m ISK to the first one who can actually come up with a good reason. -HAND. I play AV instead of militia t...
- by Baal Omniscient - at 2013.12.17 23:30:00
|
1555. Let's Discuss Webifiers! - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Robot Devil wrote: Standard Web Same range and stats as a standard flux but creates a 5m bubble with a 10% drop in speed for 7s where ever it lands. Sleek Web Same range and stats as a sleek but creates a 3m bubble with a 10% drop in speed...
- by Baal Omniscient - at 2013.12.17 13:39:00
|
1556. Let's Discuss Webifiers! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ranger SnakeBlood wrote: Baal Omniscient wrote: Ranger SnakeBlood wrote: Sounds good but a little situation like very situational, what if it has a 50 to 60% speed reduction even on DS i dont think this would make em drop out of the air a...
- by Baal Omniscient - at 2013.12.17 11:07:00
|
1557. Let's Discuss Webifiers! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ranger SnakeBlood wrote: Sounds good but a little situation like very situational, what if it has a 50 to 60% speed reduction even on DS i dont think this would make em drop out of the air as the trusters would still be effective but the maneuv...
- by Baal Omniscient - at 2013.12.17 02:09:00
|
1558. Let's Discuss Webifiers! - in General Discussions [original thread]
We'll get to webifiers in JUST a moment, let me preface with this: First, I feel that the many people wanting webifier grenades aren't thinking this through properly. I also don't think they have run into some of our professional DS pilots yet...
- by Baal Omniscient - at 2013.12.17 00:59:00
|
1559. An Evening of 1.7 reflections and FW - in General Discussions [original thread]
CEOPyrex CloneA wrote: GG CCP all round If you disagree, you were likely an elitist protostomper whose special tactic or trick no longer works and no amount of whining will bring it back, adapt or leave the game, thanks. Luv CEO No, I'm a M...
- by Baal Omniscient - at 2013.12.15 01:44:00
|
1560. remotes are the new AV crutch - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Atiim wrote: LMAO Really Dude? What's next? You gonna complain about Proximity Explosives? You obviously didn't read. Remotes don't need to be manually detonated to destroy tanks now. You obviously don't consider that ...
- by Baal Omniscient - at 2013.12.15 00:54:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |