| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
1481. to AVers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thorn Badblood wrote: It takes 1 guy to kill a tank, want proof? Here you go... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3xsMqHu56g What do you think the price difference is between the weapon and the tank? The M136 AT4 is the Army's primary light ...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 11:17:00
|
1482. NIce work CCP with the sneaky Sniping nerf! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maken Tosch wrote: Godin forbid you have to actually get closer to the action as a sniper. As someone who likes the change (woo, no rooftop forge guns!) I have to point out Snipers are supposed to be away from the action. That's kind of th...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 11:11:00
|
1483. to AVers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zero Harpuia wrote: Shokhann Echo wrote: Jastad wrote: The cost is not the problem, the problem is the balance. 2/3 guy needed to take down 1 guys with a Tank is not good. its a ******* vehicle dumbass, in the future too... infantr...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 11:09:00
|
1484. Tanks are OP dont listen to tanks post threads ' Tanks are not OP' - in General Discussions [original thread]
Text Grant wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: Text Grant wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: Limit the amount of HAVs that can be deployed. Bam, balance. Tanks should take more than one infantry to destroy. Its a freaking TANK. But limit them t...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 10:12:00
|
1485. to AVers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: Shokhann Echo wrote: Jastad wrote: The cost is not the problem, the problem is the balance. 2/3 guy needed to take down 1 guys with a Tank is not good. its a ******* vehicle dumbass, in the future too... inf...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 10:05:00
|
1486. Tanks are OP dont listen to tanks post threads ' Tanks are not OP' - in General Discussions [original thread]
Text Grant wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: Limit the amount of HAVs that can be deployed. Bam, balance. Tanks should take more than one infantry to destroy. Its a freaking TANK. But limit them to one oer side, and suddenly, AV can easily coor...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 08:50:00
|
1487. Tanks are OP dont listen to tanks post threads ' Tanks are not OP' - in General Discussions [original thread]
darkiller240 wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: Limit the amount of HAVs that can be deployed. Bam, balance. Tanks should take more than one infantry to destroy. Its a freaking TANK. But limit them to one oer side, and suddenly, AV can easily co...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 08:42:00
|
1488. Tanks are OP dont listen to tanks post threads ' Tanks are not OP' - in General Discussions [original thread]
Limit the amount of HAVs that can be deployed. Bam, balance. Tanks should take more than one infantry to destroy. Its a freaking TANK. But limit them to one oer side, and suddenly, AV can easily coordinate to kill that tank, because they aren't be...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 08:39:00
|
1489. to AVers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shokhann Echo wrote: Jastad wrote: The cost is not the problem, the problem is the balance. 2/3 guy needed to take down 1 guys with a Tank is not good. its a ******* vehicle dumbass, in the future too... infantry cannot be god, you ca...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 08:36:00
|
1490. to AVers - in General Discussions [original thread]
To clarify, I was directing this only at the AV players who dismissed tankers objection about price differences and are now using the same excuse to complain about the new update. I know not all AV did it, but I couldn't miss adding insult to inju...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 08:30:00
|
1491. To stop tank spam (as a tanker/dropship pilot) - in General Discussions [original thread]
TheBLAZZED wrote: the number of vehicles on the field should be specific to the vehicle types. Ie:"Team HAV quota has been reached" "team dropship quota has been reached"ect... Exactly what I was thinking.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 08:24:00
|
1492. To stop tank spam (as a tanker/dropship pilot) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Make a limit to the number of HAVs that can be deployed. Tanks get their powerful tanks that are a force multiplier (ie: take multiple players to kill) and AV doesn't have 4 tanks gangbanging them before they can get a swarm off. Everybody wins...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 06:43:00
|
1493. to AVers - in General Discussions [original thread]
A simple question. I've heard the argument that a sica costs 57k isk and your proto suit costs 200k+, which isn't fair. Didn't tankers say the same thing when tanks were upwards of a million isk, and yall said that wasn't a valid excuse? Be hone...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 06:35:00
|
1494. Now that i'm getting used to 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
BobThe 844-1 CakeMan wrote: even against a blaster or missile in close quarters a rail still wins. Rails are AV. They should win against blasters and missiles when it comes to AV. I'm even inclined to say that blasters should do reduced damag...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 06:18:00
|
1495. A question for tankers (No QQ) - in General Discussions [original thread]
3 at most. with my hardeners up, 4. Buff RE damage to allow this. IT's not like any suit can survive the blast anyway. What's the difference of being instakilled by 1500 or 2000 damage.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.13 05:05:00
|
1496. AV'ers and infantry men. Rally behind me against VEHICLES.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Apparently LAVs and Drop ships aren't vehicles.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.13 00:14:00
|
1497. DUST 514 is unbalancable. - in General Discussions [original thread]
How about keep tanks where they are now, and limit the amount that can be deployed at a time? perhaps 2 per side. This hurts them in pub matches, but would balance out more in PC and FW once team deploy is a thing.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.12 23:56:00
|
1498. The Assault Combat Rifle................. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Beren Hurin wrote: Or change the bonus to the minmatar assault suit to give it a bonus to the projectile weapon clip size. So that all racial assault suits effectively bonus their main weapon. You'd have to somehow do caldari then too. 5% red...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.12 23:48:00
|
1499. Tanks are meant to wreck you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
crazy space 1 wrote: They cost less than my dropsuit... Which tank is cheaper than which of your dropsuits? If you're going to use this argument, then you must compare equal tiers. IF you're talking militia tanks, you must compare it to mil...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.12 23:46:00
|
1500. So who was it that was saying tanks were getting nerfed? - in General Discussions [original thread]
The issue with AV is not the damage it deals, but the application of it. Tanks can zip away before they can apply their dps. I will best ISK that if I sit there, a proto swarm could pop me. I simply do not allow them the chance. Therefore, I shoul...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.12 01:04:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |