Title says uprising 2... We skipping 1.2-1.9?

For the most part, we want to focus on getting things like aiming and movement right and fun before we turn back to filling out these roles. Getting those nailed down has been one of the major pieces of feedback we've heard from players and reviews of the game following the Uprising deployment.

For the most part, we want to focus on getting things like aiming and movement right and fun before we turn back to filling out these roles. Getting those nailed down has been one of the major pieces of feedback we've heard from players and reviews of the game following the Uprising deployment.

AV grenades need a vehicle seeking flux version thst also disrupts their drive for a short time. LLAV problem solved.

Well, we already know about the armor plates, and given the values we pulled from the video, we know that they will be more beneficial to shield tankers than armor tankers.

Adding yet another module for shields, which from the sounds of it would be a resistance mod is crazy. It absolutely kills diversity in the game.

YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
thank you very much for this. shiny new apples are great but if the core is rotten you notice after the first bite. dont get me wrong not trying to say the core is quite rotten right now but definitely it needs some help.

i have been playing dust since about 2 weeks after the closed beta started so its been quite a while (and i have spent quite a lot of real money in that time). dust has been the ONLY game i have played since joining the closed beta until the last couple weeks where i have gone back to bf3. i love dust but it has recently gotten very hard to be as dedicated and excited about the game due to the work needed on the "core" as well as the decisions made that caused PC to only be for large dust/eve corps.

with this focus on getting the "core" shooter mechanics right i am hoping i will want to log in every day like i used to.

This is absolutely, utterly, completely ridiculous. Did any of you devs read Arkenai's 7000 word (WALL OF TEXT :P) analysis of why the new armor modules were insufficient? ( https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=87752 )

THEN YOU ADD A NEW SHIELD TANKING MODULE?!


REALLY CCP?

CCP Rise and company are doing such an excellent job with the ship rebalancing, why can't you even get basic armor vs shields rebalancing right in dust - when you had all the forewarning in New Eden of the issues with poorly balancing tanking from EVE. We have players recommending excellent fixes, and we get hlf measures that make things worse in the long run!

This is extremely vague.

Can you shed any more light on the Commando?

Well, we already know about the armor plates, and given the values we pulled from the video, we know that they will be more beneficial to shield tankers than armor tankers.

Adding yet another module for shields, which from the sounds of it would be a resistance mod is crazy. It absolutely kills diversity in the game.

It will essentially turn the Gallente suit into a non factor, and make the Amarr suit only viable to tote around a scrambler rifle.

Everyone else should spec Caldari, to enjoy the massive bias towards shields. Doing anything else is just giving yourself a disadvantage.

If CCP intends to have diversity, something major needs to be done to change this trend. Either that or just give everyone a respec, remove all the suits except shield tankers and let people get in on the fun.

Oh good, I'm glad to hear that you guys are mixing things up again! I was starting to get worried that this game was just going to die as-is!

I'm honestly breathing a sign of relief right now, and I bet many others are as well.

Rumor has it DS3 is really good once one knows how to use it, I never figured that out but felt I was semi-pro with the KBM before the aiming went weird on me lol Guess I'll have to train some more

Will the new weapon ranges be available in-game and hopefully as a data dump?