Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
DS 10
G I A N T EoN.
298
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 13:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYzQGwMnzEM&feature=youtu.be
Sorry in advance for the language. I've been doing NyQuil shots with beer chasers for the past two days. I was kinda out of my mind.
In this video I discuss why AWOXing is not effective for the long haul and is a technique with an overall negative outcome. And sorry to Jenza...
Any input from you guys? |
Cappy Gorram
BetaMax Beta CRONOS.
11
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 13:55:00 -
[2] - Quote
I can't stay mad at you. |
DS 10
G I A N T EoN.
298
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 14:04:00 -
[3] - Quote
Cappy Gorram wrote:I can't stay mad at you.
I didn't know you were mad at me. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
442
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 14:12:00 -
[4] - Quote
you weren't drunk w/e enough in the video and not enough cursing. |
DS 10
G I A N T EoN.
301
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 14:38:00 -
[5] - Quote
ladwar wrote:you weren't drunk w/e enough in the video and not enough cursing.
I wasn't drunk as much as I was just super groggy from the NyQuil. At least I think that's how I was. I don't know. I had about half a bottle of NyQuil and a 12-pack. |
Fingal Senga
Codpiece Conundrum
30
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 14:48:00 -
[6] - Quote
DS 10 wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYzQGwMnzEM&feature=youtu.be
Sorry in advance for the language. I've been doing NyQuil shots with beer chasers for the past two days. I was kinda out of my mind.
In this video I discuss why AWOXing is not effective for the long haul and is a technique with an overall negative outcome. And sorry to Jenza...
Any input from you guys?
Great vid as always man, hope you feel better soon. |
Eltra Ardell
Goonfeet
100
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 15:02:00 -
[7] - Quote
I find it amusing that you are behaving exactly like the FPSers I describe in my news article.
http://themittani.com/news/dust-514-eve-culture-shock-and-grief-university
Quote:It's this kind of metagaming that FPS games lack. When someone sneaks into a clan and spies or wreaks havoc, they tend to be promptly booted, shamed, called all sorts of names, and potentially disqualified from whatever event they were involved in. Basically, it's a big no-no. In EVE, you get the opposite reaction. It's a fact of life and tends to provide capsuleers with entertainment. Whatever the carebears in space might claim, such behavior is not only expected, it's sanctioned by CCP.
You are experiencing culture shock. Welcome to New Eden. |
DS 10
G I A N T EoN.
303
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 15:09:00 -
[8] - Quote
Eltra Ardell wrote:I find it amusing that you are behaving exactly like the FPSers I describe in my news article. http://themittani.com/news/dust-514-eve-culture-shock-and-grief-universityQuote:It's this kind of metagaming that FPS games lack. When someone sneaks into a clan and spies or wreaks havoc, they tend to be promptly booted, shamed, called all sorts of names, and potentially disqualified from whatever event they were involved in. Basically, it's a big no-no. In EVE, you get the opposite reaction. It's a fact of life and tends to provide capsuleers with entertainment. Whatever the carebears in space might claim, such behavior is not only expected, it's sanctioned by CCP. You are experiencing culture shock. Welcome to New Eden.
I think you totally missed the point I was making. Although I disagree with AWOXing, I know it's a mechanic in the game. Not a big deal. My point was that there are better ways to utilize infiltration than doing a one-time tactic that makes your corp look bad.
And alienating "FPSers" probably isn't a smart way to go. Sure, the diehard EVE guys will like you, but Dust isn't EVE. Dust is a console FPS, so a majority of the players are going to be, wait for it, FPSers. Regardless of how you feel, for a console FPS to do well and compete with other AAA titles, they have to appeal to FPSers. CCP knows this. They want the game to grow, and the best way to have Dust grow is by appealing to regular FPSers. |
RedRebelCork
Ahrendee Mercenaries
72
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 15:11:00 -
[9] - Quote
I don't buy this 'culture shock' argument. CCP failed to foresee an obvious exploit in the corporate battle game mechanics.
There's no parallel in the EVE universe for the result that I know of. The spying and manipulation that is part of EVE is intriguing and exciting to read about. It's what made me try EVE in the first place. I strongly doubt anyone reading about this broken game mechanic is going to enticed into playing Dust514.
If the tables were reversed somehow and EVE players were experiencing a new game mechanic where any member of their corporation no matter how lowly could lock down or vanish 1/4 of their fleet at any critical engagement without any effort required I reckon the players of EVE would have some culture shock of their own. |
Maximus Stryker
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
468
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 15:13:00 -
[10] - Quote
DS 10 wrote:ladwar wrote:you weren't drunk w/e enough in the video and not enough cursing. I wasn't drunk as much as I was just super groggy from the NyQuil. At least I think that's how I was. I don't know. I had about half a bottle of NyQuil and a 12-pack. People do this for enjoyment/fun? |
|
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
443
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 15:17:00 -
[11] - Quote
Maximus Stryker wrote:DS 10 wrote:ladwar wrote:you weren't drunk w/e enough in the video and not enough cursing. I wasn't drunk as much as I was just super groggy from the NyQuil. At least I think that's how I was. I don't know. I had about half a bottle of NyQuil and a 12-pack. People do this for enjoyment/fun? well normally they mix the Dayquil and Nyquil but hey a 12-pack Is always good to add. |
Abu Stij
Goonfeet
56
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 15:19:00 -
[12] - Quote
So AWOXing makes you look weak?
I'm a little confused, by that since its not on the AWOXer or the corp who initiated the AWOX at all who ends up looking weak. There are corps who have better regulations and prerequisites to join their ranks than those who have been AWOXed. The act of AWOXing is exploiting someone else's inability to adequately protect their assets and organization, which is actual weakness.
You might be trying to imply that if you AWOX or your group supports AWOXing, you're "weak" (as the kids say) and aren't good at the game at all, but then again as many people have pointed out this is being played out in the metagame and caring about your KDR or leaderboard status matter not in that respect. The metagame is all about playing the people, not the game, into doing what you want and acting in a way you want them to start acting like. In this case its making people point fingers and try to disgrace others. In other cases there is the metagame goal of making people thing you're bring X items to the field of battle, and ultimately when you both engage they realize they're poorly underprepared as you brough Y items. You can also say that manipulating the market is part of the metagame and is a completely different.
You're just expressing an immense ignorance to the matter and putting up in the guise of "well if you AWOX you're just bad at the game." when, in actuality, CCP has a long history of making games where having a metagame is far more important than winning a handful of battles. Look at the HBC, it got taken down due to political turmoil caused by ProGodLegend (of N3 & Nulli Secunda) insulting Sort Dragons girlfriend. That act caused Sort to go on a fit and threaten TEST, who then promptly left the HBC and took the largest alliance in that Coalition with them, making the Sort Dragon/HBC vs PGL/N3 war be over with without a single shot fired. That's the sort of game CCP makes, if you're not capable of comprehending, or willing to partake in it, you may want to play a different game since this sort of thing will continue to grow and more than just simple AWOXing will take place. |
DS 10
G I A N T EoN.
303
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 15:20:00 -
[13] - Quote
Maximus Stryker wrote:DS 10 wrote:ladwar wrote:you weren't drunk w/e enough in the video and not enough cursing. I wasn't drunk as much as I was just super groggy from the NyQuil. At least I think that's how I was. I don't know. I had about half a bottle of NyQuil and a 12-pack. People do this for enjoyment/fun?
No. I'm legitimately sick. Lol. I ran out of NyQuil so I drank so I could sleep through the night. |
Abu Stij
Goonfeet
56
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 15:25:00 -
[14] - Quote
RedRebelCork wrote:I don't buy this 'culture shock' argument. CCP failed to foresee an obvious exploit in the corporate battle game mechanics.
There's no parallel in the EVE universe for the result that I know of. The spying and manipulation that is part of EVE is intriguing and exciting to read about. It's what made me try EVE in the first place. I strongly doubt anyone reading about this broken game mechanic is going to enticed into playing Dust514.
If the tables were reversed somehow and EVE players were experiencing a new game mechanic where any member of their corporation no matter how lowly could lock down or vanish 1/4 of their fleet at any critical engagement without any effort required I reckon the players of EVE would have some culture shock of their own.
That's actually what AWOXing is like in EVE. In EVE you have, technically, two sorts of AWOXing.
1) Jihadi AWOXing is where you simply just start shooting random people in your fleet because you are, in fact, not friendly to them whatsoever.
2) The other is being in a phobos/hic (certain ship type) and tackling (locking down) an expensive blue ship while also cynoing (warping in to a specific point, not a stargate) in your buddies super carrier (big ship) to haze the victim or hold him for ransom, sometimes still resulting in their death.
|
DS 10
G I A N T EoN.
303
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 15:26:00 -
[15] - Quote
Abu Stij wrote:So AWOXing makes you look weak?
I'm a little confused, by that since its not on the AWOXer or the corp who initiated the AWOX at all who ends up looking weak. There are corps who have better regulations and prerequisites to join their ranks than those who have been AWOXed. The act of AWOXing is exploiting someone else's inability to adequately protect their assets and organization, which is actual weakness.
You might be trying to imply that if you AWOX or your group supports AWOXing, you're "weak" (as the kids say) and aren't good at the game at all, but then again as many people have pointed out this is being played out in the metagame and caring about your KDR or leaderboard status matter not in that respect. The metagame is all about playing the people, not the game, into doing what you want and acting in a way you want them to start acting like. In this case its making people point fingers and try to disgrace others. In other cases there is the metagame goal of making people thing you're bring X items to the field of battle, and ultimately when you both engage they realize they're poorly underprepared as you brough Y items. You can also say that manipulating the market is part of the metagame and is a completely different.
You're just expressing an immense ignorance to the matter and putting up in the guise of "well if you AWOX you're just bad at the game." when, in actuality, CCP has a long history of making games where having a metagame is far more important than winning a handful of battles. Look at the HBC, it got taken down due to political turmoil caused by ProGodLegend (of N3 & Nulli Secunda) insulting Sort Dragons girlfriend. That act caused Sort to go on a fit and threaten TEST, who then promptly left the HBC and took the largest alliance in that Coalition with them, making the Sort Dragon/HBC vs PGL/N3 war be over with without a single shot fired. That's the sort of game CCP makes, if you're not capable of comprehending, or willing to partake in it, you may want to play a different game since this sort of thing will continue to grow and more than just simple AWOXing will take place.
Good Lord.
AWOXing does make your corp look weak. You're doing it to gain a severe advantage that can't be countered. That's what makes you look weak. Forget all the meta game BS for one second. Showing the necessity to have an unfair advantage makes it look like you can't win a fight straight up.
|
General John Ripper
187. Unclaimed.
276
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 15:26:00 -
[16] - Quote
" Its about as trendy as Jenza's pants in fanfest" LOL |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
470
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 15:26:00 -
[17] - Quote
RedRebelCork wrote:I don't buy this 'culture shock' argument. CCP failed to foresee an obvious exploit in the corporate battle game mechanics.
There's no parallel in the EVE universe for the result that I know of. The spying and manipulation that is part of EVE is intriguing and exciting to read about. It's what made me try EVE in the first place. I strongly doubt anyone reading about this broken game mechanic is going to enticed into playing Dust514.
If the tables were reversed somehow and EVE players were experiencing a new game mechanic where any member of their corporation no matter how lowly could lock down or vanish 1/4 of their fleet at any critical engagement without any effort required I reckon the players of EVE would have some culture shock of their own.
Clearly you haven't played Eve much then. I believe that there is effort required, and corp members in Eve can do significant damage to a corp depending on their roles.
Truthfully, you need to manage your corp members better, Just like Eve |
The Robot Devil
BetaMax. CRONOS.
268
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 15:29:00 -
[18] - Quote
Abu Stij wrote:So AWOXing makes you look weak?
I'm a little confused, by that since its not on the AWOXer or the corp who initiated the AWOX at all who ends up looking weak. There are corps who have better regulations and prerequisites to join their ranks than those who have been AWOXed. The act of AWOXing is exploiting someone else's inability to adequately protect their assets and organization, which is actual weakness.
You might be trying to imply that if you AWOX or your group supports AWOXing, you're "weak" (as the kids say) and aren't good at the game at all, but then again as many people have pointed out this is being played out in the metagame and caring about your KDR or leaderboard status matter not in that respect. The metagame is all about playing the people, not the game, into doing what you want and acting in a way you want them to start acting like. In this case its making people point fingers and try to disgrace others. In other cases there is the metagame goal of making people thing you're bring X items to the field of battle, and ultimately when you both engage they realize they're poorly underprepared as you brough Y items. You can also say that manipulating the market is part of the metagame and is a completely different.
You're just expressing an immense ignorance to the matter and putting up in the guise of "well if you AWOX you're just bad at the game." when, in actuality, CCP has a long history of making games where having a metagame is far more important than winning a handful of battles. Look at the HBC, it got taken down due to political turmoil caused by ProGodLegend (of N3 & Nulli Secunda) insulting Sort Dragons girlfriend. That act caused Sort to go on a fit and threaten TEST, who then promptly left the HBC and took the largest alliance in that Coalition with them, making the Sort Dragon/HBC vs PGL/N3 war be over with without a single shot fired. That's the sort of game CCP makes, if you're not capable of comprehending, or willing to partake in it, you may want to play a different game since this sort of thing will continue to grow and more than just simple AWOXing will take place.
Amen. |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
728
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 15:30:00 -
[19] - Quote
DS 10 wrote:I think you totally missed the point I was making. Although I disagree with AWOXing, I know it's a mechanic in the game. Not a big deal. My point was that there are better ways to utilize infiltration than doing a one-time tactic that makes your corp look bad.
If you think they 'look bad' and the one-time tactic (per alt, soon forgotten / overlooked by the next corp they sneak into) then you don't understand the kind of game EVE is, and DUST will become.
Some of the biggest alliances in EVE now are those who never subscribed to the e-honor thing and decided they'd be bad. A few years later BOB fell and now we're left with only bad alliances. Be on the losing side if you want.
DS 10 wrote:And alienating "FPSers" probably isn't a smart way to go. Sure, the diehard EVE guys will like you, but Dust isn't EVE. Dust is a console FPS, so a majority of the players are going to be, wait for it, FPSers. Regardless of how you feel, for a console FPS to do well and compete with other AAA titles, they have to appeal to FPSers. CCP knows this. They want the game to grow, and the best way to have Dust grow is by appealing to regular FPSers. And CCP can also get another Jita Riot moment if they try to go soft. EVE players, and those that are now playing both, will not be happy to see My Little Merc Online connected to our universe.
Secondly, the cultural victory over e-honor was built on results. As in, winning. Enough FPS'ers will soon lose their virginity and a slow, if unstoppable, migration will happen.
You're going to stand alone with the e-honor banner.
derp |
Zekain K
Expert Intervention Caldari State
14
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 15:32:00 -
[20] - Quote
All's fair in love and war.
|
|
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
473
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 15:33:00 -
[21] - Quote
DS 10 wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYzQGwMnzEM&feature=youtu.be
Sorry in advance for the language. I've been doing NyQuil shots with beer chasers for the past two days. I was kinda out of my mind.
In this video I discuss why AWOXing is not effective for the long haul and is a technique with an overall negative outcome. And sorry to Jenza...
Any input from you guys?
CCP isn't going to hold your hand through this game. If you don't screen your members well enough to know who's friend or foe. Lol. I'm sorry, I didn't mean to laugh at you.
CCP isn't going to fix an issue that can be managed by corporations being more vigilant and interacting more with their members. |
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
588
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 15:35:00 -
[22] - Quote
DS 10 wrote:Good Lord.
AWOXing does make your corp look weak. You're doing it to gain a severe advantage that can't be countered. That's what makes you look weak. Forget all the meta game BS for one second. Showing the necessity to have an unfair advantage makes it look like you can't win a fight straight up.
So taking advantage of a weakness to gain an unassailable advantage is actually weak?
I'd beg to differ. In a game where any advantage can mean life or death, victory or defeat, you'll take anything you can. If your corp is stupid enough to recruit someone without vetting them, then you, frankly, deserve to be AWOXed. There are a huge number of ways to vet someone, and your corp's naivete led to it being AWOXed. CRONOS simply took advantage of that stupidity.
Besides. You're trying to enforce the "video game honor" rule. In New Eden, honor quickly goes down the drain when you're facing enormous pressures to bring you down. |
Cappy Gorram
BetaMax Beta CRONOS.
11
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 15:36:00 -
[23] - Quote
DS 10 wrote:Cappy Gorram wrote:I can't stay mad at you. I didn't know you were mad at me.
You spoke ill of the pants |
Abu Stij
Goonfeet
59
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 15:42:00 -
[24] - Quote
DS 10 wrote:
Good Lord.
AWOXing does make your corp look weak. You're doing it to gain a severe advantage that can't be countered. That's what makes you look weak. Forget all the meta game BS for one second. Showing the necessity to have an unfair advantage makes it look like you can't win a fight straight up.
This is what many people would refer to as "E-Bushido" or "E-Honor", this game and universe isn't about winning in a head on head fair fight. CCP has routinely shown that they are far more interested in making it so that players have the tools to take advantage of their enemies regardless the weakness.
This isn't a bad thing whatsoever, plenty of real life armies do this to great success and has been a staple of various militaries for centuries.
You can't really ignore the metagame "bs" since as previously stated, its part of the world CCP has made in New Eden. If you're afraid to deal with a game that has a metagame on top of its basic gameplay, please go find something more simple.
When you use a tactic the other team can't counter initially, it doesn't mean the attacking team is "weak" it means they've used a new strategy that has enhanced the "game" and made things more challenging for everyone. Go read Ender's Game and you'll see the more you change and adapt how you attack your enemy, the less and less your enemy can defend themselves. This is why you have things like espionage both in games like EVE and in the real world. The more you add to how you approach the battle you get more people following those tactics, whether consciously or subsconsciously, for their own uses and the game actually grows and takes a life of its own. Having a vanilla "we only face each other head on" gets dull and repetitive and isn't at all what DUST was intended to be like.
If you're of the opinion espionage and AWOXing is cheating to win, then you'll be in for a rude awakening later down the line as EVE & DUST are integrated more and more. This would include market manipulation, and more. It's not cheating to win, when you're literally given the tools and you're the first to figure it out, if that were the case the USA wouldn't have won the American Revolution because they didn't face the British Empire in open combat. |
Rupture Reaperson
Deadly Blue Dots RISE of LEGION
150
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 15:53:00 -
[25] - Quote
You had been already branded as a fanboy in the past, therefore ALL your arguments are invalid.
Ontopic: its quite simple, if used a tool, the shrewed tactic is legal (you will look like an *******, but still) however, relying ONLY on shrewed tactics, and specially on a FPS it shows that you have no faith in your performance therefore you need said adventage as a "crutch", and that makes you look weak, besides being despised.
As for the goon walls'otext all I can say its.... sure you can always try to get the adventage and follow the "new eden creed" but as some EVE pilots say "you will have to deal with the consequences of your acts" and in this case would be painting a huge target on your backs and be looked down by a lot of people, and if you rely solely on that strategy, also being called a *****. |
DS 10
G I A N T EoN.
303
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 15:55:00 -
[26] - Quote
So apparently I've rustled some jimmies.
Let me make myself clear. I may not LIKE AWOXers, but I understand it is a mechanic in the game. Therefore, I don't think it's cheating. It is highly effective for the one match, but then it's over. I merely think there are better infiltration strategies out there
Spies/AWOXing are in the game, and I'm perfectly fine with that. I DO NOT CONSIDER IT CHEATING. If you choose to go that route, that's cool with me. As I said before, it's just one game
Maybe there should be some kind of reading comprehension course you have to take before posting in the forums. |
Hobo on Fire
Goonfeet
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 16:18:00 -
[27] - Quote
Rupture Reaperson wrote: ...relying ONLY on shrewed tactics, and specially on a FPS it shows that you have no faith in your performance therefore you need said adventage as a "crutch", and that makes you look weak, besides being despised.
Real life wars can be waged (and even won) solely using these kinds of tactics. Lets take the Taliban as an example: In 2001 they control the country of Afghanistan. The US military invades, and they go into hiding. They understand that facing the American military head on is suicidal, so instead they infiltrate the new US backed Afghan government and military.
Some kid wants to join the Taliban? He enlists in the Afghan National Army where American troops not only train him how to fight, but pay him for it. When his training is complete he has three options: A) Go AWOL and join the Taliban fighters off in the mountains B) Find some Americans with their backs turned and shoot (knowing he will probably be caught/killed himself) C) Wait for the US military to finally leave the country so he can help overthrow the US backed government from the inside.
The Taliban has lasted more than a decade against the most powerful military in the world, and that military is currently withdrawing from Afghanistan. If they can overthrow the current government, they'll have won the war despite never winning a conventional battle. I would hardly call that "weak." |
Charizard Zakalwe
Goonfeet
45
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 16:23:00 -
[28] - Quote
You guys do understand that "Metagame" is what sets DUST 514 apart from other FPSes, right? The idea that a single game has consequences between YOU WON or YOU LOST, and that there is more to the game than shooting mans, driving jeeps, and blowing stuff up. The concept of the "Metagame" is the only thing that really keeps Dust 514 from turning into Battlefield 2142 2, what keeps it interesting. If you don't like this idea that there is more to the game than the ability to shoot mans, maybe you should play something else, something simpler like Battlefield or Call of Duty. Then again, if you're bothered by things other people can do, maybe you're better off with playing Bejeweled.
Personally, I eagerly look forward to when this game expands it's scope of PC beyond Molden Heath, so PC can happen in places where things actually matter, ie, nullsec, and there will be much more competition and spying and other fun stuff. |
Abu Stij
Goonfeet
61
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 16:24:00 -
[29] - Quote
You can also refer to the Mujahideen in the 1970s (precursor to the Taliban) that did the exact same thing against the Soviet Union. |
Rupture Reaperson
Deadly Blue Dots RISE of LEGION
150
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 16:28:00 -
[30] - Quote
Hobo on Fire wrote:Rupture Reaperson wrote: ...relying ONLY on shrewed tactics, and specially on a FPS it shows that you have no faith in your performance therefore you need said adventage as a "crutch", and that makes you look weak, besides being despised.
Real life wars can be waged (and even won) solely using these kinds of tactics. Lets take the Taliban as an example: In 2001 they control the country of Afghanistan. The US military invades, and they go into hiding. They understand that facing the American military head on is suicidal, so instead they infiltrate the new US backed Afghan government and military. Some kid wants to join the Taliban? He enlists in the Afghan National Army where American troops not only train him how to fight, but pay him for it. When his training is complete he has three options: A) Go AWOL and join the Taliban fighters off in the mountains B) Find some Americans with their backs turned and shoot (knowing he will probably be caught/killed himself) C) Wait for the US military to finally leave the country so he can help overthrow the US backed government from the inside. The Taliban has lasted more than a decade against the most powerful military in the world, and that military is currently withdrawing from Afghanistan. If they can overthrow the current government, they'll have won the war despite never winning a conventional battle. I would hardly call that "weak." Sure they can, however thad doesnt stop the backlashes and stigma they have all around the world, and from a military standpoint.. it is "weak", the reason of why the taliban are still where they are its more about the motivations behind the conflict, (US doing an occupation on a country with a shitton of oil, moved by greed) if the situation was different like "all the middle east country just declared war on the US and european countries" AKA a fully fledged war... I doubt of them standing an ioda of chance. |
|
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
589
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 16:40:00 -
[31] - Quote
Rupture Reaperson wrote: You had been already branded as a fanboy in the past, therefore ALL your arguments are invalid.
Oh look, an ad hominem, let's give this guy a medal for using impeccable logic.
I'm hardly a fanboy. I love CCP as a company, and I defend them, but I do see where CCP has gone wrong in the development of this game, and I do dislike the fact that many of the features which sell DUST 514 to me as a game currently aren't in yet.
Frankly, this attitude disgusts me. Just because I enjoy the game, I can't have a valid opinion on it? I'm also a Bethesda "fanboy", but I can also see a lot of faults and areas of improvement with their games.
Grow the **** up. |
DS 10
G I A N T EoN.
303
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 16:42:00 -
[32] - Quote
Charizard Zakalwe wrote:You guys do understand that "Metagame" is what sets DUST 514 apart from other FPSes, right? The idea that a single game has consequences between YOU WON or YOU LOST, and that there is more to the game than shooting mans, driving jeeps, and blowing stuff up. The concept of the "Metagame" is the only thing that really keeps Dust 514 from turning into Battlefield 2142 2, what keeps it interesting. If you don't like this idea that there is more to the game than the ability to shoot mans, maybe you should play something else, something simpler like Battlefield or Call of Duty. Then again, if you're bothered by things other people can do, maybe you're better off with playing Bejeweled.
Personally, I eagerly look forward to when this game expands it's scope of PC beyond Molden Heath, so PC can happen in places where things actually matter, ie, nullsec, and there will be much more competition and spying and other fun stuff.
I'm all for spies and messing with the enemy. I like that there is more to the game than actual gameplay. It adds a different level of immersion. I don't mind AWOXing either. It's at the same level as AFKing for me. At the end of the day, it's just a game. People will do what they want. That's totally fine with me. But just because "it's all about the meta game", it doesn't mean it's not something that should be tweaked moving forward. |
Daedric Lothar
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
417
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 16:47:00 -
[33] - Quote
I was gonna troll this thread with "Pandas Everywhere!"
But.... you guys all seem to know the deal on Awoxing lol |
Hobo on Fire
Goonfeet
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 16:57:00 -
[34] - Quote
Rupture Reaperson wrote: Sure they can, however thad doesnt stop the backlashes and stigma they have all around the world, and from a military standpoint.. it is "weak", the reason of why the taliban are still where they are its more about the motivations behind the conflict, (US doing an occupation on a country with a shitton of oil, moved by greed) if the situation was different like "all the middle east country just declared war on the US and european countries" AKA a fully fledged war... I doubt of them standing an ioda of chance.
You're missing the point. They figured out how to win a war without actively fighting a war. They may have a stigma attached to them, but at the end of the day, a win is a win. The Taliban's motivation was seeing US troops in their country, so they set the goal to get the Americans the hell out; they have very nearly accomplished this. They never set the goal of a full fledged war against the US/Europe, because they are smart enough to realize it's beyond their means. They have no reason to leave their homes and waste a bunch of money to fight in another country.
As for the US motivations, Afghanistan doesn't really have oil. The Taliban were harboring Bin Laden after 9/11. You're thinking of Iraq, who "honorably" tried to fight the US Military head on and got stomped. They adopted the guerrilla tactics after the fact, since they saw it was working for the Taliban. |
Vickers S Grunt
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
92
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 17:32:00 -
[35] - Quote
I agree with the op
Its not cheating because ccp have given us the means to do it but its not a mechanic that will benefit our game .
Its just far to easy .
In eve it is possible to cause MUCH more damage to a corp then the loss of one small battle but the amount of effort required is also much higher.
In eve a some one high up in the corp has to make a decision on who gets roles that can cause damage to the corp . Only the fleet commanders can gang warp the fleet in to trouble .Any one can be kicked from the fleet at any time . In low sec or 0.0 no single low level fleet member can cause this kind of disruption they would be instantly killed buy the rest of the fleet .
If we gave battle commanders in dust the ability to kick any team mates at any time this would still allow LOTS of opportunity for spies to sabotage games . If a spy managed to talk him self in to command of the team then he can wreak untold damage (just like in eve) but this requires effort . Do i really need to list the ways a clever hostile in team can sabotage without giving himself away ?
The corps most at risk from this are not the main players most of which ether have strict recruitment polices or feeder cops(or they do now! ). The most at risk are the small and new corps who due to a lack of fame and fortune need to be much less selective of who they recruit .
Lets not forget that we are playing a free game with the ability to create endless free alts and spread them amongst anyone who may in the future possibly...maby...become a enemy .
lastly where as i might not agree with all the tactics my alliance utilizes and i do agree that this has lessened us in the eyes of the community i will say that CRONOS are a VERY talented group of players with the organization, dedication and raw talent to become the dominant force in dust for quite a few years to come . To dismiss us as sub par after a few questionable tactics would be very foolish of anyone.
|
Charizard Zakalwe
Goonfeet
45
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 17:41:00 -
[36] - Quote
DS 10 wrote:Charizard Zakalwe wrote:You guys do understand that "Metagame" is what sets DUST 514 apart from other FPSes, right? The idea that a single game has consequences between YOU WON or YOU LOST, and that there is more to the game than shooting mans, driving jeeps, and blowing stuff up. The concept of the "Metagame" is the only thing that really keeps Dust 514 from turning into Battlefield 2142 2, what keeps it interesting. If you don't like this idea that there is more to the game than the ability to shoot mans, maybe you should play something else, something simpler like Battlefield or Call of Duty. Then again, if you're bothered by things other people can do, maybe you're better off with playing Bejeweled.
Personally, I eagerly look forward to when this game expands it's scope of PC beyond Molden Heath, so PC can happen in places where things actually matter, ie, nullsec, and there will be much more competition and spying and other fun stuff. I'm all for spies and messing with the enemy. I like that there is more to the game than actual gameplay. It adds a different level of immersion. I don't mind AWOXing either. It's at the same level as AFKing for me. At the end of the day, it's just a game. People will do what they want. That's totally fine with me. But just because "it's all about the meta game", it doesn't mean it's not something that should be tweaked moving forward.
AWOXing isn't broken, though. Any half decent corp run by intelligent people would've used holding corps, some basic research, and something resembling control to keep spies from messing up their action. Instead, they didn't, and thus suffered. Now, some corporate controls so that people can be assigned roles, allowing non-directorship hierarchy to be established in game is something that is needed, but not strictly because of AWOX'ing. This could have a variety of uses that go well beyond spies. What's needed for dealing with spies is for the API system to be brought to Dust 514, but that's certainly coming Soon^(tm).
Also, the military, in general, does not care about "weak" as much as they care about "effective" and "winning". It doens't matter if their methods of combat aren't honorable, what matters is if they'll win. This isn't the eighteenth goddamned century. The Taliban has stigma attached to them for being generally horrible people and doing horrible things, not for fighting a guerrilla war. No one is going "well that Taliban lot is okay, but what I can't get behind is how they didn't face the Americans in open combat", people don't like them because they're horrible people who have a rigid interpretation of their religion that is pretty much awful in regards to human rights and civil rights and that stuff. |
Rupture Reaperson
Deadly Blue Dots RISE of LEGION
150
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 17:52:00 -
[37] - Quote
Hobo on Fire wrote:Rupture Reaperson wrote: Sure they can, however thad doesnt stop the backlashes and stigma they have all around the world, and from a military standpoint.. it is "weak", the reason of why the taliban are still where they are its more about the motivations behind the conflict, (US doing an occupation on a country with a shitton of oil, moved by greed) if the situation was different like "all the middle east country just declared war on the US and european countries" AKA a fully fledged war... I doubt of them standing an ioda of chance.
You're missing the point. They figured out how to win a war without actively fighting a war. They may have a stigma attached to them, but at the end of the day, a win is a win. The Taliban's motivation was seeing US troops in their country, so they set the goal to get the Americans the hell out; they have very nearly accomplished this. They never set the goal of a full fledged war against the US/Europe, because they are smart enough to realize it's beyond their means. They have no reason to leave their homes and waste a bunch of money to fight in another country. As for the US motivations, Afghanistan doesn't really have oil. The Taliban were harboring Bin Laden after 9/11. You're thinking of Iraq, who "honorably" tried to fight the US Military head on and got stomped. They adopted the guerrilla tactics after the fact, since they saw it was working for the Taliban. My bad on Iraq, however that doesnt translate as well into Dust or any fps, why? because one of the pillars of any fps to date it that is a "seek and destroy" game, unlike the taliban vs US conflict, where they are civilians war treaties, litigation against war crimes... etc. Do you go on dust and say "Oh I wont fire that clone, he might have kids" or do you see any civilian running around... or do you get a court marshall by firing some plasma rounds at someone? Of course not! You "seek and destroy" targets, no remorse no questions asked (in the case of awoxers that includes them as targets)
I understand that the taliban are able to grind the US balls with few militar effort and evict them, but at the same time they are able to use tools that are non existant in the context of a fps: civilians, war treaties, UN regulations, all that jazz. When on a FPS you just shoot the enemy on the face and thats the end of it Therefore if your corp its not able to accomplish to "seek and destroy" on a FPS, and have to rely on underhanded metods (even with said methods STILL lose), you will be looked down as weak.
Would on a future a corp can beat another one without firing a round, possibly. But it will be defined by ACTUAL metagame, not cheap acessible expliots.
@Laiheon: Yes I just ruled any argument you made with and ad homenem, get used to it. Im not willing to even waste time on you. |
Z00KU 02
BetaMax Beta CRONOS.
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 17:53:00 -
[38] - Quote
Well Said
Welcome to New Eden
Abu Stij wrote:So AWOXing makes you look weak?
I'm a little confused, by that since its not on the AWOXer or the corp who initiated the AWOX at all who ends up looking weak. There are corps who have better regulations and prerequisites to join their ranks than those who have been AWOXed. The act of AWOXing is exploiting someone else's inability to adequately protect their assets and organization, which is actual weakness.
You might be trying to imply that if you AWOX or your group supports AWOXing, you're "weak" (as the kids say) and aren't good at the game at all, but then again as many people have pointed out this is being played out in the metagame and caring about your KDR or leaderboard status matter not in that respect. The metagame is all about playing the people, not the game, into doing what you want and acting in a way you want them to start acting like. In this case its making people point fingers and try to disgrace others. In other cases there is the metagame goal of making people thing you're bring X items to the field of battle, and ultimately when you both engage they realize they're poorly underprepared as you brough Y items. You can also say that manipulating the market is part of the metagame and is a completely different.
You're just expressing an immense ignorance to the matter and putting up in the guise of "well if you AWOX you're just bad at the game." when, in actuality, CCP has a long history of making games where having a metagame is far more important than winning a handful of battles. Look at the HBC, it got taken down due to political turmoil caused by ProGodLegend (of N3 & Nulli Secunda) insulting Sort Dragons girlfriend. That act caused Sort to go on a fit and threaten TEST, who then promptly left the HBC and took the largest alliance in that Coalition with them, making the Sort Dragon/HBC vs PGL/N3 war be over with without a single shot fired. That's the sort of game CCP makes, if you're not capable of comprehending, or willing to partake in it, you may want to play a different game since this sort of thing will continue to grow and more than just simple AWOXing will take place.
|
Charizard Zakalwe
Goonfeet
45
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 18:00:00 -
[39] - Quote
You are so astoundingly short sighted and narrow minded it boggles the mind.
The entire point of DUST 514 is that there is more to it than "shoot mans in space".
I understand some things can be difficult to handle or process. I had a lot of trouble learning how to integrate by parts, but I got past that and moved on. I didn't stay on the forums being a sad sack of tears whining about how everything isn't exactly the way I want it.
So please, sit down for a moment. Put down the controller, put down the mountain dew. Think about a game that is bigger, not just bigger, but wider, much wider, than just shooting mans. Because that is what is DUST 514 is to be.
If you can't handle that concept, you're welcome to go back and play Call of Duty or Battlefield to your hearts content.
You won't be missed.
There are plenty of other dumb pubbies with dumb opinions that can be milked for hilarity. |
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
590
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 18:09:00 -
[40] - Quote
Rupture Reaperson wrote: My bad on Iraq, however that doesnt translate as well into Dust or any fps, why? because one of the pillars of any fps to date it that is a "seek and destroy" game, unlike the taliban vs US conflict, where they are civilians war treaties, litigation against war crimes... etc. Do you go on dust and say "Oh I wont fire that clone, he might have kids" or do you see any civilian running around... or do you get a court marshall by firing some plasma rounds at someone? Of course not! You "seek and destroy" targets, no remorse no questions asked (in the case of awoxers that includes them as targets)
I understand that the taliban are able to grind the US balls with few militar effort and evict them, but at the same time they are able to use tools that are non existant in the context of a fps: civilians, war treaties, UN regulations, all that jazz. When on a FPS you just shoot the enemy on the face and thats the end of it Therefore if your corp its not able to accomplish to "seek and destroy" on a FPS, and have to rely on underhanded metods (even with said methods STILL lose), you will be looked down as weak.
Would on a future a corp can beat another one without firing a round, possibly. But it will be defined by ACTUAL metagame, not cheap acessible expliots.
@Laiheon: Yes I just ruled any argument you made with and ad homenem, get used to it. Im not willing to even waste time on you.
How narrow-minded and immature.
The problem with your argument is that DUST isn't meant to be a simple FPS. The best way it could be categorised is "war simulator" rather than "FPS". FPS implies that's all there is to do, shoot people. In DUST, however, you are able to choose your enemies. The only other game I've heard of being called a war simulator was actually Battlefield, and that doesn't particularly have as many features (war wise) as DUST does.
In DUST, we are able to avert war (or conclude it) through means other than shooting other mercs. For example, making peace, creating an alliance or a contract, dissolving the other corporation/alliance through subterfuge, etc. This is much more involved than any other FPS that you might be able to name, and involves diplomacy and subterfuge just as much as gun game. |
|
DS 10
G I A N T EoN.
303
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 18:22:00 -
[41] - Quote
Charizard Zakalwe wrote:You are so astoundingly short sighted and narrow minded it boggles the mind.
The entire point of DUST 514 is that there is more to it than "shoot mans in space".
I understand some things can be difficult to handle or process. I had a lot of trouble learning how to integrate by parts, but I got past that and moved on. I didn't stay on the forums being a sad sack of tears whining about how everything isn't exactly the way I want it.
So please, sit down for a moment. Put down the controller, put down the mountain dew. Think about a game that is bigger, not just bigger, but wider, much wider, than just shooting mans. Because that is what is DUST 514 is to be.
If you can't handle that concept, you're welcome to go back and play Call of Duty or Battlefield to your hearts content.
You won't be missed.
There are plenty of other dumb pubbies with dumb opinions that can be milked for hilarity.
I'm short sighted, yet in the video I suggest keeping your spies in the corporation for an extended amount of time to gather intel and do other spy stuff? I'm confused.
Also, I never said the metagame doesn't belong in Dust. I like that there is more to the game than shooting. If you read my past comments on this thread, you'll see that.
The video was about how AWOXing isn't the best use of your inside guys. Yes, it is effective, but only for a short time.
Before you try to get all e-peen, you should try some reading comprehension. It'll do you wonders. |
Charizard Zakalwe
Goonfeet
45
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 18:42:00 -
[42] - Quote
Well 1) I wans't talking to you.
2) Watching a video, would, in fact, not be reading comprehension.
3) AWOXing is a perfectly good use of a spy account. There are no rules that say you can only have one spy in a corp. Burning all of your assets in a corp could be rather foolish, but not necessarily so. |
CASHERN X2
DIOS X. II
19
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 18:48:00 -
[43] - Quote
DS 10 wrote:ladwar wrote:you weren't drunk w/e enough in the video and not enough cursing. I wasn't drunk as much as I was just super groggy from the NyQuil. At least I think that's how I was. I don't know. I had about half a bottle of NyQuil and a 12-pack.
Are you trying to put yourself in a coma? |
Aegis Scientiafide
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
34
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 19:25:00 -
[44] - Quote
Eltra Ardell wrote:I find it amusing that you are behaving exactly like the FPSers I describe in my news article. http://themittani.com/news/dust-514-eve-culture-shock-and-grief-universityQuote:It's this kind of metagaming that FPS games lack. When someone sneaks into a clan and spies or wreaks havoc, they tend to be promptly booted, shamed, called all sorts of names, and potentially disqualified from whatever event they were involved in. Basically, it's a big no-no. In EVE, you get the opposite reaction. It's a fact of life and tends to provide capsuleers with entertainment. Whatever the carebears in space might claim, such behavior is not only expected, it's sanctioned by CCP. You are experiencing culture shock. Welcome to New Eden.
Maybe Eve culture is crap, did you ever think about that? The idea that emotionally manipulating people is fun and good entertainment is disgusting. There are tons of games with deep metagames that don't involve this type of behavior.
The most disturbing aspect of this game though involves the playerbase's attitude towards spying. Any person who's spent an exorbitant amount of time gaining people's trust and befriending them so they can betray them in an online game (for digital gains) needs to examine themselves. Anyone who condones this behavior should do the same. Quite frankly, these people should get a life; not to mention, such anti-social behavior borders on sociopathy.
Maybe you eve players who condone this behavior are unaware of this, but it's this type of behavior and and attitude that have branded eve players as being the scum of the gaming world. It's because of this that other gamers look down on you (well, that and the fact that you spend so much time playing a ridiculously boring game). |
EverNub
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
15
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 19:40:00 -
[45] - Quote
General John Ripper wrote:" Its about as trendy as Jenza's pants in fanfest" LOL
Hahaha....hahaha omg I cant stop laughing...*wipes away tears* +1 |
DS 10
G I A N T EoN.
305
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 21:31:00 -
[46] - Quote
Aegis Scientiafide wrote:Eltra Ardell wrote:I find it amusing that you are behaving exactly like the FPSers I describe in my news article. http://themittani.com/news/dust-514-eve-culture-shock-and-grief-universityQuote:It's this kind of metagaming that FPS games lack. When someone sneaks into a clan and spies or wreaks havoc, they tend to be promptly booted, shamed, called all sorts of names, and potentially disqualified from whatever event they were involved in. Basically, it's a big no-no. In EVE, you get the opposite reaction. It's a fact of life and tends to provide capsuleers with entertainment. Whatever the carebears in space might claim, such behavior is not only expected, it's sanctioned by CCP. You are experiencing culture shock. Welcome to New Eden. Maybe Eve culture is crap, did you ever think about that? The idea that emotionally manipulating people is fun and good entertainment is disgusting. There are tons of games with deep metagames that don't involve this type of behavior. The most disturbing aspect of this game though involves the playerbase's attitude towards spying. Any person who's spent an exorbitant amount of time gaining people's trust and befriending them so they can betray them in an online game (for digital gains) needs to examine themselves. Anyone who condones this behavior should do the same. Quite frankly, these people should get a life; not to mention, such anti-social behavior borders on sociopathy. Maybe you eve players who condone this behavior are unaware of this, but it's this type of behavior and and attitude that have branded eve players as being the scum of the gaming world. It's because of this that other gamers look down on you (well, that and the fact that you spend so much time playing a ridiculously boring game).
Although the EVE elitists get on my nerves, you are wrong about spying. It adds a "trust nobody" twist to the genre. After all, this is just a game. Of course spying is frustrating for the victims, but they should have spies as well. This isn't sociopathy. This is strategy in a war game
|
Charizard Zakalwe
Goonfeet
45
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 05:31:00 -
[47] - Quote
Aegis Scientiafide wrote:
Maybe Eve culture is crap, did you ever think about that? The idea that emotionally manipulating people is fun and good entertainment is disgusting. There are tons of games with deep metagames that don't involve this type of behavior.
The most disturbing aspect of this game though involves the playerbase's attitude towards spying. Any person who's spent an exorbitant amount of time gaining people's trust and befriending them so they can betray them in an online game (for digital gains) needs to examine themselves. Anyone who condones this behavior should do the same. Quite frankly, these people should get a life; not to mention, such anti-social behavior borders on sociopathy.
Maybe you eve players who condone this behavior are unaware of this, but it's this type of behavior and and attitude that have branded eve players as being the scum of the gaming world. It's because of this that other gamers look down on you (well, that and the fact that you spend so much time playing a ridiculously boring game).
Exactly my point. If one person stops posting, another, equally foolish person will begin posting in their stead so they may be readily absorbed for amusement.
Firstly, in all serious talk, you're seriously remiss in both your use of the word sociopath (in terms of definition) and in labeling players with it. I mean really. It's Hollywood term that has no real meaning in the actual psychiatric community for that very reason. Assuming you're implying they have or nearly have ASPD, you're also wrong, as it's obsolete as of DSM-V. Update your knowledge pool accordingly.
EVE Culture, really, isn't 'crap'. It's a wonderful social experiment and source of great entertainment and fun. Also, pretty much all entertainment is a form of emotional manipulation. You do certain things to induce certain changes in your own emotion. So that's a moot point.
Spying is such a unique form of escapism though. So few games let you do it where it really actually something you do on your own to some effect. Most games you're just a soldier man or a fighter man or maybe you're a spy man but you're very much a spyman on the games terms. Spying in EVE (and DUST 514) is so great because it's so unique. It's such a completely different way of playing that makes it so appealing. So few games allow to do such wide and far things, totally destructive to one side or another and not just let you do it, you get away with it (if you can). And you won't have GM's reversing things or undoing things. They're not there to babysit the game and rules lawyer, they're there to facilitate gameplay by fixing bugs and handling problems that keep people from playing the game, and only care about laying down the law when people take things out of the game and into real life. They're not going to punish you for cutting in line to the roller coaster, they're there to keep it running, and will only deal with the riders when they start doing bad things off the roller coaster or to sabotage the roller coaster. Spying in EVE is such an utterly lateral way of playing the game that some people just can't comprehend it. And what they can't understand, they fear, and what they fear, they hate.
Now, I'm not saying that you're sufficiently stupid that you can't grasp the concept spying and why it's fun, but I'm strongly implying it. Doubly so considering the condescending way that I'm spelling that out for you.
Your claims of "gettalife" are cute and all, but it's such a nerdy little insult that it's really only insulting to someone who lacks (or feels they lack) a "life" because it's the quickest thing to come to mind to them because they're so insecure about it. Additionally, while you're implying that it's not worth investing so much into a purely digital thing with no real life benefits, you seem to get awfully worked up about it. Probably, again, because you're so utterly insecure about not having a 'life'.
PS. Everyone knows that the worst group of players are the players of DOTA-likes. Followed by "hardcore" gamers who can't use a mouse, then come the worst of eve, who are usually hisec AFK miners, people who get scammed, and people who get betrayed by their most trusted internet friend.
|
Aegis Scientiafide
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
39
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 19:59:00 -
[48] - Quote
Oh Charizard, where to begin. I suppose that I should start by stating that I expected your kind of response. I mean, I post on a forum for a game set in the eve universe, calling eve culture crappy, well of course I'm going to get responses like yours. In fact, I'm sure I'll get more people jumping aboard to defend their game. So it does not shock me at all that you're attempting to belittle me and are insulting my intelligence. I wrote what I wrote because I felt it was worth mentioning. I know you feel differently, but hey people aren't going to all have the same point of view as yours. I'm sure you'd rather see yet another post praising how awesome spying is.
I guess I should also start off by how much of a BSerr you are. Hilariously so. First off, I looked it up, and DSM V was literally released days ago (May 18). Also check this out:
http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/Personality%20Disorders/DSM-IV%20and%20DSM-5%20Criteria%20for%20the%20Personality%20Disorders%205-1-12.pdf
What's that on page 2? Oh I'm sorry, are those DSM V criteria for diagnosing ASPD? My god are you looking foolish right now. See, I make it a habit not to make assertions about things I know nothing about. Looks like you've yet to learn that lesson.
If you did a quick google search for the DSM V, you'd also see that it's highly controversial, with the NIMH openly stating that mental health practitioners avoid using it.
Update your knowledge pool accordingly. Also, when are people like you ever going to learn not to BS on the internet?
But I digress, it's a stupid argument anyway because if you actually read my comment, I did not actually diagnose anyone with sociopathy. I merely said it borders on sociopathy. In fact I'd say I'd definitely be wasting my time arguing with a bunch of sociopaths about the severe lack of morality and empathy they're exhibiting.
But just to clarify, I'd never diagnose anyone with anything, as I'm not a professional in the field. Similarly, I'd never use the DSM because it's a tool meant for professionals to use, not for people like you and I.
Here's an eve-related video that encapsulates what I'm talking at it's worst:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-2acttwPNc
There are tons of examples like this. Notice how everyone in the video thought this was totally acceptable and even laughed along with him. Are you sure afk hisec miners are the worst of eve?
I'd like to point out that there's a big difference between, say, being moved or excited by a film and being manipulated by some **** who's pretending to be your buddy for months to years on end just to get information/digital items, or being harassed endlessly by some ******* (like in the video I showed above).
As for your argument for spying, it basically boiled down to an entire paragraph of, "It's completely unique and different!" and "It feels like you can do anything and the GMs will let you!" As a fellow gamer, I can sympathize with the fact that a lot of games churned out nowadays tend to be the same old crap with the same old tired mechanics. This is a very poor defense against my assertion that a) eve culture is ******, and b) the behaviors that are common on eve are terrible. Also, just because something's unique does not mean it is good.
Also, this idea that people bash spying only because they're afraid of it or hate it is absurd. I can't speak for other people, but personally, I don't look at "spies" with fear or hatred. I look upon them with disgust and maybe even contempt (for the more extreme cases of "espionage").
As for my get a life comment, it was very appropriate. As much as you'd like to believe, it's not a catchphrase I throw around all the time due to me projecting my so-called insecurities (I'm guessing you're using your self-proclaimed psychiatric expertise for this diagnosis huh?) Anyone who feels spending years (in the most ridiculous accounts of espionage and infiltration) infiltrating a corp and befriending people just so they can later betray them in an online game does in fact need to get a life. It is not an accomplishment, as much as a lot of people around here would like to believe.
As for getting worked up about it, I guess I get worked up when I see something I find to be terrible and am disgusted by. Both my ideas that digital items are not all that important (although I do realize people place value on digital items, that's not what I'm criticizing) and the idea that I'm disgusted by people who will do terrible things for digital items are not contradictory.
Anyway, guess not everyone can be respectful of different opinions like DS 10. Kudos to him for being a gentleman and not throwing a tantrum when someone insulted his game. |
Schalac 17
Murderz for hire
160
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 20:16:00 -
[49] - Quote
Abu Stij wrote:You can also refer to:
- Mujahideen in the 1970s (precursor to the Taliban) vs the Soviet Union. - North Vietnamese vs the US forces. - Colonial Army vs the British Empire.
The list goes on and the message stays the same, attacking head on isn't the only way to win a war. Those were all the weaker factions in the war. So what was your point again? |
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
603
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 21:02:00 -
[50] - Quote
@Aegis...
You will also find that The Mittani lost a lot of respect within the EVE community because of that incident, and had to step down from the CSM. Generalising a whole community like that is simply ridiculous, it's like saying all Americans are fat, all Chinese are good at maths, and all the English are hooligans. In any community, you'll get a range of people. Stereotyping for any other purpose than humor simply isn't acceptable.
Frankly, no, it's not emotional manipulation. It's nothing personal either. An alliance wants to conquer the land that you currently own, but you're too strong for them. So the alliance sends in a spy to dissolve the alliance, and after a few months, manages. That's not on a personal level whatsoever. He's doing a job for material gain, not to hurt someone.
As often stated in online games, it's not really material wealth. In the end, it's just a few kilobytes of data on a server somewhere. You effectively haven't lost anything but time, time which you were very happy to invest in the game. Any emotions that may have been hurt on the way simply aren't intentional, and if the person had actually been sensible, they would know not to trust someone on an online game who has the ability to ruin their whole experience. |
|
Abu Stij
Goonfeet
78
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 21:13:00 -
[51] - Quote
Schalac 17 wrote: Those were all the weaker factions in the war. So what was your point again?
EDIT: As a side note, the clans using "AWOXing" are horrible shots and seriously lack battlefield presence. Most of them rely on proto gear and SP to make up for this fact and will fall off rather quickly in the grand scheme of things.
And why do goons even think they are relevant in DUST?
I guess you only look at the term "weak" in terms of military strength, where as using techniques such as AWOXing or implanting a spy to then take all your opponents assets is quite powerful and shows the utter weakness their enemies.
I've yet to see any evidence that people in Grief U actually using Proto fits, but if the other groups are it just shows they're not that skilled at it.
Also I was unaware of any Goon claiming they've done anything relevant in DUST as of yet, can you point out a source? The only posts I've seen by my fellow SA members has been to:
- Mock pubbies for horribly bad ideas - Mock pubbies for crying about "broken" mechanics when they work as intended - Laugh at the crying over AWOXing - Correct horrible grammar mistakes - Provide counterpoints to any discussion that isn't pure whining - Give entertaining erotica stories for your reading - Explaining the "complex" concept of what a meta-game is & how it works in a CCP game
But if you want to talk in terms of "playing" DUST 514, I guess I could say all good things come with time, we're not going anywhere soon, but you can keep pounding your chest over our space in LowSec, we'll be doing what Goons do best, making you look like foolish.
Abu Stij
Pubbie Relations Officer Director of Planet/Space Relations Loremaster of GoonFeet Veteran of Caldari Prime Survivor of Cerebral Wolf's Leadership Defector of Immobile Infantry OpFor Veteran of AWOXgate Heir Apparent of the Sojik Trading Empire Recepient of "I Like You" Comment from The Mittani (2013) Commissioner of GoonFeet Media Network Propaganda Master Oft Imitated, Never Duplicated Breeder of Sebiestor Turtles Master of the Trial of War Dustradomas Uplink Destroyer Defender of the Goonish Lifestyle Medical Doctor of Anatomy from Sebiestor State College (Go Irish!) Hero of Forums Drinker of Tears Vanquisher of Horrible Grammar Friend to All Tetatae Rocker of Hurricanes The Most Awful of Somethings (Paying to Win Since 2012) Survivor of the MechWarrior Online Podcast War Player of The Board of Keys Tracker Extraordinaire RIP Vile Rat
|
Hobo on Fire
Goonfeet
2
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 21:15:00 -
[52] - Quote
Schalac 17 wrote:Abu Stij wrote:You can also refer to:
- Mujahideen in the 1970s (precursor to the Taliban) vs the Soviet Union. - North Vietnamese vs the US forces. - Colonial Army vs the British Empire.
The list goes on and the message stays the same, attacking head on isn't the only way to win a war. Those were all the weaker factions in the war. So what was your point again?
They all won? |
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
603
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 21:20:00 -
[53] - Quote
Abu, I'm grudgingly giving you a +1 for that post. |
Abu Stij
Goonfeet
79
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 21:21:00 -
[54] - Quote
Laheon wrote:Abu, I'm grudgingly giving you a +1 for that post.
Is it because I'm pretty? |
Schalac 17
Murderz for hire
160
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 21:29:00 -
[55] - Quote
Hobo on Fire wrote:Schalac 17 wrote:Abu Stij wrote:You can also refer to:
- Mujahideen in the 1970s (precursor to the Taliban) vs the Soviet Union. - North Vietnamese vs the US forces. - Colonial Army vs the British Empire.
The list goes on and the message stays the same, attacking head on isn't the only way to win a war. Those were all the weaker factions in the war. So what was your point again? They all won? Except one of the most notable examples of AWOX in DUST was a complete failure.
Let me make a timeline for your simple mind to understand.
- OP said you are weak if you need to AWOX.
- A bunch of people were mentioned, proving the OPs point.
- Abu Stij wrote a long winded post that I didn't care to really read because in fighting against the OP he supported the OPs claim.
Any questions? |
Abu Stij
Goonfeet
80
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 21:32:00 -
[56] - Quote
Schalac 17 wrote:Except one of the most notable examples of AWOX in DUST was a complete failure. Let me make a timeline for your simple mind to understand.
- OP said you are weak if you need to AWOX.
- A bunch of people were mentioned, proving the OPs point.
- Abu Stij wrote a long winded post that I didn't care to really read because in fighting against the OP he supported the OPs claim.
Any questions?
You're saying that BETAmax not knowing how to successfully AWOX means AWOXing in general is a failure. That seems to counter what Grief U has been able to accomplish successfully, I believe they're success rate is 100% according to reports.
How did you come to the conclusion I was supporting the OP's claim when you didn't really read what I wrote?
That seem's quite illogical. And nothing I said supported the OP's claim outside of "if you only look at it in military strength sure, but they found your weakness and used it to their advantage. They came out on top in the end, you didn't." which was only mentioned after the fact and is still true.
Honestly, are you trying to act dumb or does it come naturally?
Abu Stij
Pubbie Relations Officer Director of Planet/Space Relations Loremaster of GoonFeet Veteran of Caldari Prime Survivor of Cerebral Wolf's Leadership Defector of Immobile Infantry Heir Apparent of the Sojik Trading Empire Recepient of "I Like You" Comment from The Mittani (2013) Commissioner of GoonFeet Media Network Propaganda Master Oft Imitated, Never Duplicated Breeder of Sebiestor Turtles Master of the Trial of War Dustradomas Uplink Destroyer Defender of the Goonish Lifestyle Medical Doctor of Anatomy from Sebiestor State College (Go Irish!) Hero of Forums Drinker of Tears Vanquisher of Horrible Grammar Friend to All Tetatae Rocker of Hurricanes The Most Awful of Somethings (Paying to Win Since 2012) Survivor of the MechWarrior Online Podcast War Player of The Board of Keys Tracker Extraordinaire RIP Vile Rat |
Samahiel
Goonfeet
31
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 21:34:00 -
[57] - Quote
Abu Stij wrote:Laheon wrote:Abu, I'm grudgingly giving you a +1 for that post. Is it because I'm pretty?
That's why I gave you one. |
Phantomnom
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
509
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 21:39:00 -
[58] - Quote
AWOXing isn't a culture shock it's a wasted opportunity, Done by kids who run to forums within ten minutes of turning a corp over screaming about how megaleetz they are. People thinking too small. |
Abu Stij
Goonfeet
80
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 21:41:00 -
[59] - Quote
Phantomnom wrote:AWOXing isn't a culture shock it's a wasted opportunity, Done by kids who run to forums within ten minutes of turning a corp over screaming about how megaleetz they are. People thinking too small.
While it is true you can burn your "plant" in the target (as evident by the first reported AWOX by Model Number), I'm sure there are ways to do it without exposing the name of the spy you planted into the corp. |
Samahiel
Goonfeet
31
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 21:45:00 -
[60] - Quote
Phantomnom wrote:AWOXing isn't a culture shock it's a wasted opportunity, Done by kids who run to forums within ten minutes of turning a corp over screaming about how megaleetz they are. People thinking too small.
What has your big thinking netted you recently? |
|
Schalac 17
Murderz for hire
160
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 21:49:00 -
[61] - Quote
Abu Stij wrote:
You're saying that BETAmax not knowing how to successfully AWOX means AWOXing in general is a failure. That seems to counter what Grief U has been able to accomplish successfully.
How did you come to the conclusion I was supporting the OP's claim when you didn't really read what I wrote?
That seem's quite illogical. And nothing I said supported the OP's claim outside of "if you only look at it in military strength sure, but they found your weakness and used it to their advantage. They came out on top in the end, you didn't." which was only mentioned after the fact and is still true.
AWOXing in general is failure. It is a failure on CCPs part for leaving such a gaping hole in the development of such an important aspect of the game. It is a failure in the fact that it is a one-off disposable asset that may or may not even work. And it is a failure because people like you think it is some super James Bond type ****. HEY GAIS I HAZ TOONZ IN DAY CORP FOR SPAM PC, LOLZ. The whole mechanic is just silly, and the fixes people are posting for it are even more so.
If you want to AWOX do it right. Actually infiltrate a group and steal intel, gain directorship and clean them out. Kick everyone from corp before a PC match. Clean the corp account. Steal clone reserves and plant them on your side. Just joining a PC match and talking smack and team killing is petty HALO bs. I attribute it to getting a full Warthog and driving it off a cliff. There is no emergent gameplay here. There is no amazing tactics involved. Just petty silliness.
|
hooc order
Deep Space Republic Gentlemen's Agreement
125
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 21:57:00 -
[62] - Quote
DS 10 wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYzQGwMnzEM&feature=youtu.be
If you think this video is about meta vs anti-meta, you should watch it again. I'm not against the metagame, so don't assume that just because I think AWOXing is overrated, I want the game to be Call of Duty. Jesus Christ.
Sorry in advance for the language. I've been doing NyQuil shots with beer chasers for the past two days. I was kinda out of my mind.
In this video I discuss why AWOXing is not effective for the long haul and is a technique with an overall negative outcome. And sorry to Jenza...
Any input from you guys?
Will you run against Iron Wolf Saber in the next council election? |
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
605
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 21:57:00 -
[63] - Quote
Schalac 17 wrote: If you want to AWOX do it right. Actually infiltrate a group and steal intel, gain directorship and clean them out. Kick everyone from corp before a PC match. Clean the corp account. Steal clone reserves and plant them on your side. Just joining a PC match and talking smack and team killing is petty HALO bs. I attribute it to getting a full Warthog and driving it off a cliff. There is no emergent gameplay here. There is no amazing tactics involved. Just petty silliness.
You're assuming that there aren't people doing that *right now* but just aren't advertising that fact. |
Abu Stij
Goonfeet
80
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 22:05:00 -
[64] - Quote
Schalac 17 wrote:AWOXing in general is failure. It is a failure on CCPs part for leaving such a gaping hole in the development of such an important aspect of the game. It is a failure in the fact that it is a one-off disposable asset that may or may not even work. And it is a failure because people like you think it is some super James Bond type ****. HEY GAIS I HAZ TOONZ IN DAY CORP FOR SPAM PC, LOLZ. The whole mechanic is just silly, and the fixes people are posting for it are even more so.
If you want to AWOX do it right. Actually infiltrate a group and steal intel, gain directorship and clean them out. Kick everyone from corp before a PC match. Clean the corp account. Steal clone reserves and plant them on your side. Just joining a PC match and talking smack and team killing is petty HALO bs. I attribute it to getting a full Warthog and driving it off a cliff. There is no emergent gameplay here. There is no amazing tactics involved. Just petty silliness.
It's been a thing CCP has regularly supported so its not a "failure" in that part, I will admit in its current form its fairly easy to do and not the most fun thing someone can spend their time doing.
I did say, in a different thread I think, there are actually two forms of AWOXing not just the one people have only been exposed to.
Jihadi
You burn your alt by exposing who they are and just killing your targets indiscriminately without care for your alt's long term survival in the game's universe. As we're reliant on what we know about AWOXing from EVE, this is just a random guy doing random killing with no real intent or goal.
At present this is the form you are seeing right now in DUST.
Tackling
In reality this "Long Con" isn't actually an AWOX, its just simple intelligence gathering. In EVE, the second type of AWOX actually is when an alt toon tackling and immobilizing an expensive ship when the rest of the fleet are elsewhere and having his buddies come in and destroy those assets. There isn't really much like that in DUST so its hard to equate at present.
What you're referring to is actually the simple act of intelligence gathering and manipulating your opponents long term. This is when your implanted toon collects data and so forth on the target and, as you stated your support of, cleaning corp assets of any valuables.
I'm more than positive that the "Long Con" is being worked on as this is a fairly new discovery as to how the AWOXing works in DUST 514 (remember the need to do this is technically only 2 weeks old).
Tackling is possible, but at present there has been no indication as to how you would achieve such a form of AWOXing. And no, its not the same as going Jihadi as in Tackling you have a specific target, where as going Jihadi simply is causing mass deaths in the quickest fashion without a target. |
hooc order
Deep Space Republic Gentlemen's Agreement
125
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 22:06:00 -
[65] - Quote
Laheon wrote:Schalac 17 wrote: If you want to AWOX do it right. Actually infiltrate a group and steal intel, gain directorship and clean them out. Kick everyone from corp before a PC match. Clean the corp account. Steal clone reserves and plant them on your side. Just joining a PC match and talking smack and team killing is petty HALO bs. I attribute it to getting a full Warthog and driving it off a cliff. There is no emergent gameplay here. There is no amazing tactics involved. Just petty silliness.
You're assuming that there aren't people doing that *right now* but just aren't advertising that fact.
I am pretty someone has an alt in my alliance right now for the sole purpose of keeping an eye on me because of the stuff i have written in these here forums.
Is getting other Corps and alliances to waste resources in spying on you considered Meta? |
Abu Stij
Goonfeet
80
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 22:07:00 -
[66] - Quote
hooc order wrote:Will you run against Iron Wolf Saber in the next council election?
Subtle. I like that. |
Schalac 17
Murderz for hire
160
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 22:08:00 -
[67] - Quote
Laheon wrote:Schalac 17 wrote: If you want to AWOX do it right. Actually infiltrate a group and steal intel, gain directorship and clean them out. Kick everyone from corp before a PC match. Clean the corp account. Steal clone reserves and plant them on your side. Just joining a PC match and talking smack and team killing is petty HALO bs. I attribute it to getting a full Warthog and driving it off a cliff. There is no emergent gameplay here. There is no amazing tactics involved. Just petty silliness.
You're assuming that there aren't people doing that *right now* but just aren't advertising that fact. I know there are people doing just that, and I am not against it. I'll even support it. But what these other people are doing in PC matches right now, it's not even in the same vein. And the way they are celebrating it like it is some huge accomplishment just irks me. Oh I got onto a team and then shot them all, I'm so talented.... Give me a break.
|
hooc order
Deep Space Republic Gentlemen's Agreement
125
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 22:27:00 -
[68] - Quote
Schalac 17 wrote:Laheon wrote:Schalac 17 wrote: If you want to AWOX do it right. Actually infiltrate a group and steal intel, gain directorship and clean them out. Kick everyone from corp before a PC match. Clean the corp account. Steal clone reserves and plant them on your side. Just joining a PC match and talking smack and team killing is petty HALO bs. I attribute it to getting a full Warthog and driving it off a cliff. There is no emergent gameplay here. There is no amazing tactics involved. Just petty silliness.
You're assuming that there aren't people doing that *right now* but just aren't advertising that fact. I know there are people doing just that, and I am not against it. I'll even support it. But what these other people are doing in PC matches right now, it's not even in the same vein. And the way they are celebrating it like it is some huge accomplishment just irks me. Oh I got onto a team and then shot them all, I'm so talented.... Give me a break.
Eh?
It does not bother me so much as how it is all wrapped up with the Council. There are serious problems with DUST and the council is dicking around with this crap.
DS 10 nailed it when he said this is an FPS and the focus should be on getting that FPS right. Yes there will be meta nothing wrong with meta but when our community reps focus on a broken game mechanic and try desperately to turn into some sort of super spy feature when they should be taking notes about actual broken FPS game mechanics then it just gets stupid.
Also i think Dust needs more sand box features in it for real meta. AWOX is pretty weak sauce when CCP could actually make district infiltration and sabotage game play....which would you rather have...BetaMax clicking invites into a PC match or an FPS PvP stealth game?
Hell i would rather have a virtual pub in local where people can play spy.
Real good emergent meta can only really be good when we have a a real sand box with a crap ton of features. (go play PvP on a clan/seige based minecraft server and you will see real emergent Meta in a sandbox)..AWOX just feels like so much kludge and clicking on boxes. |
Rhorian Darkstar
Dark Force Katana General Tso's Alliance
36
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 23:12:00 -
[69] - Quote
Laheon wrote:Rupture Reaperson wrote: My bad on Iraq, however that doesnt translate as well into Dust or any fps, why? because one of the pillars of any fps to date it that is a "seek and destroy" game, unlike the taliban vs US conflict, where they are civilians war treaties, litigation against war crimes... etc. Do you go on dust and say "Oh I wont fire that clone, he might have kids" or do you see any civilian running around... or do you get a court marshall by firing some plasma rounds at someone? Of course not! You "seek and destroy" targets, no remorse no questions asked (in the case of awoxers that includes them as targets)
I understand that the taliban are able to grind the US balls with few militar effort and evict them, but at the same time they are able to use tools that are non existant in the context of a fps: civilians, war treaties, UN regulations, all that jazz. When on a FPS you just shoot the enemy on the face and thats the end of it Therefore if your corp its not able to accomplish to "seek and destroy" on a FPS, and have to rely on underhanded metods (even with said methods STILL lose), you will be looked down as weak.
Would on a future a corp can beat another one without firing a round, possibly. But it will be defined by ACTUAL metagame, not cheap acessible expliots.
@Laiheon: Yes I just ruled any argument you made with and ad homenem, get used to it. Im not willing to even waste time on you.
How narrow-minded and immature. The problem with your argument is that DUST isn't meant to be a simple FPS. The best way it could be categorised is "war simulator" rather than "FPS". FPS implies that's all there is to do, shoot people. In DUST, however, you are able to choose your enemies. The only other game I've heard of being called a war simulator was actually Battlefield and ARMA, and that doesn't particularly have as many features (war wise) as DUST does. In DUST, we are able to avert war (or conclude it) through means other than shooting other mercs. For example, making peace, creating an alliance or a contract, dissolving the other corporation/alliance through subterfuge, etc. This is much more involved than any other FPS that you might be able to name, and involves diplomacy and subterfuge just as much as gun game. add one more to simulator ^_^ |
Loss Tovas
Defensores Doctrina
242
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 23:13:00 -
[70] - Quote
I keep reading "broken game mechanic" when people are referring to this. I imagine that CCP will have some kind of fix for this more than likely just being the ability to remove players from battle or making it an application kind of thing where you accept who is inbound into the battle. There will be a kind of fix but people are going to continue to exploit every facet of this game to bring themselves victory.
Either way, the Taliban was brought up and I would like to point out that Afghanistan is understood to be the place empires go to die. There is a very good reason for this; there is both symmetrical and asymmetrical warfare. Every FPS I've ever played is based on symmetrical theories. It would seem those with the most experience with this are utterly baffled with the asymmetrical theories being applied currently as those individuals come across them. Perfect example: Grief Uni.
It is important that when discussing things like strength and weakness that you recognize your own parameters. By all measure of force the US is superior to the Taliban and yet we find that that particular brand of strength means very little. Similarly as was brought up with the revolutionary war we see that the colonists fought like "savages" adopting the geruilla tactics utilized by the Native American nations they fought against. This led to all out killing of officers on the battlefield by what would become known as Rangers and was considered a war-crime at the time.
This juxtaposition of real and fantasy lets us fully understand what is actually happening in New Eden currently from the mercenary perspective and I can tell you that all I see are individuals that hold on dearly to outdated methodology. Even if you are right about ethics, having the moral high ground doesn't mean you deserve to be the victor anymore than the people who are resorting to the most barbaric of tactics. There is no such thing as a just world ladies and gentlemen. The faster everyone realizes this the better off we will all be as a community. |
|
Samahiel
Goonfeet
31
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 23:16:00 -
[71] - Quote
hooc order wrote: It does not bother me so much as how it is all wrapped up with the Council. There are serious problems with DUST and the council is dicking around with this crap.
DS 10 nailed it when he said this is an FPS and the focus should be on getting that FPS right. Yes there will be meta nothing wrong with meta but when our community reps focus on a broken game mechanic and try desperately to turn into some sort of super spy feature when they should be taking notes about actual broken FPS game mechanics then it just gets stupid.
Also i think Dust needs more sand box features in it for real meta. AWOX is pretty weak sauce when CCP could actually make district infiltration and sabotage game play....which would you rather have...BetaMax clicking invites into a PC match or an FPS PvP stealth game?
Hell i would rather have a virtual pub in local where people can play spy.
Real good emergent meta can only really be good when we have a a real sand box with a crap ton of features. (go play PvP on a clan/seige based minecraft server and you will see real emergent Meta in a sandbox)..AWOX just feels like so much kludge and clicking on boxes.
Note: for those thinking of laughing at Meta in minecraft PvP. On one server i was offered a cyber skype from a women (ie boobs) to give up my clan's base location. AWOX and EvE Meta seem weak in comparison to me.
So... They should focus on fixing the FPS by taking a massive amount of dev time away and devoting it to non-fps enviroments and game types, and you can't figure out how to install skype and back room deal with the big boys so CCP has to make a scale mockup of the Mos Eisley Cantina for you since your sense of imagination and originality has been atrophied beyond recognition? I think the problem isn't the game, but that you're not actually playing it. |
Aegis Scientiafide
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
39
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 01:06:00 -
[72] - Quote
Laheon wrote:@Aegis...
You will also find that The Mittani lost a lot of respect within the EVE community because of that incident, and had to step down from the CSM. Generalising a whole community like that is simply ridiculous, it's like saying all Americans are fat, all Chinese are good at maths, and all the English are hooligans. In any community, you'll get a range of people. Stereotyping for any other purpose than humor simply isn't acceptable.
Frankly, no, it's not emotional manipulation. It's nothing personal either. An alliance wants to conquer the land that you currently own, but you're too strong for them. So the alliance sends in a spy to dissolve the alliance, and after a few months, manages. That's not on a personal level whatsoever. He's doing a job for material gain, not to hurt someone.
As often stated in online games, it's not really material wealth. In the end, it's just a few kilobytes of data on a server somewhere. You effectively haven't lost anything but time, time which you were very happy to invest in the game. Any emotions that may have been hurt on the way simply aren't intentional, and if the person had actually been sensible, they would know not to trust someone on an online game who has the ability to ruin their whole experience.
First off I wanna say I appreciate the civility. I know it may not seem like that after my response to charizard but civility is something I do genuinely appreciate.
Anyway, I agree that it's unfair to label the entire eve community as being on par with that prick. That was not my intention in putting up that video. That was simply me showcasing the most disgusting product of "eve culture", taken at a high extreme (it seems charizard will tell you otherwise, afk miners are much worse). Although i will say that for me the most disturbing aspect of that video was not what he said or did, but the fact that pretty much everyone present laughed with him and was accepting of his actions. That, to me, is the main problem.
And that's the thing, I think it's simply way too easy to spend a lot of time in that game with a lot of people who think alike, and not realize just how ****** everyone is acting and how messed up it is.
And just to clarify, I'm not a moralist prude or anything. I'm not trying to act holier than though, I'm imperfect just like everyone else (We've all had our moments). In all honesty I'm fine with a lot of things, and I'm actually not particularly judgmental. My attitude is people can do w/e they want as long as they're not causing any harm; however, in the case of "eve's culture" I'm not entirely sure that's true. Hence why I proclaimed eve's culture is ******.
The behavior in eve does not shock me nearly as much as the general acceptance of it (or respect and admiration it generates).
I think I should clarify a few things about myself just so you can understand where I'm coming from. First, I typically hate most MMOs due to the mindless grind that usually accompanies them. When I play a game I enjoy a challenge. For that reason, most of the games I have played I tend to gravitate towards PvP (In fact most of the games I play usually involve a lot of strategy and thought). I'm also not one of those players who clings to a ridiculous standard of honor over what's fair or not fair, my attitude is if it's in the game you should expect to see it and learn to adapt.
Furthermore, there's nothing wrong with backstabbing, sabotage, etc in games. The main problem I have with eve is the means with which this is all accomplished. Generally, in most games there's no personal connection involved whatsoever, and it's usually accomplished in a short period of time (usually within a few hours at most). In Eve it's different, the act usually involves gaining several people's trust, pretending to be their pal after months on end (even as long as a year if necessary). And the funny thing is, in a game like EVE you need to place your trust on people to effectively run a coorporation (the same can be said of any organization, including those in games). So naturally, the ones you place in positions of power are those that you have felt have earned your trust, probably those you consider to be your best online pals. Say what you will, but that type of emotional manipulation sounds pretty ****** up.
Anyway, I just highlighted spying because it's one of the more particularly messed up aspects of the game that's commonplace, but there are tons of things that go on in that game that are pretty ****** (Which I'm convinced are highlighted as "features" by CCP as a way to simply avoid having to deal with it). It's a pretty toxic community.
The thing is, though, I've enough experience in high-level MMO gameplay to know that this behavior is commonplace. What I find surprising is the general attitude towards all of this. While in pretty much every other game people who do **** like this are looked down on, Eve's the only game I know of that actually celebrates this. |
hooc order
Deep Space Republic Gentlemen's Agreement
125
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 01:18:00 -
[73] - Quote
Samahiel wrote:hooc order wrote: It does not bother me so much as how it is all wrapped up with the Council. There are serious problems with DUST and the council is dicking around with this crap.
DS 10 nailed it when he said this is an FPS and the focus should be on getting that FPS right. Yes there will be meta nothing wrong with meta but when our community reps focus on a broken game mechanic and try desperately to turn into some sort of super spy feature when they should be taking notes about actual broken FPS game mechanics then it just gets stupid.
Also i think Dust needs more sand box features in it for real meta. AWOX is pretty weak sauce when CCP could actually make district infiltration and sabotage game play....which would you rather have...BetaMax clicking invites into a PC match or an FPS PvP stealth game?
Hell i would rather have a virtual pub in local where people can play spy.
Real good emergent meta can only really be good when we have a a real sand box with a crap ton of features. (go play PvP on a clan/seige based minecraft server and you will see real emergent Meta in a sandbox)..AWOX just feels like so much kludge and clicking on boxes.
Note: for those thinking of laughing at Meta in minecraft PvP. On one server i was offered a cyber skype from a women (ie boobs) to give up my clan's base location. AWOX and EvE Meta seem weak in comparison to me.
So... They should focus on fixing the FPS by taking a massive amount of dev time away and devoting it to non-fps enviroments and game types, and you can't figure out how to install skype and back room deal with the big boys so CCP has to make a scale mockup of the Mos Eisley Cantina for you since your sense of imagination and originality has been atrophied beyond recognition? I think the problem isn't the game, but that you're not actually playing it.
Perfect Golden Brilliance.
This is exactly what i said and exactly what i mean.
I should get you to write my posts for me.
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |