Over not getting reimbursed for game-launch on the aurum I bought. I recommend anyone else do the same if this pissed you off.

Got a source confirming the game has launched? Because I'm sure a few minutes of searching will provide multiple confirmed sources stating that we not only haven't hit commercial release yet, but also won't be getting there with Uprising either.

CCP said no more wipes of any kind which includes AUR and they're CHANGING the description of their items on the marketplace AFTER people purchased them.

What exactly is the issue with the aurum? I read people complaining but couldn-¦t understand the main point so far.

Dat Q_Q bro, ******* dry your eyes.
You've bought your Aurum, you knew what you were getting into when you paid for **** in a BETA you mug.

all aurum purchases we're supposed to be refunded on commercial launch, they're changing the description of the items after we purchased them and claiming they won't refund us.

I bought a merc pack, bought items with aurums, got reset moving to singularity. Got all my stuff refunded.

I had unclaimed items and aurum, got reset moving to tranqulity, got all my stuff refunded.

Now, i bought a 30 day passive booster, still have unclaimed items, and there will be no more resets.

Why the hell would i be refunded, if i haven-¦t lost anything to a reset?

I'm starting to see a pattern here with certain mercs who still get their bottles warmed at night. lol writing a letter to Sony. Your silly beef is with the developer, what on earth could Sony possibly do? Give you a free PSN avatar for your troubles? Keyboard revolutionists, I tell ya

When the game goes into commercial release they are legally obligated to refund it again and without any SP wipes like people are saying. Sorry if you didnt see a good deal when they were waving it in your face begging you to take advantage of it.

Edit: we have not hit commercial release yet.

You make a good point, it's almost as if the people opposed to the aur refund are actually just jealous that they missed out.
Oh well

When the game goes into commercial release they are legally obligated to refund it again and without any SP wipes like people are saying. Sorry if you didnt see a good deal when they were waving it in your face begging you to take advantage of it.

Edit: we have not hit commercial release yet.

Sony funds some of the development of dust if I'm not mistaken.

You make a good point, it's almost as if the people opposed to the aur refund are actually just jealous that they missed out.
Oh well

It's going to be a fun lawsuit.

If they said refund, you must understand the meaning of the word.
Unless of course, you-¦re trying to give a new meaning to words, socially implement it, and make it retroactive to justify your point.

https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=691079#post691079



We are now in session for the QQplayers X Sony, where they claim that "refund" applies to something that was not lost.

Fun ideed.

ENGLISH KITTENKITTEN, DO YOU SPEAK IT?

Refund

v. re-+fund-+ed, re-+fund-+ing, re-+funds
v.tr.
To give back, especially money; return or repay: refunded the purchase price.

Give back, not give away. Sure i would like them to give me aurum, but they can-¦t refund me aurum if i haven-¦t lost any aurum due to them.

CCP said no more wipes of any kind which includes AUR and they're CHANGING the description of their items on the marketplace AFTER people purchased them.

In the real world, with the Merc Pack, they're still legally bound to the terms given at the time of purchase.

In-game, "Welcome to New Eden" applies.

None of that proves that we've reached commercial release, and none of it confirms that CCP aren't planning to honour their legal obligations. In fact, there's plenty of evidence to say that they're working on a plan to resolve the issues with the Merc Pack.

Did the Game Stop Merc Pack info every change? I believe last week it was still the origional statement.

Sony funds some of the development of dust if I'm not mistaken.

Legal, Legal, Legally. I keep hearing this on this subject, but how many of you have actually sought legal advice on this subject?

Also, "commercial release" isn't the same as "out of beta". The game was technically commercially released when it went live on tranquillity and "no more resets or wipes" were announced (note... "no more RESETS"). An AUR reset happened then, just as promised.

Got a friend whose mother is a lawyer, and has been through similar cases to this one more than once, all of which were resolved in the customer's favour. Asked her to look at the original wording of the Merc Pack compared with the current wording, and got her to look at multiple official sources - from both Sony and CCP - stating that the game isn't commercially released yet. She says there's a really solid case. I also had a friend who's in a law degree doing a case study specifically based around online purchases and the relevant laws, and he can't see any possible way for a lawsuit to fail if CCP don't give some form of refund of Merc Pack content to the purchasers who bought it with the original terms. Does that count?


As mentioned, both CCP and Sony have gone on record, publicly, stating that the game isn't yet commercially released. When people approach Sony about the issue, they specifically refuse to get involved until commercial release. When people have been arguing that the game is commercially released, CCP have said no, and in a thread where people were discussing the wording of the Human Endurance event's original posting, there was mention of Uprising "leading into commercial release" and CCP directly stated that Uprising WILL NOT BE THE RELEASE BUILD.