|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
299
   |
Posted - 2013.04.14 09:41:00 -
[1] - Quote
Over not getting reimbursed for game-launch on the aurum I bought. I recommend anyone else do the same if this pissed you off. |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
299
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 09:56:00 -
[2] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Over not getting reimbursed for game-launch on the aurum I bought. I recommend anyone else do the same if this pissed you off. Got a source confirming the game has launched? Because I'm sure a few minutes of searching will provide multiple confirmed sources stating that we not only haven't hit commercial release yet, but also won't be getting there with Uprising either.
CCP said no more wipes of any kind which includes AUR and they're CHANGING the description of their items on the marketplace AFTER people purchased them. |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
299
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 09:59:00 -
[3] - Quote
Natu Nobilis wrote:What exactly is the issue with the aurum? I read people complaining but couldn-¦t understand the main point so far.
all aurum purchases we're supposed to be refunded on commercial launch, they're changing the description of the items after we purchased them and claiming they won't refund us. |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
299
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 10:24:00 -
[4] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote:I'm starting to see a pattern here with certain mercs who still get their bottles warmed at night. lol writing a letter to Sony. Your silly beef is with the developer, what on earth could Sony possibly do? Give you a free PSN avatar for your troubles? Keyboard revolutionists, I tell ya
Sony funds some of the development of dust if I'm not mistaken. |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
300
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 10:35:00 -
[5] - Quote
Natu Nobilis wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:
When the game goes into commercial release they are legally obligated to refund it again and without any SP wipes like people are saying. Sorry if you didnt see a good deal when they were waving it in your face begging you to take advantage of it.
Edit: we have not hit commercial release yet.
ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Sony funds some of the development of dust if I'm not mistaken. Drud Green wrote:You make a good point, it's almost as if the people opposed to the aur refund are actually just jealous that they missed out.
Oh well If they said refund, you must understand the meaning of the word. Unless of course, you-¦re trying to give a new meaning to words, socially implement it, and make it retroactive to justify your point. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=691079#post691079Three Double-A Batteries wrote:It's going to be a fun lawsuit. We are now in session for the QQplayers X Sony, where they claim that "refund" applies to something that was not lost. Fun ideed.
I lost the aurum doing to spending it on items in-game and they have the power to, and are legally obligated to, return it.
|
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
300
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 12:44:00 -
[6] - Quote
I am only trying to get what I agreed to purchase. This is complete and utter bullshit that they'd even attempt anything such as this, I gave them MY money as an investment in the hopes of creating a better game, and now they stab me in the back by not fullfilling their end of the agreement AND take my money. unacceptable by any company. |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
300
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 12:45:00 -
[7] - Quote
xaerael Kabiel wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Ryder Azorria wrote:1: I'm guessing your friends mom didn't read the EULA (I have. Spoiler: you're screwed.) EULA wrote:
You are responsible for reviewing the Fees section of the Game for changes in the Fee or payment terms. If a change is unacceptable to you, you may, as your sole and exclusive remedy, terminate the EULA and close your Account as described in section 13 below. You are responsible for paying all applicable taxes and for all hardware, software, Internet service, and other costs you incur to access the System.
No, she didn't read the EULA. There's a good reason for that. It's not relevant to the purchase agreement, the contents of which include the product description as it stood at the time of purchase. Doesn't matter what civilised country you're applying the laws for - I'd say "even" Britain, but "especially" might fit better, since they offer better consumer protection than most US states, in which this is still not legal - but you can't retroactively use a digital product's EULA to get out of ANY detail included in a purchase agreement. Spoiler: The product description in an online store legally comprises a part of the purchase agreement. By British law as well as US, NZ, Australian and most other countries that actually have consumer laws with any possibility of application to online purchases. Uh, The EULA overrides everything. You're wrong. Like I said before, If you can actually find a Lawyer stupid/desperate enough to take the case, try to prosecute. Don't be sad when you fail though.
class action law suits are a rare fail especially with something like this where a company is clearly changing an agreement AFTER purchase.
|
|
|
| |
|