Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
578
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 20:58:00 -
[91] - Quote
Nguruthos IX wrote:
New Games modes =/= preventing the use of players skills/builds/weapons/etc from entering that map what-so-ever.
It really makes you wonder what kind of mass driver user would willingly enter a game mode that doesn't let him use mass drivers. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
578
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:00:00 -
[92] - Quote
Nguruthos IX wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:
Um. Are you suggesting every video game should cater to a crown of people who choose to completely ignore every mechanic and aspect of that game?
Oh no! The average World of Warcraft player is too stupid to figure out how to "not stand in the fire". We'd better remove fire from the game. Also from now on all PVE encounters are click-to-kill. There, now they don't have to learn anything and every new player can have so much FUN when they first join =D
... Sorry read that wrong, drunk. Thought you were excusing newberries from not swapping to AV and saying they shouldn't have to learn why they should. I'm saying give them somewhere else to hangout so my team doesn't get steamrolled because all the blueberries were to stupid to switch to AV, which they are, 90% of the time. |
Nguruthos IX
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
148
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:02:00 -
[93] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote: Then why would we need to separate by weapons?
Because why not? Split the player base? Skirmish and the eventual PVE will already do that. You're that guy telling Naughty Dog to cut multiplier from Uncharted because all you ever do is play story mode. That doesn't split the player base, it gives people more options without limiting what they use to play It doesn't matter, it's still limiting them. Dude, if you want to play against tanks, THEN DON'T GO INTO IO MODE, NO ONE IS ******* LIMITING YOU, THAT HAS GOT TO BE THE STUPIDEST THING I'VE EVER READ. A new mode in no way limits what you can do as long as you have alternatives.
Obviously all this will do is create a game mode of AV vs Tanks.
And gun-infantry vs gun-infantry.
See the problem? The rock paper scissors here is Infantry --> AV --> Tanks --> Infantry
Now you have a game of Rock vs Rock and Paper vs Scissors.
0 tanks (or any vehicle) would queue. Vehicles are effectively removed from the game. I hope CCP can see this, its a terrible idea. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
578
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:02:00 -
[94] - Quote
Vermaak Doe wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:gbghg wrote:Chris F2112 wrote:Tanks are a problem when playing against a decent tank driver, especially when you are running in a squad that isn't great at taking out vehicles. If you only have one good AV player, there is practically no chance that they will destroy a well fit tank.
It would be nice to have a mode where we don't have to worry about getting stomped by a tank. That said, in no way should this mode even touch planetary conquest or corp battles. Even 1 good AV player can be enough to restrict a tanks movements and make it difficult to dominate your team Still needs good infantry to keep him safe, unless he's just spamming AV grenades. Sidearms and the many secondary suggestions being made in the feedback part of the forum Hey, I can handle myself pretty well with a Scrambler, but I'm not taking down 5 guys who know where I'm at because I just launched the bat signal into the sky without some support. |
Nguruthos IX
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
148
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:04:00 -
[95] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:
Um. Are you suggesting every video game should cater to a crown of people who choose to completely ignore every mechanic and aspect of that game?
Oh no! The average World of Warcraft player is too stupid to figure out how to "not stand in the fire". We'd better remove fire from the game. Also from now on all PVE encounters are click-to-kill. There, now they don't have to learn anything and every new player can have so much FUN when they first join =D
... Sorry read that wrong, drunk. Thought you were excusing newberries from not swapping to AV and saying they shouldn't have to learn why they should. I'm saying give them somewhere else to hangout so my team doesn't get steamrolled because all the blueberries were to stupid to switch to AV, which they are, 90% of the time.
So wait, yeah? You were saying cater to inexcusably stupid right? strip down the game so anyone with a single digit IQ can enjoy it but anyone with average intellect views it as simple and pointless as tic tac toe. |
Knight SoIaire
Better Hide R Die
90
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:04:00 -
[96] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:gbghg wrote:Chris F2112 wrote:Tanks are a problem when playing against a decent tank driver, especially when you are running in a squad that isn't great at taking out vehicles. If you only have one good AV player, there is practically no chance that they will destroy a well fit tank.
It would be nice to have a mode where we don't have to worry about getting stomped by a tank. That said, in no way should this mode even touch planetary conquest or corp battles. Even 1 good AV player can be enough to restrict a tanks movements and make it difficult to dominate your team Still needs good infantry to keep him safe, unless he's just spamming AV grenades. Sidearms and the many secondary suggestions being made in the feedback part of the forum but I'm not taking down 5 guys who know where I'm at because I just launched the bat signal into the sky without some support.
Good.
You're not supposed to be able to.
Working as intended. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
578
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:05:00 -
[97] - Quote
Nguruthos IX wrote:
Obviously all this will do is create a game mode of AV vs Tanks.
And gun-infantry vs gun-infantry.
See the problem? The rock paper scissors here is Infantry --> AV --> Tanks --> Infantry
Now you have a game of Rock vs Rock and Paper vs Scissors.
0 tanks (or any vehicle) would queue. Vehicles are effectively removed from the game. I hope CCP can see this, its a terrible idea.
You're telling me an IO mode would completely stop people from using guns in regular ambush? You've never been in a corp battle have you? |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
578
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:08:00 -
[98] - Quote
Knight SoIaire wrote: Good.
You're not supposed to be able to.
Working as intended.
I never said I was supposed to, you're the one who said that 1 AV guy could keep a tank pinned by himself. My response was "not if that tank has support and the AV guy doesn't", which we don't most of the time
Go on, play solo ambush without a squad, then comback and tell me how many tanks you took out by yourself while the blues just hung out in their little blob.
It's like fight O&S without summoning Solaire, good luck with that sh*t. I have done it BTW |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
794
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:09:00 -
[99] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:gbghg wrote:Chris F2112 wrote:Tanks are a problem when playing against a decent tank driver, especially when you are running in a squad that isn't great at taking out vehicles. If you only have one good AV player, there is practically no chance that they will destroy a well fit tank.
It would be nice to have a mode where we don't have to worry about getting stomped by a tank. That said, in no way should this mode even touch planetary conquest or corp battles. Even 1 good AV player can be enough to restrict a tanks movements and make it difficult to dominate your team Still needs good infantry to keep him safe, unless he's just spamming AV grenades. Sidearms and the many secondary suggestions being made in the feedback part of the forum Hey, I can handle myself pretty well with a Scrambler, but I'm not taking down 5 guys who know where I'm at because I just launched the bat signal into the sky without some support. My AV suit is a logi suit to be frankly honest my effectiveness against enemy infantry with a swarm launcher as my main is effectively unchanged. And the food metaphors in this thread have gotten out of control. |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
607
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:09:00 -
[100] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:gbghg wrote:Chris F2112 wrote:Tanks are a problem when playing against a decent tank driver, especially when you are running in a squad that isn't great at taking out vehicles. If you only have one good AV player, there is practically no chance that they will destroy a well fit tank.
It would be nice to have a mode where we don't have to worry about getting stomped by a tank. That said, in no way should this mode even touch planetary conquest or corp battles. Even 1 good AV player can be enough to restrict a tanks movements and make it difficult to dominate your team Still needs good infantry to keep him safe, unless he's just spamming AV grenades. Sidearms and the many secondary suggestions being made in the feedback part of the forum Hey, I can handle myself pretty well with a Scrambler, but I'm not taking down 5 guys who know where I'm at because I just launched the bat signal into the sky without some support. Flux nades + smg = U3 opening bar brawl |
|
Nguruthos IX
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
148
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:10:00 -
[101] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:
Obviously all this will do is create a game mode of AV vs Tanks.
And gun-infantry vs gun-infantry.
See the problem? The rock paper scissors here is Infantry --> AV --> Tanks --> Infantry
Now you have a game of Rock vs Rock and Paper vs Scissors.
0 tanks (or any vehicle) would queue. Vehicles are effectively removed from the game. I hope CCP can see this, its a terrible idea.
You're telling me an IO mode would completely stop people from using guns in regular ambush? You've never been in a corp battle have you?
It essentially would when you look at the prices.
AV (cheap) as in free-tens of thousands.
Vehicles. Effectively range from 500k-million ISK ds and 1-3 million ISk tanks.
Tell me, what idiot will call in a vehicle instead of come cheap or free/militia AV when fighting an entire team of people who know their vehicle will be forge-gunned from the sky before a ******** RDV has even the chance to crash it into a wall for them???
|
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
607
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:11:00 -
[102] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:gbghg wrote:Chris F2112 wrote:Tanks are a problem when playing against a decent tank driver, especially when you are running in a squad that isn't great at taking out vehicles. If you only have one good AV player, there is practically no chance that they will destroy a well fit tank.
It would be nice to have a mode where we don't have to worry about getting stomped by a tank. That said, in no way should this mode even touch planetary conquest or corp battles. Even 1 good AV player can be enough to restrict a tanks movements and make it difficult to dominate your team Still needs good infantry to keep him safe, unless he's just spamming AV grenades. Sidearms and the many secondary suggestions being made in the feedback part of the forum but I'm not taking down 5 guys who know where I'm at because I just launched the bat signal into the sky without some support.
Good.
You're not supposed to be able to.
Working as intended.[/quote] Says who? My corpmate ONLY uses scrambler pistols with his logi and he does great. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
578
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:11:00 -
[103] - Quote
gbghg wrote:And the food metaphors in this thread have gotten out of control. They also made me hungry, Man I want some Chinese Food now... |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
794
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:11:00 -
[104] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Knight SoIaire wrote: Good.
You're not supposed to be able to.
Working as intended.
I never said I was supposed to, you're the one who said that 1 AV guy could keep a tank pinned by himself. My response was "not if that tank has support and the AV guy doesn't", which we don't most of the time Go on, play solo ambush without a squad, then comback and tell me how many tanks you took out by yourself while the blues just hung out in their little blob. It's like fight O&S without summoning Solaire, good luck with that sh*t. I have done it BTW that was me actually and i said that with the assumption that you have your squad to protect you |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
794
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:12:00 -
[105] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:gbghg wrote:And the food metaphors in this thread have gotten out of control. They also made me hungry, Man I want some Chinese Food now... no don't say stuff like that or i'll be hungry as well |
CrotchGrab 360
Better Hide R Die
18
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:14:00 -
[106] - Quote
Winscar Shinobi wrote:You want the freedom to be diverse and drive your ship, but won't respect the freedom of others to want to play a mode where vehicles don't roll over them?
HEY!
YOU!
STOP MAKING SO MUCH SENSE! |
Knight SoIaire
Better Hide R Die
90
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:14:00 -
[107] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Knight SoIaire wrote: Good.
You're not supposed to be able to.
Working as intended.
I never said i was supposed to, you're the one who said that 1 AV guy could keep a tank pinned by himself. My response was "not if that tank has support and the AV guy doesn't, which we don't most of the time" Go on, play solo ambush without a squad, then comback and tell me how many tanks you took out by yourself while the blues just hung out in their little blob.
Actually, I already did, today.
I think it was an Unreal tanker, It was a Madrugar with a 80GJ Blaster, it also had an armour rep module.
I was using an Assault Forge Gun with a Complex Damage Mod, I also had a couple of AV Grenades at the time.
It was on Manus Peak, the tank was just to the left (From where I was standing) of the fishbowl right by a jagged rock formation.
Just so you dont accuse me of lying.
Just because you cant take out a tank on your own, doesn't mean I cant. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
578
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:14:00 -
[108] - Quote
Nguruthos IX wrote:
It essentially would when you look at the prices.
AV (cheap) as in free-tens of thousands.
Vehicles. Effectively range from 500k-million ISK ds and 1-3 million ISk tanks.
Tell me, what idiot will call in a vehicle instead of come cheap or free/militia AV when fighting an entire team of people who know their vehicle will be forge-gunned from the sky before a ******** RDV has even the chance to crash it into a wall for them???
You mean AV people who know what they're doing? You're just proving my point that tanks only do well because they always go up against noobs, but guess what? All those people who switched over to AV are now easy to pick off with infantry, that was what you said right? Paper, scissors, rock. |
Nguruthos IX
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
148
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:16:00 -
[109] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:
It essentially would when you look at the prices.
AV (cheap) as in free-tens of thousands.
Vehicles. Effectively range from 500k-million ISK ds and 1-3 million ISk tanks.
Tell me, what idiot will call in a vehicle instead of come cheap or free/militia AV when fighting an entire team of people who know their vehicle will be forge-gunned from the sky before a ******** RDV has even the chance to crash it into a wall for them???
You mean AV people who know what they're doing? You're just proving my point that tanks only do well because they always go up against noobs, but guess what? All those people who switched over to AV are now easy to pick off with infantry, that was what you said right? Paper, scissors, rock.
yeah... And you're proving my point that if you eliminate rock from rock paper scissors which is FINE. Then you end up with paper scissors which is inherently broken . |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
607
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:17:00 -
[110] - Quote
No one mentioned Italian food even though I was eating spaghetti not long ago |
|
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
578
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:17:00 -
[111] - Quote
Knight SoIaire wrote: Just because you cant take out a tank on your own, doesn't mean I cant.
Never said I couldn't take own out on my own, just that it was unlikely and harder to do then if you have support. F*CK, it's annoying whenever people assume me being in favor of an IO mode automatically means i have a problem taking on tanks.
That said, I have never taken out a Madrugar, so kudos to you. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
578
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:19:00 -
[112] - Quote
Nguruthos IX wrote: yeah... And you're proving my point that if you eliminate rock from rock paper scissors which is FINE. Then you end up with paper scissors which is inherently broken .
Why would anyone switch to paper if no one is using rock? lol
"I know they can't use vehicles, but I switched to AV anyway for the lols" |
Nguruthos IX
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
148
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:20:00 -
[113] - Quote
Vermaak Doe wrote:No one mentioned Italian food even though I was eating spaghetti not long ago
I really got a hankering for chipotle reading this thread. Not sure why, |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
578
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:21:00 -
[114] - Quote
Vermaak Doe wrote:No one mentioned Italian food even though I was eating spaghetti not long ago had some last night |
Nguruthos IX
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
148
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:22:00 -
[115] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote: yeah... And you're proving my point that if you eliminate rock from rock paper scissors which is FINE. Then you end up with paper scissors which is inherently broken .
Why would anyone switch to paper if no one is using rock? lol "I know they can't use vehicles, but I switched to AV anyway for the lols"
Anyone who wanted to use guns would be using guns in IO Anyone who wanted to blow up tanks with gear that cost 1000x less than the tanks would join the other ambush. Anyone who wanted to lose their tank with no feasible chance of financial compensation or victory after calling it in would que non IO
And no other vehicle ever would be used anywhere after. |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
607
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:22:00 -
[116] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote: yeah... And you're proving my point that if you eliminate rock from rock paper scissors which is FINE. Then you end up with paper scissors which is inherently broken .
Why would anyone switch to paper if no one is using rock? lol "I know they can't use vehicles, but I switched to AV anyway for the lols" Without scissors (tanks) there's no need for rock (Av) so we're only left with a loop of paper. |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
607
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:24:00 -
[117] - Quote
Nguruthos IX wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:No one mentioned Italian food even though I was eating spaghetti not long ago I really got a hankering for chipotle reading this thread. Not sure why, Because that is what separates us from animals, chipolte makes us human |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
578
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:25:00 -
[118] - Quote
Nguruthos IX wrote:
Anyone who wanted to use guns would be using guns in IO Anyone who wanted to blow up tanks with gear that cost 1000x less than the tanks would join the other ambush. Anyone who wanted to lose their tank with no feasible chance of financial compensation or victory after calling it in would que non IO
And no other vehicle ever would be used anywhere after.
Like I said, you need to try a corp battle without decent AV. I guarantee it won't be fun.
Vermaak Doe wrote: Without scissors (tanks) there's no need for rock (Av) so we're only left with a loop of paper.
I take it you've never had a paperball fight? Oh, how I miss my childhood |
The dark cloud
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
1166
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:33:00 -
[119] - Quote
CCP wont implement a infantry only game mode cause that would be against new edens policy of "use whatever you want where ever you want". We allready have maps which are better for infantry then for vehicles. And a tank can be a deciding factor. When i decide to play as infantry and get overrun by proto suits then i know its time to call a tank in cause these guys have much more SP invested into AR setups instead of Av or vehicles. I would be stupid if i wouldnt use that what i have skilled into. |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
607
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:37:00 -
[120] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:
Anyone who wanted to use guns would be using guns in IO Anyone who wanted to blow up tanks with gear that cost 1000x less than the tanks would join the other ambush. Anyone who wanted to lose their tank with no feasible chance of financial compensation or victory after calling it in would que non IO
And no other vehicle ever would be used anywhere after.
Like I said, you need to try a corp battle without decent AV. I guarantee it won't be fun. Vermaak Doe wrote: Without scissors (tanks) there's no need for rock (Av) so we're only left with a loop of paper.
I take it you've never had a paperball fight? Oh, how I miss my childhood I guess you never have, it was funner when food was added to it |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |