Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming
887
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 19:18:00 -
[1] - Quote
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=633845#post633845
[REQUEST] Changes to Ambush and Ambush OMS - new modes such as infantry only on ambush. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63337&find=unread Update: This is being considered.
Yes! Didn't know why people were so against this...well the people besides the tank spamming leet players who farm kills on Ambush.
People who are looking for a quick gun on gun game mode, can finally do so without the fair of tank / LAV spamming. People arguing about it's too much like "CoD"... really? So CoD is the only game ever made that's infantry only? Plus it's another game mode, not THE ONLY GAME MODE.
You have a choice between Infantry only Ambush, or normal Ambush. Want to spam your tanks? Ambush. Want to get raped by tanks being followed by infantry? Ambush. Want gun on gun action, Infantry only Ambush.
It's a win win imo. I wish someone can tell me what's wrong with that. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
536
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 19:24:00 -
[2] - Quote
inb4butthurttankers |
PIMP MAC DADDY 2100374163
A.I.
42
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 19:26:00 -
[3] - Quote
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=633845#post633845 [REQUEST] Changes to Ambush and Ambush OMS - new modes such as infantry only on ambush. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63337&find=unreadUpdate: This is being considered. Yes! Didn't know why people were so against this...well the people besides the tank spamming leet players who farm kills on Ambush. People who are looking for a quick gun on gun game mode, can finally do so without the fair of tank / LAV spamming. People arguing about it's too much like "CoD"... really? So CoD is the only game ever made that's infantry only? Plus it's another game mode, not THE ONLY GAME MODE. You have a choice between Infantry only Ambush, or normal Ambush. Want to spam your tanks? Ambush. Want to get raped by tanks being followed by infantry? Ambush. Want gun on gun action, Infantry only Ambush. It's a win win imo. I wish someone can tell me what's wrong with that. Nice now I can play a match without being spamed by a scattered Ion cannon |
Vin Vicious
Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation
33
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 19:28:00 -
[4] - Quote
PIMP MAC DADDY 2100374163 wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=633845#post633845 [REQUEST] Changes to Ambush and Ambush OMS - new modes such as infantry only on ambush. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63337&find=unreadUpdate: This is being considered. Yes! Didn't know why people were so against this...well the people besides the tank spamming leet players who farm kills on Ambush. People who are looking for a quick gun on gun game mode, can finally do so without the fair of tank / LAV spamming. People arguing about it's too much like "CoD"... really? So CoD is the only game ever made that's infantry only? Plus it's another game mode, not THE ONLY GAME MODE. You have a choice between Infantry only Ambush, or normal Ambush. Want to spam your tanks? Ambush. Want to get raped by tanks being followed by infantry? Ambush. Want gun on gun action, Infantry only Ambush. It's a win win imo. I wish someone can tell me what's wrong with that. Nice now I can play a match without being spamed by a scattered Ion cannon
yep now you can get spamed by noobtubes without worrying about getting spamed by scattered ion cannons. baby steps |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming
887
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 19:32:00 -
[5] - Quote
Vin Vicious wrote:PIMP MAC DADDY 2100374163 wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=633845#post633845 [REQUEST] Changes to Ambush and Ambush OMS - new modes such as infantry only on ambush. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63337&find=unreadUpdate: This is being considered. Yes! Didn't know why people were so against this...well the people besides the tank spamming leet players who farm kills on Ambush. People who are looking for a quick gun on gun game mode, can finally do so without the fair of tank / LAV spamming. People arguing about it's too much like "CoD"... really? So CoD is the only game ever made that's infantry only? Plus it's another game mode, not THE ONLY GAME MODE. You have a choice between Infantry only Ambush, or normal Ambush. Want to spam your tanks? Ambush. Want to get raped by tanks being followed by infantry? Ambush. Want gun on gun action, Infantry only Ambush. It's a win win imo. I wish someone can tell me what's wrong with that. Nice now I can play a match without being spamed by a scattered Ion cannon yep now you can get spamed by noobtubes without worrying about getting spamed by scattered ion cannons. baby steps
rather noobtubes than tanks...at least I can shoot them without the need of changing kits. |
Nguruthos IX
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
136
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 19:34:00 -
[6] - Quote
all this because tanks are op
:(
my poor drop-ship will be lonely |
Django Quik
R.I.f.t
326
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 19:37:00 -
[7] - Quote
Just because CCP is considering something doesn't mean it will ever get applied. That feedback report thread is just to let people know that their ideas have been seen and not completely ignored. I wouldn't go holding your breath because even if it does happen, it won't be for a very very long time. |
Sobriety Denied
FIREFLY ATLANTIS ENTERPRISES UNLIMITED TACNET
498
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 19:37:00 -
[8] - Quote
they need to go even one step farther by building the lolgun gaming whiners their kiddie pool with an AR only ambush |
Vin Vicious
Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation
33
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 19:38:00 -
[9] - Quote
either way, basic ambush will be deserted and AMBUSH OMS will be where all the tankdrivers and tankbusters will play. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
536
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 19:48:00 -
[10] - Quote
Vin Vicious wrote:either way, basic ambush will be deserted and AMBUSH OMS will be where all the tankdrivers and tankbusters will play. lol tankers hate OMS because of the supply depots, the lack of supply depots is the exact reason tanks have no business being in ambush. |
|
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
3212
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 19:48:00 -
[11] - Quote
I really hope they just make Ambush no vehicles, instead of creating yet another new varation. |
Sentient Archon
Red Star.
845
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 19:51:00 -
[12] - Quote
+1 for the idea |
Dr Stabwounds
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
15
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 19:54:00 -
[13] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Vin Vicious wrote:either way, basic ambush will be deserted and AMBUSH OMS will be where all the tankdrivers and tankbusters will play. lol tankers hate OMS because of the supply depots, the lack of supply depots is the exact reason tanks have no business being in ambush.
+1
Choose to willingly die so you can change fits and fight the tank or hide until it's gone? Crappy choices. |
arimal lavaren
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
188
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 19:54:00 -
[14] - Quote
I'm not totally opposed to the idea of some more interior fights. |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming
894
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 20:01:00 -
[15] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:Just because CCP is considering something doesn't mean it will ever get applied. That feedback report thread is just to let people know that their ideas have been seen and not completely ignored. I wouldn't go holding your breath because even if it does happen, it won't be for a very very long time.
They implemented OMS pretty quickly imo. Why wouldn't they want to try out Infantry only game modes? This IS a beta after all, so testing out new stuff is what it's about.
I see your point, but you're not taking into consideration the importance of testing stuff out. It won't surprise me if it's in the new build coming up. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
538
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 20:03:00 -
[16] - Quote
Dr Stabwounds wrote: Choose to willingly die so you can change fits and fight the tank or hide until it's gone? Crappy choices.
"Oh no, I'm sure somebody else will do it", yeah, we know how well that tends to go.
And then even if you do bring it down, you're either stuck with a side arm until you die or the match ends. I particularly hate switching over and then seeing that the tank got destroyed as I spwaned |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2507
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 20:06:00 -
[17] - Quote
Vin Vicious wrote:either way, basic ambush will be deserted and AMBUSH OMS will be where all the tankdrivers and tankbusters will play.
not really basic ambush will be for ppl who want pure gungame which is alot of high end infantry players Ambush OMS will be full on evrything which is good cuz now infantry has supply depot drops and installations to help counter |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2507
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 20:07:00 -
[18] - Quote
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:I really hope they just make Ambush no vehicles, instead of creating yet another new varation.
no need to make another read my thread using the current 2 modes u make OMS able to drop vehicles and have vanilla changed to be infantry only |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
538
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 20:10:00 -
[19] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:Vin Vicious wrote:either way, basic ambush will be deserted and AMBUSH OMS will be where all the tankdrivers and tankbusters will play. not really basic ambush will be for ppl who want pure gungame which is alot of high end infantry players Ambush OMS will be full on evrything which is good cuz now infantry has supply depot drops and installations to help counter Now we just need a vehicle only mode so that tank drivers can't say CCP favors Infantry. |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming
894
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 20:15:00 -
[20] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Mavado V Noriega wrote:Vin Vicious wrote:either way, basic ambush will be deserted and AMBUSH OMS will be where all the tankdrivers and tankbusters will play. not really basic ambush will be for ppl who want pure gungame which is alot of high end infantry players Ambush OMS will be full on evrything which is good cuz now infantry has supply depot drops and installations to help counter Now we just need a vehicle only mode so that tank drivers can't say CCP favors Infantry.
World of Tanks!!!
|
|
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
349
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 20:16:00 -
[21] - Quote
While tanks can be annoying, I have found it quite satisfying destroying those multimillion ISK machines
A good tank hunt in ambush is extremely fun, although it sours quickly when that tank has good ground support and cover. Getting steamrolled by infantry while the tank picks people off is about as bad as it gets. But a well balanced infantry fight means AV players can have a good duel with the tankers, which is very fun.
Either way, infantry only would be nice to have as an option. I have always felt that vehicles should be playing skirmish and stay out of ambush, as a tank in ambush is like bringing a gun to a knife fight. Players don't play ambush to fight tanks (they will if they have to, but most join in the hope of good infantry fights). |
That fine fellow
Forgotten Militia
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 20:31:00 -
[22] - Quote
Even as a dedicated tanker, I think it's nice to have an option for those who want to just fight infantry. But on the downside to this, I can see Ambush becoming more vehicle heavy because the number of vehicle operators playing that game mode might increase due to the decrease of people joining.
But of course, I could be wrong. I don't know the exact numbers for each group after all.
+1 |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries Legacy Rising
970
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 21:41:00 -
[23] - Quote
Infantry only ambush just makes the most sense |
Takahiro Kashuken
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
156
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 23:49:00 -
[24] - Quote
So then if infantry do get an infantry only ambush
What about this idea
Skirmish without the warbarge strike? for those tanks vs tanks and AV battles |
BobThe843CakeMan
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz
146
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 00:48:00 -
[25] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:So then if infantry do get an infantry only ambush
What about this idea
Skirmish without the warbarge strike? for those tanks vs tanks and AV battles or a mode with just tanks. Tht would be awesome. no av infantry just tanks. if infantry don't want me then i don't want av infantry. :). Fair is fair. |
J'Jor Da'Wg
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
672
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 00:52:00 -
[26] - Quote
I don't call infantry only ambush a new game mode, just a variation on the existing mode. Until I see a objective mode with actually new stuff in it, I won't be accept its a new mode anymore than AOMS is a new mode |
Takahiro Kashuken
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
156
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 01:04:00 -
[27] - Quote
BobThe843CakeMan wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:So then if infantry do get an infantry only ambush
What about this idea
Skirmish without the warbarge strike? for those tanks vs tanks and AV battles or a mode with just tanks. Tht would be awesome. no av infantry just tanks. if infantry don't want me then i don't want av infantry. :). Fair is fair.
I do play WOT and i enjoy it
I wouldnt mind seeing it in DUST but the only problem is that tank battles finish so quickly because it would be tanks with rails and damage mods 3 shotting each other as soon as anyone saw each other
|
BobThe843CakeMan
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz
146
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 01:06:00 -
[28] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:BobThe843CakeMan wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:So then if infantry do get an infantry only ambush
What about this idea
Skirmish without the warbarge strike? for those tanks vs tanks and AV battles or a mode with just tanks. Tht would be awesome. no av infantry just tanks. if infantry don't want me then i don't want av infantry. :). Fair is fair. I do play WOT and i enjoy it I wouldnt mind seeing it in DUST but the only problem is that tank battles finish so quickly because it would be tanks with rails and damage mods 3 shotting each other as soon as anyone saw each other so? thts the fun. ppl grind off infantry in skirmish and destroy each other with top tier tanks in the tank only mode. :D last with 0 isk wins. like a never ending game. :D |
ICECREAMK1NG
WARRIORS 1NC
438
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 01:19:00 -
[29] - Quote
Funny how things change.
I made a thread requesting this 9 or 10 months ago.
One idiot said to me, quote '' I will defend to the death my right to bring tanks to ambush''
Tanks on these stupid maps, that are designed for tanks, is one of the biggest reasons the player base is almost non existant.
Personaly i don't care about tanks, I just avoid them or afk the game if there;s 4 or 5 and let all the blue dots die to get my isk.
game is dumb, game is dumb. |
BobThe843CakeMan
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz
146
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 01:26:00 -
[30] - Quote
ICECREAMK1NG wrote:Funny how things change.
I made a thread requesting this 9 or 10 months ago.
One idiot said to me, quote '' I will defend to the death my right to bring tanks to ambush''
Tanks on these stupid maps, that are designed for tanks, is one of the biggest reasons the player base is almost non existant.
Personaly i don't care about tanks, I just avoid them or afk the game if there;s 4 or 5 and let all the blue dots die to get my isk.
game is dumb, game is dumb. i still think tanks should be allowed. i mean i used my skill points for tanks he used his for infantry of course im going to use tanks or i'm going to die. assuming we r equally skilled on foot. due to him having better infantry gear. but you know thts my look on it. |
|
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
132
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 01:57:00 -
[31] - Quote
Personally, I think the idea of a vehicles banned game mode sets a bad precedent, but meh. |
knight of 6
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
101
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 01:59:00 -
[32] - Quote
my concern is that the non-infantry only ambush would just become one massive vehicle fest. tanks can't survive without infantry support. non-infantry only would die because anti-infantry tanks (blaster) wouldn't be able to make a profit anymore because they don't do AV well at all and would leave. without anti infantry tanks the prey would be gone for AV players and railgun tanks which would undoubtedly move on to greener pastures
step 1) what this means to infantry, is nothing less than the death of the tanker (it would lose it's profit, why would anyone do it?) step 2) a dramatic increase in the number of HMG heavies (all the forge gunners gotta do something) step 3) the death of AV. (why would you need it?) step 4) corp/district matches roll around the tankers wipe the cobwebs off their 60 tonne death machines, unchecked by AV the leviathans roll about the battlefields cutting down swaths of unprepared AP babes, frantically the AR and lazor babes find old fits with AV nades only to find out they are completely useless against the 7000 hitpoint monsters. the few forge gunners still active are swamped to the point they can't counter the tanks. step 5) people complain that tanks are op though they aren't, the soldiers are simply unprepared to fight them. step 6) CCP lays down the nerf hammer yet again on the poor tankers. hammering home the final nail in their coffin. tanks go the way of the large missile turret and slowly sink into uselessness.
vehicles are part of the game. i'd like to keep them a part. i think that rather than having infantry only maps. a wiser path would be maps poorly suited to tanking tight areas with lots of verticality to provide swarm and forge vantage points (not unlike the sky-fire battery map). and removing the bowl/crater shape that allows tank snipe |
J Lav
Lost-Legion Orion Empire
37
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 02:05:00 -
[33] - Quote
The only reason Tanks are an issue in current ambush, is that CCP has completely failed to implement ANY close quarters environments into their maps. At most, there's one or two places on 2 maps, that have a single corridor with a corner. In the future build, they've promised more CQC, and that should go a long way to redeem people's choice to engage a tank or not, and sidearms like the SMG. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
539
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 02:15:00 -
[34] - Quote
BobThe843CakeMan wrote:ICECREAMK1NG wrote:Funny how things change.
I made a thread requesting this 9 or 10 months ago.
One idiot said to me, quote '' I will defend to the death my right to bring tanks to ambush''
Tanks on these stupid maps, that are designed for tanks, is one of the biggest reasons the player base is almost non existant.
Personaly i don't care about tanks, I just avoid them or afk the game if there;s 4 or 5 and let all the blue dots die to get my isk.
game is dumb, game is dumb. i still think tanks should be allowed. i mean i used my skill points for tanks he used his for infantry of course im going to use tanks or i'm going to die. assuming we r equally skilled on foot. due to him having better infantry gear. but you know thts my look on it. You don't have to die to get into a tank, you don't have to die to get out of a tank. I do have to die to get into an AV fit, I do have to die to get out an Av fit. It's simply not fair for there to be tanks if infantry doesn't have access to supply depots. |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming
900
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 02:28:00 -
[35] - Quote
knight of 6 wrote:my concern is that the non-infantry only ambush would just become one massive vehicle fest. tanks can't survive without infantry support. non-infantry only would die because anti-infantry tanks (blaster) wouldn't be able to make a profit anymore because they don't do AV well at all and would leave. without anti infantry tanks the prey would be gone for AV players and railgun tanks which would undoubtedly move on to greener pastures
step 1) what this means to infantry, is nothing less than the death of the tanker (it would lose it's profit, why would anyone do it?) step 2) a dramatic increase in the number of HMG heavies (all the forge gunners gotta do something) step 3) the death of AV. (why would you need it?) step 4) corp/district matches roll around the tankers wipe the cobwebs off their 60 tonne death machines, unchecked by AV the leviathans roll about the battlefields cutting down swaths of unprepared AP babes, frantically the AR and lazor babes find old fits with AV nades only to find out they are completely useless against the 7000 hitpoint monsters. the few forge gunners still active are swamped to the point they can't counter the tanks. step 5) people complain that tanks are op though they aren't, the soldiers are simply unprepared to fight them. step 6) CCP lays down the nerf hammer yet again on the poor tankers. hammering home the final nail in their coffin. tanks go the way of the large missile turret and slowly sink into uselessness.
vehicles are part of the game. i'd like to keep them a part. i think that rather than having infantry only maps. a wiser path would be maps poorly suited to tanking tight areas with lots of verticality to provide swarm and forge vantage points (not unlike the sky-fire battery map). and removing the bowl/crater shape that allows tank snipe
1- There's still Skirmish, and Ambush OMS. Being a drama queen about "the death of the tanker"...c'mon.
2- Heavies are a problem? looool...Last i checked, duvolles + dmg mods melts heavies faster then they even reach assault armor.
3- Drama queen again. Death of AV? Seriously? I have proto FG's and don't play Ambush. Again, there's Skirmish.
4- ???
5- Unprepared? Well there's no supply depots in Ambush, so yeah. Why do you think there's so few tanks in OMS. There's supply depots and installations to counter tanks.
6- Who's talking about nerfing tanks??? I don't think a single person in this thread mentions ANYTHING about nerfing tanks.
People are just asking for a infantry vs infantry game mode. This IS A FIRST PERSON SHOOTER, and correct me if I'm wrong but infantry vs infantry is the core mechanic of shooters. |
knight of 6
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
101
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 02:34:00 -
[36] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:BobThe843CakeMan wrote:ICECREAMK1NG wrote:Funny how things change.
I made a thread requesting this 9 or 10 months ago.
One idiot said to me, quote '' I will defend to the death my right to bring tanks to ambush''
Tanks on these stupid maps, that are designed for tanks, is one of the biggest reasons the player base is almost non existant.
Personaly i don't care about tanks, I just avoid them or afk the game if there;s 4 or 5 and let all the blue dots die to get my isk.
game is dumb, game is dumb. i still think tanks should be allowed. i mean i used my skill points for tanks he used his for infantry of course im going to use tanks or i'm going to die. assuming we r equally skilled on foot. due to him having better infantry gear. but you know thts my look on it. You don't have to die to get into a tank, you don't have to die to get out of a tank. I do have to die to get into an AV fit, I do have to die to get out an Av fit. It's simply not fair for there to be tanks if infantry doesn't have access to supply depots. Ambush should be just Infantry Tank drivers still have OMS, but the infantry can fight back there, which is what a lot tank drivers don't seem to like.
your right. they price for leaving a tank is much higher than simply death. it's death and the loss of 4-5 matches earnings... one does not simply leave a tank. while we don't need to die to get into a tank. there is no way the pilot will EVER leave their tank not sober anyways. we're in the same boat as you only the stakes are much higher. what do you propose we do with the tank once we leave? just leave 500,000 isk lying about like a discarded shell hoping nobody will take it and get blown up? what we get out simply to kill you? because my militia AR is so much better than the 125+ DAM main gun on the tank no doubt. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
540
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 02:51:00 -
[37] - Quote
knight of 6 wrote: your right. they price for leaving a tank is much higher than simply death. it's death and the loss of 4-5 matches earnings... one does not simply leave a tank. while we don't need to die to get into a tank. there is no way the pilot will EVER leave their tank not sober anyways. we're in the same boat as you only the stakes are much higher. what do you propose we do with the tank once we leave? just leave 500,000 isk lying about like a discarded shell hoping nobody will take it and get blown up? what we get out simply to kill you? because my militia AR is so much better than the 125+ DAM main gun on the tank no doubt.
When people start talking about the price of a tank it's because they're treating it as an "I win", button. You may not realize it, but you just said that it will take you 4-5 matches to make up for the loss of a tank; therefore the tank should last you 4-5 matches. Do you honestly think it's okay for you to stomp your way through 4 matches just because that's what your tank costs?
Bringing in a tank is always a big risk., they're not meant to be sustainable. The problem is that there is currently is very little risk in Ambush matches because of the lack of supply depots, people are essentially going "I deserve to win this match because I spent this much ISK". Sorry, but no one forced you to bring in your 500,00 ISK killing machine into a pub match that's only going to pay you about 300. If you lose a tank then you will go in the negatives for that match. Don't use it if you're not willing to lose it. |
Vance Alken
Commando Perkone Caldari State
101
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 03:03:00 -
[38] - Quote
More interior fights would be cool, but that should be due to base design, not some silly gamemode limitation. |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming
902
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 03:44:00 -
[39] - Quote
Vance Alken wrote:More interior fights would be cool, but that should be due to base design, not some silly gamemode limitation.
"game mode limitation"? You do realize nobody is suggesting to take out a game mode right? The point of this is give players a choice. Last time I checked, having more game modes = more things to do.
I still can't comprehend why people have a problem with adding another game mode just for infantry?!!... like... honestly, what's the big deal? |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
764
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 03:59:00 -
[40] - Quote
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Vance Alken wrote:More interior fights would be cool, but that should be due to base design, not some silly gamemode limitation. "game mode limitation"? You do realize nobody is suggesting to take out a game mode right? The point of this is give players a choice. Last time I checked, having more game modes = more things to do. I still can't comprehend why people have a problem with adding another game mode just for infantry?!!... like... honestly, what's the big deal? As others have said it sets a bad precedent, and a lot of people will end up playing it extensively and not see the need to invest in AV, right now getting stomped by a tank gives people good motivation to invest in AV. And stop complaining about having to die to switch to an AV fit, his tank is much more expensive than your suit. Besides it teaches players they have to be adaptable and be able to deal with different situations instead of pure infantry on infantry, what ccp need to do is improve the map designs, make them larger so we have more space to move around in and make area's where only infantry can access so people can have close range brawls they want. |
|
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
598
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 04:04:00 -
[41] - Quote
If their was no ambush oms I'd be pissed, but since there is guess how much I care? |
Baal Omniscient
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
357
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 04:05:00 -
[42] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:I really hope they just make Ambush no vehicles, instead of creating yet another new varation. no need to make another read my thread using the current 2 modes u make OMS able to drop vehicles and have vanilla changed to be infantry only Too lazy to read the thread, thanks for the summary. And agreed 100%. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
540
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 04:06:00 -
[43] - Quote
gbghg wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Vance Alken wrote:More interior fights would be cool, but that should be due to base design, not some silly gamemode limitation. "game mode limitation"? You do realize nobody is suggesting to take out a game mode right? The point of this is give players a choice. Last time I checked, having more game modes = more things to do. I still can't comprehend why people have a problem with adding another game mode just for infantry?!!... like... honestly, what's the big deal? As others have said it sets a bad precedent, and a lot of people will end up playing it extensively and not see the need to invest in AV, right now getting stomped by a tank gives people good motivation to invest in AV. And stop complaining about having to die to switch to an AV fit, his tank is much more expensive than your suit. Besides it teaches players they have to be adaptable and be able to deal with different situations instead of pure infantry on infantry, what ccp need to do is improve the map designs, make them larger so we have more space to move around in and make area's where only infantry can access so people can have close range brawls they want. Except these would just be "modes", the main purpose of Dust is FW an district control and all that jazz, and those will definitely involve vehicles. So yeah, you don't have to invest in AV to play an infantry only mode, but you do( or at least need someone who has) if you ever want to play at a higher level. |
Johnny Guilt
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
61
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 04:07:00 -
[44] - Quote
Well ****,there goes my safe haven, i just got used to barley seeing any tanks in OMS compared to regular ambush. |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
764
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 04:11:00 -
[45] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:gbghg wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Vance Alken wrote:More interior fights would be cool, but that should be due to base design, not some silly gamemode limitation. "game mode limitation"? You do realize nobody is suggesting to take out a game mode right? The point of this is give players a choice. Last time I checked, having more game modes = more things to do. I still can't comprehend why people have a problem with adding another game mode just for infantry?!!... like... honestly, what's the big deal? As others have said it sets a bad precedent, and a lot of people will end up playing it extensively and not see the need to invest in AV, right now getting stomped by a tank gives people good motivation to invest in AV. And stop complaining about having to die to switch to an AV fit, his tank is much more expensive than your suit. Besides it teaches players they have to be adaptable and be able to deal with different situations instead of pure infantry on infantry, what ccp need to do is improve the map designs, make them larger so we have more space to move around in and make area's where only infantry can access so people can have close range brawls they want. Except these would just be "modes", the main purpose of Dust is FW an district control and all that jazz, and those will definitely involve vehicles. So yeah, you don't have to invest in AV to play an infantry only mode, but you do( or at least need someone who has) if you ever want to play at a higher level. IMO i think making a new mode would be a bad idea, making new maps that are designed to screw tankers and vehicle users in every possible way= yes. you preserve the existing modes while also having maps where infantry has every advantage, and a reliance on someone else to bring the AV is why tankers can stomp so much, it doesn't cost much sp or isk to get an advanced swarm launcher, and stick a couple of damage mods on it and you can make sure that tankers will respect the danger infantry can pose |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
540
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 04:11:00 -
[46] - Quote
Johnny Guilt wrote:Well ****,there goes my safe haven, i just got used to barley seeing any tanks in OMS compared to regular ambush . lol there's like a 3/5 chance that someone will call in a tank in ambush, it's like .5 in OMS. Skirmish has more tankers than OMS for some reason though. |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
764
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 04:16:00 -
[47] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Johnny Guilt wrote:Well ****,there goes my safe haven, i just got used to barley seeing any tanks in OMS compared to regular ambush . lol there's like a 3/5 chance that someone will call in a tank in ambush, it's like .5 in OMS. Skirmish has more tankers than OMS for some reason though. more space and better cover for them |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
541
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 04:18:00 -
[48] - Quote
gbghg wrote:get an advanced swarm launcher, and stick a couple of damage mods on it and you can make sure that tankers will respect the danger infantry can pose I don't think that they don't realize the dangers of infantry, it's that they know that their will be very little AV in Ambush, I blame that on the absence of supply depots. Essentially most tankers stick to ambush because it's a safe bet. It doesn't matter if it's just militia AV or how expensive your tank is, if an entire team switches to AV then your tank is going down, but that will almost never happen in an Ambush match and tankers know it.
So yes, I think Ambush should infantry only, tankers still OMS. or we could add supply depots to Ambush, but then what purpose does OMS serve?
gbghg wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Johnny Guilt wrote:Well ****,there goes my safe haven, i just got used to barley seeing any tanks in OMS compared to regular ambush . lol there's like a 3/5 chance that someone will call in a tank in ambush, it's like .5 in OMS. Skirmish has more tankers than OMS for some reason though. more space and better cover for them Ahh, right
Hell, if tanks were OMS and Skirmish only then I would actually call them under powered, but in Ambush? No. |
Jotun Hiem
The Tritan Industries
505
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 04:20:00 -
[49] - Quote
Hooray! Now all the points I put into AV are essentially useless in Ambush.
You guys keep fighting the good fight! |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
598
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 04:21:00 -
[50] - Quote
Jotun Hiem wrote:Hooray! Now all the points I put into AV are essentially useless in Ambush.
You guys keep fighting the good fight! Even as a part time tanker this realization brings me to tears |
|
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
764
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 04:33:00 -
[51] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:gbghg wrote:get an advanced swarm launcher, and stick a couple of damage mods on it and you can make sure that tankers will respect the danger infantry can pose I don't think that they don't realize the dangers of infantry, it's that they know that their will be very little AV in Ambush, I blame that on the absence of supply depots. Essentially most tankers stick to ambush because it's a safe bet. It doesn't matter if it's just militia AV or how expensive your tank is, if an entire team switches to AV then your tank is going down, but that will almost never happen in an Ambush match and tankers know it. So yes, I think Ambush should infantry only, tankers still OMS. or we could add supply depots to Ambush, but then what purpose does OMS serve? gbghg wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Johnny Guilt wrote:Well ****,there goes my safe haven, i just got used to barley seeing any tanks in OMS compared to regular ambush . lol there's like a 3/5 chance that someone will call in a tank in ambush, it's like .5 in OMS. Skirmish has more tankers than OMS for some reason though. more space and better cover for them Ahh, right Hell, if tanks were OMS and Skirmish only then I would actually call them under powered, but in Ambush? No. making an infantry only mode would affect lav's and dropships as well, some ambush maps are actually pretty fun to call lav's in and they make a good addition. but as i said before it comes done to poor map design, i mean manus peak practically screams for tanks to be called in but a couple of others (can't remember the names) have area's where only infantry can access while tanks are restricted to the outskirts and roads, these are the best maps as gives tankers the opportunity to get kills as enemy infantry moves about while also giving infantry a haven from the tank. we need more maps like this |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
542
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 04:34:00 -
[52] - Quote
Jotun Hiem wrote:Hooray! Now all the points I put into AV are essentially useless in Ambush.
You guys keep fighting the good fight! Getting rid of dumb-fire for Swarms was a dumb idea, just saying... |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
542
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 04:38:00 -
[53] - Quote
gbghg wrote:
making an infantry only mode would affect lav's and dropships as well, some ambush maps are actually pretty fun to call lav's in and they make a good addition. but as i said before it comes done to poor map design, i mean manus peak practically screams for tanks to be called in but a couple of others (can't remember the names) have area's where only infantry can access while tanks are restricted to the outskirts and roads, these are the best maps as gives tankers the opportunity to get kills as enemy infantry moves about while also giving infantry a haven from the tank. we need more maps like this
We do need more variety in regards to maps, and 2 of those maps have CRUs and Supply Depots for some reason... but I also see no harm in an infantry only mode. If we get more maps with "safe zones" then that's also fine with me, but I also think an infantry only mode would be fun. |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
764
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 04:39:00 -
[54] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Jotun Hiem wrote:Hooray! Now all the points I put into AV are essentially useless in Ambush.
You guys keep fighting the good fight! Getting rid of dumb-fire for Swarms was a dumb idea, just saying... yeah i struck a swarm launcher on a logi suit earlier, it let me dual stack complex damage mods on an advanced swam launcher, if i had dumbfire i could protect myself against enemy infantry |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
764
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 04:43:00 -
[55] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:gbghg wrote:
making an infantry only mode would affect lav's and dropships as well, some ambush maps are actually pretty fun to call lav's in and they make a good addition. but as i said before it comes done to poor map design, i mean manus peak practically screams for tanks to be called in but a couple of others (can't remember the names) have area's where only infantry can access while tanks are restricted to the outskirts and roads, these are the best maps as gives tankers the opportunity to get kills as enemy infantry moves about while also giving infantry a haven from the tank. we need more maps like this
We do need more variety in regards to maps, and 2 of those maps have CRUs and Supply Depots for some reason... but I also see no harm in an infantry only mode. My fear is that it might split the playerbase and some people will play only infantry only (can we shorten that to IO i'm getting bored of typing it) and neglect everything else the game has to offer. my other fear is that a weapon balanced towards a mode with vehicles will be considered unbalanced in the IO mode and it'll get nerfed/buffed across the board completely throwig it out of balance. |
Johnny Guilt
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
61
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 04:47:00 -
[56] - Quote
gbghg wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:gbghg wrote:
making an infantry only mode would affect lav's and dropships as well, some ambush maps are actually pretty fun to call lav's in and they make a good addition. but as i said before it comes done to poor map design, i mean manus peak practically screams for tanks to be called in but a couple of others (can't remember the names) have area's where only infantry can access while tanks are restricted to the outskirts and roads, these are the best maps as gives tankers the opportunity to get kills as enemy infantry moves about while also giving infantry a haven from the tank. we need more maps like this
We do need more variety in regards to maps, and 2 of those maps have CRUs and Supply Depots for some reason... but I also see no harm in an infantry only mode. My fear is that it might split the playerbase and some people will play only infantry only (can we shorten that to IO i'm getting bored of typing it) and neglect everything else the game has to offer. my other fear is that a weapon balanced towards a mode with vehicles will be considered unbalanced in the IO mode and it'll get nerfed/buffed across the board completely throwig it out of balance. The player base is already split to late to bring this up |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
764
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 04:50:00 -
[57] - Quote
Johnny Guilt wrote:gbghg wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:gbghg wrote:
making an infantry only mode would affect lav's and dropships as well, some ambush maps are actually pretty fun to call lav's in and they make a good addition. but as i said before it comes done to poor map design, i mean manus peak practically screams for tanks to be called in but a couple of others (can't remember the names) have area's where only infantry can access while tanks are restricted to the outskirts and roads, these are the best maps as gives tankers the opportunity to get kills as enemy infantry moves about while also giving infantry a haven from the tank. we need more maps like this
We do need more variety in regards to maps, and 2 of those maps have CRUs and Supply Depots for some reason... but I also see no harm in an infantry only mode. My fear is that it might split the playerbase and some people will play only infantry only (can we shorten that to IO i'm getting bored of typing it) and neglect everything else the game has to offer. my other fear is that a weapon balanced towards a mode with vehicles will be considered unbalanced in the IO mode and it'll get nerfed/buffed across the board completely throwig it out of balance. The player base is already split to late to bring this up no need to do anymore splitting then, huh? |
Johnny Guilt
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
61
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 04:51:00 -
[58] - Quote
gbghg wrote:Johnny Guilt wrote:gbghg wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:gbghg wrote:
making an infantry only mode would affect lav's and dropships as well, some ambush maps are actually pretty fun to call lav's in and they make a good addition. but as i said before it comes done to poor map design, i mean manus peak practically screams for tanks to be called in but a couple of others (can't remember the names) have area's where only infantry can access while tanks are restricted to the outskirts and roads, these are the best maps as gives tankers the opportunity to get kills as enemy infantry moves about while also giving infantry a haven from the tank. we need more maps like this
We do need more variety in regards to maps, and 2 of those maps have CRUs and Supply Depots for some reason... but I also see no harm in an infantry only mode. My fear is that it might split the playerbase and some people will play only infantry only (can we shorten that to IO i'm getting bored of typing it) and neglect everything else the game has to offer. my other fear is that a weapon balanced towards a mode with vehicles will be considered unbalanced in the IO mode and it'll get nerfed/buffed across the board completely throwig it out of balance. The player base is already split to late to bring this up no need to do anymore splitting then, huh? it's not splitting, it's cutting off a growth that was killing a mode. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
542
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 04:52:00 -
[59] - Quote
gbghg wrote: 1. My fear is that it might split the playerbase and some people will play only infantry only (can we shorten that to IO i'm getting bored of typing it) and neglect everything else the game has to offer.
2.my other fear is that a weapon balanced towards a mode with vehicles will be considered unbalanced in the IO mode and it'll get nerfed/buffed across the board completely throwig it out of balance.
1. Then those players are choosing to not get the complete Dust experience, but I think that's a choice they should be able to make. Just like I don't play skirmish cause I find it boring. 2. I can't think of any weapons where that would be the case. Maybe the Plasma Cannon once we get it, and Swarm Launchers if they ever get dumb-fire back, but it's not something I can really say for sure.
Edit: 1 thing, we should never balance for "modes", just like balancing for public matches is stupid. What might seem Op in ambush might be "just fine" or even under-powered in a corp battle. |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
764
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 04:56:00 -
[60] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:gbghg wrote: 1. My fear is that it might split the playerbase and some people will play only infantry only (can we shorten that to IO i'm getting bored of typing it) and neglect everything else the game has to offer.
2.my other fear is that a weapon balanced towards a mode with vehicles will be considered unbalanced in the IO mode and it'll get nerfed/buffed across the board completely throwig it out of balance.
1. Then those players are choosing to not get the complete Dust experience, but I think that's a choice they should be able to make. Just like I don't play skirmish cause I find it boring. 2. I can't think of any weapons where that would be the case. Maybe the Plasma Cannon once we get it, and Swarm Launchers if they ever get dumb-fire back, but it's not something I can really say for sure. You're right I am thinking more along future weapon lines on the second point, and i'll concede the first point |
|
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming
905
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 04:58:00 -
[61] - Quote
gbghg wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Vance Alken wrote:More interior fights would be cool, but that should be due to base design, not some silly gamemode limitation. "game mode limitation"? You do realize nobody is suggesting to take out a game mode right? The point of this is give players a choice. Last time I checked, having more game modes = more things to do. I still can't comprehend why people have a problem with adding another game mode just for infantry?!!... like... honestly, what's the big deal? As others have said it sets a bad precedent, and a lot of people will end up playing it extensively and not see the need to invest in AV, right now getting stomped by a tank gives people good motivation to invest in AV. And stop complaining about having to die to switch to an AV fit, his tank is much more expensive than your suit. Besides it teaches players they have to be adaptable and be able to deal with different situations instead of pure infantry on infantry, what ccp need to do is improve the map designs, make them larger so we have more space to move around in and make area's where only infantry can access so people can have close range brawls they want.
No offense, but that argument is dumb. I have Proto FG and never play Ambush to learn I need it. I have Adv AV nades, never played Ambush to know I need it.
I had Swarm launchers lvl 2 while I was using militia assault suits. You're telling me, people NEED to play Ambush to learn they need AV?
I still think infantry players would benefit from infantry vs infantry servers. People against this are tankers, or people too lazy to hunt tanks on skirmish. |
Deluxe Edition
Like a Boss.
65
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 05:01:00 -
[62] - Quote
How about ranked Ambush where we are matched up based on a ratio such as WP / Death. The problem right now isn't that tanks are OP, its that the teams are sometimes wildly imbalanced and this spawn system having major flaws, which leads to good tankers being able to farm newberries and eventually an entire team when they start spawning on top of each other. I don't know if you noticed but when good players vs good players very often a tank will go down with team work and good posiitoning.
Ambush isn't broken because of tanks, its broken because I have 6mil + skill points and am fighting opponents with less than 2 mil a majority of the time. |
Tech Ohm Eaven
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
444
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 05:02:00 -
[63] - Quote
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=633845#post633845 [REQUEST] Changes to Ambush and Ambush OMS - new modes such as infantry only on ambush. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63337&find=unreadUpdate: This is being considered. Yes! Didn't know why people were so against this...well the people besides the tank spamming leet players who farm kills on Ambush. People who are looking for a quick gun on gun game mode, can finally do so without the fair of tank / LAV spamming. People arguing about it's too much like "CoD"... really? So CoD is the only game ever made that's infantry only? Plus it's another game mode, not THE ONLY GAME MODE. You have a choice between Infantry only Ambush, or normal Ambush. Want to spam your tanks? Ambush. Want to get raped by tanks being followed by infantry? Ambush. Want gun on gun action, Infantry only Ambush. It's a win win imo. I wish someone can tell me what's wrong with that.
Posted back when we got advanced technology and we discovered that instead of tossing dirt clods that advanced technology such as rocks was much better.
Anywho heres the original thread asking for infantry only maps:
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=43416 |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
765
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 05:04:00 -
[64] - Quote
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:gbghg wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Vance Alken wrote:More interior fights would be cool, but that should be due to base design, not some silly gamemode limitation. "game mode limitation"? You do realize nobody is suggesting to take out a game mode right? The point of this is give players a choice. Last time I checked, having more game modes = more things to do. I still can't comprehend why people have a problem with adding another game mode just for infantry?!!... like... honestly, what's the big deal? As others have said it sets a bad precedent, and a lot of people will end up playing it extensively and not see the need to invest in AV, right now getting stomped by a tank gives people good motivation to invest in AV. And stop complaining about having to die to switch to an AV fit, his tank is much more expensive than your suit. Besides it teaches players they have to be adaptable and be able to deal with different situations instead of pure infantry on infantry, what ccp need to do is improve the map designs, make them larger so we have more space to move around in and make area's where only infantry can access so people can have close range brawls they want. No offense, but that argument is dumb. I have Proto FG and never play Ambush to learn I need it. I have Adv AV nades, never played Ambush to know I need it. I had Swarm launchers lvl 2 while I was using militia assault suits. You're telling me, people NEED to play Ambush to learn they need AV? I still think infantry players would benefit from infantry vs infantry servers. People against this are tankers, or people too lazy to hunt tanks on skirmish. I never said they have to play ambush, I said they have to come up against tanks, in either ambush or skirmish. I was saying that getting stomped in an ambush match when you have no AV is a good way to learn just how important it is have a decent AV fitting. and neither of those things apply to me so don't genralise |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
765
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 05:07:00 -
[65] - Quote
Tech Ohm Eaven wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=633845#post633845 [REQUEST] Changes to Ambush and Ambush OMS - new modes such as infantry only on ambush. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63337&find=unreadUpdate: This is being considered. Yes! Didn't know why people were so against this...well the people besides the tank spamming leet players who farm kills on Ambush. People who are looking for a quick gun on gun game mode, can finally do so without the fair of tank / LAV spamming. People arguing about it's too much like "CoD"... really? So CoD is the only game ever made that's infantry only? Plus it's another game mode, not THE ONLY GAME MODE. You have a choice between Infantry only Ambush, or normal Ambush. Want to spam your tanks? Ambush. Want to get raped by tanks being followed by infantry? Ambush. Want gun on gun action, Infantry only Ambush. It's a win win imo. I wish someone can tell me what's wrong with that. Posted back when we got advanced technology and we discovered that instead of tossing dirt clods that advanced technology such as rocks was much better. Anywho heres the original thread asking for infantry only maps: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=43416 I'll support infantry only maps or ones where vehicle's are at an extreme disadvantage but not a separate game mode |
Deluxe Edition
Like a Boss.
65
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 05:07:00 -
[66] - Quote
I don't think its a good idea to ostracize a portion of the community in a game mode. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
542
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 05:11:00 -
[67] - Quote
gbghg wrote: You're right I am thinking more along future weapon lines on the second point, and i'll concede the first point
Like I said in my edit, we shouldn't balance for these alternate modes. Weapon balance should be based on FW, not pub matches. That might make some weapons OP in public matches, it might not, I can't really say for sure, but I don't think weapons should be balanced around Instant battles. Though I think more map variety like you suggested would go long way in partially fixing that.
|
Baal Omniscient
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
357
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 05:12:00 -
[68] - Quote
gbghg wrote: making an infantry only mode would affect lav's and dropships as well, some ambush maps are actually pretty fun to call lav's in and they make a good addition. but as i said before it comes done to poor map design, i mean manus peak practically screams for tanks to be called in but a couple of others (can't remember the names) have area's where only infantry can access while tanks are restricted to the outskirts and roads, these are the best maps as gives tankers the opportunity to get kills as enemy infantry moves about while also giving infantry a haven from the tank. we need more maps like this
*cough* Ok, so if you are referring to communication, biomass, etc., then I have to say no. The enclosed areas are not havens from tanks. Infantry are corralled there, pushed back by tank blasters and their splash damage combined with basic infantry support, allowing enemy infantry to safely approach and grenade spam, then rush in to mop up the remaining injured players. And since the new spawn system is the way it is, this now becomes a spawn camp area unless people get smart enough to wait until the last person in that area dies before they spawn in..
Until better maps are made then having OMS for everything and vanilla for non-tank related engagements is a solid mid-ground while we wait for these maps to be streamed in. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
542
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 05:14:00 -
[69] - Quote
Deluxe Edition wrote:I don't think its a good idea to ostracize a portion of the community in a game mode. Do you go to burger joint and ask for sushi?
Sloth9230 wrote:Let me try and use an analogy.
If I go to a sushi place, am I going to ask for a hamburger? No. Does the existence of a sushi place mean that I can't get a burger elsewhere? No. If I want a burger, then I'll just go to a place that sells burgers. I'm not going to have the place shut down just because they don't have burgers.
If you want to use a vehicle then you wouldn't be interested in an infantry only mode anyway, why would that make anyone feel left out? My friends know I hate fish, so they don't invite me to seafood places, that doesn't bother me, because I DON"T LIKE FISH. The only way it would be "giving a good chunk of the player base the finger" would be if alternatives didn't exist. You're saying that certain modes shouldn't exist because not everyone would play them, really? That's like someone who only plays single player asking for multi-player to get cut just because they don't care for it.
|
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
766
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 05:20:00 -
[70] - Quote
Baal Omniscient wrote:gbghg wrote: making an infantry only mode would affect lav's and dropships as well, some ambush maps are actually pretty fun to call lav's in and they make a good addition. but as i said before it comes done to poor map design, i mean manus peak practically screams for tanks to be called in but a couple of others (can't remember the names) have area's where only infantry can access while tanks are restricted to the outskirts and roads, these are the best maps as gives tankers the opportunity to get kills as enemy infantry moves about while also giving infantry a haven from the tank. we need more maps like this
*cough* Ok, so if you are referring to communication, biomass, etc., then I have to say no. The enclosed areas are not havens from tanks. Infantry are corralled there, pushed back by tank blasters and their splash damage combined with basic infantry support, allowing enemy infantry to safely approach and grenade spam, then rush in to mop up the remaining injured players. And since the new spawn system is the way it is, this now becomes a spawn camp area unless people get smart enough to wait until the last person in that area dies before they spawn in.. Until better maps are made then having OMS for everything and vanilla for non-tank related engagements is a solid mid-ground while we wait for these maps to be streamed in. was actually referring to skim junction and the map that has b inside the tower, but what you described was what tanks and infantry working together can do, the main problem there is that the spawn system keeps dropping everyone into the **** |
|
Baal Omniscient
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
357
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 05:20:00 -
[71] - Quote
Deluxe Edition wrote:I don't think its a good idea to ostracize a portion of the community in a game mode. Says Mr. Gunnlogi.
Tell you what. Add another game mode where you ride the bolas into battle in your vehicles, no one can exit the vehicle, and it's for vehicles only. I guarantee you that 90% of infantry won't feel ostracized. Sure, some AV players might feel a bit left out, but they can still run in skirmish and OMS to find vehicles, so they can get over it. Same goes here. Vehicle drivers can find plenty of targets in Skirmish and OMS. You'll get over it.
Heavy vehicles are too overbearing for game modes where you have to die in order to equip AV. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
542
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 05:23:00 -
[72] - Quote
Baal Omniscient wrote: Heavy vehicles are too overbearing for game modes where you have to die in order to equip AV.
Especially when the only mode where that happens is also the one that's only determined by clone count i.e. deaths |
Baal Omniscient
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
357
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 05:30:00 -
[73] - Quote
gbghg wrote:Baal Omniscient wrote:gbghg wrote: making an infantry only mode would affect lav's and dropships as well, some ambush maps are actually pretty fun to call lav's in and they make a good addition. but as i said before it comes done to poor map design, i mean manus peak practically screams for tanks to be called in but a couple of others (can't remember the names) have area's where only infantry can access while tanks are restricted to the outskirts and roads, these are the best maps as gives tankers the opportunity to get kills as enemy infantry moves about while also giving infantry a haven from the tank. we need more maps like this
*cough* Ok, so if you are referring to communication, biomass, etc., then I have to say no. The enclosed areas are not havens from tanks. Infantry are corralled there, pushed back by tank blasters and their splash damage combined with basic infantry support, allowing enemy infantry to safely approach and grenade spam, then rush in to mop up the remaining injured players. And since the new spawn system is the way it is, this now becomes a spawn camp area unless people get smart enough to wait until the last person in that area dies before they spawn in.. Until better maps are made then having OMS for everything and vanilla for non-tank related engagements is a solid mid-ground while we wait for these maps to be streamed in. was actually referring to skim junction and the map that has b inside the tower, but what you described was what tanks and infantry working together can do, the main problem there is that the spawn system keeps dropping everyone into the **** Skim junction still ends up pinning infantry inside bravo, which leads to the grenade spam, and the inevitable mop up/spawn camp.
Even if the spawn system worked perfectly, it still leaves infantry spawning either in the open (tank fodder) or in an enclosed area (grenade fodder). A comprehensive spawn overhaul would help, but it would not solve the issue of being unable to handle a tank without hindering your ability to deal with infantry or losing a fitting.
And as for AV grenades, most people use locust or flux grenades until they see a need for them since grenades are so useful for dealing with infantry. And when a vehicle comes out? Well, have to lose my fitting to deal with it, gotta die now. If you start in with AV grenades, you lose most of your ability to handle entrenched enemies (unless you use a mass driver oc). |
knight of 6
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
101
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 03:05:00 -
[74] - Quote
i'd be willing to compromise.
Though IGÇÖm strongly against further dividing the community by adding "infantry only" anything. i have no malice against supply depots (in fact i really like them). i would support a buff to the HP of existing supply depots and the addition of new supply depots to normal ambush game modes. supply depots represent areas of tactical importance on ambush maps and add an interesting dynamic to matches. these points are of equal importance to tankers as infantry. (little known fact sitting next to a supply depot in a tank will slowly heal the tanks armor).
there seems to be some misconception as to why tankers don't drop their tanks in OMS matches and to a lessened degree in skirmish matches. i can tell you right now it's not because of supply depots. the only threat a supply depot posses to tankers is AV nade spam. the reason you don't see blaster tanks in oms or skirmish (as frequently) is large railgun installations. blasters aren't effective when it comes to dealing high damage over a short time. so even 4000 ehp turret emplacements pose a serious threat to them let alone the 3 or 4 on the map at once and even unmanned they shoot at us effectively doubling the av on the field without enemy forces having to dedicate more clones to take it down. to a certain point i expect a lot of AV and built my tank to take it. that said i really like the AV - tank balance right now and i'm not sure how lots more AV would effect it.
BTW, 3 is the magic number where av becomes fun, one with a forge, one with a swarm, one with AV nades, VS a really nice standard tank (has some proto mod on it). |
Ninjanomyx
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
23
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 05:23:00 -
[75] - Quote
The main reason people refer to those in favor of "Infantry Only Ambush" as "CoDtards" is b/c those who wish for such a Mode are inflexible Lemmings who want the *Insert Generic AAA Shooter* Experience in a Title which clearly has no home for it. If you all are so adamant about preserving your "Rambotard Fantasies" then by all means.......do it on any other Game which clearly caters to said behaviors. You simply want to grind "Meat" all day w/ Protosuits/Weapons w/o a clear Risk so you can finally equip Fused Locust Grenades & be "Team-Fire Gods" vs the rest of the Underdeveloped Community. I assure you that a good "Ground Game" Player with actual Skill/Logic has no issue Surviving & Killing with Tanks against them, & often kill more often b/c they learn to use Cover & Positioning, can move about the Map more freely, &/or swap to AV Nades to keep "Threats" @ bay. Flexibility??? WTH is that you ask??? Get Good.
People are so caught up in the FPS portion of this Title that they forget this is to be delivered as an MMO. Asking for such an ignorant choice of Mode only further diverts Development Attention away from the initial focus/vision of DUST 514. It also disincentives the Community from adapting and diversifying, resulting in a Player Base that will inevitably fail @ Endgame due to the lack of need for any actual Teamplay/Specialization. The only "Teamplay" this may promote is Zerg Warfare. You will all still QQ about "Blueberry Pie" KSing & wasting Clones for going "Lone Wolf" with a 1-24 KDR just the same as you do for being the only one AVing w/ Militia Swarms expecting to Solo a Tank, then proceed to QQ about your Team sucking for not all going AV at once b/c you did & went 0-12.
This proposal also promotes inevitable Segregation (Rosa Parks & MLK Jr. just shed a tear on the back of a Unicorn caught in a Bear Trap......), as we will also need *Insert Vehicle/Dropsuit/Weapon/Mods/Tier Here* Mode in order to.....at the very least....present a step back into Separate-But-Equal times. Are we seriously catering to the babies that QQ everytime anything kills them??? Apparently so...... Suicide is OP.....it Instakills and can be accessed freely through the UI with only the Soft-Counter of Logic & Chance/Luck. Nerf Sepuku, Buff Intelligence plox!!!!!! It only takes 1 Proto Forge or a sneaky AV Nader to wreak havok on a Tank. Not everyone on the Team needs to go AV......just 1, 2 at most. 1 good AV Specialist can quite easily pin down a Tank for an entire Match if left unchecked.
This is Chess......not Checkers people. I'm sure a "Pawns Only" Chess Match would be "Delightfully Engaging"..... It is the fault of the Player Base/Community for coming unprepared, along with multiple other clearcut Broken Mechanics that provide ample supply of "Beer Goggles" which provide the Illusion of many things being "OP". Once those Broken Mechanics are Fixed, then, and only then.....will we truly be able to guage what is and is not OP.
If this grossly incompetent Request gets Greenlit.....then just give me an SP Respec b/c I refuse to be limited in Game-Mode Access which inevitability devalues my Investments (Both Time/Choice & IRL Financial). Game-Modes are solely based on Community Participation. If all Infantry go into "Infantry Only Ambush" then the other Game-Modes suffer due to lack of Presence. This is a Space Shooter & an MMO, not "Hoof it, Pew Pew or QQ R-US".
TL;DR: Cut the Kitten, HTFU, Adapt or Die. |
Deluxe Edition
Like a Boss.
70
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 05:28:00 -
[76] - Quote
Baal Omniscient wrote:Deluxe Edition wrote:I don't think its a good idea to ostracize a portion of the community in a game mode. Says Mr. Gunnlogi. Tell you what. Add another game mode where you ride the bolas into battle in your vehicles, no one can exit the vehicle, and it's for vehicles only. I guarantee you that 90% of infantry won't feel ostracized. Sure, some AV players might feel a bit left out, but they can still run in skirmish and OMS to find vehicles, so they can get over it. Same goes here. Vehicle drivers can find plenty of targets in Skirmish and OMS. You'll get over it. Heavy vehicles are too overbearing for game modes where you have to die in order to equip AV.
Up until 2 weeks ago I was exclusively assault, and now I play 50/50 depending on my mood. I only went tanks because we lack one in our corp and its been hurting us in corp battles. |
Baal Omniscient
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
360
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 05:37:00 -
[77] - Quote
Deluxe Edition wrote:Baal Omniscient wrote:Deluxe Edition wrote:I don't think its a good idea to ostracize a portion of the community in a game mode. Says Mr. Gunnlogi. Tell you what. Add another game mode where you ride the bolas into battle in your vehicles, no one can exit the vehicle, and it's for vehicles only. I guarantee you that 90% of infantry won't feel ostracized. Sure, some AV players might feel a bit left out, but they can still run in skirmish and OMS to find vehicles, so they can get over it. Same goes here. Vehicle drivers can find plenty of targets in Skirmish and OMS. You'll get over it. Heavy vehicles are too overbearing for game modes where you have to die in order to equip AV. Up until 2 weeks ago I was exclusively assault, and now I play 50/50 depending on my mood. I only went tanks because we lack one in our corp and its been hurting us in corp battles. I was just ribbing you on that, it seems everyone these days has at least a FEW skills into vehicles. Nothing wrong with it. |
lordjanuz
Norwegian Dust514 Corporation
91
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 10:23:00 -
[78] - Quote
Soo its going to be a fake mode were infantery will not have to deal with tanks. Thats not a good school for them, so how to deal with real battles. Next , modes : no snipers, no laser, no heavy.
|
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2095
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 11:47:00 -
[79] - Quote
I've considered AV to be one of my primary roles since I first started playing DUST.
I enjoy it, I'm good at it, and Ambush is my favourite mode.
I hope CCP "considering" this only means they'll be putting a "no vehicles" modifier onto the upcoming arena mode they're considering, because tanks in Ambush are AWESOME fun.
When you're under attack by 4 enemy tanks, and you manage to leave only one alive, it's a great feeling. And that only really happens - or CAN happen - in Ambush. |
Moonracer2000
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
366
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 16:50:00 -
[80] - Quote
lordjanuz wrote:Soo its going to be a fake mode were infantery will not have to deal with tanks. Thats not a good school for them, so how to deal with real battles. Next , modes : no snipers, no laser, no heavy. Ambush is already a "fake" mode where players do not have to deal with objectives. It is not a good school for teaching them how to deal with real battles.
If you want to learn to play Dust well you should probably be playing Skirmish, which best simulates Faction Warfare battles.
I hope we get an infantry mode. I think a lot of players would enjoy it and it would offer some much needed variety to the game. |
|
ImperfectFan514
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
102
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 17:25:00 -
[81] - Quote
Moonracer2000 wrote:lordjanuz wrote:Soo its going to be a fake mode were infantery will not have to deal with tanks. Thats not a good school for them, so how to deal with real battles. Next , modes : no snipers, no laser, no heavy. Ambush is already a "fake" mode where players do not have to deal with objectives. It is not a good school for teaching them how to deal with real battles. If you want to learn to play Dust well you should probably be playing Skirmish, which best simulates Faction Warfare battles. I hope we get an infantry mode. I think a lot of players would enjoy it and it would offer some much needed variety to the game.
dumbest post of the day by far. At least in ambush, Everybody actually has to play the damn game versus AFKing up in the MCC. |
Blackie 71
Ground Pounders Inc.
7
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 17:28:00 -
[82] - Quote
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=633845#post633845
People who are looking for a quick gun on gun game mode, can finally do so without the fair of tank / LAV spamming. People arguing about it's too much like "CoD"... really? So CoD is the only game ever made that's infantry only? Plus it's another game mode, not THE ONLY GAME MODE.
What the heck is even wrong with an FPS being like COD? It's one of the best FPS out there. |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
790
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 17:41:00 -
[83] - Quote
Blackie 71 wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=633845#post633845
People who are looking for a quick gun on gun game mode, can finally do so without the fair of tank / LAV spamming. People arguing about it's too much like "CoD"... really? So CoD is the only game ever made that's infantry only? Plus it's another game mode, not THE ONLY GAME MODE.
What the heck is even wrong with an FPS being like COD? It's one of the best FPS out there. *cough*generic fps with an over promotion on sole play and k/dr*cough* |
Knight SoIaire
Better Hide R Die
88
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 18:37:00 -
[84] - Quote
Yay, now we can play Infantry VS Infantry battles!
How....... exciting......
Am I the only one whos not interested in this?
Atleast tanks add a dynamic to the battlefield in Ambush, its better than seeing ARs everywhere. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2105
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 18:40:00 -
[85] - Quote
Kills per... doctor?
That would be an interesting stat.
Yes, I know what you meant, but I'm sleep-deprived (it's almost 8am. I'm not normally up this late), and that was the first thing that came to mind when I saw it. |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
605
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 18:40:00 -
[86] - Quote
I read this post elsewhere, since the main argument is infantry have to die to change classes wouldn't it be quite a bit easier to remove regular ambush than segregating players? |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
790
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 18:42:00 -
[87] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Kills per... doctor? That would be an interesting stat. Yes, I know what you meant, but I'm sleep-deprived (it's almost 8am. I'm not normally up this late), and that was the first thing that came to mind when I saw it. aah that wonderful period where sleep deprivation does weird things to your thinking processes |
Unit-775
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
36
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 18:45:00 -
[88] - Quote
Knight SoIaire wrote:Yay, now we can play Infantry VS Infantry battles!
How....... exciting......
Am I the only one whos not interested in this?
Atleast tanks add a dynamic to the battlefield in Ambush, its better than seeing ARs everywhere.
no your not the only one.
Was to be expected to have the one trick ponys getting what they want.
Proves the point of whining gets results. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
574
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 18:54:00 -
[89] - Quote
Unit-775 wrote: Proves the point of whining gets results.
Dude, no one is whining. We want an infantry only mode because it would be fun, that's it, you got something against fun punk? |
EKH0 0ne
RestlessSpirits
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 18:56:00 -
[90] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Unit-775 wrote: Proves the point of whining gets results.
Dude, no one is whining. We want an infantry only mode because it would be fun, that's it, you got something against fun punk?
NERD FIGHT!!!!
P.S. I thought thats why none of you guys like Call of Duty |
|
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
1130
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 18:58:00 -
[91] - Quote
Vin Vicious wrote:PIMP MAC DADDY 2100374163 wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=633845#post633845 [REQUEST] Changes to Ambush and Ambush OMS - new modes such as infantry only on ambush. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63337&find=unreadUpdate: This is being considered. Yes! Didn't know why people were so against this...well the people besides the tank spamming leet players who farm kills on Ambush. People who are looking for a quick gun on gun game mode, can finally do so without the fair of tank / LAV spamming. People arguing about it's too much like "CoD"... really? So CoD is the only game ever made that's infantry only? Plus it's another game mode, not THE ONLY GAME MODE. You have a choice between Infantry only Ambush, or normal Ambush. Want to spam your tanks? Ambush. Want to get raped by tanks being followed by infantry? Ambush. Want gun on gun action, Infantry only Ambush. It's a win win imo. I wish someone can tell me what's wrong with that. Nice now I can play a match without being spamed by a scattered Ion cannon yep now you can get spamed by noobtubes without worrying about getting spamed by scattered ion cannons. baby steps Try using a mass driver, dumbshit. They take the most practice out of everything in the game to be good with. |
EKH0 0ne
RestlessSpirits
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 19:01:00 -
[92] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Vin Vicious wrote:PIMP MAC DADDY 2100374163 wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=633845#post633845 [REQUEST] Changes to Ambush and Ambush OMS - new modes such as infantry only on ambush. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63337&find=unreadUpdate: This is being considered. Yes! Didn't know why people were so against this...well the people besides the tank spamming leet players who farm kills on Ambush. People who are looking for a quick gun on gun game mode, can finally do so without the fair of tank / LAV spamming. People arguing about it's too much like "CoD"... really? So CoD is the only game ever made that's infantry only? Plus it's another game mode, not THE ONLY GAME MODE. You have a choice between Infantry only Ambush, or normal Ambush. Want to spam your tanks? Ambush. Want to get raped by tanks being followed by infantry? Ambush. Want gun on gun action, Infantry only Ambush. It's a win win imo. I wish someone can tell me what's wrong with that. Nice now I can play a match without being spamed by a scattered Ion cannon yep now you can get spamed by noobtubes without worrying about getting spamed by scattered ion cannons. baby steps Try using a mass driver, dumbshit. They take the most practice out of everything in the game to be good with.
Lol, I already did that on an Alt charachter. Results? Its a noob tube. 3 games of practice is all i needed
So whos a dumbshit now? |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
605
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 19:07:00 -
[93] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Unit-775 wrote: Proves the point of whining gets results.
Dude, no one is whining. We want an infantry only mode because it would be fun, that's it, you got something against fun punk? Not really, it was achieved by whining. Maybe, just maybe I can get the redline removed... |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
605
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 19:09:00 -
[94] - Quote
EKH0 0ne wrote:Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Vin Vicious wrote:PIMP MAC DADDY 2100374163 wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=633845#post633845 [REQUEST] Changes to Ambush and Ambush OMS - new modes such as infantry only on ambush. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63337&find=unreadUpdate: This is being considered. Yes! Didn't know why people were so against this...well the people besides the tank spamming leet players who farm kills on Ambush. People who are looking for a quick gun on gun game mode, can finally do so without the fair of tank / LAV spamming. People arguing about it's too much like "CoD"... really? So CoD is the only game ever made that's infantry only? Plus it's another game mode, not THE ONLY GAME MODE. You have a choice between Infantry only Ambush, or normal Ambush. Want to spam your tanks? Ambush. Want to get raped by tanks being followed by infantry? Ambush. Want gun on gun action, Infantry only Ambush. It's a win win imo. I wish someone can tell me what's wrong with that. Nice now I can play a match without being spamed by a scattered Ion cannon yep now you can get spamed by noobtubes without worrying about getting spamed by scattered ion cannons. baby steps Try using a mass driver, dumbshit. They take the most practice out of everything in the game to be good with. Lol, I already did that on an Alt charachter. Results? Its a noob tube. 3 games of practice is all i needed So whos a dumbshit now?
You, it's slightly overpowered in one area but needs a buff in another (2 to be exact) besides it takes more skill than an Ar
|
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
574
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 19:11:00 -
[95] - Quote
I swear, people are so quick to assume that wanting an Infantry only mode means that we don't know how to deal with tanks. I do know how to deal with a tank, it's not like AV is the hardest thing to figure out, but sometimes I just don't want to. Why should I make the sacrifice play just because the rest of blues are too stupid to go AV or at least try and protect me.
Somehow that makes me a CoDtard? CoD is probably the single shooter I hate the most. I've played Battlefield, no problem with tanks there; I've played uncharted, no problems with tanks there; I've played Halo, no problems with tanks there. |
Harkon Vysarii
Dead Six Initiative Daringly Inserting Large Dangerous Objects
73
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 19:14:00 -
[96] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:I swear, people are so quick to assume that wanting an Infantry only mode means that we don't know how to deal with tanks. I do know how to deal with a tank, it's not like AV is the hardest thing to figure out, but sometimes I just don't want to. Why should I make the sacrifice play just because the rest of blues are too stupid to go AV or at least try and protect me.
Somehow that makes me a CoDtard? CoD is probably the single shooter I hate the most. I've played Battlefield, no problem with tanks there; I've played uncharted, no problems with tanks there; I've played Halo, no problems with tanks there.
Uh does this guy speak the truth or is it just me. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
574
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 19:14:00 -
[97] - Quote
Vermaak Doe wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Unit-775 wrote: Proves the point of whining gets results.
Dude, no one is whining. We want an infantry only mode because it would be fun, that's it, you got something against fun punk? Not really, it was achieved by whining. Maybe, just maybe I can get the redline removed... Well good for the whiners I guess, but not everyone in favor of it is whining just because they don't know how to deal with tanks. That said, it does sound like there are a lot tank drivers butthurt that they won't have as many people to kill. |
EKH0 0ne
RestlessSpirits
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 19:25:00 -
[98] - Quote
Its the easiest gun in the game dude, what are you talking about? Its like your telling me New york city is in Alaska. |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
605
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 19:25:00 -
[99] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Unit-775 wrote: Proves the point of whining gets results.
Dude, no one is whining. We want an infantry only mode because it would be fun, that's it, you got something against fun punk? Not really, it was achieved by whining. Maybe, just maybe I can get the redline removed... Well good for the whiners I guess, but not everyone in favor of it is whining just because they don't know how to deal with tanks. That said, it does sound like there are a lot tank drivers butthurt that they won't have as many people to kill. Because now every butthurt infantry person will be hiding in regular ambush if CCP goes through with this. This is without a doubt like complaining certain weapons shouldn't be allowed in ambush or even certain dropsuits |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
605
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 19:29:00 -
[100] - Quote
EKH0 0ne wrote:Its the easiest gun in the game dude, what are you talking about? Its like your telling me New york city is in Alaska. Well let's see if that's true on facts shall we:
Mass driver cons:
Low ammo
Low muzzle velocity
High drop
Crappy shield damage
Assault rifle cons:
Doesn't alter aim when shot with it
Less damage per shot
Don't forget that the Ar is much mire practical to Ads with |
|
Crimson Moon V
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
242
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 19:31:00 -
[101] - Quote
Harkon Vysarii wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:I swear, people are so quick to assume that wanting an Infantry only mode means that we don't know how to deal with tanks. I do know how to deal with a tank, it's not like AV is the hardest thing to figure out, but sometimes I just don't want to. Why should I make the sacrifice play just because the rest of blues are too stupid to go AV or at least try and protect me.
Somehow that makes me a CoDtard? CoD is probably the single shooter I hate the most. I've played Battlefield, no problem with tanks there; I've played uncharted, no problems with tanks there; I've played Halo, no problems with tanks there. Uh does this guy speak the truth or is it just me. He is right. If there was a IO ambush I would play it when solo. I like popping tanks but I hate trying to fight 5 tanks by myself.
None of it even matters. In the end all the good players will be in sov anyway. A new game mode would spice the beta up.
|
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
574
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 19:33:00 -
[102] - Quote
Vermaak Doe wrote: Because now every butthurt infantry person will be hiding in regular ambush if CCP goes through with this.
You mean newberries? You're right, I'm sorry tankers won't get to slaughter noobs anymore. Honestly, the only people who don't know how to fight a tank are noobs charging at them with their little ARs.
I take back what I said about the lack of supply depots, newberries are the reason tankers hangout in ambush. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2106
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 19:36:00 -
[103] - Quote
Do I want a mode with no vehicles? Not really. If they add a mode with no vehicles, will I play it? Only when I'm with a squad and other people want to do so. If they remove vehicles from Ambush, will I be upset? Yes. I'll be very upset. If they add a new mode that I don't particularly care for, will I be upset? No. That's fine. Let people have their AR-fests.
Don't try and tell me "it's ok, you can play OMS", because no. No, OMS isn't the same as Ambush. Turrets, CRUs and Supply Depots would all - individually - change the dynamic of the mode significantly. Adding all three totally alter the way the mode is played, vehicles or no.
If they make a new vehicle-free Ambush mode, they need to keep the current Ambush. If they make the current Ambush mode infantry-only, they need to add a vehicle-friendly version of Ambush that ISN'T Ambush OMS. Maybe something like having Supply Depots spread across the map, so both teams have access (or at least a chance at access) to fitting swaps when the enemy tanks roll in. |
BASSMEANT
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
164
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 11:36:00 -
[104] - Quote
figures.
all you nerds were ever good at was hiding in "suppression" like a bunch of garbage codbois.
actually not like.
you're a buncha codbois.
now you want to turn ambush into suppression because you're being reminded that you're codbois.
next up on the request list:
"ccp make it so that only of the teams in the match have ammo. then maybe we can actually play without getting the crap kicked outta us. and since we are all fulla crap, that would take some serious doing"
you kids and your inability to play video games. you guys get worse and worse each year
"wahhhhhh someone shot me with a tank. wahhhhhhhh my kd.......... wahhhhhh where is my sniper rifle and a box of tampax!"
Peace B |
Baal Omniscient
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
362
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 11:42:00 -
[105] - Quote
EKH0 0ne wrote:Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Vin Vicious wrote:PIMP MAC DADDY 2100374163 wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=633845#post633845 [REQUEST] Changes to Ambush and Ambush OMS - new modes such as infantry only on ambush. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63337&find=unreadUpdate: This is being considered. Yes! Didn't know why people were so against this...well the people besides the tank spamming leet players who farm kills on Ambush. People who are looking for a quick gun on gun game mode, can finally do so without the fair of tank / LAV spamming. People arguing about it's too much like "CoD"... really? So CoD is the only game ever made that's infantry only? Plus it's another game mode, not THE ONLY GAME MODE. You have a choice between Infantry only Ambush, or normal Ambush. Want to spam your tanks? Ambush. Want to get raped by tanks being followed by infantry? Ambush. Want gun on gun action, Infantry only Ambush. It's a win win imo. I wish someone can tell me what's wrong with that. Nice now I can play a match without being spamed by a scattered Ion cannon yep now you can get spamed by noobtubes without worrying about getting spamed by scattered ion cannons. baby steps Try using a mass driver, dumbshit. They take the most practice out of everything in the game to be good with. Lol, I already did that on an Alt charachter. Results? Its a noob tube. 3 games of practice is all i needed So whos a dumbshit now? If you have to ask.... it's probably you.
And I can confirm that for you. It is you. You're calling a weapon that is slow firing, deals severely reduced damage to shields (almost all suits are shield suits these days), one of the most difficult weapons to aim at a distance in the game, the only handheld weapon besides the forge gun and laser that can hurt the user, almost entirely useless against enemies at a higher altitude than you, and having devastatingly limited ammo capacity a noob tube weapon.
But let me put it this way... if it was a super easy noob tube, where are all of the cheap little CoD players who would love to exploit it? I've seen plenty of people try, but 90% of the time go back to the AR because it get's too hard to use. Where are all of the noob tubers brah? 'Cause I'm lucky if I see one mass driver in a match on either team, and when I do it's usually me because I got tired of shooting the AR. |
Ninjanomyx
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
25
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 12:17:00 -
[106] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:I swear, people are so quick to assume that wanting an Infantry only mode means that we don't know how to deal with tanks. I do know how to deal with a tank, it's not like AV is the hardest thing to figure out, but sometimes I just don't want to. Why should I make the sacrifice play just because the rest of blues are too stupid to go AV or at least try and protect me.
Somehow that makes me a CoDtard? CoD is probably the single shooter I hate the most. I've played Battlefield, no problem with tanks there; I've played uncharted, no problems with tanks there; I've played Halo, no problems with tanks there.
This Post proves the Community Laziness & willing inability to play as a Team in a Teamplay Title. If there's "No Problem" with Tanks in other Games then why the hell did you even bother to post this contradictory nonsense??? You obviously have yet to learn what Squadding-Up is......L2P KthxBAI
Harkon Vysarii wrote:Uh does this guy speak the truth or is it just me.
Just you......follow the Lemming, taste the Pavement.
Sloth9230 wrote:I take back what I said about the lack of supply depots, newberries are the reason tankers hangout in ambush.
& Newberries are the excuse used by "Ground Gamers" wanting to funnel the CoDtard Newberries into IOA so they can farm them w/o fear of a Hard Counter *GASP*. B/C w/o the Near-Infinite HP/Ammo (Supply Depot Swap-Trick) & Auto-Cannons w/ Hax Aimbot & Turn Speed when Unmanned babysitting their precious Dropsuit from a Giant Hitbox w/ Paper Thin "Armor" & slow Regen (Free $$$ if you are smart), which has no way to Swap Fits freely for Flexibility Mid-Game, Infantry can't find the Nipple on their Baby Bottle w/o help. Go back to the Space Nursery in the MQ for Debrief plox. |
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
214
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 12:23:00 -
[107] - Quote
This thread is getting a little bit hostile... Kids, chill. Post constructively.
I like the idea of indoors maps, but instead of having a different game mode, mix it in with the regular ambush.
Although that's kind of going to be irrelevant when PC comes in. I mean, 200km districts? You're not going to have a building 200km in size. |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
804
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 14:04:00 -
[108] - Quote
Baal Omniscient wrote: If you have to ask.... it's probably you.
And I can confirm that for you. It is you. You're calling a weapon that is slow firing, deals severely reduced damage to shields (almost all suits are shield suits these days), one of the most difficult weapons to aim at a distance in the game, the only handheld weapon besides the forge gun and laser that can hurt the user, almost entirely useless against enemies at a higher altitude than you, and has devastatingly limited ammo capacity a noob tube weapon.
But let me put it this way... if it was a super easy noob tube, where are all of the cheap little CoD players who would love to exploit it? I've seen plenty of people try, but 90% of the time go back to the AR because it get's too hard to use. Where are all of the noob tubers brah? 'Cause I'm lucky if I see one mass driver in a match on either team, and when I do it's usually me because I got tired of shooting the AR.
ah MD duels are so fun especially on uneven terrain. |
BASSMEANT
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
169
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 23:18:00 -
[109] - Quote
LOL
"post constructively" = "please don't say anything negative or approaching negative or anything that might make anyone feel like they made a bad economic choice by spending money on the game. in short, please... just don't question anything about this game and that will be appreciated"
for this being a game made by the same company that makes EvE, these guys sure are sensitive.
infantry only mode is actually sorta dead nuts on when you think about it. it's just spelled slightly wrong.
what you're asking for is:
"infant only mode".
Peace B |
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
234
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 23:24:00 -
[110] - Quote
BASSMEANT wrote:"post constructively" = "please don't say anything negative or approaching negative or anything that might make anyone feel like they made a bad economic choice by spending money on the game. in short, please... just don't question anything about this game and that will be appreciated"
for this being a game made by the same company that makes EvE, these guys sure are sensitive.
Wow. Seriously? I'm trying hard not to break the rules here, for example, being respectful, and personal attacks. Really hard.
There's a huge difference between being constructive criticism and straight criticism. For example. "This game sucks" is criticism. "This game has some very serious gameplay issues. For example, it takes five minutes to reload. It needs to be lowered." is constructive criticism. See the difference?
Spotting a mistake and making a suggestion is constructive. Spotting a mistake and lambasting them for it is straight criticism, and helps no one.
|
|
Roy Ventus
Foxhound Corporation
181
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 23:43:00 -
[111] - Quote
I'd want these battles to be logical...by that I mean I'd want the map to be underground or in another area where RDVs would have trouble accessing.
I'll be satisfied with that.
I'd love to fight in a tunnel or highly dense urban-esque scape. Scouts and heavies will dominate while AV and Vehicles will be refused access >.>. We'll be easy picking for the pros because they can just run proto fits and have to deal with nothing...not even installations...Unless they were built in. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |