Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
1130
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 18:58:00 -
[91] - Quote
Vin Vicious wrote:PIMP MAC DADDY 2100374163 wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=633845#post633845 [REQUEST] Changes to Ambush and Ambush OMS - new modes such as infantry only on ambush. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63337&find=unreadUpdate: This is being considered. Yes! Didn't know why people were so against this...well the people besides the tank spamming leet players who farm kills on Ambush. People who are looking for a quick gun on gun game mode, can finally do so without the fair of tank / LAV spamming. People arguing about it's too much like "CoD"... really? So CoD is the only game ever made that's infantry only? Plus it's another game mode, not THE ONLY GAME MODE. You have a choice between Infantry only Ambush, or normal Ambush. Want to spam your tanks? Ambush. Want to get raped by tanks being followed by infantry? Ambush. Want gun on gun action, Infantry only Ambush. It's a win win imo. I wish someone can tell me what's wrong with that. Nice now I can play a match without being spamed by a scattered Ion cannon yep now you can get spamed by noobtubes without worrying about getting spamed by scattered ion cannons. baby steps Try using a mass driver, dumbshit. They take the most practice out of everything in the game to be good with. |
EKH0 0ne
RestlessSpirits
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 19:01:00 -
[92] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Vin Vicious wrote:PIMP MAC DADDY 2100374163 wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=633845#post633845 [REQUEST] Changes to Ambush and Ambush OMS - new modes such as infantry only on ambush. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63337&find=unreadUpdate: This is being considered. Yes! Didn't know why people were so against this...well the people besides the tank spamming leet players who farm kills on Ambush. People who are looking for a quick gun on gun game mode, can finally do so without the fair of tank / LAV spamming. People arguing about it's too much like "CoD"... really? So CoD is the only game ever made that's infantry only? Plus it's another game mode, not THE ONLY GAME MODE. You have a choice between Infantry only Ambush, or normal Ambush. Want to spam your tanks? Ambush. Want to get raped by tanks being followed by infantry? Ambush. Want gun on gun action, Infantry only Ambush. It's a win win imo. I wish someone can tell me what's wrong with that. Nice now I can play a match without being spamed by a scattered Ion cannon yep now you can get spamed by noobtubes without worrying about getting spamed by scattered ion cannons. baby steps Try using a mass driver, dumbshit. They take the most practice out of everything in the game to be good with.
Lol, I already did that on an Alt charachter. Results? Its a noob tube. 3 games of practice is all i needed
So whos a dumbshit now? |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
605
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 19:07:00 -
[93] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Unit-775 wrote: Proves the point of whining gets results.
Dude, no one is whining. We want an infantry only mode because it would be fun, that's it, you got something against fun punk? Not really, it was achieved by whining. Maybe, just maybe I can get the redline removed... |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
605
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 19:09:00 -
[94] - Quote
EKH0 0ne wrote:Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Vin Vicious wrote:PIMP MAC DADDY 2100374163 wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=633845#post633845 [REQUEST] Changes to Ambush and Ambush OMS - new modes such as infantry only on ambush. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63337&find=unreadUpdate: This is being considered. Yes! Didn't know why people were so against this...well the people besides the tank spamming leet players who farm kills on Ambush. People who are looking for a quick gun on gun game mode, can finally do so without the fair of tank / LAV spamming. People arguing about it's too much like "CoD"... really? So CoD is the only game ever made that's infantry only? Plus it's another game mode, not THE ONLY GAME MODE. You have a choice between Infantry only Ambush, or normal Ambush. Want to spam your tanks? Ambush. Want to get raped by tanks being followed by infantry? Ambush. Want gun on gun action, Infantry only Ambush. It's a win win imo. I wish someone can tell me what's wrong with that. Nice now I can play a match without being spamed by a scattered Ion cannon yep now you can get spamed by noobtubes without worrying about getting spamed by scattered ion cannons. baby steps Try using a mass driver, dumbshit. They take the most practice out of everything in the game to be good with. Lol, I already did that on an Alt charachter. Results? Its a noob tube. 3 games of practice is all i needed So whos a dumbshit now?
You, it's slightly overpowered in one area but needs a buff in another (2 to be exact) besides it takes more skill than an Ar
|
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
574
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 19:11:00 -
[95] - Quote
I swear, people are so quick to assume that wanting an Infantry only mode means that we don't know how to deal with tanks. I do know how to deal with a tank, it's not like AV is the hardest thing to figure out, but sometimes I just don't want to. Why should I make the sacrifice play just because the rest of blues are too stupid to go AV or at least try and protect me.
Somehow that makes me a CoDtard? CoD is probably the single shooter I hate the most. I've played Battlefield, no problem with tanks there; I've played uncharted, no problems with tanks there; I've played Halo, no problems with tanks there. |
Harkon Vysarii
Dead Six Initiative Daringly Inserting Large Dangerous Objects
73
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 19:14:00 -
[96] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:I swear, people are so quick to assume that wanting an Infantry only mode means that we don't know how to deal with tanks. I do know how to deal with a tank, it's not like AV is the hardest thing to figure out, but sometimes I just don't want to. Why should I make the sacrifice play just because the rest of blues are too stupid to go AV or at least try and protect me.
Somehow that makes me a CoDtard? CoD is probably the single shooter I hate the most. I've played Battlefield, no problem with tanks there; I've played uncharted, no problems with tanks there; I've played Halo, no problems with tanks there.
Uh does this guy speak the truth or is it just me. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
574
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 19:14:00 -
[97] - Quote
Vermaak Doe wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Unit-775 wrote: Proves the point of whining gets results.
Dude, no one is whining. We want an infantry only mode because it would be fun, that's it, you got something against fun punk? Not really, it was achieved by whining. Maybe, just maybe I can get the redline removed... Well good for the whiners I guess, but not everyone in favor of it is whining just because they don't know how to deal with tanks. That said, it does sound like there are a lot tank drivers butthurt that they won't have as many people to kill. |
EKH0 0ne
RestlessSpirits
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 19:25:00 -
[98] - Quote
Its the easiest gun in the game dude, what are you talking about? Its like your telling me New york city is in Alaska. |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
605
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 19:25:00 -
[99] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Unit-775 wrote: Proves the point of whining gets results.
Dude, no one is whining. We want an infantry only mode because it would be fun, that's it, you got something against fun punk? Not really, it was achieved by whining. Maybe, just maybe I can get the redline removed... Well good for the whiners I guess, but not everyone in favor of it is whining just because they don't know how to deal with tanks. That said, it does sound like there are a lot tank drivers butthurt that they won't have as many people to kill. Because now every butthurt infantry person will be hiding in regular ambush if CCP goes through with this. This is without a doubt like complaining certain weapons shouldn't be allowed in ambush or even certain dropsuits |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
605
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 19:29:00 -
[100] - Quote
EKH0 0ne wrote:Its the easiest gun in the game dude, what are you talking about? Its like your telling me New york city is in Alaska. Well let's see if that's true on facts shall we:
Mass driver cons:
Low ammo
Low muzzle velocity
High drop
Crappy shield damage
Assault rifle cons:
Doesn't alter aim when shot with it
Less damage per shot
Don't forget that the Ar is much mire practical to Ads with |
|
Crimson Moon V
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
242
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 19:31:00 -
[101] - Quote
Harkon Vysarii wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:I swear, people are so quick to assume that wanting an Infantry only mode means that we don't know how to deal with tanks. I do know how to deal with a tank, it's not like AV is the hardest thing to figure out, but sometimes I just don't want to. Why should I make the sacrifice play just because the rest of blues are too stupid to go AV or at least try and protect me.
Somehow that makes me a CoDtard? CoD is probably the single shooter I hate the most. I've played Battlefield, no problem with tanks there; I've played uncharted, no problems with tanks there; I've played Halo, no problems with tanks there. Uh does this guy speak the truth or is it just me. He is right. If there was a IO ambush I would play it when solo. I like popping tanks but I hate trying to fight 5 tanks by myself.
None of it even matters. In the end all the good players will be in sov anyway. A new game mode would spice the beta up.
|
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
574
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 19:33:00 -
[102] - Quote
Vermaak Doe wrote: Because now every butthurt infantry person will be hiding in regular ambush if CCP goes through with this.
You mean newberries? You're right, I'm sorry tankers won't get to slaughter noobs anymore. Honestly, the only people who don't know how to fight a tank are noobs charging at them with their little ARs.
I take back what I said about the lack of supply depots, newberries are the reason tankers hangout in ambush. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2106
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 19:36:00 -
[103] - Quote
Do I want a mode with no vehicles? Not really. If they add a mode with no vehicles, will I play it? Only when I'm with a squad and other people want to do so. If they remove vehicles from Ambush, will I be upset? Yes. I'll be very upset. If they add a new mode that I don't particularly care for, will I be upset? No. That's fine. Let people have their AR-fests.
Don't try and tell me "it's ok, you can play OMS", because no. No, OMS isn't the same as Ambush. Turrets, CRUs and Supply Depots would all - individually - change the dynamic of the mode significantly. Adding all three totally alter the way the mode is played, vehicles or no.
If they make a new vehicle-free Ambush mode, they need to keep the current Ambush. If they make the current Ambush mode infantry-only, they need to add a vehicle-friendly version of Ambush that ISN'T Ambush OMS. Maybe something like having Supply Depots spread across the map, so both teams have access (or at least a chance at access) to fitting swaps when the enemy tanks roll in. |
BASSMEANT
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
164
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 11:36:00 -
[104] - Quote
figures.
all you nerds were ever good at was hiding in "suppression" like a bunch of garbage codbois.
actually not like.
you're a buncha codbois.
now you want to turn ambush into suppression because you're being reminded that you're codbois.
next up on the request list:
"ccp make it so that only of the teams in the match have ammo. then maybe we can actually play without getting the crap kicked outta us. and since we are all fulla crap, that would take some serious doing"
you kids and your inability to play video games. you guys get worse and worse each year
"wahhhhhh someone shot me with a tank. wahhhhhhhh my kd.......... wahhhhhh where is my sniper rifle and a box of tampax!"
Peace B |
Baal Omniscient
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
362
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 11:42:00 -
[105] - Quote
EKH0 0ne wrote:Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Vin Vicious wrote:PIMP MAC DADDY 2100374163 wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=633845#post633845 [REQUEST] Changes to Ambush and Ambush OMS - new modes such as infantry only on ambush. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63337&find=unreadUpdate: This is being considered. Yes! Didn't know why people were so against this...well the people besides the tank spamming leet players who farm kills on Ambush. People who are looking for a quick gun on gun game mode, can finally do so without the fair of tank / LAV spamming. People arguing about it's too much like "CoD"... really? So CoD is the only game ever made that's infantry only? Plus it's another game mode, not THE ONLY GAME MODE. You have a choice between Infantry only Ambush, or normal Ambush. Want to spam your tanks? Ambush. Want to get raped by tanks being followed by infantry? Ambush. Want gun on gun action, Infantry only Ambush. It's a win win imo. I wish someone can tell me what's wrong with that. Nice now I can play a match without being spamed by a scattered Ion cannon yep now you can get spamed by noobtubes without worrying about getting spamed by scattered ion cannons. baby steps Try using a mass driver, dumbshit. They take the most practice out of everything in the game to be good with. Lol, I already did that on an Alt charachter. Results? Its a noob tube. 3 games of practice is all i needed So whos a dumbshit now? If you have to ask.... it's probably you.
And I can confirm that for you. It is you. You're calling a weapon that is slow firing, deals severely reduced damage to shields (almost all suits are shield suits these days), one of the most difficult weapons to aim at a distance in the game, the only handheld weapon besides the forge gun and laser that can hurt the user, almost entirely useless against enemies at a higher altitude than you, and having devastatingly limited ammo capacity a noob tube weapon.
But let me put it this way... if it was a super easy noob tube, where are all of the cheap little CoD players who would love to exploit it? I've seen plenty of people try, but 90% of the time go back to the AR because it get's too hard to use. Where are all of the noob tubers brah? 'Cause I'm lucky if I see one mass driver in a match on either team, and when I do it's usually me because I got tired of shooting the AR. |
Ninjanomyx
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
25
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 12:17:00 -
[106] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:I swear, people are so quick to assume that wanting an Infantry only mode means that we don't know how to deal with tanks. I do know how to deal with a tank, it's not like AV is the hardest thing to figure out, but sometimes I just don't want to. Why should I make the sacrifice play just because the rest of blues are too stupid to go AV or at least try and protect me.
Somehow that makes me a CoDtard? CoD is probably the single shooter I hate the most. I've played Battlefield, no problem with tanks there; I've played uncharted, no problems with tanks there; I've played Halo, no problems with tanks there.
This Post proves the Community Laziness & willing inability to play as a Team in a Teamplay Title. If there's "No Problem" with Tanks in other Games then why the hell did you even bother to post this contradictory nonsense??? You obviously have yet to learn what Squadding-Up is......L2P KthxBAI
Harkon Vysarii wrote:Uh does this guy speak the truth or is it just me.
Just you......follow the Lemming, taste the Pavement.
Sloth9230 wrote:I take back what I said about the lack of supply depots, newberries are the reason tankers hangout in ambush.
& Newberries are the excuse used by "Ground Gamers" wanting to funnel the CoDtard Newberries into IOA so they can farm them w/o fear of a Hard Counter *GASP*. B/C w/o the Near-Infinite HP/Ammo (Supply Depot Swap-Trick) & Auto-Cannons w/ Hax Aimbot & Turn Speed when Unmanned babysitting their precious Dropsuit from a Giant Hitbox w/ Paper Thin "Armor" & slow Regen (Free $$$ if you are smart), which has no way to Swap Fits freely for Flexibility Mid-Game, Infantry can't find the Nipple on their Baby Bottle w/o help. Go back to the Space Nursery in the MQ for Debrief plox. |
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
214
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 12:23:00 -
[107] - Quote
This thread is getting a little bit hostile... Kids, chill. Post constructively.
I like the idea of indoors maps, but instead of having a different game mode, mix it in with the regular ambush.
Although that's kind of going to be irrelevant when PC comes in. I mean, 200km districts? You're not going to have a building 200km in size. |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
804
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 14:04:00 -
[108] - Quote
Baal Omniscient wrote: If you have to ask.... it's probably you.
And I can confirm that for you. It is you. You're calling a weapon that is slow firing, deals severely reduced damage to shields (almost all suits are shield suits these days), one of the most difficult weapons to aim at a distance in the game, the only handheld weapon besides the forge gun and laser that can hurt the user, almost entirely useless against enemies at a higher altitude than you, and has devastatingly limited ammo capacity a noob tube weapon.
But let me put it this way... if it was a super easy noob tube, where are all of the cheap little CoD players who would love to exploit it? I've seen plenty of people try, but 90% of the time go back to the AR because it get's too hard to use. Where are all of the noob tubers brah? 'Cause I'm lucky if I see one mass driver in a match on either team, and when I do it's usually me because I got tired of shooting the AR.
ah MD duels are so fun especially on uneven terrain. |
BASSMEANT
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
169
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 23:18:00 -
[109] - Quote
LOL
"post constructively" = "please don't say anything negative or approaching negative or anything that might make anyone feel like they made a bad economic choice by spending money on the game. in short, please... just don't question anything about this game and that will be appreciated"
for this being a game made by the same company that makes EvE, these guys sure are sensitive.
infantry only mode is actually sorta dead nuts on when you think about it. it's just spelled slightly wrong.
what you're asking for is:
"infant only mode".
Peace B |
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
234
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 23:24:00 -
[110] - Quote
BASSMEANT wrote:"post constructively" = "please don't say anything negative or approaching negative or anything that might make anyone feel like they made a bad economic choice by spending money on the game. in short, please... just don't question anything about this game and that will be appreciated"
for this being a game made by the same company that makes EvE, these guys sure are sensitive.
Wow. Seriously? I'm trying hard not to break the rules here, for example, being respectful, and personal attacks. Really hard.
There's a huge difference between being constructive criticism and straight criticism. For example. "This game sucks" is criticism. "This game has some very serious gameplay issues. For example, it takes five minutes to reload. It needs to be lowered." is constructive criticism. See the difference?
Spotting a mistake and making a suggestion is constructive. Spotting a mistake and lambasting them for it is straight criticism, and helps no one.
|
|
Roy Ventus
Foxhound Corporation
181
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 23:43:00 -
[111] - Quote
I'd want these battles to be logical...by that I mean I'd want the map to be underground or in another area where RDVs would have trouble accessing.
I'll be satisfied with that.
I'd love to fight in a tunnel or highly dense urban-esque scape. Scouts and heavies will dominate while AV and Vehicles will be refused access >.>. We'll be easy picking for the pros because they can just run proto fits and have to deal with nothing...not even installations...Unless they were built in. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |