Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Arpentis
28
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:21:00 -
[61] - Quote
Abron why are you so against turning ambush into a game mode that would be better and more fun for all that people will actually want to play it? |
Abron Garr
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
256
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:24:00 -
[62] - Quote
Carilito wrote:Abron Garr wrote:Carilito wrote:SO you turn to the its a game argument when the rest of us are trying to make a serious point.
Ran out points to argue did you?
Make it gladiator arena and not for war.
Make Ambush more apt to its name. Instead of getting angry and making nearly unintelligible posts, it might be better if you actually used some critical thinking skills. Yes it is a game. And sometimes people want to just log in and kill a few people for some laughs. Not always, but sometimes. That's what TDM is for. It's also there so people with epeens can grab a few of their friends and fight another group with epeens for e-honor. There are a lot of reasons for having a TDM style game mode in Dust. Yeah make it gladiator arena not for war and Im not gonna type essays to you. If you wanna do what you just described go get that from COD because it already exists. Dust is trying to do something new and that can include KDR base game but ambush doesnt as it stand does little to further district control for what will eventually be null sec war. I have no problem with it making it there but mind you but if it does it will be hard pressed to have any real place there besides avoid that district till last. At that point it will be a cake walk. So by all mean have your ambush and we will ***** about the dead end future of it. It will stay in high sec and you guy can drink your beer and chill in high sec. Thats fine but that game doesnt translate well when commanders are trying to navigate district battle order and thats a bad game mechanic which at the level Eve commanders in Low and null sec. "Why send equal troop against equal troops, Ill wait and go around" says the eve commander
And there she is...."Go back to COD". I was wondering how long it would take before someone threw down that little gem into the discussion.
Listen kid, I play Eve. I don't play COD, but even if I did, that doesn't excuse the removal or changing of a game mode because you don't like to play it. Most FPS games have a version of TDM, Dust is no different. I don't know of anyone who has said that the Ambush style has to also apply to nullsec. It easily translates into low and hisec quickmatches however.
|
Carilito
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
345
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:27:00 -
[63] - Quote
SO you cant read the part where I agreed with you about high sec KDR games?
You obviously care much more about keeping this game mode in this game. You seem to be a one man "army" |
Abron Garr
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
256
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:28:00 -
[64] - Quote
Arpentis wrote:Abron why are you so against turning ambush into a game mode that would be better and more fun for all that people will actually want to play it?
Look, I'm not against any of the ideas you brought up. Like for instance the "Destroy this" you mentioned or the sabotage gameplay that Rorek offered. I just think those ideas deserve their own game mode. As long as there is a TDM style mode in the game, I don't really care what it is called. But I do want a TDM mode that I can choose when I feel like it, rather than being shoehorned into a Skirmish "lite" all the time. |
Abron Garr
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
256
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:31:00 -
[65] - Quote
Carilito wrote:SO you cant read the part where I agreed with you about high sec KDR games?
I muddled through the poorly written text brick you threw at me, but i got that part. That's not the argument. |
Carilito
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
345
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:33:00 -
[66] - Quote
Abron Garr wrote:Carilito wrote:SO you cant read the part where I agreed with you about high sec KDR games? I muddled through the poorly written text brick you threw at me, but i got that part. That's not the argument.
The argument is ambush should be changed into something more constructive that most players feel is awesome.
Your argument is TDM should be in Dust.
You see the difference |
Carilito
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
345
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:35:00 -
[67] - Quote
We all feel that Ambush isnt that fun and should be changed to something more fun. TDM isnt threatened by that its just getting reassigned some where else in my argument. Get off the pills bro. |
Kira Lannister
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
711
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:35:00 -
[68] - Quote
Honestly, leave ambush alone. You don't like it, don't play it. Honestly sometimes your tired and just want to lay back and kill. No playing tag with objective: a, b, c, d.
If you add an objective to ambush then it becomes a smaller mode of skirmish.
Their seems to be a base of players who enjoys it also. A game needs variety so it is natural to have a team death match mode. Mag had Suppression which was like Ambush, and Sabotage which was like Skirmish. Of course Sabotage was more popular, but people were still actively playing Suppression.
The core of FPS was a team death match. I remember just wasting hours away playing golden eye 64 with my friends. It was a 2 vs 2 match, or sometimes a free for all. It was hours of entertainment. I understand mindlessly killing can and does get boring but it is a nice change of pace. If you don't like ambush don't play it. It is a place where people who care little about objectives and team work can go to run about.
Changing it to be a mini skirmish is going to ruin the spirit of a team death match. I'm pretty sure the game will have smaller skirmish mode, and some sort of capture the flag mode. |
Abron Garr
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
256
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:36:00 -
[69] - Quote
Carilito wrote:Abron Garr wrote:Carilito wrote:SO you cant read the part where I agreed with you about high sec KDR games? I muddled through the poorly written text brick you threw at me, but i got that part. That's not the argument. The argument is ambush should be changed into something more constructive that most players feel is awesome. Your argument is TDM should be in Dust. You see the difference
Ambush is TDM. |
Carilito
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
345
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:37:00 -
[70] - Quote
Abron Garr wrote:Carilito wrote:Abron Garr wrote:Carilito wrote:SO you cant read the part where I agreed with you about high sec KDR games? I muddled through the poorly written text brick you threw at me, but i got that part. That's not the argument. The argument is ambush should be changed into something more constructive that most players feel is awesome. Your argument is TDM should be in Dust. You see the difference Ambush is TDM.
Ok your close now, take one more step with it. |
|
Logi Bro
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
836
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:37:00 -
[71] - Quote
Carilito wrote:We all feel that Ambush isnt that fun and should be changed to something more fun. TDM isnt threatened by that its just getting reassigned some where else in my argument. Get off the pills bro.
Whoa, blew my mind a bit there... You are saying we should change Ambush in to something different, and put in a TDM mode?... Do you understand how redundant this is? Why not just make a new game mode and leave Ambush as it is? |
Arpentis
28
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:38:00 -
[72] - Quote
Kira Lannister wrote:Honestly, leave ambush alone. You don't like it, don't play it. Honestly sometimes your tired and just want to lay back and kill. No playing tag with objective: a, b, c, d.
If you add an objective to ambush then it becomes a smaller mode of skirmish.
Their seems to be a base of players who enjoys it also. A game needs variety so it is natural to have a team death match mode. Mag had Suppression which was like Ambush, and Sabotage which was like Skirmish. Of course Sabotage was more popular, but people were still actively playing Suppression.
The core of FPS was a team death match. I remember just wasting hours away playing golden eye 64 with my friends. It was a 2 vs 2 match, or sometimes a free for all. It was hours of entertainment. I understand mindlessly killing can and does get boring but it is a nice change of pace. If you don't like ambush don't play it. It is a place where people who care little about objectives and team work can go to run about.
Changing it to be a mini skirmish is going to ruin the spirit of a team death match. I'm pretty sure the game will have smaller skirmish mode, and some sort of capture the flag mode. There's that adding an objective to a game mode makes it like all the other game modes with objectives... |
Carilito
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
345
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:39:00 -
[73] - Quote
Logi Bro wrote:Carilito wrote:We all feel that Ambush isnt that fun and should be changed to something more fun. TDM isnt threatened by that its just getting reassigned some where else in my argument. Get off the pills bro. Whoa, blew my mind a bit there... You are saying we should change Ambush in to something different, and put in a TDM mode?... Do you understand how redundant this is? Why not just make a new game mode and leave Ambush as it is?
ROFL the depth of human understanding must be low today. |
Logi Bro
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
836
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:43:00 -
[74] - Quote
Carilito wrote:Logi Bro wrote:Carilito wrote:We all feel that Ambush isnt that fun and should be changed to something more fun. TDM isnt threatened by that its just getting reassigned some where else in my argument. Get off the pills bro. Whoa, blew my mind a bit there... You are saying we should change Ambush in to something different, and put in a TDM mode?... Do you understand how redundant this is? Why not just make a new game mode and leave Ambush as it is? ROFL the depth of human understanding must be low today.
lol...I pointed out such a large flaw in your argument you can't even come up with a response. Reread the comment at the top of this quote and then respond to this. "TDM is just being reassigned some where else in my argument." Let me say this again: You want to change Ambush to something "more fun" and reassign TDM? That IS redundant. Maybe YOU should get off the pills. |
Abron Garr
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
256
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:47:00 -
[75] - Quote
Logi Bro wrote:Carilito wrote:Logi Bro wrote:Carilito wrote:We all feel that Ambush isnt that fun and should be changed to something more fun. TDM isnt threatened by that its just getting reassigned some where else in my argument. Get off the pills bro. Whoa, blew my mind a bit there... You are saying we should change Ambush in to something different, and put in a TDM mode?... Do you understand how redundant this is? Why not just make a new game mode and leave Ambush as it is? ROFL the depth of human understanding must be low today. lol...I pointed out such a large flaw in your argument you can't even come up with a response. Reread the comment at the top of this quote and then respond to this. "TDM is just being reassigned some where else in my argument." Let me say this again: You want to change Ambush to something "more fun" and reassign TDM? That IS redundant. Maybe YOU should get off the pills.
He's in his own world now. Just let him keep digging. |
Kira Lannister
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
711
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:47:00 -
[76] - Quote
Arpentis wrote:Kira Lannister wrote:Honestly, leave ambush alone. You don't like it, don't play it. Honestly sometimes your tired and just want to lay back and kill. No playing tag with objective: a, b, c, d.
If you add an objective to ambush then it becomes a smaller mode of skirmish.
Their seems to be a base of players who enjoys it also. A game needs variety so it is natural to have a team death match mode. Mag had Suppression which was like Ambush, and Sabotage which was like Skirmish. Of course Sabotage was more popular, but people were still actively playing Suppression.
The core of FPS was a team death match. I remember just wasting hours away playing golden eye 64 with my friends. It was a 2 vs 2 match, or sometimes a free for all. It was hours of entertainment. I understand mindlessly killing can and does get boring but it is a nice change of pace. If you don't like ambush don't play it. It is a place where people who care little about objectives and team work can go to run about.
Changing it to be a mini skirmish is going to ruin the spirit of a team death match. I'm pretty sure the game will have smaller skirmish mode, and some sort of capture the flag mode. There's that adding an objective to a game mode makes it like all the other game modes with objectives...
Yes adding an objective to ambush, makes it not longer the same mode.
Before it was a kill fest.
Add an objective it changes the entire mechanics of the match. It will involve defending that one objective. It essentially makes it a "light low calorie" version of Skirmish. Is it exactly like Skirmish? No, but it embodies the basic spirit of Skirmish.
Hey if they wanna add a Smaller Skirmish that is cool. Or other types of match like a capture the flag, or a juggernaut mode. More the better, but don't obliterate one game mode because it isn't the most popular one.
The point of team death match is to kill. Nothing else.
|
Arpentis
28
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:49:00 -
[77] - Quote
Kira Lannister wrote:Arpentis wrote:Kira Lannister wrote:Honestly, leave ambush alone. You don't like it, don't play it. Honestly sometimes your tired and just want to lay back and kill. No playing tag with objective: a, b, c, d.
If you add an objective to ambush then it becomes a smaller mode of skirmish.
Their seems to be a base of players who enjoys it also. A game needs variety so it is natural to have a team death match mode. Mag had Suppression which was like Ambush, and Sabotage which was like Skirmish. Of course Sabotage was more popular, but people were still actively playing Suppression.
The core of FPS was a team death match. I remember just wasting hours away playing golden eye 64 with my friends. It was a 2 vs 2 match, or sometimes a free for all. It was hours of entertainment. I understand mindlessly killing can and does get boring but it is a nice change of pace. If you don't like ambush don't play it. It is a place where people who care little about objectives and team work can go to run about.
Changing it to be a mini skirmish is going to ruin the spirit of a team death match. I'm pretty sure the game will have smaller skirmish mode, and some sort of capture the flag mode. There's that adding an objective to a game mode makes it like all the other game modes with objectives... Yes adding an objective to ambush, makes it not longer the same mode. Before it was a kill fest. Add an objective it changes the entire mechanics of the match. It will involve defending that one objective. It essentially makes it a "light low calorie" version of Skirmish. Is it exactly like Skirmish? No, but it embodies the basic spirit of Skirmish. Hey if they wanna add a Smaller Skirmish that is cool. Or other types of match like a capture the flag, or a juggernaut mode. More the better, but don't obliterate one game mode because it isn't the most popular one. The point of team death match is to kill. Nothing else. But who said that objective has to be hack and hold? |
Abron Garr
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
256
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:49:00 -
[78] - Quote
Arpentis wrote:Kira Lannister wrote:Honestly, leave ambush alone. You don't like it, don't play it. Honestly sometimes your tired and just want to lay back and kill. No playing tag with objective: a, b, c, d.
If you add an objective to ambush then it becomes a smaller mode of skirmish.
Their seems to be a base of players who enjoys it also. A game needs variety so it is natural to have a team death match mode. Mag had Suppression which was like Ambush, and Sabotage which was like Skirmish. Of course Sabotage was more popular, but people were still actively playing Suppression.
The core of FPS was a team death match. I remember just wasting hours away playing golden eye 64 with my friends. It was a 2 vs 2 match, or sometimes a free for all. It was hours of entertainment. I understand mindlessly killing can and does get boring but it is a nice change of pace. If you don't like ambush don't play it. It is a place where people who care little about objectives and team work can go to run about.
Changing it to be a mini skirmish is going to ruin the spirit of a team death match. I'm pretty sure the game will have smaller skirmish mode, and some sort of capture the flag mode. There's that adding an objective to a game mode makes it like all the other game modes with objectives...
Once you add other objectives to TDM, it's no longer traditional TDM. |
Carilito
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
345
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:50:00 -
[79] - Quote
Logi Bro wrote:Carilito wrote:Logi Bro wrote:Carilito wrote:We all feel that Ambush isnt that fun and should be changed to something more fun. TDM isnt threatened by that its just getting reassigned some where else in my argument. Get off the pills bro. Whoa, blew my mind a bit there... You are saying we should change Ambush in to something different, and put in a TDM mode?... Do you understand how redundant this is? Why not just make a new game mode and leave Ambush as it is? ROFL the depth of human understanding must be low today. lol...I pointed out such a large flaw in your argument you can't even come up with a response. Reread the comment at the top of this quote and then respond to this. "TDM is just being reassigned some where else in my argument." Let me say this again: You want to change Ambush to something "more fun" and reassign TDM? That IS redundant. Maybe YOU should get off the pills.
TDM has no place in this game as it is, it needs tweeks. Read this thread before commenting on something I already mentioned, There needs to be a point besides kill each other to make it more interesting and it can be as simple as adding CRUs to the maps and fixing the infinite grenade resupply from supply depots.
As for the name Ambush it needs to be a whole different game type or a more apt name.
TDM or Ambush needs both of those in my opinion but one will most likely do. |
Carilito
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
345
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:52:00 -
[80] - Quote
Can we get back to trying to better this game type like the thread OP wants |
|
Chris Ridgeway
42
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:53:00 -
[81] - Quote
Im not a big fan of Ambush, but Ill play it. I don't care if they change it or don't. What I do know that the arguement for people who don't like Ambush has trouble killing people is BULLSHIT. My friend hates Ambush, and he's a pretty decent FPS player in all aspects. And he's really pissed about the fact we did instant battle like 5x in a row today and got all Ambush maps. He loves DUST as a concept and game, but he did say if they don't fix this he isn't gonna play.
Apparently from what he told me his whole team just stopped spawning in the middle of the match, because they were basically spawn camped. Now before anyone starts, Default Spawn Point, does not mean the same thing as Random Spawn. So if there are 3 Default Spawn Points on the map, and I know where they are, I can spawn camp you.
This hasn't happened to me in an Ambush yet, I say yet cause you never know what may happen next game. However, if the spawns can be found and camped they need to at least change that. And before everyone asks, no Im not posting saying this is a friends problem and it's mine. Although I could see people thinking that.
So I say fix the spawns and leave the game mode. Simple Enough |
Kira Lannister
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
711
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:53:00 -
[82] - Quote
If it isn't broke don't fix it. Team Death Match was the corner stone of online fps gaming. Objectives were added to that cocktail to make it more enticing, but ultimately they should just have a plain old death match mode.
Sometimes you walk into that ice cream shop and honestly you just want vanilla, not mocha latte mint flavor.
Adding an objective kills the spirit of an original team death match. It becomes something different when you add an objective. Whether it is hack and hold. Or capture the flag. Or plant a bomb. |
Arpentis
28
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:53:00 -
[83] - Quote
Abron Garr wrote:Arpentis wrote:Kira Lannister wrote:Honestly, leave ambush alone. You don't like it, don't play it. Honestly sometimes your tired and just want to lay back and kill. No playing tag with objective: a, b, c, d.
If you add an objective to ambush then it becomes a smaller mode of skirmish.
Their seems to be a base of players who enjoys it also. A game needs variety so it is natural to have a team death match mode. Mag had Suppression which was like Ambush, and Sabotage which was like Skirmish. Of course Sabotage was more popular, but people were still actively playing Suppression.
The core of FPS was a team death match. I remember just wasting hours away playing golden eye 64 with my friends. It was a 2 vs 2 match, or sometimes a free for all. It was hours of entertainment. I understand mindlessly killing can and does get boring but it is a nice change of pace. If you don't like ambush don't play it. It is a place where people who care little about objectives and team work can go to run about.
Changing it to be a mini skirmish is going to ruin the spirit of a team death match. I'm pretty sure the game will have smaller skirmish mode, and some sort of capture the flag mode. There's that adding an objective to a game mode makes it like all the other game modes with objectives... Once you add other objectives to TDM, it's no longer traditional TDM. But that doesn't make it the same as any other game mode that is my point TDM or not. |
Abron Garr
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
256
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:54:00 -
[84] - Quote
Arpentis wrote:Kira Lannister wrote:Arpentis wrote:Kira Lannister wrote:Honestly, leave ambush alone. You don't like it, don't play it. Honestly sometimes your tired and just want to lay back and kill. No playing tag with objective: a, b, c, d.
If you add an objective to ambush then it becomes a smaller mode of skirmish.
Their seems to be a base of players who enjoys it also. A game needs variety so it is natural to have a team death match mode. Mag had Suppression which was like Ambush, and Sabotage which was like Skirmish. Of course Sabotage was more popular, but people were still actively playing Suppression.
The core of FPS was a team death match. I remember just wasting hours away playing golden eye 64 with my friends. It was a 2 vs 2 match, or sometimes a free for all. It was hours of entertainment. I understand mindlessly killing can and does get boring but it is a nice change of pace. If you don't like ambush don't play it. It is a place where people who care little about objectives and team work can go to run about.
Changing it to be a mini skirmish is going to ruin the spirit of a team death match. I'm pretty sure the game will have smaller skirmish mode, and some sort of capture the flag mode. There's that adding an objective to a game mode makes it like all the other game modes with objectives... Yes adding an objective to ambush, makes it not longer the same mode. Before it was a kill fest. Add an objective it changes the entire mechanics of the match. It will involve defending that one objective. It essentially makes it a "light low calorie" version of Skirmish. Is it exactly like Skirmish? No, but it embodies the basic spirit of Skirmish. Hey if they wanna add a Smaller Skirmish that is cool. Or other types of match like a capture the flag, or a juggernaut mode. More the better, but don't obliterate one game mode because it isn't the most popular one. The point of team death match is to kill. Nothing else. But who said that objective has to be hack and hold?
If you suggested making other game modes that are in between skirmish and Ambush in play style, I'd sign on to it in a heartbeat. But I cannot support the removal/revamping of Ambush if it means interfering with the TDM style. If your argument is about adding variety to the game, I'd agree. Eve, and subsequently Dust, is about choices. Don't take away mine to offset yours. |
Kira Lannister
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
711
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:55:00 -
[85] - Quote
Arbon speaks sense! |
Logi Bro
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
836
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:56:00 -
[86] - Quote
Logi Bro wrote:Carilito wrote:Arpentis wrote:Abron Garr wrote:Ambush is my favorite game. In my opinion, most of the people who dislike ambush have a problem getting kills and so they blame the game mode. Ambush is perfect for learning how to move and shoot. Just suck it up. Most people who dislike ambush dislike it because it has no objective other than shoot and kill This wraps it up Once again, I have to disagree with you. The newest map, when played on Ambush, has supply depots, and I am assuming CCP will continue to add more installations in later maps created for Ambush.
I already said this^ Supply Depots, CRUs, and Large Turret Installations will MOST LIKELY be added, I can't read CCP's mind, but they would be idiots not to. My argument wasn't that Ambush is good as it is, it was that the comment made by you was completely and utterly redundant. |
Abron Garr
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
256
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:56:00 -
[87] - Quote
Arpentis wrote:Abron Garr wrote:Arpentis wrote:Kira Lannister wrote:Honestly, leave ambush alone. You don't like it, don't play it. Honestly sometimes your tired and just want to lay back and kill. No playing tag with objective: a, b, c, d.
If you add an objective to ambush then it becomes a smaller mode of skirmish.
Their seems to be a base of players who enjoys it also. A game needs variety so it is natural to have a team death match mode. Mag had Suppression which was like Ambush, and Sabotage which was like Skirmish. Of course Sabotage was more popular, but people were still actively playing Suppression.
The core of FPS was a team death match. I remember just wasting hours away playing golden eye 64 with my friends. It was a 2 vs 2 match, or sometimes a free for all. It was hours of entertainment. I understand mindlessly killing can and does get boring but it is a nice change of pace. If you don't like ambush don't play it. It is a place where people who care little about objectives and team work can go to run about.
Changing it to be a mini skirmish is going to ruin the spirit of a team death match. I'm pretty sure the game will have smaller skirmish mode, and some sort of capture the flag mode. There's that adding an objective to a game mode makes it like all the other game modes with objectives... Once you add other objectives to TDM, it's no longer traditional TDM. But that doesn't make it the same as any other game mode that is my point TDM or not.
Is it exactly the same? Of course not. But once you start adding objectives you begin stepping on the toes of other potential game modes, including skirmish. |
Arpentis
28
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:57:00 -
[88] - Quote
Kira Lannister wrote:If it isn't broke don't fix it. Team Death Match was the corner stone of online fps gaming. Objectives were added to that cocktail to make it more enticing, but ultimately they should just have a plain old death match mode.
Sometimes you walk into that ice cream shop and honestly you just want vanilla, not mocha latte mint flavor.
Adding an objective kills the spirit of an original team death match. It becomes something different when you add an objective. Whether it is hack and hold. Or capture the flag. Or plant a bomb. Ok but it does not fit in this game as you saw last build as well as this one people do not like to play ambush so it's obviously doing something wrong so instead of having something no one plays how about we make into something people do play.
|
Ignatius Crumwald
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
475
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:58:00 -
[89] - Quote
Vehicles should cost personal WP in Ambush - in fact, list the WP cost in its stats.
Problem solved. |
Abron Garr
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
256
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 23:59:00 -
[90] - Quote
Carilito wrote:Logi Bro wrote:Carilito wrote:Logi Bro wrote:Carilito wrote:We all feel that Ambush isnt that fun and should be changed to something more fun. TDM isnt threatened by that its just getting reassigned some where else in my argument. Get off the pills bro. Whoa, blew my mind a bit there... You are saying we should change Ambush in to something different, and put in a TDM mode?... Do you understand how redundant this is? Why not just make a new game mode and leave Ambush as it is? ROFL the depth of human understanding must be low today. lol...I pointed out such a large flaw in your argument you can't even come up with a response. Reread the comment at the top of this quote and then respond to this. "TDM is just being reassigned some where else in my argument." Let me say this again: You want to change Ambush to something "more fun" and reassign TDM? That IS redundant. Maybe YOU should get off the pills. TDM has no place in this game as it is, it needs tweeks. Read this thread before commenting on something I already mentioned, There needs to be a point besides kill each other to make it more interesting and it can be as simple as adding CRUs to the maps and fixing the infinite grenade resupply from supply depots. As for the name Ambush it needs to be a whole different game type or a more apt name. TDM or Ambush needs both of those in my opinion but one will most likely do.
Who the hell are you to tell me TDM has no place in Dust? This is why I have a hard time taking you seriously. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |