| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
1216
   |
Posted - 2012.07.31 03:38:00 -
[31] - Quote
I think infinite ammo for anything is bad in all cases. I'm not even a fan of the Nanite Injector allowing infinite uses. |
Mo Gallas Gentralde
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
178
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 03:38:00 -
[32] - Quote
Jesse Jayne wrote:Have you read this whole ******* thread or are you really that incompetent?
Yes I read the entirety of the.. Single... post you responded to about shield HP in the middle of a topic regarding reloads.
As for incompetency? You can usually tell who is the most incompetent in a thread by simply viewing their posting record. Those with the most blatant and unrestrained insults are usually the least secure of the group, and very clearly state so through the use of incredibly simplistic insults. Hence they try to bolster an illusion of "being tough" by throwing around said useless insults.
Its similar to how a small dog, such as a chiwawa will bark at high speed almost constantly, while the larger dogs such as a Labrador will just lay down and sleep.
--Those with actual force don't have to assert themselves as they know there is no real threat to themselves. Those without force, flail around madly because they are constantly threatened.
Does that answer your question of incompetency? |
Zeran Haggai
Royal Uhlans
Amarr Empire
196
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 03:57:00 -
[33] - Quote
Mo Gallas Gentralde wrote:Jesse Jayne wrote:
Alright man post a couple links to these threads. There is millions so you can at least come up with ten right? An what ******* swarm launcher are you using that can blow up the strongest tanks in this game. Mine is maxed out with 3 10% damage increasers an I can shoot all 7 at noc an barely get through his shields. Just shut your mouth an quit trying to ruin someones thread.
So you're saying you want to take out a vehicle designed solely for the purpose of breaking through a group of infantry with.... a single infantry unit? What is the purpose of the vehicle then if solo infantry can destroy it?
I think you're missreading his post. He's not asking to solo highend tanks, he's calling bullshit on a guy who claims to solo high end tanks. |
JAG ONE
97
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 04:15:00 -
[34] - Quote
Mo Gallas Gentralde wrote:
Its similar to how a small dog, such as a chiwawa will bark at high speed almost constantly, while the larger dogs such as a Labrador will just lay down and sleep.
LOL.. this thread is now about dog psychology. I have Jack Russell terrier that thinks its a ******* rottweiler..  |
STB-stlcarlos989 EV
Circle of Huskarl
Minmatar Republic
936
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 04:19:00 -
[35] - Quote
Yeah I just wanted a civilized discussion over an Idea I had.  |
Wakko03
Better Hide R Die
134
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 04:19:00 -
[36] - Quote
It does seem logical that they would need to be resupplied.
I'll keep looking for someone to actually discuss the view from the vehicles, dropship should be a cockpit style limited view, the lav is a convertible, and the tank is also supposed to have a cockpit type of view, it shouldn't be that because you are in a vehicle you should be able to see 360degrees around it and notice someone creeping around..... yeah I know the mini-map and invisibility drop suits. |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood
Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 04:22:00 -
[37] - Quote
STB-stlcarlos989 EV wrote:Yeah I just wanted a civilized discussion over an Idea I had.
srry bud, some people arent capable of maintaining that.
while i feel it would make sense that ammo should be unlimited due to them being smart enough to put some kind of internal nanohive into a tank, i can also see how unlimited arty shells would be scary.
Ima go ahead and say that wont be an issue tho since i can see CCP being smart enough to either put a significant refire time on arties or make it so arty pieces cant direct fire without using small turrets |
STB-stlcarlos989 EV
Circle of Huskarl
Minmatar Republic
936
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 04:53:00 -
[38] - Quote
If tanks do have internal nano hives then it would be feasible to strap a nano hive to the back of a dropsuit for infinite ammo. If infantry want nano hives they have to consciously make the decision to equip nano hives, I feel that vehicle drivers should also have to make the decision to equip nano hives or use the module slot for defensive or offensive purposes.
Someone earlier mention the size of infantry nano hives, and the answer is to have the nano hives use the current radius for infantry and they would have a larger radius for vehicles. |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood
Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 05:06:00 -
[39] - Quote
STB-stlcarlos989 EV wrote:If tanks do have internal nano hives then it would be feasible to strap a nano hive to the back of a dropsuit for infinite ammo. If infantry want nano hives they have to consciously make the decision to equip nano hives, I feel that vehicle drivers should also have to make the decision to equip nano hives or use the module slot for defensive or offensive purposes.
Someone earlier mention the size of infantry nano hives, and the answer is to have the nano hives use the current radius for infantry and they would have a larger radius for vehicles.
ehhh........nah.......
its normal to think an infantry unit would have to drop a nanohive due to pg limitations of the suit.
vehicles on the other hand are a lot bigger with more juice.
How about this idea? When the capacitors in a vehicle are drained due to extended use, EW, whatever, the nanohive stops working for a time and the tank cant shoot at all? (I believe that will happen with EW anyway)
you talk bout tanks with unlimited ammo before experiencing EW and how it affects the tanks....I certainly dont think tanks should have a small amount of amm by any means if CCP decides to limit the amount of ammo |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 05:07:00 -
[40] - Quote
Hopefully it can work like eve ammo for the HAV's. |
|
|
STB-stlcarlos989 EV
Circle of Huskarl
Minmatar Republic
936
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 05:09:00 -
[41] - Quote
Debacle Nano wrote:Hopefully it can work like eve ammo for the HAV's.
Sorry I'm not an EVE player, but how does it work? |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 05:14:00 -
[42] - Quote
Eve players buy loads of ammo.Such as one blast out of all their 6 turrets costs 6 of their ammunition tat's equipped with the gun. They just buy stock loads of it. It's pretty cheap though if you just want standard rounds. There is tech 2 rounds and the advanced. |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood
Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 05:17:00 -
[43] - Quote
Debacle Nano wrote:Eve players buy loads of ammo.Such as one blast out of all their 6 turrets costs 6 of their ammunition tat's equipped with the gun. They just buy stock loads of it. It's pretty cheap though if you just want standard rounds. There is tech 2 rounds and the advanced.
honestly i think CCP will do that anyway just cause the EVE market is already in the business of producing ammo.
i load my railguns with light posts |
STB-stlcarlos989 EV
Circle of Huskarl
Minmatar Republic
936
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 05:17:00 -
[44] - Quote
With proper pricing that seems reasonable.
LOL Lurch. |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 05:18:00 -
[45] - Quote
I'm sure they'll be priced evenly. Such as railguns are expensive, missiles are moderately priced, and blasters are the cheapest. |
Draco Dustflier
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
45
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 05:29:00 -
[46] - Quote
wat we really need is for remote explosives to stick to tanks and do enough damage so that 2 kill a militia tank and 4 kill a marauder |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 05:31:00 -
[47] - Quote
Where does that factor into vehicle ammunition? |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood
Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 05:36:00 -
[48] - Quote
Draco Dustflier wrote:wat we really need is for remote explosives to stick to tanks and do enough damage so that 2 kill a militia tank and 4 kill a marauder
no. |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood
Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 05:36:00 -
[49] - Quote
hey carlos......301 |
STB-stlcarlos989 EV
Circle of Huskarl
Minmatar Republic
936
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 05:39:00 -
[50] - Quote
Oh really? LOL. |
|
|
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood
Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 05:43:00 -
[51] - Quote
STB-stlcarlos989 EV wrote:Oh really? LOL.
...................carlos...................... |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood
Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 05:44:00 -
[52] - Quote
I hope you understand the ramifications of what you have just done.... |
STB-stlcarlos989 EV
Circle of Huskarl
Minmatar Republic
936
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 05:44:00 -
[53] - Quote
|
From Costa Rica
Grupo de Asalto Chacal
CRONOS.
66
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 05:45:00 -
[54] - Quote
Limited amo is a great idea, and a solution to supply depots getting destroyed by vehicles. |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 05:45:00 -
[55] - Quote
From Costa Rica wrote:Limited amo is a great idea, and a solution to supply depots getting destroyed by vehicles.
Hopefully not limited, but priced. |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood
Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 05:46:00 -
[56] - Quote
hold on, ima make a sandwich, ill be back in a sec |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 05:51:00 -
[57] - Quote
I count 3 or 4 people on right now. You won't miss much. |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood
Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 05:51:00 -
[58] - Quote
okay back......
**** YOU CARLOS |
STB-stlcarlos989 EV
Circle of Huskarl
Minmatar Republic
936
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 05:53:00 -
[59] - Quote
 |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood
Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 05:56:00 -
[60] - Quote
btw, now that i think about it, whats stl? are you 989 millimeters tall? |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |