Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
4993
|
Posted - 2015.02.19 23:11:00 -
[1] - Quote
Attempting to move the conversation here as not to further derail the MBT/SHAV thread.
Concerns about Minmatar Commando providing too much of a bonus to swarms compared to other roles. I decided to actually do my own calcs to confirm everything firsthand.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_8dAX2RzWtlB0Xi0e_JA2WJ3ihrMJ4w_TnidSjjE_Kw/edit?usp=sharing
Short version, in a comparison between a Minmatar Commando with 2 Damage mods and a Non Commando with 3 damage mods. Damage is assumed neutral (No Proficiency or damage profiles). Delta Methodology follows 100%[(Minmando/NonMando)-1].... or in other words "How much more damage does the Minmando do than a Nonmmando"
Short version is
Difference in Alpha Damage ~5% Difference in Sustained Damage ~22%
I have not calculated the Gallmando with Plasma Cannon yet, but I suspect the results will be similar. More to come on that.
Another point to mention is that the Commandos in general are fairly balanced in all other situations, probably even leaning to the underpowered side as they often struggle on several fronts. that being said, if the only issue with Minmatar commandos is how well it performs with a Swarm Launcher, then it's really more that the Swarm needs to change, and less so the Minmmando itself.
Feel free to call me a moron and try to eat each other while we discuss.
"That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
Dust514 // Podcast
www.biomassed.net
|
Atiim
Heaven's Lost Property Negative-Feedback
15681
|
Posted - 2015.02.19 23:18:00 -
[2] - Quote
Your DPS is misleading, as it takes longer than 1.05s to launch a volley.
Though the thought of consuming a Pilot is, interesting to say the least.
The 1st Matari Commando
-HAND
|
Breakin Stuff
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
7303
|
Posted - 2015.02.19 23:26:00 -
[3] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Your DPS is misleading, as it takes longer than 1.05s to launch a volley, aside from that I'll wait until you're finished before commenting on the rest of your assertion. Though the thought of consuming a Pilot is, interesting to say the least. the problem is the math can only go based on what we have in the stats.
Now whether or not you have to wait for the server to confirm something that lets you lock, like a lag burp? can't account for that.
AV
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
4993
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 00:19:00 -
[4] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Your DPS is misleading, as it takes longer than 1.05s to launch a volley, aside from that I'll wait until you're finished before commenting on the rest of your assertion. Though the thought of consuming a Pilot is, interesting to say the least.
Fair enough but the point isn't to compare absolute DPS, it's to compare the difference between an Assault and a Commando, and since I have the same listed 1.05 seconds for both, it really doesn't matter. It's simply a component in a sustained DPS calc.
"That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
Dust514 // Podcast
www.biomassed.net
|
Doc DDD
TeamPlayers Negative-Feedback
345
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 00:35:00 -
[5] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Your DPS is misleading, as it takes longer than 1.05s to launch a volley, aside from that I'll wait until you're finished before commenting on the rest of your assertion. Though the thought of consuming a Pilot is, interesting to say the least.
Here is the problem - the initial swarm lock-on time means nothing.
Most swarmers are smart enough not to stand directly in front of a tank turret to try and lock on..
They lock on beside, behind or above a tank, fire, then lock on again.... usually, depending on range, this is the point that the first volleys hit the tank, causing him to hit hardeners right before the second volley hits, by the time the second volley hits the third volley has already locked on and been fired.
So unless you are a minmando bunny hopping in front of the turret firing swarms and miraculously get killed, you are garanteed 2 volleys to hit as pilots have 2 seconds to react to the first volley, and if they don't find cover the third hits around 4 seconds after the first impact.
The perception to the pilot is 3 volleys hitting in 4 seconds as they have no idea when the first lock on is starting..
An assault suit with three damage mods is not very viable as you only have a sidearm vs infantry, although I have been having a lot of luck as a cloaked scout with swarms and damage mods. Play as a vehicle chaser far away from infantry.
That also adds to the minmando problem, soon everyone will have the added 5% warbarges bonus, which affects both of their weapons, as does complex light damage mods--- enough EHP to hold their own against infantry and 2 garanteed swarm hits on every vehicle that gets within swarm range.
Swarms also turn corners, go through rocks and hills and sometimes don't give a direction indicator when the pilot takes damage.
Dropships have the benefit if afte- burning if the first volley does enough damage, second volley will still hit but with good flying you can out rep the last volley killing you if the swarmer locked on in time.
With tanks-
Minmando = Madrugar useless. Minmando = One shield hardener Gunlogi useless.
That's one minmando, that also has a secondary damage modded light weapon and a fairly high EHP and strafe speed |
DeathwindRising
ROGUE RELICS VP Gaming Alliance
880
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 00:55:00 -
[6] - Quote
and rattati aims to reduce vehicle hardeners to only one per vehicle fit... |
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
4993
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 01:05:00 -
[7] - Quote
Good job, you completely missed the point of the thread.
This thread is not here to discuss "OMG SWARMS ARE OP AGAINST TANKS!"
It's to discuss the relative differences between non-commandos using AV, and Commandos using AV. Not how they perform against vehicles because all of those values will be changing anyways so right now its irrelevant. So please remain on-topic and hold your grievances above how AV balances against HAVs, because we're not talking about that right now.
Anyways.
So crunching the numbers for the Gallente Commando....its comical in that a Caldari Commando can actually do more DPS...not much, but a little more. As for how the Gallmando compares to say an Assault, the Alpha is again....nearly identical. Where it really shines is in the sustained DPS, primarily due to its reload speed.
As for the Minmatar Commando, it's really not that much different. The difference in alpha is really pretty close, around 5%, but the real gem is the sustained DPS...again because the reload shaves off quite a bit of lost time. The reason the Minmatar Commando can muster more alpha than the triple modded Nonmmando is because it can fit 2 damage mods, whereas the Gallente cannot.
So in short, the Commandos are not capable of putting out much more DPS than a Nonmmando *until* the reload comes, at which point the DPS increases by a good margin. For a PLC this is after 1 shot, and a Swarm after 3, obviously.
So that begs the question of....where do you want things to land? I don't think innately changing the Commando bonuses is what needs to happen....their bonuses have good use in non-AV situations and nerfing the bonuses are simply going to cause collateral nerfs in areas where it is not needed.
That being said, it really comes down to How do you change the weapon so that the Commando bonus is not overbearing in its effectiveness. We've established that the differences in alpha are not too significant, so what it really comes down to is "How do we modify the Reload and Lock-On/Charge time of the Swarm/PLC so that the Reload bonus of the Commando is useful, but not overbearing."
"That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
Dust514 // Podcast
www.biomassed.net
|
Doc DDD
TeamPlayers Negative-Feedback
345
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 01:14:00 -
[8] - Quote
Exactly,
2 Swarmers = 4 garanteed hits
If using minmandos, which are viable vs infantry, rounding down to 1800 damage per volley sets the vehicle being hit with 7200 damage in 2 seconds ( start from first swarm impact ). 10000 EHP down to 2800 in 2 seconds.
15000 EHP down to 7800 in 2 seconds.
Going to be rough with one hardener unless only one player specs into AV on the other team. |
One Eyed King
Nos Nothi
7889
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 01:22:00 -
[9] - Quote
I am trying to understand what the real issue is.
That Minmandos are better at AV?
Is that really a problem if that turns out to be the case?
They start off with much lower HP than other heavies. They have comperable HP to assaults, if not much lower yet have no grenades and few module slots to use, and have poor EWAR.
Commandos in general are lacking a role, would it be a significant problem if they were much better at AV than other classes?
Former CEO of the Land of the BIind.
Any double entendre is unintended I assure you.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
2941
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 01:29:00 -
[10] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:gibberish
Of course you completely ignore his point, which is exactly what you do with people you don't agree with, most especially me.
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
|
Doc DDD
TeamPlayers Negative-Feedback
347
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 01:37:00 -
[11] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:Good job, you completely missed the point of the thread. This thread is not here to discuss "OMG SWARMS ARE OP AGAINST TANKS!" It's to discuss the relative differences between non-commandos using AV, and Commandos using AV. Not how they perform against vehicles because all of those values will be changing anyways so right now its irrelevant. So please remain on-topic and hold your grievances above how AV balances against HAVs, because we're not talking about that right now.
Anyways. So crunching the numbers for the Gallente Commando....its comical in that a Caldari Commando can actually do more DPS...not much, but a little more. As for how the Gallmando compares to say an Assault, the Alpha is again....nearly identical. Where it really shines is in the sustained DPS, primarily due to its reload speed. As for the Minmatar Commando, it's really not that much different. The difference in alpha is really pretty close, around 5%, but the real gem is the sustained DPS...again because the reload shaves off quite a bit of lost time. The reason the Minmatar Commando can muster more alpha than the triple modded Nonmmando is because it can fit 2 damage mods, whereas the Gallente cannot. So in short, the Commandos are not capable of putting out much more DPS than a Nonmmando *until* the reload comes, at which point the DPS increases by a good margin. For a PLC this is after 1 shot, and a Swarm after 3, obviously. So that begs the question of....where do you want things to land? I don't think innately changing the Commando bonuses is what needs to happen....their bonuses have good use in non-AV situations and nerfing the bonuses are simply going to cause collateral nerfs in areas where it is not needed. That being said, it really comes down to How do you change the weapon so that the Commando bonus is not overbearing in its effectiveness. We've established that the differences in alpha are not too significant, so what it really comes down to is "How do we modify the Reload and Lock-On/Charge time of the Swarm/PLC so that the Reload bonus of the Commando is useful, but not overbearing."
Sorry you can't understand anything I wrote.
Commandos are viable against infantry, triple modded assault's are not viable against infantry as they only have a sidearm and lower EHP.
Following?
Scouts can use stealth to avoid infantry and focus on AV.
Following?
Currently 2 Minmandos with swarms will pop every tank configuration under the new proposed hull numbers less than 4 seconds after the first swarms hit.
Following?
The minmando bonus is a problem as it only compares to an non-viable assault fit.
Now add in warbarge bonus, and unless you are using dual plasma canons on a galmando, speccing one suit trumps all points put into vehicles.
Following?
Pokey, I know this isn't Eve, but if you start a thread about minmandos and swarms, people that actually play the game and use things that are affected by minmandos and swarms are going to publicize the problems.
|
MINA Longstrike
Kirjuun Heiian
2212
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 01:38:00 -
[12] - Quote
One Eyed King wrote:I am trying to understand what the real issue is.
That Minmandos are better at AV?
Is that really a problem if that turns out to be the case?
They start off with much lower HP than other heavies. They have comperable HP to assaults, if not much lower yet have no grenades and few module slots to use, and have poor EWAR.
Commandos in general are lacking a role, would it be a significant problem if they were much better at AV than other classes?
I think the problem isn't that 'commandos do av' its that 'specific commando has sustained dps well above higher skilled weapons that can miss with a weapon that functionally cannot miss'.
I'm just spitballing ideas and I think it really comes down to we need to turn back the weapons ease of use. I'd propose this by making the swarm function more similarly to the PLC but with a few tweaks: make it a single projectile weapon with a damage per shot, magazine size and reload similar to plc, allow it to dumbfire vs infantry & installations, give it a flat travel path and finally cause its projectile to home like an AV grenade when it passes within say 25m of a vehicle.
The swarm could now 'miss' at long ranges, but it still functions well at short range. Variants could be created like an assault/breach that don't home so they can be used vs infantry or tactical which does a little less damage but has a wider homing area that could be used vs dropships.
This also allows for a little closer av balancing.
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. Kirjuun Heiian.
I have a few alts.
|
Doc DDD
TeamPlayers Negative-Feedback
347
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 01:55:00 -
[13] - Quote
Mina longstrike;
Careful, you are confusing Pokey.
The minmando bonus affects swarms, comparing only to a completely unviable fit.
Calmandos sniping have the added rail benefit. ( sorry to confuse you more Pokey )
Galmandos are great against shield vehicles BUT THEY ARE NOT GARANTEED 2 HIT, THERE IS A CHANCE ONE OR BOTH SHOTS WILL MISS. ( confusing I know )
So Pokey do go on about the problem with the minmando bonus via math. |
MINA Longstrike
Kirjuun Heiian
2212
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 02:03:00 -
[14] - Quote
Pokey is incredibly reasonable, I don't really appreciate you trying to belittle him when he's trying to foster healthy discussion on something perceived by a reasonably large portion of the community to be a problem. If you can't act like an adult **** off.
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. Kirjuun Heiian.
I have a few alts.
|
Doc DDD
TeamPlayers Negative-Feedback
347
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 02:08:00 -
[15] - Quote
He is doing a poor job at fostering productive conversation if his response to input is to simply label it jiberish.
You reap what you sow, I read what he writes and actually play the game. He unrest and numbers but notso much tthe application of said numbers in game. |
Doc DDD
TeamPlayers Negative-Feedback
347
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 02:14:00 -
[16] - Quote
MINA Longstrike wrote:Pokey is incredibly reasonable, I don't really appreciate you trying to belittle him when he's trying to foster healthy discussion on something perceived by a reasonably large portion of the community to be a contentious issue. If you can't act like an adult **** off.
Acting like an adult I see,
Swarms on any commando are deadly, on the minmando it's a whole new level. |
Thaddeus Reynolds
Facepunch Security
206
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 02:15:00 -
[17] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:gibberish
Of course you completely ignore his point, which is exactly what you do with people you don't agree with, most especially me. The reason Pokey ignored his point, was because that was not the intended purpose of the thread. This isn't an examination of the platforms the swarm launchers can be deployed on
The purpose of this thread is to discuss how much (If at all) the commandos alter the vehicle TTK, and how much they should (if at all) compared to a non-commando (Assuming spherical mercs in a vacuum)
@Doc DDD, I understand and agree that the on-paper DPS and sustained DPS of swarm launchers alone stand out as an anomaly compared to the other AV weapon options available, and I'm reasonably sure that Pokey is aware of that. Please understand that in this thread Pokey wants to examine the Minmatar Commando (and all commando platforms in general) and how they theoretically affect the TTK. Please, by all means start a thread for the reasonably discussion of swarm launchers themselves, and improvements that could be made to them as a weapon system to fit more in balance (Note: that improvements to fit in balance may mean the weapon damage needs to be nerfed)
Khanid Logi and Tanker, sometimes AV Heavy or Sniper.
Vehicle Re-vamp Proposal
|
Doc DDD
TeamPlayers Negative-Feedback
348
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 02:28:00 -
[18] - Quote
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:gibberish
Of course you completely ignore his point, which is exactly what you do with people you don't agree with, most especially me. The reason Pokey ignored his point, was because that was not the intended purpose of the thread. This isn't an examination of the platforms the swarm launchers can be deployed on The purpose of this thread is to discuss how much (If at all) the commandos alter the vehicle TTK, and how much they should (if at all) compared to a non-commando (Assuming spherical mercs in a vacuum) @Doc DDD, I understand and agree that the on-paper DPS and sustained DPS of swarm launchers alone stand out as an anomaly compared to the other AV weapon options available, and I'm reasonably sure that Pokey is aware of that. Please understand that in this thread Pokey wants to examine the Minmatar Commando (and all commando platforms in general) and how they theoretically affect the TTK. Please, by all means start a thread for the reasonably discussion of swarm launchers themselves, and improvements that could be made to them as a weapon system to fit more in balance (Note: that improvements to fit in balance may mean the weapon damage needs to be nerfed)
Assuming spherical mercs in a vacuum, any suit with 3 high slots or more will do similar damage as a commando with the a damage bonus to the same weapon, so long as that commando suit has at least two high slots.
This comes from running countless, logi, assault, scout, commando av fits as well as doing basic math.
Now if that is the point of this thread, do we really need a thread to know that a 10% native damage bonus roughly equates to about 50% more than a complex damage mod in a high slot?
No offense intended, but I think most people picked that point up already, and the actual problem is the weapon that the bonus applies to....
You want a new thread to tackle this? Or maybe glance at my jiberish. . |
Doc DDD
TeamPlayers Negative-Feedback
348
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 02:43:00 -
[19] - Quote
Now that we all understand that the Commando bonus adds roughly a complex light damage mod plus 50% with no stacking penalty, meaning the next damage mod is a full 7%, giving 17% with one damage mod.. that decreases the TTK of all vehicles by 17%. Now add another mod and you are looking decreasing TTK by somewhere around 22%. On a suit that also decreases the TTK of all infantry it shoots at with its secondary light weapon by 22%... This is the bonus that no other suit gets which is why if you are speccing swarms you are more than likely spec minmitar commando.
And this is without factoring in reload speed bonus. |
Thaddeus Reynolds
Facepunch Security
206
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 02:47:00 -
[20] - Quote
Doc DDD wrote:Thaddeus Reynolds wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:gibberish
Of course you completely ignore his point, which is exactly what you do with people you don't agree with, most especially me. The reason Pokey ignored his point, was because that was not the intended purpose of the thread. This isn't an examination of the platforms the swarm launchers can be deployed on The purpose of this thread is to discuss how much (If at all) the commandos alter the vehicle TTK, and how much they should (if at all) compared to a non-commando (Assuming spherical mercs in a vacuum) @Doc DDD, I understand and agree that the on-paper DPS and sustained DPS of swarm launchers alone stand out as an anomaly compared to the other AV weapon options available, and I'm reasonably sure that Pokey is aware of that. Please understand that in this thread Pokey wants to examine the Minmatar Commando (and all commando platforms in general) and how they theoretically affect the TTK. Please, by all means start a thread for the reasonably discussion of swarm launchers themselves, and improvements that could be made to them as a weapon system to fit more in balance (Note: that improvements to fit in balance may mean the weapon damage needs to be nerfed) Assuming spherical mercs in a vacuum, any suit with 3 high slots or more will do similar damage as a commando with the a damage bonus to the same weapon, so long as that commando suit has at least two high slots. This comes from running countless, logi, assault, scout, commando av fits as well as doing basic math. Now if that is the point of this thread, do we really need a thread to know that a 10% native damage bonus roughly equates to about 50% more than a complex damage mod in a high slot? No offense intended, but I think most people picked that point up already, and the actual problem is the weapon that the bonus applies to.... You want a new thread to tackle this? Or maybe glance at my jiberish. .
well, it's also about weather or not it should, and if yes to what degree it should affect TTK
as for the weapon itself, the on-paper stats are anomalous to say the least, however, it is another system I can best describe as temperamental...the on-paper stats are extremely powerful, but in-the-field it functions very differently and has a number of glitches associated with it's operation (Delay between lock-ons, only firing 2 missiles instead of the full four, missile "AI" not being consistent in how it flies to the target, etc.) And yes, sometimes rockets do go around corners, but it's not a 100% of the time thing, and yes sometimes they do phase through certain objects, but it doesn't happen all the time...(similar to the temperamentality associated with the shield boosters). As-is, in-game they feel too powerful against a PRO fit HAV, but that might change (Given the stats we've been given for the PRO HAVs), but no matter what happens here, they'll need some adjustment (OK...there's a .01% chance that everything will be exactly fine when new HAVs are released)
Anyway, I don't feel swarms need to be adjusted significantly enough based on the stats of the new HAVs to worry about adjusting them until after we see how they actually perform against the new HAVs in the field (Or until Rattati asks for feedback about them ofc)...and while I do agree that their performance seems very high, they are noticeably better on the Minmando/Calmando...not to mention Commandos need to be looked at since overall they seem to be under performing in almost every task (Other than AV...and to some extent Sniping), so it's worth looking at them on a whole.
I'm not saying you're opinions on the Swarm Launcher are entirely wrong, nor am I saying they're right...I'm saying that this isn't a thread to go on just listing how they perform currently...at the very least, make suggestions on how they could be changed to work in the overall game better (although, this should be mostly about how the commandos could be changed to make the game overall better, with respect to vehicle TTK, and relative to non-commando suits)
Oh, and you raise a good point about the Commando carrying both an AV weapon and an AI weapon on the overall, it does make them inherently better for the job already
Khanid Logi and Tanker, sometimes AV Heavy or Sniper.
Vehicle Re-vamp Proposal
|
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
2941
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 03:20:00 -
[21] - Quote
Doc DDD wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:Good job, you completely missed the point of the thread. This thread is not here to discuss "OMG SWARMS ARE OP AGAINST TANKS!" It's to discuss the relative differences between non-commandos using AV, and Commandos using AV. Not how they perform against vehicles because all of those values will be changing anyways so right now its irrelevant. So please remain on-topic and hold your grievances above how AV balances against HAVs, because we're not talking about that right now.
Anyways. So crunching the numbers for the Gallente Commando....its comical in that a Caldari Commando can actually do more DPS...not much, but a little more. As for how the Gallmando compares to say an Assault, the Alpha is again....nearly identical. Where it really shines is in the sustained DPS, primarily due to its reload speed. As for the Minmatar Commando, it's really not that much different. The difference in alpha is really pretty close, around 5%, but the real gem is the sustained DPS...again because the reload shaves off quite a bit of lost time. The reason the Minmatar Commando can muster more alpha than the triple modded Nonmmando is because it can fit 2 damage mods, whereas the Gallente cannot. So in short, the Commandos are not capable of putting out much more DPS than a Nonmmando *until* the reload comes, at which point the DPS increases by a good margin. For a PLC this is after 1 shot, and a Swarm after 3, obviously. So that begs the question of....where do you want things to land? I don't think innately changing the Commando bonuses is what needs to happen....their bonuses have good use in non-AV situations and nerfing the bonuses are simply going to cause collateral nerfs in areas where it is not needed. That being said, it really comes down to How do you change the weapon so that the Commando bonus is not overbearing in its effectiveness. We've established that the differences in alpha are not too significant, so what it really comes down to is "How do we modify the Reload and Lock-On/Charge time of the Swarm/PLC so that the Reload bonus of the Commando is useful, but not overbearing." Sorry you can't understand anything I wrote. Commandos are viable against infantry, triple modded assault's are not viable against infantry as they only have a sidearm and lower EHP. Following? Scouts can use stealth to avoid infantry and focus on AV. Following? Currently 2 Minmandos with swarms will pop every tank configuration under the new proposed hull numbers less than 4 seconds after the first swarms hit. Following? The minmando bonus is a problem as it only compares to an non-viable assault fit. Now add in warbarge bonus, and unless you are using dual plasma canons on a galmando, speccing one suit trumps all points put into vehicles. Following? Pokey, I know this isn't Eve, but if you start a thread about minmandos and swarms, people that actually play the game and use things that are affected by minmandos and swarms are going to publicize the problems. I have Minmando, just because. Vehicles melt. It's pathetically easy to destroy anything that moves.
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
2941
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 03:22:00 -
[22] - Quote
MINA Longstrike wrote:Pokey is incredibly reasonable, I don't really appreciate you trying to belittle him when he's trying to foster healthy discussion on something perceived by a reasonably large portion of the community to be a contentious issue. If you can't act like an adult **** off. The argument is pilots vs forum/spreadsheet warriors. That's experience vs people that make charts.
Experience > chartmaking
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
MINA Longstrike
Kirjuun Heiian
2212
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 03:29:00 -
[23] - Quote
Doc DDD wrote:MINA Longstrike wrote:Pokey is incredibly reasonable, I don't really appreciate you trying to belittle him when he's trying to foster healthy discussion on something perceived by a reasonably large portion of the community to be a contentious issue. If you can't act like an adult **** off. Acting like an adult I see, Swarms on any commando are deadly, on the minmando it's a whole new level. Stating quite clearly that no one wants to listen to belligerent and demeaning bullshit from someone acting like a whiny idiot because they couldn't read the thread and understand why their initial point was dismissed is surprisingly an adult thing to do. It's called establishing boundaries and setting expectations of behaviour.
You missed the point, that is why you were dismissed. It is not acceptable to demean and belittle someone based on your failing.
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. Kirjuun Heiian.
I have a few alts.
|
MINA Longstrike
Kirjuun Heiian
2213
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 03:41:00 -
[24] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:MINA Longstrike wrote:Pokey is incredibly reasonable, I don't really appreciate you trying to belittle him when he's trying to foster healthy discussion on something perceived by a reasonably large portion of the community to be a contentious issue. If you can't act like an adult **** off. The argument is pilots vs forum/spreadsheet warriors. That's experience vs people that make charts. Experience > chartmaking
How have you not been banned yet you pedantic ****. I'm honestly surprised with how you've carried on in every thread ever. Especially with rattati warning you to stop being a shitlord.
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. Kirjuun Heiian.
I have a few alts.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
2941
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 04:00:00 -
[25] - Quote
MINA Longstrike wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:MINA Longstrike wrote:Pokey is incredibly reasonable, I don't really appreciate you trying to belittle him when he's trying to foster healthy discussion on something perceived by a reasonably large portion of the community to be a contentious issue. If you can't act like an adult **** off. The argument is pilots vs forum/spreadsheet warriors. That's experience vs people that make charts. Experience > chartmaking How have you not been banned yet you pedantic ****. I'm honestly surprised with how you've carried on in every thread ever. Especially with rattati warning you to stop being a shitlord. Funny how by pointing out bad ideas, it's being toxic to the community and you want my voice silenced because of it.
Me and Doc use vehicles. I never see you, Pokey or Breakin in game. I play domination every day, so there's a damn good chance I'd see a bunch of people from the forums in game. But.............................................. I rarely do. Seems everybody has these incredible ideas they want implemented over all others, without actually being able to compare anything. Numbers on a chart is not the same thing as actually watching your HP melt away by AV.
As I've been saying, experience will trump spreadsheets every time. Do all the fancy equations you want, they may or may not translate to actual gameplay. Nobody has explained how AV being a deterrent would be a bad thing. Nobody has explained to me why a tank being its own best counter is a bad thing. Nobody has explained to me how it's a good thing that a weapon which does all the aiming for the user has such incredible damage. Nobody has explained why it's a good thing that the top AV grenade does ~1800 damage against unhardened armor.
Nobody validates AV doing such incredible damage.
And I also don't use profanity on here. Might want to watch what you type.
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
2941
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 04:03:00 -
[26] - Quote
The rage all of you feel for pilots is enough for me to suggest you all go see a therapist about it.
Nope. Confirming that pilot input is not, and never was, valued. - Breakin Stuff
|
MINA Longstrike
Kirjuun Heiian
2213
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 04:05:00 -
[27] - Quote
FYI I have 4 accounts spkr, I only tank on Mina, I destroy you relatively regularly on other characters because you play like you post, headstrong moronic and belligerent.
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. Kirjuun Heiian.
I have a few alts.
|
CeeJ Mantis
Mantodea MC
132
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 04:11:00 -
[28] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:MINA Longstrike wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:MINA Longstrike wrote:Pokey is incredibly reasonable, I don't really appreciate you trying to belittle him when he's trying to foster healthy discussion on something perceived by a reasonably large portion of the community to be a contentious issue. If you can't act like an adult **** off. The argument is pilots vs forum/spreadsheet warriors. That's experience vs people that make charts. Experience > chartmaking How have you not been banned yet you pedantic ****. I'm honestly surprised with how you've carried on in every thread ever. Especially with rattati warning you to stop being a shitlord. Funny how by pointing out bad ideas, it's being toxic to the community and you want my voice silenced because of it. Me and Doc use vehicles. I never see you, Pokey or Breakin in game. I play domination every day, so there's a damn good chance I'd see a bunch of people from the forums in game. But.............................................. I rarely do. Seems everybody has these incredible ideas they want implemented over all others, without actually being able to compare anything. Numbers on a chart is not the same thing as actually watching your HP melt away by AV. As I've been saying, experience will trump spreadsheets every time. Do all the fancy equations you want, they may or may not translate to actual gameplay. Nobody has explained how AV being a deterrent would be a bad thing. Nobody has explained to me why a tank being its own best counter is a bad thing. Nobody has explained to me how it's a good thing that a weapon which does all the aiming for the user has such incredible damage. Nobody has explained why it's a good thing that the top AV grenade does ~1800 damage against unhardened armor. Nobody validates AV doing such incredible damage. And I also don't use profanity on here. Might want to watch what you type.
You know Spkr4theDead, both in local, and on the forums, I have never heard you say ANYTHING constructive. You never post ideas, or explain your problems with anything are, you just say "I'm the chief authority on this, and EVERYONE else is wrong!" IF you posted numbers, or ideas, then nobody would be getting mad at you. IF you are half the pilot you claim to be, you could be a valuable asset to the discussion. Instead, you complain and moan like an infant, mewling and puking in the nurses arms.
Try being useful for ONCE in your life, or at least just shut up.
Longest plasma cannon kill: 236.45m
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
4994
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 04:32:00 -
[29] - Quote
Here's the deal, I wasn't necessarily disagreeing with you. I wasn't saying your point was invalid, and I certainly understand what you're saying.
However when I start a thread saying "Hey, let's talk about green apples versus red apples" and you immediately go straight to "Apples are gross compared to oranges!" It's a little frustrating, because I'm not here to talk about oranges. I'm not saying oranges shouldn't be talked about, but it's a little thing called *staying on topic* and that's not the topic of the thread. If I wanted to make a thread about the balance of swarms vs vehicles, I would, but i didn't. I'm here to speak about the relative impact of the Commando bonuses and how they affect the performance of AV weapons.
And the fact of the matter is that I'm actually fully maxed out in both Minmatar and Gallente Commando, and nearly maxed out in both of their respective AV weapons, so I do know a thing or two about how they work, as I run them more often than any other suit. So I would appreciate drop the "Oh you're just a numbers guy" bull, it's getting old.
Spkr4theDead wrote:MINA Longstrike wrote:Pokey is incredibly reasonable, I don't really appreciate you trying to belittle him when he's trying to foster healthy discussion on something perceived by a reasonably large portion of the community to be a contentious issue. If you can't act like an adult **** off. The argument is pilots vs forum/spreadsheet warriors. That's experience vs people that make charts. Experience > chartmaking
Actually with you, it's typically an argument between those who can do basic math, and those who can't. My offer still stands, if you want me to teach you how to add and multiply I have very reasonable rates for tutoring.
"That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
Dust514 // Podcast
www.biomassed.net
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
4994
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 04:45:00 -
[30] - Quote
Doc DDD wrote:MINA Longstrike wrote:Pokey is incredibly reasonable, I don't really appreciate you trying to belittle him when he's trying to foster healthy discussion on something perceived by a reasonably large portion of the community to be a contentious issue. If you can't act like an adult **** off. Acting like an adult I see, Swarms on any commando are deadly, on the minmando it's a whole new level.
And I labled your points as gibberish, because they're in the wrong thread.
So instead of complaining about getting killed by swarms, how about you offer up a solution to the problem that doesn't negatively affect the gameplay of the Minmatar Commando when it is in its Non-AV role.
"That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
Dust514 // Podcast
www.biomassed.net
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |