DUST Search - Sticky:Hotfix Charlie

All Channels

Feedback/Requests

Sticky:Hotfix Charlie - Final Numbers

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 24 post(s)
Dust User KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 415	Posted - 2014.08.08 17:03:00 - [211] - Quote DozersMouse XIII wrote: Dust User wrote: Kallas Hallytyr wrote: John Demonsbane wrote: Overall solid, but I'm not sure that the damage mod buff (to lower than original levels, meaning still worse than brick tankng for most builds) is really an adequate justification or compensation for yet another nerf to swarms. It makes no sense to make them worse than they already are. STD/ADV Swarms are getting buffed. I'm sick of people only thinking about PRO stuff, especially when so may complain about the cost of their PRO AV fits, now ADV, which is much cheaper, is going to be much more effective, comparably. Now shut up trying to say that Swarms are nerfed. PRO got reduced, but the others got buffed and the damage mods went up. It's a wash fro PRO and a buff for the others. If you're not running proto then you're not doing it right. actually pro swarms are good but if you ask me the cbr7's lock on faster after every volly is fired Swarms are for noobs anyways. Get good and grab a forge gun.
Jadd Hatchen Kinda New here 640	Posted - 2014.08.08 19:15:00 - [212] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: Dear players, the final numbers have gone into QA testing and eventual deployment. As per usual, a Devblog will be posted after the hotfix has been successfully deployed. You can find them here: Hotfix Charlie - Final Numbers For those that have been following the Hotfix Charlie discussions and thread, there should be no surprises. Thanks everyone for your feedback and your enthusiasm Feel free to discuss Hotfix Charlie here, in a constructive and polite manner What happened to removing the sidearm slot from the Amarr Logi Dropsuit?
I-Shayz-I I----------I 4500	Posted - 2014.08.08 20:23:00 - [213] - Quote In support of Minmatar Sentinel HP buff. 7162 wp with a Repair Tool! List of Legion Feedback Threads!
DozersMouse XIII Opus Arcana Covert Intervention 867	Posted - 2014.08.08 20:26:00 - [214] - Quote Dust User wrote: DozersMouse XIII wrote: Dust User wrote: Kallas Hallytyr wrote: John Demonsbane wrote: Overall solid, but I'm not sure that the damage mod buff (to lower than original levels, meaning still worse than brick tankng for most builds) is really an adequate justification or compensation for yet another nerf to swarms. It makes no sense to make them worse than they already are. STD/ADV Swarms are getting buffed. I'm sick of people only thinking about PRO stuff, especially when so may complain about the cost of their PRO AV fits, now ADV, which is much cheaper, is going to be much more effective, comparably. Now shut up trying to say that Swarms are nerfed. PRO got reduced, but the others got buffed and the damage mods went up. It's a wash fro PRO and a buff for the others. If you're not running proto then you're not doing it right. actually pro swarms are good but if you ask me the cbr7's lock on faster after every volly is fired Swarms are for noobs anyways. Get good and grab a forge gun. not my type of gameplay as a matter of fact I have over 55 million sp and not one point is spec'd into heavy suits or weapons. i'd much rather use proxy mines, packed AV grenades, gauged nanos, m512 smg, and swarms on my amarr logi NERF THE TAMSEN!
PLAYSTTION GamersForChrist 196	Posted - 2014.08.08 21:16:00 - [215] - Quote Deleted: Im stupid forget I ever posted. 44/4 in a BPO Scout (1.8) 40/5 in a Proto Assault (1.7) Open Beta Vet 26mil sp R.I.P Dust 514
Dalton Smithe OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 104	Posted - 2014.08.09 01:17:00 - [216] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: Dear players, the final numbers have gone into QA testing and eventual deployment. As per usual, a Devblog will be posted after the hotfix has been successfully deployed. You can find them here: Hotfix Charlie - Final Numbers For those that have been following the Hotfix Charlie discussions and thread, there should be no surprises. Thanks everyone for your feedback and your enthusiasm Feel free to discuss Hotfix Charlie here, in a constructive and polite manner Not gonna lie, I was hoping for something along the lines of ADS getting an adjustment. Instead, I see the proto-swarms are getting a damage nerf. If you were going to reduce the number of missiles, then you should have increased the damage accordingly, not stepping it up half assed.....
Kallas Hallytyr Skullbreakers 713	Posted - 2014.08.09 01:58:00 - [217] - Quote Dust User wrote: If you're not running proto then you're not doing it right. Such a credit to the community you are...[/sarcasmincaseyoudidntrealise] Alt of Halla Murr.
NextDark Knight Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 448	Posted - 2014.08.09 03:43:00 - [218] - Quote Can we get a AUR or limited trial run version of the Caldari 3 2 setup on the heavy. We would only need a proto variant maybe "Charlie" Sentinal CK.0. Thank you in advance and would be a great test suit! Forge Changes needed Officer Splash 3.0, Proto 2.7 Advanced 2.5 Standard 2.1. Original ROF needs to return!
Temias Mercurial Knights Of Ender RISE of LEGION 147	Posted - 2014.08.09 04:25:00 - [219] - Quote Dalton Smithe wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Dear players, the final numbers have gone into QA testing and eventual deployment. As per usual, a Devblog will be posted after the hotfix has been successfully deployed. You can find them here: Hotfix Charlie - Final Numbers For those that have been following the Hotfix Charlie discussions and thread, there should be no surprises. Thanks everyone for your feedback and your enthusiasm Feel free to discuss Hotfix Charlie here, in a constructive and polite manner Not gonna lie, I was hoping for something along the lines of ADS getting an adjustment. Instead, I see the proto-swarms are getting a damage nerf. If you were going to reduce the number of missiles, then you should have increased the damage accordingly, not stepping it up half assed..... The 'nerf' is less than 100 damage (not that big of a deal...), and for proto swarms, they did increase the total damage of 4 missiles to be near equivalent to the current total 6 missiles. Old damage total: 1,320 New damage total: 1,248 Please read the post before commenting. My apologies if I come off as an elitist, but I try to view things objectively, logically, and factually.
Thor Odinson42 Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 4157	Posted - 2014.08.09 09:06:00 - [220] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: Alldin Kan wrote: Rattati please consider increasing the HP for Minmatar Sentinel, there's really not much reason to use it other than chasing Assaults and low EHP Heavies. Giving it 450 Shields with 410 Armor would be fair and it should convince more people to skill into it. Let me take a look tomorrow. It was one of the things that has bothered me, especially that Minmatar ehp reduction is more than the amarr ehp bonus, compared to the other two. For scouts its the same number, but not for the rest of the dropsuits. I think the Min Heavy might be better with the lower eHP but get a bonus to the Burst HMG or something. Make it a flank/breach suit. It gets torn up by the other heavies in competitive matches, but it's really fun in pubs with 2x Kin Cats. I haven't thought about the numbers much, but a heavy suit with that speed shouldn't be a defensive beast IMO. Level 4 Forum Warrior Very, very bitter vet PSN: wbrom42

Vrain Matari Mikramurka Shock Troop Minmatar Republic 2176	Posted - 2014.08.09 13:13:00 - [221] - Quote Kallas Hallytyr wrote: Dust User wrote: If you're not running proto then you're not doing it right. Such a credit to the community you are...[/sarcasmincaseyoudidntrealise] But he has a point. I don't run proto in any other weapon, normally stick to STD BPO tbh, but with the Swarm Launcher the proto is the only way to go since the weapon is underpowered against it's targets. Swarm AV put themselves at a lot of risk and generally take a beating for the sake of the team, and they do it at considerable ISK cost to themselves. It's an old argument that won't be resolved here, but i will say this: proto swarms are currently very close to the edge of usefulness, and any direct(e.g. damage) or relative(e.g. DS ehp buff) nerf will serve to push a portion of the playerbase away from running swarm AV at all. PSN: RationalSpark
Mordecai Snake Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance 62	Posted - 2014.08.09 14:01:00 - [222] - Quote Thor Odinson42 wrote: I think the Min Heavy might be better with the lower eHP but get a bonus to the Burst HMG or something. Make it a flank/breach suit. It gets torn up by the other heavies in competitive matches, but it's really fun in pubs with 2x Kin Cats. I haven't thought about the numbers much, but a heavy suit with that speed shouldn't be a defensive beast IMO. Minmatar are supposed to be equal with Amarr in the opposite direction. Amarr: 960 Gallente/Caldari: 915 Minmatar: 825 It needs 45 more hp.
zzZaXxx The Phoenix Federation 419	Posted - 2014.08.09 15:23:00 - [223] - Quote I like these changes. I think this tips the game over to the point where devs should let us all have a fresh start. A total respec of all invested SP would not only bring some players back to the game (even some would make an impact) and would be appropriate considering that everything has been altered by now. Most weapons have been changed; scout, sentinal, assault will have changed significantly since the dropsuit respec; modules have changed; vehicles have changed; installations will change the way the game is played and therefore skill priorities. It's time for a fresh start.
Ironmans Fist Gummibaerenbande 514 0	Posted - 2014.08.09 16:17:00 - [224] - Quote Are ADS getting cheaper in Charlie? I can-¦t find anything about it in the numbers :(
NextDark Knight Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 448	Posted - 2014.08.09 16:31:00 - [225] - Quote Putting down my drink again : Would CCP Rattati or the Community be against putting in a AUR/LP variant of the Caldari Heavy Suit with the proposed 3 High and 2 Low Caldari Sentinel CK.0? I know it just got removed a few posts ago, but think about it for community testing purposes. It would be interesting to see something different we could choose to spent AUR or LP. That AUR and LP can be used to test a prototyped design variant. Don't add any new skins or anything just the new prototype item with the 3 / 2 layout. Forge Changes needed Officer Splash 3.0, Proto 2.7 Advanced 2.5 Standard 2.1. Original ROF needs to return!
GENERAL FCF Sentinels of New Eden 31	Posted - 2014.08.09 21:17:00 - [226] - Quote No quite sure if i like the changes of hot fix charlie. i liked bravo and 1.8 but i think this is a step backwards. i read the spreadsheet and noticed a change to the light and side-arm damage mods but not the heavy mods. it seems that what all the "cool kids" are doing is getting a caldari Sentinal stacking damage mods and out gunning every other class... I think you should consider giving HIGHER stacking penaltise like 0% efficacy after two heavy damage mods to increase tacticle situations instead of skill-less ones. perhaps giving sentinals greater racial parity in respective suits: Amarr having a moderate edge in armor/shields, gallente having obviously more armor(+200 instead of +50) at the sacrifice of shields, Caldari having significantly more shields than now(+150), and minmitar needs both armor/shields by(+65). the sentinels are unbalanced and not worth spending heavy time with SP into them. this is all my opinion ofcourse,who knows if anyone agrees. Thx for trying anyways CCP!

CCP Rattati C C P C C P Alliance 5330	Posted - 2014.08.09 21:56:00 - [227] - Quote NextDark Knight wrote: Putting down my drink again : Would CCP Rattati or the Community be against putting in a AUR/LP variant of the Caldari Heavy Suit with the proposed 3 High and 2 Low Caldari Sentinel CK.0? I know it just got removed a few posts ago, but think about it for community testing purposes. It would be interesting to see something different we could choose to spent AUR or LP. That AUR and LP can be used to test a prototyped design variant. Don't add any new skins or anything just the new prototype item with the 3 / 2 layout. this is a pretty good idea actually. It's now on the list. "As well as stupid, Rattati is incredibly slow and accident-prone, and cannot even swim"

Viktor Hadah Jr Negative-Impact Gentlemen's.Club 4956	Posted - 2014.08.09 22:03:00 - [228] - Quote when we getting officer weapons? Earn 500Mil EVE 21 Day Trial Chat Channel: Vik PC
NextDark Knight Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 448	Posted - 2014.08.09 22:50:00 - [229] - Quote Thank you. Forge Changes needed Officer Splash 3.0, Proto 2.7 Advanced 2.5 Standard 2.1. Original ROF needs to return!
BlazeXYZ xCosmic Voidx Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive 107	Posted - 2014.08.09 23:20:00 - [230] - Quote Why can't we have different color schemes for weapons at std, adv, and proto. My basic mass driver looks exactly the same as my advance. Give me some badass colors. The Blazing Intellect Machine

I-Shayz-I I----------I 4524	Posted - 2014.08.09 23:32:00 - [231] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: NextDark Knight wrote: Putting down my drink again : Would CCP Rattati or the Community be against putting in a AUR/LP variant of the Caldari Heavy Suit with the proposed 3 High and 2 Low Caldari Sentinel CK.0? I know it just got removed a few posts ago, but think about it for community testing purposes. It would be interesting to see something different we could choose to spent AUR or LP. That AUR and LP can be used to test a prototyped design variant. Don't add any new skins or anything just the new prototype item with the 3 / 2 layout. this is a pretty good idea actually. It's now on the list. Next thing you know, EVERYONE'S going to start wanting Type Bk.1 Series suits 7162 wp with a Repair Tool! List of Legion Feedback Threads!
Booby Tuesdays Tuesdays With Boobies 738	Posted - 2014.08.09 23:35:00 - [232] - Quote BlazeXYZ wrote: Why can't we have different color schemes for weapons at std, adv, and proto. My basic mass driver looks exactly the same as my advance. Give me some badass colors. I have no hope of this anytime soon, sadly. They can't even get the proper colors on dropsuits after many, many months. Seriously, 1.8 dropped 5 months ago... Melee Weapon of Choice: Nokia-3310 Prof. V
BlazeXYZ xCosmic Voidx Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive 110	Posted - 2014.08.09 23:43:00 - [233] - Quote Booby Tuesdays wrote: BlazeXYZ wrote: Why can't we have different color schemes for weapons at std, adv, and proto. My basic mass driver looks exactly the same as my advance. Give me some badass colors. I have no hope of this anytime soon, sadly. They can't even get the proper colors on dropsuits after many, many months. Seriously, 1.8 dropped 5 months ago... I know right. Is it that hard to fix the colors and add attractive colors for weapons. If your waiting until legion to fix this then we have a problem. It will make the game more appealing to players. I wish I had a dark red color scheme with black patches on my adv. mass driver. Even though i don't get the kills, i'll still be badass with that color. The Blazing Intellect Machine
iliel 0uter.Heaven 87	Posted - 2014.08.10 00:23:00 - [234] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: NextDark Knight wrote: Putting down my drink again : Would CCP Rattati or the Community be against putting in a AUR/LP variant of the Caldari Heavy Suit with the proposed 3 High and 2 Low Caldari Sentinel CK.0? I know it just got removed a few posts ago, but think about it for community testing purposes. It would be interesting to see something different we could choose to spent AUR or LP. That AUR and LP can be used to test a prototyped design variant. Don't add any new skins or anything just the new prototype item with the 3 / 2 layout. this is a pretty good idea actually. It's now on the list. Please also add a Cal Scout with precision rather than range.
Devadander Woodgrain Atari 64	Posted - 2014.08.10 01:08:00 - [235] - Quote Cal-mando going to get some sexy red trimmings? "Tossin uplinks and runnin fer my life" ~ Gunny blownapart "Lets group up and push an objective" ~ No blueberry ever
The Eristic Dust 90210 602	Posted - 2014.08.10 01:35:00 - [236] - Quote I-Shayz-I wrote: Next thing you know, EVERYONE'S going to start wanting Type Bk.1 Series suits Pseudo-T2 LP (NOT aurum!) variants would be pretty bonerific. It'd get me into FW more regularly for sure. Reality is the original Rorschach. Verily! So much for all that.
OgTheEnigma The Rainbow Effect Dark Taboo 193	Posted - 2014.08.10 01:55:00 - [237] - Quote Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: when we getting officer weapons? More importantantly, HOW do we get the new officer weapons? I'm only interested in Scrambler Rifles and with the current salvage machanics it's going to take weeks/months and hundreds of matches just to get 3 guns. At this rate I wouldn't be against having them on the marketplace for a million ISK or more a piece, or as a faction wafare LP item with a similar cost.
JRleo jr Xer Cloud Consortium 259	Posted - 2014.08.10 05:13:00 - [238] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: NextDark Knight wrote: Putting down my drink again : Would CCP Rattati or the Community be against putting in a AUR/LP variant of the Caldari Heavy Suit with the proposed 3 High and 2 Low Caldari Sentinel CK.0? I know it just got removed a few posts ago, but think about it for community testing purposes. It would be interesting to see something different we could choose to spent AUR or LP. That AUR and LP can be used to test a prototyped design variant. Don't add any new skins or anything just the new prototype item with the 3 / 2 layout. this is a pretty good idea actually. It's now on the list. grins evily So, how about that balic suit you guys were tweaking? Max level brony. Pink fluffy unicorns http://youtu.be/C34BzC7rnos Best song ever.
Haerr Legio DXIV 1174	Posted - 2014.08.10 06:53:00 - [239] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: NextDark Knight wrote: Putting down my drink again : Would CCP Rattati or the Community be against putting in a AUR/LP variant of the Caldari Heavy Suit with the proposed 3 High and 2 Low Caldari Sentinel CK.0? I know it just got removed a few posts ago, but think about it for community testing purposes. It would be interesting to see something different we could choose to spent AUR or LP. That AUR and LP can be used to test a prototyped design variant. Don't add any new skins or anything just the new prototype item with the 3 / 2 layout. this is a pretty good idea actually. It's now on the list. ermahgerd scout vk.1 with TWO equipment slots! ... oh wait ... ermahgerd scout vk.0 with 1 EQ and 5 low slots! Giv naow, pl0x
DeathwindRising ROGUE RELICS 511	Posted - 2014.08.10 06:57:00 - [240] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: NextDark Knight wrote: Putting down my drink again : Would CCP Rattati or the Community be against putting in a AUR/LP variant of the Caldari Heavy Suit with the proposed 3 High and 2 Low Caldari Sentinel CK.0? I know it just got removed a few posts ago, but think about it for community testing purposes. It would be interesting to see something different we could choose to spent AUR or LP. That AUR and LP can be used to test a prototyped design variant. Don't add any new skins or anything just the new prototype item with the 3 / 2 layout. this is a pretty good idea actually. It's now on the list. so now were going back to type - II's again lol? why didnt you do that for all the weapons to give us scoped and non-scoped versions, or more dropsuit variants? and no you cant add it as a aur variant because you need all items to be obtainable without spending real money. you cant start adding aur stuff with different stats unless you include the isk variant. otherwise you'll start seeing people claiming the game is pay to win



Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.