| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
chase rowland
The Enclave Syndicate
Dark Taboo
80
   |
Posted - 2013.11.25 14:34:00 -
[151] - Quote
Thurak1 wrote:Cheaper way to get rid of a tank.
buy militia heavy frame
buy militia forge gun
shoot tank multiple times until dead.
Cheaper and zero sp spent.
sad but true..... |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1359
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 14:49:00 -
[152] - Quote
jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote:ACE OF JOKERS wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:
Stop trying to solo us. What's so hard to understand about that? And what double standards are you talking about?
You tankers trying to solo a whole enemy squad,in the open....Tanks can solo squads? then aV should solo tanks. ITs called balance. What you want is: Tank can solo enemy teams Enemy teams need Strategy and teamwork to even SCARE the tank away. LOL @ your ideals . we cant escape at all which is a FORCED loss of 1 mil, infantry can hide
Nitrous
Armor Hardners (or shield hardners)
F/45 Dmg control unti.
You can easily hit 50% resistance as well as being able to have enough speed to escape in time.
Check out my corp's new website here :D
-HAND
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star.
EoN.
1780
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 14:56:00 -
[153] - Quote
Monkey MAC wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:8 pages lol
Come on infantry its not that hard to kill a tank
Why do we keep having to tell you how to do it? Because if infantry requires a tank to kill a tank that's not infantry that's a tank, so in actual fact you are telling tankers how to kill tankers which inforces the point that tanks are gonna end up op if we continuemdown this road so really everytime you tell us its easy to kill a tank with a tank, you reinforce our point, Your mind is now blown, see you when you get out
It is infantry
Currently im infantry who can call in a tank
Not hard tbh
Tank is OP if its made to take out another tank, lolno |
Jason Pearson
3162
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 17:59:00 -
[154] - Quote
Atiim wrote:jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote:ACE OF JOKERS wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:
Stop trying to solo us. What's so hard to understand about that? And what double standards are you talking about?
You tankers trying to solo a whole enemy squad,in the open....Tanks can solo squads? then aV should solo tanks. ITs called balance. What you want is: Tank can solo enemy teams Enemy teams need Strategy and teamwork to even SCARE the tank away. LOL @ your ideals . we cant escape at all which is a FORCED loss of 1 mil, infantry can hide Nitrous Armor Hardners (or shield hardners) F/45 Dmg control unti. You can easily hit 50% resistance as well as being able to have enough speed to escape in time.
Erm, So for a Shield, you want me to run a Nitrous, Hardener, Control Unit and then leave me with two slots for a Rep and a booster? No thank you. Also, y u no answer my above post? plzrespondkthx.
King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire
Laugh at the idiots crying about four BPOs being removed erryday, lul
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1359
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 18:36:00 -
[155] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:Atiim wrote:jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote:ACE OF JOKERS wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:
Stop trying to solo us. What's so hard to understand about that? And what double standards are you talking about?
You tankers trying to solo a whole enemy squad,in the open....Tanks can solo squads? then aV should solo tanks. ITs called balance. What you want is: Tank can solo enemy teams Enemy teams need Strategy and teamwork to even SCARE the tank away. LOL @ your ideals . we cant escape at all which is a FORCED loss of 1 mil, infantry can hide Nitrous Armor Hardners (or shield hardners) F/45 Dmg control unti. You can easily hit 50% resistance as well as being able to have enough speed to escape in time. Erm, So for a Shield, you want me to run a Nitrous, Hardener, Control Unit and then leave me with two slots for a Rep and a booster? No thank you. Also, y u no answer my above post? plzrespondkthx.
@work right now. I'll do so on my lunch break (15min)
Check out my corp's new website here :D
-HAND
|
Roger Cordill
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
45
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 18:40:00 -
[156] - Quote
Atiim wrote:jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote:ACE OF JOKERS wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:
Stop trying to solo us. What's so hard to understand about that? And what double standards are you talking about?
You tankers trying to solo a whole enemy squad,in the open....Tanks can solo squads? then aV should solo tanks. ITs called balance. What you want is: Tank can solo enemy teams Enemy teams need Strategy and teamwork to even SCARE the tank away. LOL @ your ideals . we cant escape at all which is a FORCED loss of 1 mil, infantry can hide Nitrous Armor Hardners (or shield hardners) F/45 Dmg control unti. You can easily hit 50% resistance as well as being able to have enough speed to escape in time.
Message from Godin: ..... Did you try to give us fitting advice? Have you lost it? |
Gelan Corbaine
Gladiators Vanguard
224
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 18:42:00 -
[157] - Quote
jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote:Monkey MAC wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:8 pages lol
Come on infantry its not that hard to kill a tank
Why do we keep having to tell you how to do it? Because if infantry requires a tank to kill a tank that's not infantry that's a tank, so in actual fact you are telling tankers how to kill tankers which inforces the point that tanks are gonna end up op if we continuemdown this road so really everytime you tell us its easy to kill a tank with a tank, you reinforce our point, Your mind is now blown, see you when you get out whats the BEST counter to a gun? another gun. whats the BEST counter to infantry? infantry AV is meant for support and area denial, not PURE killing
Then as an AV trooper why are we only paid for Pure killing ? Why are we LESS effective against infantry if we are infantry as well ? Why make a role if it's not economically viable to do that role "the right way" in your view ?
No job is worth doing if you don't get paid in the end .
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1360
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 19:16:00 -
[158] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:[quote=Atiim]
Actually, Rails are not the best counter to Blasters. It depends on a lot of factors, it's like saying a Sniper Rifle is good against a shotgun, Sure, at range, but a Blaster fitted to a speed tank is better at dealing with a Rail, Also depends on the type of tank, a missile tank might be better than a rail for example.
But I don't care much for it, the reason I'm replying is to ask a question, should AV be stronger than the turrets? Such as a Forge being stronger than a rail (don't give me BUT FORGES HAVE AMMO, because rails will too) just a question. Also, should AV be so cheap in comparison? I don't disagree that a solo tanker should die to a solo AVer (as a solo AVer can die to a solo tanker) but the cost comparison is ridiculous.
If I sit on a hill in the redline, there is no way your blaster is getting there in time without being at full health.
I believe that HAVs need a price reduction. Does that answer your question?
Check out my corp's new website here :D
-HAND
|
True Adamance
PIE Inc.
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
4291
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 19:17:00 -
[159] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:[quote=Atiim]
Actually, Rails are not the best counter to Blasters. It depends on a lot of factors, it's like saying a Sniper Rifle is good against a shotgun, Sure, at range, but a Blaster fitted to a speed tank is better at dealing with a Rail, Also depends on the type of tank, a missile tank might be better than a rail for example.
But I don't care much for it, the reason I'm replying is to ask a question, should AV be stronger than the turrets? Such as a Forge being stronger than a rail (don't give me BUT FORGES HAVE AMMO, because rails will too) just a question. Also, should AV be so cheap in comparison? I don't disagree that a solo tanker should die to a solo AVer (as a solo AVer can die to a solo tanker) but the cost comparison is ridiculous.
If I sit on a hill in the redline, there is no way your blaster is getting there in time without being at full health. I believe that HAVs need a price reduction. Does that answer your question? I believe you should not be able to fire outside of CONCORDs established battlefields. This way you get not redline rails, and we get no redline AV.
"All things were created by the Divine, and so the glory of our faith is inherent to us all"
|
Jason Pearson
3164
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 19:19:00 -
[160] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:[quote=Atiim]
Actually, Rails are not the best counter to Blasters. It depends on a lot of factors, it's like saying a Sniper Rifle is good against a shotgun, Sure, at range, but a Blaster fitted to a speed tank is better at dealing with a Rail, Also depends on the type of tank, a missile tank might be better than a rail for example.
But I don't care much for it, the reason I'm replying is to ask a question, should AV be stronger than the turrets? Such as a Forge being stronger than a rail (don't give me BUT FORGES HAVE AMMO, because rails will too) just a question. Also, should AV be so cheap in comparison? I don't disagree that a solo tanker should die to a solo AVer (as a solo AVer can die to a solo tanker) but the cost comparison is ridiculous.
If I sit on a hill in the redline, there is no way your blaster is getting there in time without being at full health. I believe that HAVs need a price reduction. Does that answer your question?
Not really, what of the strength of a rail vs a Forge for example, oh and any a rail in the hills against a blaster is like a sniper in the hills firing at a shotgun scout, again it's all down the situation and how good the players are, if you're a sniper and not on the redline, it's possible to get a jump on you with a scout, same as a blaster tank getting a jump on a rail.
King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire
Laugh at the idiots crying about four BPOs being removed erryday, lul
|
|
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1361
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 19:33:00 -
[161] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Atiim wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:[quote=Atiim]
Actually, Rails are not the best counter to Blasters. It depends on a lot of factors, it's like saying a Sniper Rifle is good against a shotgun, Sure, at range, but a Blaster fitted to a speed tank is better at dealing with a Rail, Also depends on the type of tank, a missile tank might be better than a rail for example.
But I don't care much for it, the reason I'm replying is to ask a question, should AV be stronger than the turrets? Such as a Forge being stronger than a rail (don't give me BUT FORGES HAVE AMMO, because rails will too) just a question. Also, should AV be so cheap in comparison? I don't disagree that a solo tanker should die to a solo AVer (as a solo AVer can die to a solo tanker) but the cost comparison is ridiculous.
If I sit on a hill in the redline, there is no way your blaster is getting there in time without being at full health. I believe that HAVs need a price reduction. Does that answer your question? I believe you should not be able to fire outside of CONCORDs established battlefields. This way you get not redline rails, and we get no redline AV.
Not completely. What if the team gets redlined?
Check out my corp's new website here :D
-HAND
|
True Adamance
PIE Inc.
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
4291
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 19:43:00 -
[162] - Quote
Atiim wrote:True Adamance wrote:Atiim wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:[quote=Atiim]
Actually, Rails are not the best counter to Blasters. It depends on a lot of factors, it's like saying a Sniper Rifle is good against a shotgun, Sure, at range, but a Blaster fitted to a speed tank is better at dealing with a Rail, Also depends on the type of tank, a missile tank might be better than a rail for example.
But I don't care much for it, the reason I'm replying is to ask a question, should AV be stronger than the turrets? Such as a Forge being stronger than a rail (don't give me BUT FORGES HAVE AMMO, because rails will too) just a question. Also, should AV be so cheap in comparison? I don't disagree that a solo tanker should die to a solo AVer (as a solo AVer can die to a solo tanker) but the cost comparison is ridiculous.
If I sit on a hill in the redline, there is no way your blaster is getting there in time without being at full health. I believe that HAVs need a price reduction. Does that answer your question? I believe you should not be able to fire outside of CONCORDs established battlefields. This way you get not redline rails, and we get no redline AV. Not completely. What if the team gets redlined?
You don't deserve to be able to fire with impunity if your team is that bad.
"All things were created by the Divine, and so the glory of our faith is inherent to us all"
|
jerrmy12 kahoalii
The dyst0pian Corporation
Zero-Day
140
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 21:01:00 -
[163] - Quote
Gelan Corbaine wrote:jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote:Monkey MAC wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:8 pages lol
Come on infantry its not that hard to kill a tank
Why do we keep having to tell you how to do it? Because if infantry requires a tank to kill a tank that's not infantry that's a tank, so in actual fact you are telling tankers how to kill tankers which inforces the point that tanks are gonna end up op if we continuemdown this road so really everytime you tell us its easy to kill a tank with a tank, you reinforce our point, Your mind is now blown, see you when you get out whats the BEST counter to a gun? another gun. whats the BEST counter to infantry? infantry A Then as an AV trooper why are we only paid for Pure killing ? Why are we LESS effective against infantry if we are infantry as well ? Why make a role if it's not economically viable to do that role "the right way" in your view ?
carry a smg and ccp needs to add WP for damage
recuruit link
5 to 11 mil isk per 100k recuruit
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |