DUST Search - AVers, how to kill a tank.

All Channels

General Discussions

AVers, how to kill a tank.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
jerrmy12 kahoalii The dyst0pian Corporation Zero-Day 136	Posted - 2013.11.24 15:04:00 - [1] - Quote Atiim wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Atiim wrote: Not sure if trolling or being a legitimate dumbfluck Obviously lets the whole of the forums know you're terrible at tanking. His OP listed instructions on how AV can destroy HAVs. Yet, all of this requires an HAV; therefore making it not actual AV, but simply HAV vs HAV. sica's are cheap, if you say no, QQ SUM MOAR AV BRIGADE recuruit link 5 to 11 mil isk per 100k recuruit
jerrmy12 kahoalii The dyst0pian Corporation Zero-Day 136	Posted - 2013.11.24 15:06:00 - [2] - Quote Atiim wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Atiim wrote: Not sure if trolling or being a legitimate dumbfluck Obviously lets the whole of the forums know you're terrible at tanking. Ooh, I haven't been on here for a while, I like your sig :D The funny part is how it's an exact opposite of the truth. Replace anti-vehicle infantry with pilots and you can summarize about 95% of their "balancing" threads. i just solo'd a good 5000 shield gunlogi with STD swarms and STD av nades, so easy, he destroyed a scatered ion cannon but had full hp so suck on that newb, he used his booster when he took cover. recuruit link 5 to 11 mil isk per 100k recuruit
jerrmy12 kahoalii The dyst0pian Corporation Zero-Day 137	Posted - 2013.11.25 02:09:00 - [3] - Quote Atiim wrote: jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: Atiim wrote: Not sure if trolling or being a legitimate dumbfluck Obviously lets the whole of the forums know you're terrible at tanking. Ooh, I haven't been on here for a while, I like your sig :D The funny part is how it's an exact opposite of the truth. Replace anti-vehicle infantry with pilots and you can summarize about 95% of their "balancing" threads.[/quote] i just solo'd a good 5000 shield gunlogi with STD swarms and STD av nades, so easy, he destroyed a scatered ion cannon but had full hp so suck on that newb, he used his booster when he took cover.[/quote] That's an obvious lie. My friend has a Gunnlogi with 4k shields and he survived 3 people using STD swarms. [/quote] dont need em, and i meant 5 mins earlier, i had him near D near a bridge so he couldn't escape, i had a hive too, love AV. but it took 2 swarm clips and 3 nades to kill, or 4 idk but he was screwed because his missiles barely hurt. recuruit link 5 to 11 mil isk per 100k recuruit
jerrmy12 kahoalii The dyst0pian Corporation Zero-Day 137	Posted - 2013.11.25 02:12:00 - [4] - Quote Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: ZeHealingHurts HurtingHeals wrote: So make AV obsolete? K. I'll never understand the problem you all have with a tank being its own best counter. Nobody has a problem with a sniper being it's own best counter but a tank oh no the best counter should not be a tank. IDR! people counter snipe but don't counter tank recuruit link 5 to 11 mil isk per 100k recuruit
jerrmy12 kahoalii The dyst0pian Corporation Zero-Day 137	Posted - 2013.11.25 02:15:00 - [5] - Quote Atiim wrote: True Adamance wrote: Atiim wrote: That's an obvious lie. My friend has a Gunnlogi with 4k shields and he survived 3 people using STD swarms. (I knew they were STD because the volleys only had 4 rockets). To put a more urban twist on things, "Pics or GTFO!" Its debatable Atiim. There are times when mu HAV seems like its doing its job well.....there are other where It seems weak as hell. As we have discussed before neither one of us is ambivalent enough to actually have a valid opinion since we are by far too biased. And our anecdotal evidence is pretty lack lustre Everything in both real life and in fictional situations such as video games have times where they are performing perfectly and other instances where they are performing poorly. I'd like to think that I'm unbiased. All I want is for people to stop trying to balance PRO weapons against STD hulls we only have STD, and EVERYONE has pro AV now. CCP is balancing what we have now ok? recuruit link 5 to 11 mil isk per 100k recuruit
jerrmy12 kahoalii The dyst0pian Corporation Zero-Day 138	Posted - 2013.11.25 02:33:00 - [6] - Quote yea, we only have STD, combined with EVERYONE has pro AV, you need to balance around pro AV recuruit link 5 to 11 mil isk per 100k recuruit
jerrmy12 kahoalii The dyst0pian Corporation Zero-Day 138	Posted - 2013.11.25 04:01:00 - [7] - Quote Atiim wrote: jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: yea, we only have STD, combined with EVERYONE has pro AV, you need to balance around pro AV Yes, instead of adding ADV and PRO tanks we need to simply need to balance PRO gear around STD gear. While were at it, why not solve our "protostomping" issue by balancing PRO weapons around the [Starter] Medic fit. you know what? im done arguing with people like you, thats infantry, not a vehicle, and i've killed a sentinel AK.0 on my armor HAV alt with a starter fit in 1 clip, and we have both pro suits and pro weapons, so bye, get vehicles removed/vulnerable to ar's like you want. recuruit link 5 to 11 mil isk per 100k recuruit
jerrmy12 kahoalii The dyst0pian Corporation Zero-Day 138	Posted - 2013.11.25 04:04:00 - [8] - Quote ACE OF JOKERS wrote: True Adamance wrote: Atiim wrote: jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: yea, we only have STD, combined with EVERYONE has pro AV, you need to balance around pro AV Yes, instead of adding ADV and PRO tanks we need to simply need to balance PRO gear around STD gear. While were at it, why not solve our "protostomping" issue by balancing PRO weapons around the [Starter] Medic fit. Nope I want my tanks balanced around your proto level swarms. A tank with full modules can take 6+ Proto swarms, id say they can hold their ground pretty well. thats 2 clips, thats barely anything, and if they survive more than you think they probably have a heavy efficient armor repearer going recuruit link 5 to 11 mil isk per 100k recuruit
jerrmy12 kahoalii The dyst0pian Corporation Zero-Day 138	Posted - 2013.11.25 04:56:00 - [9] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: ACE OF JOKERS wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: ACE OF JOKERS wrote: A tank with full modules can take 6+ Proto swarms, id say they can hold their ground pretty well. So you're idea of a strong tank is one that requires you to reload once before it pops? So your idea is for a tank to be able to take MORE than 6 Missile volleys in a row. PROTO MISSILES designed to DESTROY vehicles? I mean ,if after the first volley the tank hasn't gotten the f away,he deserves to die , of course... Even at PROTO level,Infatry does not just STAND taking damage...you move, take cover.Why should it be different for tanks? How many times do [/quote] S[/QUOTE] infantry v infantry or tank v infantry solo'ing im done arguing with "them" please explain why its stupid to 2 clip a tank, and how easy it is, he's worse than Atim. i mean 2 clips, really? recuruit link 5 to 11 mil isk per 100k recuruit
jerrmy12 kahoalii The dyst0pian Corporation Zero-Day 138	Posted - 2013.11.25 04:58:00 - [10] - Quote ACE OF JOKERS wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Stop trying to solo us. What's so hard to understand about that? And what double standards are you talking about? You tankers trying to solo a whole enemy squad,in the open.... Tanks can solo squads? then aV should solo tanks. ITs called balance. What you want is: Tank can solo enemy teams Enemy teams need Strategy and teamwork to even SCARE the tank away. LOL @ your ideals . we cant escape at all which is a FORCED loss of 1 mil, infantry can hide recuruit link 5 to 11 mil isk per 100k recuruit

jerrmy12 kahoalii The dyst0pian Corporation Zero-Day 139	Posted - 2013.11.25 12:52:00 - [11] - Quote Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: 8 pages lol Come on infantry its not that hard to kill a tank Why do we keep having to tell you how to do it? Because if infantry requires a tank to kill a tank that's not infantry that's a tank, so in actual fact you are telling tankers how to kill tankers which inforces the point that tanks are gonna end up op if we continuemdown this road so really everytime you tell us its easy to kill a tank with a tank, you reinforce our point, Your mind is now blown, see you when you get out whats the BEST counter to a gun? another gun. whats the BEST counter to infantry? infantry AV is meant for support and area denial, not PURE killing recuruit link 5 to 11 mil isk per 100k recuruit
jerrmy12 kahoalii The dyst0pian Corporation Zero-Day 140	Posted - 2013.11.25 21:01:00 - [12] - Quote Gelan Corbaine wrote: jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: 8 pages lol Come on infantry its not that hard to kill a tank Why do we keep having to tell you how to do it? Because if infantry requires a tank to kill a tank that's not infantry that's a tank, so in actual fact you are telling tankers how to kill tankers which inforces the point that tanks are gonna end up op if we continuemdown this road so really everytime you tell us its easy to kill a tank with a tank, you reinforce our point, Your mind is now blown, see you when you get out whats the BEST counter to a gun? another gun. whats the BEST counter to infantry? infantry A Then as an AV trooper why are we only paid for Pure killing ? Why are we LESS effective against infantry if we are infantry as well ? Why make a role if it's not economically viable to do that role "the right way" in your view ? carry a smg and ccp needs to add WP for damage recuruit link 5 to 11 mil isk per 100k recuruit

Copyright © 2013-2024, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,03s, ref 20241114/1958
EVE-Online™/DUST514™ and EVE/DUST514 imagery © CCP.

bitcoin: 1CHRiBBArqpw5Yz7x5KS2RRtN5ubEn5gF

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.