DUST Search - AVers, how to kill a tank.

All Channels

General Discussions

AVers, how to kill a tank.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Jason Pearson 3122	Posted - 2013.11.24 08:42:00 - [1] - Quote Step 1, Get a HAV Step 2, Get a Railgun Step 3, Damage mods Step 4, Kill Tanks Step 5, ???? Step 6, Profit! King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Laugh at the idiots crying about four BPOs being removed erryday, lul
Jason Pearson 3124	Posted - 2013.11.24 08:50:00 - [2] - Quote Atiim wrote: Not sure if trolling or being a legitimate dumbfluck I have more likes than you, shut up :) lul King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Laugh at the idiots crying about four BPOs being removed erryday, lul
Jason Pearson 3124	Posted - 2013.11.24 08:55:00 - [3] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: Atiim wrote: Not sure if trolling or being a legitimate dumbfluck Obviously lets the whole of the forums know you're terrible at tanking. Ooh, I haven't been on here for a while, I like your sig :D King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Laugh at the idiots crying about four BPOs being removed erryday, lul
Jason Pearson 3124	Posted - 2013.11.24 09:09:00 - [4] - Quote Atiim wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Atiim wrote: Not sure if trolling or being a legitimate dumbfluck Obviously lets the whole of the forums know you're terrible at tanking. Ooh, I haven't been on here for a while, I like your sig :D The funny part is how it's an exact opposite of the truth. Replace anti-vehicle infantry with pilots and you can summarize about 95% of their "balancing" threads. I think both camps are bad and need to do something with their wrists :) And yes I understand my OP didn't make much sense to you, it was a simple fix for people who say they're Anti Vehicle (As in, fighting against Vehicles) and use Infantry based AV, why not just invest in a tank that has a Railgun? :) I mean, it's my personal belief that a tank should kill a tank, Infantry should be a nuisance. I guess because I thoroughly enjoy tank v tank battles, it seems more intense than Infantry v Infantry (yawn.) King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Laugh at the idiots crying about four BPOs being removed erryday, lul
Jason Pearson 3136	Posted - 2013.11.24 14:23:00 - [5] - Quote Smooth Assassin wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: Step 1, Get a HAV Step 2, Get a Railgun Step 3, Damage mods Step 4, Kill Tanks Step 5, ???? Step 6, Profit! WOW get outta you're redline and fight like a man! although this could stop the uprising of tanks but then again you're bringing back rail sniping. Sorry :( Let me just get my AV nades and a bucket for tears.. King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Laugh at the idiots crying about four BPOs being removed erryday, lul
Jason Pearson 3142	Posted - 2013.11.24 18:11:00 - [6] - Quote Flix Keptick wrote: Step 7: Get destroyed by the tanks you were trying to kill because you are an inexperienced driver (does not apply if enemy tanker is a noob) Shh, don't let them know! Severance Pay wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: Step 1, Get a HAV Step 2, Get a Railgun Step 3, Damage mods Step 4, Kill Tanks Step 5, ???? Step 6, Profit! What do I do when a dropship hovers over me and takes popshots while I cower in fear? Or what 3 LAVs blockade me and their passengers are all forgegun fanatics? What if they hit me with an orbital? I'm sorry sir, this is for those that sit up in the red line killing active tankers :) Severance Pay wrote: Would be even more unfair if this was modern day tanks, in which 1-2 would destroy you. Hmm.. Well if we think a single railgun shot is actually hitting a heavily armored and shielded vehicles and doing a significant amount of damage, I've got a feeling modern day tanks wouldn't survive from a single shot.. :) King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Laugh at the idiots crying about four BPOs being removed erryday, lul
Jason Pearson 3144	Posted - 2013.11.24 18:32:00 - [7] - Quote Scarr Beloxian wrote: hmmm blows a tank up with REs.... person rages out of match...yes ive done it to some people See, now that's a proper AVer, I salute you o7 King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Laugh at the idiots crying about four BPOs being removed erryday, lul
Jason Pearson 3154	Posted - 2013.11.25 07:29:00 - [8] - Quote 4447 wrote: True Adamance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: You see you miss the point, that because I don't except the same idea as you I want tanks to be easily stomped. Actually read what I write, I have no problem mwith tanks being powerful, what I have a problem with is when you want Anti-Vehicle weaponry to be useless against them. I don't have a problem with a tank taking down a squad if he networks with his own squad to bring them down. But tanks are niche weapons, just like the dropships, just like the Mass driver, just like the laser rifle. It shouldn't be the answer to every situation. Being the only side to field one shouldn't guarantee victory, being the side to field the most shouldn't either. Instead there should be points where tanks are the best solution to certain problems, not all of them! And if you read what I write you will know that is not what I want. I want balance. You don't get balance when enemies can be doing more damage than large rail guns with more splash, all the while being invisible, same with swarms. That is not balance, The size of the armament we carry we should easily have the same range as you if not more, with better in built visual targeting equipment. WE tankers GET it harder then any other class,. You used to post legit, now you're trying to act like a troll, and the sad bit is you look like a mong for doing it :) King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Laugh at the idiots crying about four BPOs being removed erryday, lul
Jason Pearson 3155	Posted - 2013.11.25 08:26:00 - [9] - Quote 4447 wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: 4447 wrote: True Adamance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: You see you miss the point, that because I don't except the same idea as you I want tanks to be easily stomped. Actually read what I write, I have no problem mwith tanks being powerful, what I have a problem with is when you want Anti-Vehicle weaponry to be useless against them. I don't have a problem with a tank taking down a squad if he networks with his own squad to bring them down. But tanks are niche weapons, just like the dropships, just like the Mass driver, just like the laser rifle. It shouldn't be the answer to every situation. Being the only side to field one shouldn't guarantee victory, being the side to field the most shouldn't either. Instead there should be points where tanks are the best solution to certain problems, not all of them! And if you read what I write you will know that is not what I want. I want balance. You don't get balance when enemies can be doing more damage than large rail guns with more splash, all the while being invisible, same with swarms. That is not balance, The size of the armament we carry we should easily have the same range as you if not more, with better in built visual targeting equipment. WE tankers GET it harder then any other class,. You used to post legit, now you're trying to act like a troll, and the sad bit is you look like a mong for doing it :) Here's my real post tankers need to be strong but have a weak attack, or weak with a strong attack, That's it. EDIT: they can't have both. There we go :) See better and I agree with you ^_^ King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Laugh at the idiots crying about four BPOs being removed erryday, lul
Jason Pearson 3161	Posted - 2013.11.25 14:22:00 - [10] - Quote Atiim wrote: jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: 8 pages lol Come on infantry its not that hard to kill a tank Why do we keep having to tell you how to do it? Because if infantry requires a tank to kill a tank that's not infantry that's a tank, so in actual fact you are telling tankers how to kill tankers which inforces the point that tanks are gonna end up op if we continuemdown this road so really everytime you tell us its easy to kill a tank with a tank, you reinforce our point, Your mind is now blown, see you when you get out whats the BEST counter to a gun? another gun. whats the BEST counter to infantry? infantry AV is meant for support and area denial, not PURE killing That statement is way to huge of a generalization. What's the best counter to a gun? A different gun. Just like how Mass Drivers are the best counter to Shotguns What's the best counter to infantry? A different class of infantry. Just like rail tanks are the best counter to blaster tanks. AV is meant for Anti-Vehicle. It is meant by title to destroy vehicles. Actually, Rails are not the best counter to Blasters. It depends on a lot of factors, it's like saying a Sniper Rifle is good against a shotgun, Sure, at range, but a Blaster fitted to a speed tank is better at dealing with a Rail, Also depends on the type of tank, a missile tank might be better than a rail for example. But I don't care much for it, the reason I'm replying is to ask a question, should AV be stronger than the turrets? Such as a Forge being stronger than a rail (don't give me BUT FORGES HAVE AMMO, because rails will too) just a question. Also, should AV be so cheap in comparison? I don't disagree that a solo tanker should die to a solo AVer (as a solo AVer can die to a solo tanker) but the cost comparison is ridiculous. King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Laugh at the idiots crying about four BPOs being removed erryday, lul

Jason Pearson 3162	Posted - 2013.11.25 17:59:00 - [11] - Quote Atiim wrote: jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: ACE OF JOKERS wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Stop trying to solo us. What's so hard to understand about that? And what double standards are you talking about? You tankers trying to solo a whole enemy squad,in the open.... Tanks can solo squads? then aV should solo tanks. ITs called balance. What you want is: Tank can solo enemy teams Enemy teams need Strategy and teamwork to even SCARE the tank away. LOL @ your ideals . we cant escape at all which is a FORCED loss of 1 mil, infantry can hide Nitrous Armor Hardners (or shield hardners) F/45 Dmg control unti. You can easily hit 50% resistance as well as being able to have enough speed to escape in time. Erm, So for a Shield, you want me to run a Nitrous, Hardener, Control Unit and then leave me with two slots for a Rep and a booster? No thank you. Also, y u no answer my above post? plzrespondkthx. King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Laugh at the idiots crying about four BPOs being removed erryday, lul
Jason Pearson 3164	Posted - 2013.11.25 19:19:00 - [12] - Quote Atiim wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: [quote=Atiim] Actually, Rails are not the best counter to Blasters. It depends on a lot of factors, it's like saying a Sniper Rifle is good against a shotgun, Sure, at range, but a Blaster fitted to a speed tank is better at dealing with a Rail, Also depends on the type of tank, a missile tank might be better than a rail for example. But I don't care much for it, the reason I'm replying is to ask a question, should AV be stronger than the turrets? Such as a Forge being stronger than a rail (don't give me BUT FORGES HAVE AMMO, because rails will too) just a question. Also, should AV be so cheap in comparison? I don't disagree that a solo tanker should die to a solo AVer (as a solo AVer can die to a solo tanker) but the cost comparison is ridiculous. If I sit on a hill in the redline, there is no way your blaster is getting there in time without being at full health. I believe that HAVs need a price reduction. Does that answer your question? Not really, what of the strength of a rail vs a Forge for example, oh and any a rail in the hills against a blaster is like a sniper in the hills firing at a shotgun scout, again it's all down the situation and how good the players are, if you're a sniper and not on the redline, it's possible to get a jump on you with a scout, same as a blaster tank getting a jump on a rail. King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire Laugh at the idiots crying about four BPOs being removed erryday, lul

Copyright © 2013-2024, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,02s, ref 20241218/0407
EVE-Online™/DUST514™ and EVE/DUST514 imagery © CCP.

bitcoin: 1CHRiBBArqpw5Yz7x5KS2RRtN5ubEn5gF

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.