Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
|
ChribbaX
Otherworld Enterprises Dust Control Otherworld Empire Productions
851
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 14:36:00 -
[91] - Quote
Here's my reason for not wanting them - and this is purely based upon my experience playing eve for over 10 years and the decision over skills that comes with that.
Flavor of the month, or should we say flavor of the patch, things are being changed in the game, something nerfed something buffed, people will generally spec into FOTM/W/P setups if they can. Not giving out respecs makes a much more dynamic gameplay, sometimes you're good sometimes worse off kinda.
In eve making decisions on what to train made my years of playing much more fun anyway, I've made mistakes, I've made good calls training something that turned out being buffed in one way, giving me a head start over others in for example manufacturing.
It also taught me to learn by my mistakes, foolishly training something because it sounds cool taught me that perhaps I should dig into things a bit more and actually gather some knowledge what the skill and skill path will do for me and push me torwards - something that if I could respec every now and then most likely would not learn.
So for me, not being able to change stuff around has extended my enjoyment and gameplay, sure there's been times where I've been meh for not being able to do something or realizing I wasted 3 months training for something I will never use, but I come to term that's how things work in this universe.
/c
DUSTBoard - Mercenary sheets
DUSTSearch - DUST Forum mirror
|
|
CRAZYHORSE ONE EIGHT
CowTek IT Infotech
34
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 14:40:00 -
[92] - Quote
Pretty sure Bob has ***** ****. |
Aikuchi Tomaru
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1125
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 14:47:00 -
[93] - Quote
I for one would hate spending all my SP again. This **** takes time too. If they totally change a skill tree (like vehicles) then okay. But everything else? God dammit Alex. You have to learn that spending your SP in something you don't need doesn't prevent you from still skilling the stuff you do want. I too have spent points into Caldari Advanced Assault suits. And I never use them! I too have spent millions of points into Assault rifles and yet I'm going to spec into Combat Rifles with 1.7. I won't complain. Why? Because I can still skill everything I want. Having some points in Assault Rifles won't prevent me from using the Combat Rifle. I'll just have to wait a little longer. And if you're not patient, then Dust isn't a game for you anways. And I mean really. How long do you guys wanting a respec want one now? Why haven't you used stuff like the triple SP event or the time since you started QQing to spec into what you really want now? Because this is totally possible.
And even if you get a respec now you will come to the point where you will spec what you once had before your respec. So why hand them out? There's not a single reason to do this. Every other game that offers respecs offers them because you can't do this. Because you are forced to chose and you can't spec everything. This is the reason respecs exist. In a game like Dust or Eve that wouldn't make any sense. |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
1749
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 14:52:00 -
[94] - Quote
steadyhand amarr wrote:No respecs Bob's smart decision making should be rewards. EvE rewards smart players and that mentally should carry over to dust still anoyyed these threads keep getting raised.
Sometimes in games things that **** u off are in there to **** u off on purpose. WOW graveyard runs are a perfect example of this :-)
Im Bob
I put all my SP into the vehicle tree and pretty much maxed it out for what i wanted, then i ended up saving 8mil SP for pilot suits which never came
So i ended up spending them SP into infantry
Now the vehicle tree SP sink has increased by a factor of 3 even tho i put all my points into my vehicle tree i wont have enough to do what i did in 1.6
Im getting punished but not because of the choices i made, i made my choices, i couldnt hold onto the SP i saved for 6months or more while CCP bumbled about, the SP i put into the vehicle tree is no longer enough for 1.7 because CCP made it into a SP sink |
Onesimus Tarsus
Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire
686
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 15:20:00 -
[95] - Quote
It doesn't matter. None of it. They should hand out respecs with a big red button in the Merc Quarters that does it free, as often as anyone likes. Why? Because none of it matters. You run about, go pew pew at people until you get pew pew and "die". But you didn't. You're immortal. So, the first hard rule of combat was chucked to the ditch as step one: you die when you get shot. After that little gift, what consequence matters, much less some little SP respec?
It doesn't matter.
Free instantaneous respecs for anyone who wants them. Now.
Better yet, remove SP entirely and let everyone have access to top gear at top prices from the get-go.
And to all those schmucks who can make a leet suit at 50 total SP, bravo. Tell me again why you then care if someone else has to spend 400k SP to do the same unicorn-rainbow miracle?
It. Just. Doesn't. Matter. (tm) |
SHROOM Headshot
Free Association Industries
8
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 16:02:00 -
[96] - Quote
I've been playing for about a month now and here's how I did it. I guess I'm a "Alex". I've been playing FPS/3PS since golden eye
Make player 1 (PL1). Play game. get butt raped. Spend SP on mass drivers. Still get buttraped. Figure out core skills and armor/shield mods are important to survivability. Crap! Out of SP.... Make Player 2 (PL2). Grind starter fits. Research on forums. Save SP for now. Make PL3. Experiment with weapons skills on PL3. Find weapon I like. Terminate PL3. Grind PL2. Skill into core skills and weapon on PL2. Play game. Get buttraped still (just not as hard )
Whether newberrys get a respec or not isn't going to turn the tides on vet players. Guys with 20-40mil SP are still going to crush guys with 2mil SP.
I think the complaint a lot of people are dealing with is that the learning curve on the game is very high (which is why I play tbh). New players become discouraged and quit when they spend all there SP on gear that doesn't help them right now on the field. Being OHK 1 second out of spawn over and over is obviously not fun for newberrys. This is the issue that needs to be addressed. I don't know if a respec is a solution for this problem, certainly not a permanent one. All games have this. Players who have been on since day 1 always have an advantage over new players, especially in Dust. Be it knowledge of the game mechanics from experience or advantages from gear unavailable to new players.
Just throwing my hat into the sea of opinions here. For the record I don't expect a respec. I'll gladly take one but I made my decision and I'm willing to live with that |
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
1230
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 16:12:00 -
[97] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote: Jesus christ, how many times do I have to say it? This isn't a flavor of the month thing, or wanting a respec for the sake of it. They're removing turrets, modules, skills and hulls. They're changing activation and cooldown times for modules. They're changing the effectiveness of modules. For some pilots, honestly, it just won't be worth it anymore due to the changes infantry forced on CCP. We make tanks work now, and infantry doesn't like it, because they STILL complain that vehicles are OP.
Don't you see, that's it's CCP changing this, completely, and not looking for an easy out?
You seem to be seeing what you want to see. I said It was fine for the partial respec, as those skills won't exist anymore. You just keep asking leading questions until you find something to whine about. I never said anything about FotM, nor a respec for the sake of it. Stop imagining persecution where it doesn't exist.
Shields as Weapons
|
Cody Sietz
Unkn0wn Killers Renegade Alliance
1515
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 16:28:00 -
[98] - Quote
I'm against a respec cause everyone is going to sepc into Gal Logi and ScR. Basically, they will move to the other side of the boat and cause it to tilt the other way.
That means everyone else will spec into stuff that kills armour...my GalAssault will not be pleased. |
TranquilBiscuit ofVaLoR
F.T.U.
667
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 16:36:00 -
[99] - Quote
Zero Harpuia wrote:People keep using the same line to defend respecs, and it has begun to wear on my patience. That line is..
"What do people who don't want respecs have to lose?"
This is usually followed by some personal attacks, something about speccing out of FotM, something about fear of newbies, and general name-calling. So I'm here to clear up the confusion and shut down a few rather virulent badposters.
If we give a respec, Imagine we have Alex. Alex spent his SP willy-nilly, just playing and testing. He didn't have a plan in mind, so if he gets a respec he can start over, plan accordingly, and put points into his favored playstyle. It's all good... for Alex.
In case you didn't get the hint, Alex is players who want respecs.
Then after the respec, we have Bob. Bob spent his SP wisely, making each choice count. He has all his points placed in carefully thought arrangements, and doesn't regret a single level. When he puts his points in again, he puts them back in the exact same place. His game hasn't changed at all, and he is upset that the game rewarded Alex, who screwed up his SP, and snubbed him.
In case you didn't get the hint, Bob is everyone else.
The Alex's of the game refuse to see things from the point of view of the Bob's. Those of us who had a plan get nothing for it, and feel like all our work was for naught.
A simple solution would be to give some goodies out along with the respec, or make it a choice between goodies and respec. The former would probably be easier on CCP, but either would give the Bob's something instead of just telling them to sod off. TL;DR
no personal attacks here.
for the skim that i did over one part of this, bob is very selfish.
all that the respec did was help other people, but because he didn't get something, he's upset. bob is very immature.
Tell me, how exactly DOES a biscuit gain Valor?
|
TranquilBiscuit ofVaLoR
F.T.U.
667
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 16:38:00 -
[100] - Quote
Cody Sietz wrote:I'm against a respec cause everyone is going to sepc into Gal Logi and ScR. Basically, they will move to the other side of the boat and cause it to tilt the other way.
That means everyone else will spec into stuff that kills armour...my GalAssault will not be pleased. don't you get it. no they won't. because there might be an increase in gallente logis, people are ruining the game for the people who don't stand a chance to the gallente logis already here.
Tell me, how exactly DOES a biscuit gain Valor?
|
|
Jadd Hatchen
Psygod9 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
61
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 16:45:00 -
[101] - Quote
Zero Harpuia wrote:People keep using the same line to defend respecs, and it has begun to wear on my patience. That line is..
"What do people who don't want respecs have to lose?"
This is usually followed by some personal attacks, something about speccing out of FotM, something about fear of newbies, and general name-calling. So I'm here to clear up the confusion and shut down a few rather virulent badposters.
If we give a respec, Imagine we have Alex. Alex spent his SP willy-nilly, just playing and testing. He didn't have a plan in mind, so if he gets a respec he can start over, plan accordingly, and put points into his favored playstyle. It's all good... for Alex.
In case you didn't get the hint, Alex is players who want respecs.
Then after the respec, we have Bob. Bob spent his SP wisely, making each choice count. He has all his points placed in carefully thought arrangements, and doesn't regret a single level. When he puts his points in again, he puts them back in the exact same place. His game hasn't changed at all, and he is upset that the game rewarded Alex, who screwed up his SP, and snubbed him.
In case you didn't get the hint, Bob is everyone else.
The Alex's of the game refuse to see things from the point of view of the Bob's. Those of us who had a plan get nothing for it, and feel like all our work was for naught.
A simple solution would be to give some goodies out along with the respec, or make it a choice between goodies and respec. The former would probably be easier on CCP, but either would give the Bob's something instead of just telling them to sod off.
And then we have Charlie... He likes the Amarr and would not stoop to debasing himself to use a Minmatar heretic's weapon, but there is no heavy weapon to go with his heavy Amarr suit. So he skills into Forge Gun or HMG, but now they are saying that the Forge is Caldari and the HMG is Minmatar. What can he do? He wants his points back to skill them into the holy and blessed Amarr tools of destruction! (Similarly for people wanting to stick with Minmatar stuff instead of Galente with the AR vs. Combat Rifle stuff.)
Oh and here's another thread to discuss respec for AUR as an option:
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=118583&find=unread |
pdiddy anfama
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
81
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 16:47:00 -
[102] - Quote
Zero Harpuia wrote:People keep using the same line to defend respecs, and it has begun to wear on my patience. That line is..
"What do people who don't want respecs have to lose?"
This is usually followed by some personal attacks, something about speccing out of FotM, something about fear of newbies, and general name-calling. So I'm here to clear up the confusion and shut down a few rather virulent badposters.
If we give a respec, Imagine we have Alex. Alex spent his SP willy-nilly, just playing and testing. He didn't have a plan in mind, so if he gets a respec he can start over, plan accordingly, and put points into his favored playstyle. It's all good... for Alex.
In case you didn't get the hint, Alex is players who want respecs.
Then after the respec, we have Bob. Bob spent his SP wisely, making each choice count. He has all his points placed in carefully thought arrangements, and doesn't regret a single level. When he puts his points in again, he puts them back in the exact same place. His game hasn't changed at all, and he is upset that the game rewarded Alex, who screwed up his SP, and snubbed him.
In case you didn't get the hint, Bob is everyone else.
The Alex's of the game refuse to see things from the point of view of the Bob's. Those of us who had a plan get nothing for it, and feel like all our work was for naught.
A simple solution would be to give some goodies out along with the respec, or make it a choice between goodies and respec. The former would probably be easier on CCP, but either would give the Bob's something instead of just telling them to sod off.
Very well put indeed. |
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
1231
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 16:48:00 -
[103] - Quote
TranquilBiscuit ofVaLoR wrote:Zero Harpuia wrote:People keep using the same line to defend respecs, and it has begun to wear on my patience. That line is..
"What do people who don't want respecs have to lose?"
This is usually followed by some personal attacks, something about speccing out of FotM, something about fear of newbies, and general name-calling. So I'm here to clear up the confusion and shut down a few rather virulent badposters.
If we give a respec, Imagine we have Alex. Alex spent his SP willy-nilly, just playing and testing. He didn't have a plan in mind, so if he gets a respec he can start over, plan accordingly, and put points into his favored playstyle. It's all good... for Alex.
In case you didn't get the hint, Alex is players who want respecs.
Then after the respec, we have Bob. Bob spent his SP wisely, making each choice count. He has all his points placed in carefully thought arrangements, and doesn't regret a single level. When he puts his points in again, he puts them back in the exact same place. His game hasn't changed at all, and he is upset that the game rewarded Alex, who screwed up his SP, and snubbed him.
In case you didn't get the hint, Bob is everyone else.
The Alex's of the game refuse to see things from the point of view of the Bob's. Those of us who had a plan get nothing for it, and feel like all our work was for naught.
A simple solution would be to give some goodies out along with the respec, or make it a choice between goodies and respec. The former would probably be easier on CCP, but either would give the Bob's something instead of just telling them to sod off. TL;DR no personal attacks here. for the skim that i did over one part of this, bob is very selfish. all that the respec did was help other people, but because he didn't get something, he's upset. bob is very immature.
I'm so sorry that biscuits are not smart enough to read a small passage of text. You shouldn't even bother to comment if you won't read, you'll make yourself look like a fool.
Look at this from Bob's point of view. Maybe I should glitz it up a bit.
Bob did nothing wrong. He did everything well, didn't have a single regret. Alex feels like he screwed up. God decides to 'fix' Alex with a huge miracle, but completely ignores Bob, who is right there. Bob doesn't get a get-out-of-screwup free card. Bob doesn't need one. Alex did, but Alex felt he needed one.
See what I mean yet? No one NEEDS a respec. NO ONE. The Alex players only WANT one, but are projecting their want on everyone as if it were a need. If CCP caves and gives the Alex players this boon, they get what they've always wanted, a hugely unlikely gift from the gods of New Eden. Bob gets NOTHING. Bob isn't immature, the very nature of the universe bent over backwards to satisfy Alex, but told Bob to screw off? Get it now?
Shields as Weapons
|
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
1231
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 16:50:00 -
[104] - Quote
Jadd Hatchen wrote:Zero Harpuia wrote:People keep using the same line to defend respecs, and it has begun to wear on my patience. That line is..
"What do people who don't want respecs have to lose?"
This is usually followed by some personal attacks, something about speccing out of FotM, something about fear of newbies, and general name-calling. So I'm here to clear up the confusion and shut down a few rather virulent badposters.
If we give a respec, Imagine we have Alex. Alex spent his SP willy-nilly, just playing and testing. He didn't have a plan in mind, so if he gets a respec he can start over, plan accordingly, and put points into his favored playstyle. It's all good... for Alex.
In case you didn't get the hint, Alex is players who want respecs.
Then after the respec, we have Bob. Bob spent his SP wisely, making each choice count. He has all his points placed in carefully thought arrangements, and doesn't regret a single level. When he puts his points in again, he puts them back in the exact same place. His game hasn't changed at all, and he is upset that the game rewarded Alex, who screwed up his SP, and snubbed him.
In case you didn't get the hint, Bob is everyone else.
The Alex's of the game refuse to see things from the point of view of the Bob's. Those of us who had a plan get nothing for it, and feel like all our work was for naught.
A simple solution would be to give some goodies out along with the respec, or make it a choice between goodies and respec. The former would probably be easier on CCP, but either would give the Bob's something instead of just telling them to sod off. And then we have Charlie... He likes the Amarr and would not stoop to debasing himself to use a Minmatar heretic's weapon, but there is no heavy weapon to go with his heavy Amarr suit. So he skills into Forge Gun or HMG, but now they are saying that the Forge is Caldari and the HMG is Minmatar. What can he do? He wants his points back to skill them into the holy and blessed Amarr tools of destruction! (Similarly for people wanting to stick with Minmatar stuff instead of Galente with the AR vs. Combat Rifle stuff.) Oh and here's another thread to discuss respec for AUR as an option: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=118583&find=unread
Having points in those things doesn't hurt you. Also, the HMG and FG are pretty obvious who they belong to. A person with only cursory knowledge of new Eden would be able to tell :p
Shields as Weapons
|
Athrak Kinz
Valkyrian Armada
2
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 17:39:00 -
[105] - Quote
So let me get this straight, Bob is pissed because Alex now knows what he wants to skill into and has learned and improved his play style? IMO Bob should be happy that Alex became a competent player, not spite him. I'm in favor of ONE repsec for all players until we get proper testing facilities, because as it stands now the only way to know what you're getting into (as a new player) is to skill into it and use it on the battlefield. Those who don't want respects lose nothing, those FOTM chasers get locked and those with new found knowledge become more stable.
Tl;Dr One (optional) respect for all until we get proper equipment test facilities.
|
low genius
The Sound Of Freedom Renegade Alliance
919
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 17:51:00 -
[106] - Quote
CRAZYHORSE ONE EIGHT wrote:His name is Robert Paulson .... His name is Robert Paulson .... His name is Robert Paulson ....
in death a member of project mayhem has a name. |
low genius
The Sound Of Freedom Renegade Alliance
919
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 17:52:00 -
[107] - Quote
I don't care if they give a mandatory respec after 2 million skillpoints or something, but all you guys asking for respecs when you have 10 million sp is silly. |
Kahn Zo
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
107
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 17:59:00 -
[108] - Quote
Athrak Kinz wrote:So let me get this straight, Bob is pissed because Alex now knows what he wants to skill into and has learned and improved his play style? IMO Bob should be happy that Alex became a competent player, not spite him. I'm in favor of ONE repsec for all players until we get proper testing facilities, because as it stands now the only way to know what you're getting into (as a new player) is to skill into it and use it on the battlefield. Those who don't want respects lose nothing, those FOTM chasers get locked and those with new found knowledge become more stable.
Tl;Dr One (optional) respect for all until we get proper equipment test facilities.
That is what "Bob' is worried about.
Bobberry~ one who negates a respec for all for selfish reasons.
Pure Gallente
|
low genius
The Sound Of Freedom Renegade Alliance
922
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 18:14:00 -
[109] - Quote
Kahn Zo wrote:Athrak Kinz wrote:So let me get this straight, Bob is pissed because Alex now knows what he wants to skill into and has learned and improved his play style? IMO Bob should be happy that Alex became a competent player, not spite him. I'm in favor of ONE repsec for all players until we get proper testing facilities, because as it stands now the only way to know what you're getting into (as a new player) is to skill into it and use it on the battlefield. Those who don't want respects lose nothing, those FOTM chasers get locked and those with new found knowledge become more stable.
Tl;Dr One (optional) respect for all until we get proper equipment test facilities.
That is what "Bob' is worried about. Bobberry~ one who negates a respec for all for selfish reasons.
and life doesn't have a respec button for those same 'selfish' reasons I suppose?
go play cod. I hear they give respecs. |
Athrak Kinz
Valkyrian Armada
2
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 18:24:00 -
[110] - Quote
low genius wrote:Kahn Zo wrote:Athrak Kinz wrote:So let me get this straight, Bob is pissed because Alex now knows what he wants to skill into and has learned and improved his play style? IMO Bob should be happy that Alex became a competent player, not spite him. I'm in favor of ONE repsec for all players until we get proper testing facilities, because as it stands now the only way to know what you're getting into (as a new player) is to skill into it and use it on the battlefield. Those who don't want respects lose nothing, those FOTM chasers get locked and those with new found knowledge become more stable.
Tl;Dr One (optional) respect for all until we get proper equipment test facilities.
That is what "Bob' is worried about. Bobberry~ one who negates a respec for all for selfish reasons. and life doesn't have a respec button for those same 'selfish' reasons I suppose? go play cod. I hear they give respecs.
Well if this is real life then I'm taken aback, I thought this was a game. Are you going to argue that life is a game now? I suppose "low genius" is an apt name for you. Let's hear it, why don't you want a respect? Validate yourself. |
|
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
1236
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 18:30:00 -
[111] - Quote
Athrak Kinz wrote:low genius wrote:Kahn Zo wrote:Athrak Kinz wrote:So let me get this straight, Bob is pissed because Alex now knows what he wants to skill into and has learned and improved his play style? IMO Bob should be happy that Alex became a competent player, not spite him. I'm in favor of ONE repsec for all players until we get proper testing facilities, because as it stands now the only way to know what you're getting into (as a new player) is to skill into it and use it on the battlefield. Those who don't want respects lose nothing, those FOTM chasers get locked and those with new found knowledge become more stable.
Tl;Dr One (optional) respect for all until we get proper equipment test facilities.
That is what "Bob' is worried about. Bobberry~ one who negates a respec for all for selfish reasons. and life doesn't have a respec button for those same 'selfish' reasons I suppose? go play cod. I hear they give respecs. Well if this is real life then I'm taken aback, I thought this was a game. Are you going to argue that life is a game now? I suppose "low genius" is an apt name for you. Let's hear it, why don't you want a respect? Validate yourself.
Aaaaaaaaaaaand personal attacks, aren't we all just having fun.
Bob isn't worried about Alex. He is upset that what he has done has amounted to nothing because CCP, in this scenario, let Alex off the hook. Furthermore, because Bob doesn't need a respec, what should be a momentous occasion the likes of which no-one will ever see again is, to him, just a mild irritation to put his points back where they were.
Bobs get nothing, so why should they support Alexs trying to poke CCP until they give in? Why should Alexs get something special for screwing up? Why should Alex not just buck up and start putting SP in better investments? It's what Bob does. Lvl I is very easy to get.
Shields as Weapons
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
1752
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 18:37:00 -
[112] - Quote
Zero Harpuia wrote:Athrak Kinz wrote:low genius wrote:Kahn Zo wrote:Athrak Kinz wrote:So let me get this straight, Bob is pissed because Alex now knows what he wants to skill into and has learned and improved his play style? IMO Bob should be happy that Alex became a competent player, not spite him. I'm in favor of ONE repsec for all players until we get proper testing facilities, because as it stands now the only way to know what you're getting into (as a new player) is to skill into it and use it on the battlefield. Those who don't want respects lose nothing, those FOTM chasers get locked and those with new found knowledge become more stable.
Tl;Dr One (optional) respect for all until we get proper equipment test facilities.
That is what "Bob' is worried about. Bobberry~ one who negates a respec for all for selfish reasons. and life doesn't have a respec button for those same 'selfish' reasons I suppose? go play cod. I hear they give respecs. Well if this is real life then I'm taken aback, I thought this was a game. Are you going to argue that life is a game now? I suppose "low genius" is an apt name for you. Let's hear it, why don't you want a respect? Validate yourself. Aaaaaaaaaaaand personal attacks, aren't we all just having fun. Bob isn't worried about Alex. He is upset that what he has done has amounted to nothing because CCP, in this scenario, let Alex off the hook. Furthermore, because Bob doesn't need a respec, what should be a momentous occasion the likes of which no-one will ever see again is, to him, just a mild irritation to put his points back where they were. Bobs get nothing, so why should they support Alexs trying to poke CCP until they give in? Why should Alexs get something special for screwing up? Why should Alex not just buck up and start putting SP in better investments? It's what Bob does. Lvl I is very easy to get.
Im Bob
Bob has planned for the vehicle tree and even saved up for the pilots suits which still dont exist
CCP has now extended the vehicle tree by a factor of 3
The SP i have into vehicles now will not cover what i have now in 1.7
I would have had to save my 10+mil SP for over 6months before CCP even released anything new for a vehicle, instead they are taking away things and changing it
In that time i chose to spend some SP into infantry because vehicle changes were not coming for a long time, now CCP extended the amount of SP needed to cover vehicles by a factor of 3 and my current SP in vehicles cannot cover it
So here is me Bob who made choices, specced out all vehicles and could go no further is now being punished because CCP extended the amount of SP needed by a factor of 3 so i need all available SP to get to where i am now in 1.7
Either that or i go full tryhard infantry and slap your **** around for the next 10years in several proto suits
|
Athrak Kinz
Valkyrian Armada
3
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 18:47:00 -
[113] - Quote
Zero Harpuia wrote:Athrak Kinz wrote:low genius wrote:Kahn Zo wrote:Athrak Kinz wrote:So let me get this straight, Bob is pissed because Alex now knows what he wants to skill into and has learned and improved his play style? IMO Bob should be happy that Alex became a competent player, not spite him. I'm in favor of ONE repsec for all players until we get proper testing facilities, because as it stands now the only way to know what you're getting into (as a new player) is to skill into it and use it on the battlefield. Those who don't want respects lose nothing, those FOTM chasers get locked and those with new found knowledge become more stable.
Tl;Dr One (optional) respect for all until we get proper equipment test facilities.
That is what "Bob' is worried about. Bobberry~ one who negates a respec for all for selfish reasons. and life doesn't have a respec button for those same 'selfish' reasons I suppose? go play cod. I hear they give respecs. Well if this is real life then I'm taken aback, I thought this was a game. Are you going to argue that life is a game now? I suppose "low genius" is an apt name for you. Let's hear it, why don't you want a respect? Validate yourself. Aaaaaaaaaaaand personal attacks, aren't we all just having fun. Bob isn't worried about Alex. He is upset that what he has done has amounted to nothing because CCP, in this scenario, let Alex off the hook. Furthermore, because Bob doesn't need a respec, what should be a momentous occasion the likes of which no-one will ever see again is, to him, just a mild irritation to put his points back where they were. Bobs get nothing, so why should they support Alexs trying to poke CCP until they give in? Why should Alexs get something special for screwing up? Why should Alex not just buck up and start putting SP in better investments? It's what Bob does. Lvl I is very easy to get.
Respecs are a dual benefit for the game, because Alex can re-align himself and become a better team mate to support Bob. I see respects as a chance to refine newberries who have made mistakes. Bobs shouldn't want for anything because they receive the best thing, a better team. I don't need a respec, but I feel for those that do.
|
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe PC RISE of LEGION
1992
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 18:56:00 -
[114] - Quote
Zero Harpuia wrote:People keep using the same line to defend respecs, and it has begun to wear on my patience. That line is..
"What do people who don't want respecs have to lose?"
This is usually followed by some personal attacks, something about speccing out of FotM, something about fear of newbies, and general name-calling. So I'm here to clear up the confusion and shut down a few rather virulent badposters.
If we give a respec, Imagine we have Alex. Alex spent his SP willy-nilly, just playing and testing. He didn't have a plan in mind, so if he gets a respec he can start over, plan accordingly, and put points into his favored playstyle. It's all good... for Alex.
In case you didn't get the hint, Alex is players who want respecs.
Then after the respec, we have Bob. Bob spent his SP wisely, making each choice count. He has all his points placed in carefully thought arrangements, and doesn't regret a single level. When he puts his points in again, he puts them back in the exact same place. His game hasn't changed at all, and he is upset that the game rewarded Alex, who screwed up his SP, and snubbed him.
In case you didn't get the hint, Bob is everyone else.
The Alex's of the game refuse to see things from the point of view of the Bob's. Those of us who had a plan get nothing for it, and feel like all our work was for naught.
A simple solution would be to give some goodies out along with the respec, or make it a choice between goodies and respec. The former would probably be easier on CCP, but either would give the Bob's something instead of just telling them to sod off.
I'll never understand Bob's line of thinking here. We are basically still playing a beta. I would assume that most people that are still playing the game want to see it succeed.
It will be 7 months from the initial release of the game by the time all racial variants of rifles will be released. I already have over 10 million SP invested into weapons. I guess it won't be that big of a deal for me to wait a month or so to skill into the new weapons, but why should we??
This new content is content that should have been available on 5/14, just as the suits should have been.
If they were adding the a tier II special dropsuit or something I could understand. I would be screaming that respecs aren't needed.
What we've all be doing since 5/14 is beta testing. I'm not sure why it's so hard for some people to comprehend that.
Remove time in battle from ISK payout formula and provide a bonus to winning team... Watch battles become fun again.
|
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe PC RISE of LEGION
1993
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 19:04:00 -
[115] - Quote
And just to add to my point above.
The FOTM chasers are actually doing the game a favor. They highlight the OPness or the shortcomings of items rather quickly.
Other than holding on to the ideals from Eve I still can't wrap my head around the anti-respec mindset.
I do believe that a lot of vets are worried that all these randoms might get their **** together if their SP were allocated properly.
Remove time in battle from ISK payout formula and provide a bonus to winning team... Watch battles become fun again.
|
Athrak Kinz
Valkyrian Armada
3
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 19:18:00 -
[116] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:Zero Harpuia wrote:People keep using the same line to defend respecs, and it has begun to wear on my patience. That line is..
"What do people who don't want respecs have to lose?"
This is usually followed by some personal attacks, something about speccing out of FotM, something about fear of newbies, and general name-calling. So I'm here to clear up the confusion and shut down a few rather virulent badposters.
If we give a respec, Imagine we have Alex. Alex spent his SP willy-nilly, just playing and testing. He didn't have a plan in mind, so if he gets a respec he can start over, plan accordingly, and put points into his favored playstyle. It's all good... for Alex.
In case you didn't get the hint, Alex is players who want respecs.
Then after the respec, we have Bob. Bob spent his SP wisely, making each choice count. He has all his points placed in carefully thought arrangements, and doesn't regret a single level. When he puts his points in again, he puts them back in the exact same place. His game hasn't changed at all, and he is upset that the game rewarded Alex, who screwed up his SP, and snubbed him.
In case you didn't get the hint, Bob is everyone else.
The Alex's of the game refuse to see things from the point of view of the Bob's. Those of us who had a plan get nothing for it, and feel like all our work was for naught.
A simple solution would be to give some goodies out along with the respec, or make it a choice between goodies and respec. The former would probably be easier on CCP, but either would give the Bob's something instead of just telling them to sod off. I'll never understand Bob's line of thinking here. We are basically still playing a beta. I would assume that most people that are still playing the game want to see it succeed. It will be 7 months from the initial release of the game by the time all racial variants of rifles will be released. I already have over 10 million SP invested into weapons. I guess it won't be that big of a deal for me to wait a month or so to skill into the new weapons, but why should I have to?? This new content is content that should have been available on 5/14, just as the suits should have been. If they were adding the a tier II special dropsuit or something I could understand. I would be screaming that respecs aren't needed. What we've all be doing since 5/14 is beta testing. I'm not sure why it's so hard for some people to comprehend that.
Valid points. New features are introduced, things break, RACIAL EQUALITY has yet to be established. For example: Alex wants to be a scout, he only had 2 options so he invested into a proto min scout and the skills and weapons that fit that play style. A couple months later the Caldari scout is released, Alex much prefers the Caldari style but when he started the Cal scout DID NOT EXIST. Is this fair to him? Is it fair to Bob who wanted Amarr dropships but had to settle? Current skills and specs are SP sinks to those that can't have their preferred fits as they'll have to spend tremendous SP to get into the new offerings while leaving their current MO in the Dust.
|
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
1236
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 19:23:00 -
[117] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:And just to add to my point above.
The FOTM chasers are actually doing the game a favor. They highlight the OPness or the shortcomings of items rather quickly.
Other than holding on to the ideals from Eve I still can't wrap my head around the anti-respec mindset.
I do believe that a lot of vets are worried that all these randoms might get their **** together if their SP were allocated properly.
Please cease that easily refuted point. The vets aren't scared of the newbies. If anything, the newbies should be scared that the vets could respec all 10-40 million SP. The anti-respec mindset is pretty easy to understand if you choose to do so. I specced into, let's say Laser Rifle I. I can still spec into ARs, ScRs, SLs, ANYTHING really. That's the point of the game. You can spec into anything given enough time investment. If you let people respec every few months it cuts down both the interest of the new and the repercussions of the permanent. For a personal example, I have enough SP saved up to proto both the new guns being added in 1.7. I chose to save instead of spend, which hurt me in the short term. I could proto them out immediately, but that would be a very Alex thing to do. I could also just put a single level into both and tinker with them. It doesn't cost much and I can get that back from a few quick fights. Then I can pour the banked SP into whichever I end ep liking, if either.
But what if we get a respec? Not only will that hurt me, because I chose to bank SP, it also kills any permanence of choice. Why not throw this to level V, enough people will be whining for another respec in a month to get me out of it. Why not put all my points into a single niche, I'm just a respec away from getting a weapon in another category. Why shouldn't I pound all my SP into the new thing, I'll get it back in a month. Why can't I just try a new role every few months until the whole game's intrigue is torn away? I could just do it the way the game intended and unlock everything over time, but why should I when they will always cave for a respec?
Shields as Weapons
|
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
1236
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 19:25:00 -
[118] - Quote
Athrak Kinz wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:Zero Harpuia wrote:People keep using the same line to defend respecs, and it has begun to wear on my patience. That line is..
"What do people who don't want respecs have to lose?"
This is usually followed by some personal attacks, something about speccing out of FotM, something about fear of newbies, and general name-calling. So I'm here to clear up the confusion and shut down a few rather virulent badposters.
If we give a respec, Imagine we have Alex. Alex spent his SP willy-nilly, just playing and testing. He didn't have a plan in mind, so if he gets a respec he can start over, plan accordingly, and put points into his favored playstyle. It's all good... for Alex.
In case you didn't get the hint, Alex is players who want respecs.
Then after the respec, we have Bob. Bob spent his SP wisely, making each choice count. He has all his points placed in carefully thought arrangements, and doesn't regret a single level. When he puts his points in again, he puts them back in the exact same place. His game hasn't changed at all, and he is upset that the game rewarded Alex, who screwed up his SP, and snubbed him.
In case you didn't get the hint, Bob is everyone else.
The Alex's of the game refuse to see things from the point of view of the Bob's. Those of us who had a plan get nothing for it, and feel like all our work was for naught.
A simple solution would be to give some goodies out along with the respec, or make it a choice between goodies and respec. The former would probably be easier on CCP, but either would give the Bob's something instead of just telling them to sod off. I'll never understand Bob's line of thinking here. We are basically still playing a beta. I would assume that most people that are still playing the game want to see it succeed. It will be 7 months from the initial release of the game by the time all racial variants of rifles will be released. I already have over 10 million SP invested into weapons. I guess it won't be that big of a deal for me to wait a month or so to skill into the new weapons, but why should I have to?? This new content is content that should have been available on 5/14, just as the suits should have been. If they were adding the a tier II special dropsuit or something I could understand. I would be screaming that respecs aren't needed. What we've all be doing since 5/14 is beta testing. I'm not sure why it's so hard for some people to comprehend that. Valid points. New features are introduced, things break, RACIAL EQUALITY has yet to be established. For example: Alex wants to be a scout, he only had 2 options so he invested into a proto min scout and the skills and weapons that fit that play style. A couple months later the Caldari scout is released, Alex much prefers the Caldari style but when he started the Cal scout DID NOT EXIST. Is this fair to him? Is it fair to Bob who wanted Amarr dropships but had to settle? Current skills and specs are SP sinks to those that can't have their preferred fits as they'll have to spend tremendous SP to get into the new offerings while leaving their current MO in the Dust.
Of course it's fair, you're acting like this feature was not available to him and him alone. Everyone has to start from the bottom when it comes out. If we just let people skip all the way to the top we won't be able to test the lower tiers, nor will we be able to get a feel for the growth of the class. Everyone starts at 0, so everyone has it fair.
Shields as Weapons
|
Your Absolut End
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
214
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 19:26:00 -
[119] - Quote
Respec=Cal/Gal AR-Logis everywhere
Variety yay, variety :D
another one bites the Dust...
|
ADAM-OF-EVE
Svartur Bjorn
553
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 19:40:00 -
[120] - Quote
Zero Harpuia wrote:People keep using the same line to defend respecs, and it has begun to wear on my patience. That line is..
"What do people who don't want respecs have to lose?"
This is usually followed by some personal attacks, something about speccing out of FotM, something about fear of newbies, and general name-calling. So I'm here to clear up the confusion and shut down a few rather virulent badposters.
If we give a respec, Imagine we have Alex. Alex spent his SP willy-nilly, just playing and testing. He didn't have a plan in mind, so if he gets a respec he can start over, plan accordingly, and put points into his favored playstyle. It's all good... for Alex.
In case you didn't get the hint, Alex is players who want respecs.
Then after the respec, we have Bob. Bob spent his SP wisely, making each choice count. He has all his points placed in carefully thought arrangements, and doesn't regret a single level. When he puts his points in again, he puts them back in the exact same place. His game hasn't changed at all, and he is upset that the game rewarded Alex, who screwed up his SP, and snubbed him.
In case you didn't get the hint, Bob is everyone else.
The Alex's of the game refuse to see things from the point of view of the Bob's. Those of us who had a plan get nothing for it, and feel like all our work was for naught.
A simple solution would be to give some goodies out along with the respec, or make it a choice between goodies and respec. The former would probably be easier on CCP, but either would give the Bob's something instead of just telling them to sod off.
except bob used to be called alex, he joined in beta and played about with everything. specced willy nilly and then a respec came where he piled all his sp into his fav playstyle. meanwhile new bob who specced wisely making all his points count got nerfed rendering all his investment and planning worthless
Ten soldiers wisely led will beat a hundred without a head
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=99075&find
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |