Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
|
CCP Nullarbor
C C P C C P Alliance
2325
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 13:58:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hi All-
Just want to write down a few notes about what we changed in 1.4 in relation to joining a battle and explain some of the questions you might have. So in 1.4 alongside a new battle finder we have rewritten the matchmaking system, that is the logic that decides what battle you join and who you are playing with. There are a number of things that we are trying to optimize in this step, for example:
- Find you your preferred selection of game mode
- Reduce the network latency between you and the server
- Match you against similarly skilled players
- Reduce the waiting time it takes to find a battle
- Reduce the number of partially filled battles
- Reduce how often you join a battle already in progress
And now on with some questions:
Why don't I get the game mode I selected? You can now choose multiple game modes however this will not always gaurentee you get one of those modes. The selection is used in 2 ways, we first build groups of players who have similar preferences of game mode, region and ranking. The second step is to use everyone's preferences to perform a vote on which mode to play. We will be tuning how effectively this works over the coming days so you should see some improvement in how often you get your selected modes.
The teams are not balanced / full This is a known issue, we are working on a fix right now.
Matchmaking is taking too long? / Why do I get some message about a guy called Scotty? This is a big new system with a lot of parameters that need careful tweaking. We are aware of a couple of issues already and are working on fixing them in the coming days. We will also be carefully monitoring the health of the matchmaking queues including waiting times and how balanced the battles are, then adjusting settings accordingly. For now, if you get a Scotty message just click join again.
I have a developer blog in the works covering a lot of these changes in more detail which we will post once things have stabilized and we have some time to produce pretty graphs and such. If you have any questions or feedback please reply to this thread.
Thanks for your patience and I hope you enjoy the rest of Uprising 1.4. |
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
1196
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 14:00:00 -
[2] - Quote
If you did matchmaking by gear it would have been simpler tbh
Basic vs basic for example
Just my 2 pennies |
Orca Amsel
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
309
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 14:06:00 -
[3] - Quote
CCP Nullarbor wrote:Hi All-
- Find you your preferred selection of game mode
- Reduce the network latency between you and the server
- Reduce the waiting time it takes to find a battle
- Reduce the number of partially filled battles
- Reduce how often you join a battle already in progress
None of these things work and on top of that now some squad members are not deploying to the battles. |
Soraya Xel
New Eden's Most Wanted Top Men.
459
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 14:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
CCP Nullarbor wrote:Why don't I get the game mode I selected? You can now choose multiple game modes however this will not always gaurentee you get one of those modes. The selection is used in 2 ways, we first build groups of players who have similar preferences of game mode, region and ranking. The second step is to use everyone's preferences to perform a vote on which mode to play. We will be tuning how effectively this works over the coming days so you should see some improvement in how often you get your selected modes.
Any attempt to put me into Domination will equal me quitting match immediately, just an FYI. Broken game mode is broken. Not letting us select that we never want to get forced into it is bad.
Also: This is one of those things that should have been clear IN THE PATCH NOTES, CCP. |
Brush Master
HavoK Core RISE of LEGION
829
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 14:20:00 -
[5] - Quote
I have not played it yet but I can tell you for certain that I have players that do not like to play ambush. If you match making is putting them into such maps, they are going to be very unhappy. They need to be filters, not votes. |
Beren Hurin
The Vanguardians
1349
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 14:24:00 -
[6] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:If you did matchmaking by gear it would have been simpler tbh
Basic vs basic for example
Just my 2 pennies
Why is this still a thing? What does it look at all of your 30 possible fits to see what you'd fight with? Or your most popular fit? Or what your skills would allow? Are you then forced to only use basic? And then basic/STD suits or weapons too? What if you are a vehicle user, but you have basic suits and ADV vehicles? Can you only take ADV vehicles in? |
Soraya Xel
New Eden's Most Wanted Top Men.
462
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 14:25:00 -
[7] - Quote
Brush Master wrote:I have not played it yet but I can tell you for certain that I have players that do not like to play ambush. If you match making is putting them into such maps, they are going to be very unhappy. They need to be filters, not votes.
Most players will be playing nothing but Ambush this week due to the event. This will both screw any attempt by CCP to gauge matchmaking stats, and will force a lot of players who don't want to, into Ambush.
Putting an event that favors Ambush together with releasing a new matchmaking system is rampant lack of forethought. But it seems lack of forethought is a running trend at CCP right now. The moment they announce something, a player is immediately able to point out something they should have thought of long before launch. |
Beren Hurin
The Vanguardians
1349
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 14:26:00 -
[8] - Quote
Brush Master wrote:I have not played it yet but I can tell you for certain that I have players that do not like to play ambush. If you match making is putting them into such maps, they are going to be very unhappy. They need to be filters, not votes.
In this case there should be a couple more toggles.
Prefer faster queue OR prefer 'fairer queue'. One would sacrifice the priority of your selections to get you in a match ASAP, it may not be very fair for you, however. Fairer, would give your vote for match type a higher priority, but you may wait significantly longer to play. |
Leither Yiltron
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
673
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 14:29:00 -
[9] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:CCP Nullarbor wrote:Why don't I get the game mode I selected? You can now choose multiple game modes however this will not always gaurentee you get one of those modes. The selection is used in 2 ways, we first build groups of players who have similar preferences of game mode, region and ranking. The second step is to use everyone's preferences to perform a vote on which mode to play. We will be tuning how effectively this works over the coming days so you should see some improvement in how often you get your selected modes. Any attempt to put me into Domination will equal me quitting match immediately, just an FYI. Broken game mode is broken. Not letting us select that we never want to get forced into it is bad. Also: This is one of those things that should have been clear IN THE PATCH NOTES, CCP.
Exactly, is this the real life?
I appreciate the new matchmaking, but I thought we were still going to get to, y'know, choose what we want to effing play. |
Beren Hurin
The Vanguardians
1350
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 14:36:00 -
[10] - Quote
My guess is that if it is a voting system, and you squad with members that are all selecting the same mode you are, then you are 5x more likely to get the same game mode. You INCREASE your liklihood to play what you want when you squad.
To suggest that all of you dumb PROto snipers with your 10.0 KDR should be put into skirmish matches just because you are queuing in them is dumb. |
|
Beren Hurin
The Vanguardians
1350
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 14:37:00 -
[11] - Quote
What if we got a bit of a 'hardship pay' bonus for being put into a different match? |
Spartan -047
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 14:41:00 -
[12] - Quote
Well ill go ahead and say first post ever! Love this game!
Now my two cents, Used to click on domination and be in a game in less then 20 seconds. I liked that.
Now tho I go into this confusing screen where I can't even figure out how to play my favorite game type. It's too complicated and you don't explain how to use it. If I just joined this dust 514 today I wouldn't even know which button to click. Although I haven't started a new profile in the last 3 hours and you might explain it to new players but for anyone not on the forum it doesn't tell you where anyone can go to do anything.
I know ccp wants feedback from all players new and old |
Brush Master
HavoK Core RISE of LEGION
830
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 14:43:00 -
[13] - Quote
Beren Hurin wrote:Brush Master wrote:I have not played it yet but I can tell you for certain that I have players that do not like to play ambush. If you match making is putting them into such maps, they are going to be very unhappy. They need to be filters, not votes. In this case there should be a couple more toggles. Prefer faster queue OR prefer 'fairer queue'. One would sacrifice the priority of your selections to get you in a match ASAP, it may not be very fair for you, however. Fairer, would give your vote for match type a higher priority, but you may wait significantly longer to play.
Quick Battle mode where it just dumps you in where ever and then an advance filter down battles I want in option sounds perfect.
What they need to do is just drop squads into the war barge and increase war barge time and allow people to invite players into the battle if there are open spots. You would then see in chat rooms skirmish barge 2 spots open, x for invites, etc. Players could fill their own games pretty fast. |
Beren Hurin
The Vanguardians
1351
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 14:49:00 -
[14] - Quote
The main point is, though, gentlemen is that you can't please everyone all the time. Fast AND fair is difficult to do for all folks. |
Brush Master
HavoK Core RISE of LEGION
834
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 14:54:00 -
[15] - Quote
Beren Hurin wrote:The main point is, though, gentlemen is that you can't please everyone all the time. Fast AND fair is difficult to do for all folks.
This is more than that though. Not getting the game mode you want to play will just be bad and I want to stress that this could cause my corporation members to login even less or even quit all together. Why why this not in patch notes ahead of time? |
Starfire Revo
G I A N T EoN.
103
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 14:55:00 -
[16] - Quote
Leither Yiltron wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:CCP Nullarbor wrote:Why don't I get the game mode I selected? You can now choose multiple game modes however this will not always gaurentee you get one of those modes. The selection is used in 2 ways, we first build groups of players who have similar preferences of game mode, region and ranking. The second step is to use everyone's preferences to perform a vote on which mode to play. We will be tuning how effectively this works over the coming days so you should see some improvement in how often you get your selected modes. Any attempt to put me into Domination will equal me quitting match immediately, just an FYI. Broken game mode is broken. Not letting us select that we never want to get forced into it is bad. Also: This is one of those things that should have been clear IN THE PATCH NOTES, CCP. Exactly, is this the real life? I appreciate the new matchmaking, but I thought we were still going to get to, y'know, choose what we want to effing play.
What's even worse about this is that because faction warfare is always Skirmish, people who wanted that game mode will swarm over to that. Given the fact that FW doesn't (or I hope doesn't) have any kind of ranking, you'll be forcing those people to go without the new ranked matchmaking you just provided. Normal matchmaking will barely get any Skirmish matches and FW will be full of people who don't care about FW. |
Absolute Idiom II
No Free Pass
591
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 14:56:00 -
[17] - Quote
It's quite the change (and I suspect counter intuitive) for your battle type preferences to be mere 'votes' and not absolute filters. No other FPS game would put you into a game type that you didn't explicitly choose or permission as allowed.
They even go as far to allow you to exclude certain maps.
Nullarbor, I do applaud the effort you've put into giving us a new matchmaking system - but votes over filters seems like such an odd choice. |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
1196
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 14:56:00 -
[18] - Quote
Beren Hurin wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:If you did matchmaking by gear it would have been simpler tbh
Basic vs basic for example
Just my 2 pennies Why is this still a thing? What does it look at all of your 30 possible fits to see what you'd fight with? Or your most popular fit? Or what your skills would allow? Are you then forced to only use basic? And then basic/STD suits or weapons too? What if you are a vehicle user, but you have basic suits and ADV vehicles? Can you only take ADV vehicles in?
Its not hard
Nothing over meta level 3, anything on your fit over meta level 3 is invalid in the match for basic vs basic
I said for example, so basics vs basic, adv vs adv, proto bs proto and basic/adv/proto is by meta level
How is it so hard to understand? |
Arkena Wyrnspire
Turalyon 514
2945
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 14:56:00 -
[19] - Quote
Queuing for the gamemodes I like and being randomly thrown in the gamemode I despise is terrible. |
Raiff Basdek
the unholy legion of darkstar DARKSTAR ARMY
19
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 15:03:00 -
[20] - Quote
OK, there's a lot of good in the new patch.
However, I'm one of the people that really doesn't like Ambush. Yesterday, I queue for dom, I get a match in under a minute. Today I queue, I wait roughly 6 minutes at any given time, and then get stuck in an ambush. Now, as far as I can tell, this change was to try and stop the pub stomping that was going on. I'm not a particularly high sp character, being around 4.8 mill at the moment. However, I seemed to be able to do ok in matches. If the issue is with the people sub 2 mill getting repeatedly killed, then the answer lies in extending the academy period, with an option to come out of it if you want, not in changing to what seems to be a mildly broken system to match players. In addition, myself and a few corp mates are also noticing that once you've had your 6 min+ queue to get stuck in a match type you didn't want to play, you're finding very unbalanced teams. ie 3 vs 8, 6 vs 15, 4 vs 15. These numbers are not made up, this is what we experienced. |
|
Chances Ghost
Inf4m0us
589
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 15:03:00 -
[21] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Beren Hurin wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:If you did matchmaking by gear it would have been simpler tbh
Basic vs basic for example
Just my 2 pennies Why is this still a thing? What does it look at all of your 30 possible fits to see what you'd fight with? Or your most popular fit? Or what your skills would allow? Are you then forced to only use basic? And then basic/STD suits or weapons too? What if you are a vehicle user, but you have basic suits and ADV vehicles? Can you only take ADV vehicles in? Its not hard Nothing over meta level 3, anything on your fit over meta level 3 is invalid in the match for basic vs basic I said for example, so basics vs basic, adv vs adv, proto bs proto and basic/adv/proto is by meta level How is it so hard to understand?
so what your saying is theres no more reason to skill into proto anything since you can just use basic forever.
what your proposing is not only technically difficult to obtain but terrible for the health of teh game as it pretty much negates the need to skill into anything, this has been discussed to death and has been agreed apon by nearly every single person to be a bad bad bad bad idea |
Taeryn Frost
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
96
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 15:18:00 -
[22] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Queuing for the gamemodes I like and being randomly thrown in the gamemode I despise is terrible.
I guess I've gotten used to that since they merged Ambush and OMS. Since its throwing me in domination now I'm easing my way into it, though its still not my preferred game mode.
I'll wait and see if increased player numbers helps alleviate some of the pain. |
Reav Hannari
Red Rock Outriders
1097
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 15:18:00 -
[23] - Quote
Orca Amsel wrote:Do you guys even test these things before you give it to us?
Hard to test a big system like that unless they spend many engineer hours creating some sort of simulator. We'll just have to endure a few days of them tweaking the parameters while they dial it in. I'd rather provide live testing and tuning than waste engineering time that could be spent creating game content.
|
InsidiousN
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
147
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 15:19:00 -
[24] - Quote
Again, I reiterate the point I've been trying to get across for months now: CCP, you have to take this game offline in order to fully fix it. DUST514 has far too many problems with its core to be able to make progress towards the game we all want and expected with live updates. Live updates work perfectly to make a great game better, but take a below average game and dig its hole deeper. No matter how painful it would be in the short-term, taking DUST offline in order to fix it is the best long-term strategy.
|
Absolute Idiom II
No Free Pass
594
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 15:22:00 -
[25] - Quote
InsidiousN wrote:Again, I reiterate the point I've been trying to get across for months now: CCP, you have to take this game offline in order to fully fix it. DUST514 has far too many problems with its core to be able to make progress towards the game we all want and expected with live updates. Live updates work perfectly to make a great game better, but take a below average game and dig its hole deeper. No matter how painful it would be in the short-term, taking DUST offline in order to fix it is the best long-term strategy.
Armchair-CEO, best-CEO. |
Elles Wils
Shaolin Legacy Preatoriani
13
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 15:24:00 -
[26] - Quote
CCP Nullarbor wrote:Why don't I get the game mode I selected? ... We will be tuning how effectively this works over the coming days so you should see some improvement in how often you get your selected modes.
Tuning? I'm sure what you did want to say was 'fixing this mistake', right?
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
1196
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 15:36:00 -
[27] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Beren Hurin wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:If you did matchmaking by gear it would have been simpler tbh
Basic vs basic for example
Just my 2 pennies Why is this still a thing? What does it look at all of your 30 possible fits to see what you'd fight with? Or your most popular fit? Or what your skills would allow? Are you then forced to only use basic? And then basic/STD suits or weapons too? What if you are a vehicle user, but you have basic suits and ADV vehicles? Can you only take ADV vehicles in? Its not hard Nothing over meta level 3, anything on your fit over meta level 3 is invalid in the match for basic vs basic I said for example, so basics vs basic, adv vs adv, proto bs proto and basic/adv/proto is by meta level How is it so hard to understand? so what your saying is theres no more reason to skill into proto anything since you can just use basic forever. what your proposing is not only technically difficult to obtain but terrible for the health of teh game as it pretty much negates the need to skill into anything, this has been discussed to death and has been agreed apon by nearly every single person to be a bad bad bad bad idea
Wrong because you can take proto into a proto match
Plus PC is always proto vs proto
Wrong again, how is it so hard to understand? |
Forlorn Destrier
Bullet Cluster
1531
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 15:54:00 -
[28] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:If you did matchmaking by gear it would have been simpler tbh
Basic vs basic for example
Just my 2 pennies
This wouldn't work - I have fittings ranging from militia to proto - and use them all depending on what I want. By your method, I would always be in matches against proto even when I wanted to run militia for a while. |
Maffia- Thug
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
63
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 15:59:00 -
[29] - Quote
Reav Hannari wrote:Orca Amsel wrote:Do you guys even test these things before you give it to us? Hard to test a big system like that unless they spend many engineer hours creating some sort of simulator. We'll just have to endure a few days of them tweaking the parameters while they dial it in. I'd rather provide live testing and tuning than waste engineering time that could be spent creating game content.
Well said sir. Although, most gamers stand points, especially one's that knows nothing nor cares about coding, they just want it to work first time around. I understand their POV but I also understand the coders POV as well.
You sir, have said all of this in one simple paragraph. KUDOS!! |
Absolute Idiom II
No Free Pass
594
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 15:59:00 -
[30] - Quote
Forlorn Destrier wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:If you did matchmaking by gear it would have been simpler tbh
Basic vs basic for example
Just my 2 pennies This wouldn't work - I have fittings ranging from militia to proto - and use them all depending on what I want. By your method, I would always be in matches against proto even when I wanted to run militia for a while.
He hasn't communicated his idea well. but it seems fairly obvious you'd choose 2 things when looking for a matchs:
Battle Type: *Ambush *Skirmish *Domination
Battle Tier *Basic *Adv *Proto
So if you enter a Basic-only match then you better have fits that are full basic, otherwise you won't have anything to choose from. With Adv you can have either basic or adv, but no proto. And for Proto: anything goes.
That said, I don't really agree with the concept since there are several-many skills which boost weapon damage, hitpoints and suit PG/CPU which would still allow high SP players to stomp in basic-only matches. And we're back to square one again.
Instead, it makes sense to be able to be matched with your peers in terms of actual battle performance as CCP are trying to implement. |
|
Reav Hannari
Red Rock Outriders
1098
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 16:03:00 -
[31] - Quote
Maffia- Thug wrote:Reav Hannari wrote:Orca Amsel wrote:Do you guys even test these things before you give it to us? Hard to test a big system like that unless they spend many engineer hours creating some sort of simulator. We'll just have to endure a few days of them tweaking the parameters while they dial it in. I'd rather provide live testing and tuning than waste engineering time that could be spent creating game content. Well said sir. Although, most gamers stand points, especially one's that knows nothing nor cares about coding, they just want it to work first time around. I understand their POV but I also understand the coders POV as well. You sir, have said all of this in one simple paragraph. KUDOS!!
Quote:I don't always test, but when I do, I do it in production.
Sometimes this is actually a legitimate process when dealing with big, complex systems and when able to adjust parameters on the fly. Sometimes.
|
RydogV
Shadow Company HQ
278
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 16:40:00 -
[32] - Quote
I too feel like some of the details of the matchmaking were held back from the Community. That is your call to make CCP but doing so only encourages the blasting forum posts we are starting to see now.
Being able to "turn off" specific gamemodes is a fine feature. All for it. But you should not have eliminated the ability to select a specific gamemode if that feature was not intended to be 100% accurate. I have absolutely no interest in playing either Ambush or Domination...ever. So wasting my time waiting to get into a battle I am only going to quit out of is just ridiculous. I mean really.
I assume dropping Squad mates from the battle was not something that was intended but needs to be addressed very quickly. A team has a single purpose...and that is to play together. Any system introduced to hamper that ability is a huge "FU" to organized teams and again, a waste of our time.
You made some nice improvements on game play once you get into battle. But they are moot when the path to combat is so impassible. Burning the midnight oil for the next few days is highly recommended. I don't envy the task at hand. |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
1197
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 16:44:00 -
[33] - Quote
Forlorn Destrier wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:If you did matchmaking by gear it would have been simpler tbh
Basic vs basic for example
Just my 2 pennies This wouldn't work - I have fittings ranging from militia to proto - and use them all depending on what I want. By your method, I would always be in matches against proto even when I wanted to run militia for a while.
No you wouldnt because you could join basic vs basic skirm matches
Why is this so hard to understand? |
pyramidhead 420
89th Infantry Division
1
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 16:46:00 -
[34] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:CCP Nullarbor wrote:Why don't I get the game mode I selected? You can now choose multiple game modes however this will not always gaurentee you get one of those modes. The selection is used in 2 ways, we first build groups of players who have similar preferences of game mode, region and ranking. The second step is to use everyone's preferences to perform a vote on which mode to play. We will be tuning how effectively this works over the coming days so you should see some improvement in how often you get your selected modes. Any attempt to put me into Domination will equal me quitting match immediately, just an FYI. Broken game mode is broken. Not letting us select that we never want to get forced into it is bad. Also: This is one of those things that should have been clear IN THE PATCH NOTES, CCP.
this, if i select ambush and end up in skirmish, ill QUIT IMMEDIATELY. if i pick AMBUSH, i wanna play AMBUSH.im not sacrificing my enjoyment to enhance someone elses. |
THEAMAZING POTHEAD
Pure Innocence. EoN.
312
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 16:57:00 -
[35] - Quote
Who the hell came up with this? Your battle choice is now a vote. WHAT THE **** IS WRONG WITH YOU CCP? My god I don't know anyone on earth this stupid. Here I was thinking oh it's just another glitch...then check the forums and see this? JESUS. I am just awe-shocked that anyone can be that ret@rded, I'm just going to play some other games, I'm tired of this. At least in other games I get to CHOOSE A ******* GAMEMODE |
Raiff Basdek
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
19
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 16:58:00 -
[36] - Quote
One thing that I'm definately curious about: The people who don't like Ambush (myself included) all seem to be complaining that when queueing for skirmish/domination, they're getting put into ambush a lot. Those who prefer ambush and queue for it, seem to be complaining that they're getting put into domination a lot.
Seems the MM settings have been put in backwards |
Chances Ghost
Inf4m0us
593
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 17:03:00 -
[37] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Forlorn Destrier wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:If you did matchmaking by gear it would have been simpler tbh
Basic vs basic for example
Just my 2 pennies This wouldn't work - I have fittings ranging from militia to proto - and use them all depending on what I want. By your method, I would always be in matches against proto even when I wanted to run militia for a while. No you wouldnt because you could join basic vs basic skirm matches Why is this so hard to understand?
thats what we are asking YOU
you cant do a game based off gear, it hasnt worked in any game, ever.
you will get twinks, people who max the lowest possable gear to stomp others. your solution just makes sure that mobody can gear up to beat them, and it doesnt solve the problem it seeks to solve (aka gear disparity causing one sided teams)
it doesnt matter what gear used, an organised squad will stomp an unorganised one.
you solution is a huge headache that doesnt actually solve any problems while at the same time causing a whole bunch more that are fixed by simply not having the system in place int he first place.
if you create a system where people will only have to have basic level gear and face basic level gear, then they simply wont skill into/use higher gear.
only a very small percentage of people even participate in PC |
Jade Hasegawa
Intrepidus XI EoN.
65
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 17:05:00 -
[38] - Quote
I will come back and try again at the weekend (that joke of an SP bonus is not worth the hassle)
Matchmaking - Busted I just got dumped 1 (me vs 8potobears) in domination, which is the one game mode I truly fking hate with a passion, the reare times I play it is cos my mates want to
Aim assist does not work for me at all but i got murdered from across the map as it seems others have got it to work and are running loads of damage mods to take advantage end result 4 hits from a GEK and I die whe nmy best suit has over 600 hp, I am 3ksp from proto sheilds but whats the fking point?#
Grunting when hit, my character is female so a male grunt of pain when hit is dumb plus it is annoying as hell TAKE IT OUT
Yes the new map is nice and in general the game looks better, but by gods it is no fun at all to play now, will try again at weekend to see if its anybetter but I cannot even slect a game mode
If you expect me toplay this crap you are wrong, I WANT A REFUND FOR MY ACTIVE SP BOOSTERS AS I WONT BE PLAYING
New UI on loading. DOnt like it, dont need it,its a waste of code.
There is one thing you have acheived however DEVS
YOU HAVE REMOVED WHAT LITTLE FAITH I HAVE LEFT IN YOU,ITS GONE!
Will the last person playing dust please turn of the servers? This game is done and dead,CCP, nice job you have killed your own product
|
Maximus Stryker
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
594
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 17:08:00 -
[39] - Quote
I support the idea of being able to queue multiple game modes in public contracts. However, you should not join a game that you did not queue for.
If I select: 'Ambush' 'Domination' 'Skirmish' --- then I should get into a match the quickest and have a variety in my playing.
If I select: 'two out of the three' --- then I should have a faster time getting into a match than if I only chose one.
If I select: 'one out of the three' --- then I should have the theoretical longest wait time and only get the game mode that I selected.
(it's been awhile but I think MAG seemed to have this figured out pretty well)
|
Scalesdini
The Surrogates Of War
130
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 17:09:00 -
[40] - Quote
CCP Nullarbor wrote: Why don't I get the game mode I selected? You can now choose multiple game modes however this will not always gaurentee you get one of those modes. The selection is used in 2 ways, we first build groups of players who have similar preferences of game mode, region and ranking. The second step is to use everyone's preferences to perform a vote on which mode to play. We will be tuning how effectively this works over the coming days so you should see some improvement in how often you get your selected modes.
Here's a protip: We should be getting our selected game modes 100% of the time like we were before. I haven't had a chance to test this non-improvement yet, but if I get stuck in an ambush or domination more than one time in a day, I'm probably going to stop playing for another eight months unless that's fixed immediately.
This is roughly the equivalent of telling your players "We see you want to play [game mode you enjoy], but that's too bad. You're playing [game mode you hate] because some unknown percentage of players we decided to stick you against enjoy that game mode. If you don't like it, go fist yourself vigorously with little to no lubrication! Enjoy 1.4, guys!"
This is just going to result in squads of people leaving matches immediately. Know how you were trying to balance matchmaking? How in the hell is matchmaking going to be balanced when teams are selected with 4-6 guys factored in on one side who are going to leave battle immediately because they didn't want to play the match type? |
|
Atom Heart Mother
We Who Walk Alone
41
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 17:27:00 -
[41] - Quote
I think that we should chose battle type. This way makes people unhappy and they quit (not me but....wtf) |
Cass Caul
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
66
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 17:31:00 -
[42] - Quote
FFS Let me chose between Ambush OMS and Ambush. I FCKing hate AMBUSH OMS. I DO NOT want to play it. I also hate Domination. It is always one-sided. always. Now it is even worse, because there's at least a 6 person difference between 1 side and the other.
InsidiousN wrote:Again, I reiterate the point I've been trying to get across for months now: CCP, you have to take this game offline in order to fully fix it. DUST514 has far too many problems with its core to be able to make progress towards the game we all want and expected with live updates. Live updates work perfectly to make a great game better, but take a below average game and dig its hole deeper. No matter how painful it would be in the short-term, taking DUST offline in order to fix it is the best long-term strategy.
THEAMAZING POTHEAD wrote:Who the hell came up with this? Your battle choice is now a vote. WHAT THE **** IS WRONG WITH YOU CCP? My god I don't know anyone on earth this stupid. Here I was thinking oh it's just another glitch...then check the forums and see this? JESUS. I am just awe-shocked that anyone can be that ret@rded, I'm just going to play some other games, I'm tired of this. At least in other games I get to CHOOSE A ******* GAMEMODE
Jade Hasegawa wrote: Matchmaking - Busted I just got dumped 1 (me vs 8potobears) in domination, which is the one game mode I truly fking hate with a passion, the rare times I play it is cos my mates want to
Aim assist does not work for me at all but i got murdered from across the map as it seems others have got it to work and are running loads of damage mods to take advantage end result 4 hits from a GEK and I die whe nmy best suit has over 600 hp, I am 3ksp from proto sheilds but whats the fking point?#
Grunting when hit, my character is female so a male grunt of pain when hit is dumb plus it is annoying as hell TAKE IT OUT
Yes the new map is nice and in general the game looks better, but by gods it is no fun at all to play now, will try again at weekend to see if its anybetter but I cannot even slect a game mode
If you expect me toplay this crap you are wrong, I WANT A REFUND FOR MY ACTIVE SP BOOSTERS AS I WONT BE PLAYING
New UI on loading. DOnt like it, dont need it,its a waste of code.
There is one thing you have acheived however DEVS
YOU HAVE REMOVED WHAT LITTLE FAITH I HAVE LEFT IN YOU,ITS GONE!
Will the last person playing dust please turn of the servers? This game is done and dead,CCP, nice job you have killed your own product
|
Cass Caul
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
66
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 17:34:00 -
[43] - Quote
I'm not playing in any "public contracts" or "faction contracts" until this ******** matchmaking is fixed. |
V1RONXSS
ARMY 0F 2
5
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 17:37:00 -
[44] - Quote
Well so far im about 30min online and still dont played any skirmish, its putting me inbambushesbetc or just to the game that is ready about finish, off to play tetris)) o7 |
Jammer Jalapeno
BIG BAD W0LVES
57
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 17:38:00 -
[45] - Quote
Brush Master wrote:I have not played it yet but I can tell you for certain that I have players that do not like to play ambush. If you match making is putting them into such maps, they are going to be very unhappy. They need to be filters, not votes.
I agree, I feel the same way about skirmish. |
Sam Booty
Rebel Raiders Inc.
1
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 17:39:00 -
[46] - Quote
I was really enjoying Dust 514 until this "upgrade".
I don't care so much about the graphics, there are frame rate issues but that is OK as long as the experience is fun.
Now with 1.4 you are putting a nail in the Dust 514 coffin. This matchmaking is unacceptable, it takes too long and I don't want to play only against pros! How does it make these decisions if you are in a squad with different level?
I waited 20 minutes for a match and it came up with domination when I wanted to play ambush. The match completely sucked only 7 players and was complete waste of my time. I don't understand if they were pros or if my suit sucked balls compared to patch 1.3 but I was spawning like never before. Sniped at spawn over and over. I see you like HALO so much that you copied everything that was bad in HALO. Heavily armored vehicles where there is no point in attacking, being snipped like crazy at spawn (this was new to me in 1.4, I really enjoy your matchmaking algorithm! ) .
I don't care about the new UI. I want to choose game mode like before. The number of players is decreasing severely and you are responsible for this. Hope someone gets fired for this bullshit.
|
Tal-Rakken
Molon Labe. RISE of LEGION
70
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 17:42:00 -
[47] - Quote
just rage quited for today my day off was hoping to get some serious grinding in the new match making kept putting our FULL team(2-3 squads) against 1-2 players or putting our 4-6 man squad against a full team of duvolle/mass driver spammers....
EVERYTHING else about 1.4 i love but if you cant have a good even match(or even at least even numbers) there is no fun redlining is boring as **** and being against a full team by yourself is what causes people to afk who wouldnt normally.i know your working on this but might want to get everyone on board this one issue as frankly this will kill your game which has huge issues already. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
3523
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 17:49:00 -
[48] - Quote
When searching specifically for Skirmish only, I've been thrown into Ambush EVERY SINGLE TIME. When searching specifically for Ambush only, I've been thrown into Skirmish EVERY SINGLE TIME.
The above are both consistent and reproducible on my PS3. |
Soraya Xel
New Eden's Most Wanted Top Men.
482
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 17:54:00 -
[49] - Quote
It's worth noting, that I have more likes than CCP Nullarbor does in this thread. Like... a lot more. Anyone need more evidence that CCP really screwed this up? |
Funkmaster Whale
0uter.Heaven
351
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 18:02:00 -
[50] - Quote
Worst changes to matchmaking ever. I'm sorry Nullarbor but you completely broke the game. People are put in game modes they don't want to be in and end up leaving. I'm joining games that are half completed more so than before. I'm still pitted against people with MLT gear so there's no real change in skill level matching.
All this matchmaking served to do was **** people off and break the game. |
|
Phantasmal Priestess
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
1
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 18:12:00 -
[51] - Quote
Listen, I like the changes. I never cared to choose which game mode I wanted as long as I got to play. I always enjoy matches with less than 16 people total. 16v16 s too much, these 5 vs 11 are way more fun.
I think Nullarbor did a great job. |
Griff Blackshadow
J-K Supply co.
0
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 18:21:00 -
[52] - Quote
Going along with the whole "uneven matches" thing, I played a skirmish match that was 2 against 9. Being stuck in my base and not being able to anything about it really is displeasing. I really hope they resolve this soon, i don't care about being matched with people who are the same skill as me, Im just worried about having even teams so the fight is fair. If they want to keep the players happy, I suggest they resolve this issue soon. |
Sam Booty
Rebel Raiders Inc.
3
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 18:23:00 -
[53] - Quote
Phantasmal Priestess wrote:Listen, I like the changes. I never cared to choose which game mode I wanted as long as I got to play. I always enjoy matches with less than 16 people total. 16v16 s too much, these 5 vs 11 are way more fun.
I think Nullarbor did a great job.
Sure. Even more fun is waiting for a match. If you are in a squad you have time to type all you want before the match. Don't matter you get kicked after 5 minutes of waiting. Forget the match. What is really fun is the chat system. Wait, but there is more you can even send emails and invites. And if you are bored you can always check the DUST/Eve universe, a three dimensional multi-connected graph.
|
Smooth Assassin
Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation
111
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 18:27:00 -
[54] - Quote
FIX THIS UNBALANCING!!! |
STABBEY
Black Phoenix Mercenaries
372
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 18:27:00 -
[55] - Quote
Its broken I click on it and 5-10secs later it just puts me back on the battlefinder screen |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
3525
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 18:29:00 -
[56] - Quote
STABBEY wrote:Its broken I click on it and 5-10secs later it just puts me back on the battlefinder screen I just started getting this too.
It took 4 tries before it lasted more than 5 seconds, and it got to 12 then stopped again.
Hasn't broken 10 seconds again since.
EDIT: RIght after posting that, I made it to 30 seconds before getting dropped back to the battle finder... only this time I'm supposedly in a team? Seriously? |
Orion Vahid
DUST University Ivy League
139
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 18:30:00 -
[57] - Quote
How about you put me into the game mode I selected? It's not just "preferred", it's what I want. It's like I order a cheeseburger and get Chinese food instead. |
Raiff Basdek
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
22
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 18:32:00 -
[58] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:STABBEY wrote:Its broken I click on it and 5-10secs later it just puts me back on the battlefinder screen I just started getting this too. It took 4 tries before it lasted more than 5 seconds, and it got to 12 then stopped again. Hasn't broken 10 seconds again since. EDIT: RIght after posting that, I made it to 30 seconds before getting dropped back to the battle finder... only this time I'm supposedly in a team? Seriously?
You need to relog. It just wont work now. Has happened to me twice so far. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
3525
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 18:52:00 -
[59] - Quote
Yeah, I switched games because I've had it happen 3 times, and relogging didn't work the first 2, had to quit and restart the client. |
Bright Cloud
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
86
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 18:57:00 -
[60] - Quote
Changes are stupid as hell. CCP you only achieve that players will quit game modes which they dont want to play. Which leads to matches that are like 6vs13 etc. This is not what we want and i refuse to play this game until i have again full controll over the game modes which i would like to play. I could live with it if you made 2 playlists like -Ambush playlist -Objective playlist
Anything else is not acceptable. 1.4 sounded promising but now that i see the results im dissapointed. |
|
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
3526
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 19:02:00 -
[61] - Quote
Tell game to search for Domination: Game searches for Domination. Tell game to search for Ambush: Game searches for Skirmish. Tell game to search for Skirmish: Game searches for Ambush.
Tested and confirmed.
CCP, when do you plan to fix this? |
GTA V FTW
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
52
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 19:07:00 -
[62] - Quote
10 year time table, lol. |
Yan Darn
DUST University Ivy League
50
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 19:15:00 -
[63] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
Wrong because you can take proto into a proto match
Plus PC is always proto vs proto
Wrong again, how is it so hard to understand?
I'm working on fitting a complex shield on my BPO scout - how would that work out?
Anyway - got another...122mins before I can play...but from reading the forums, it would seem i'm in for a real treat!
I really would like to hear someone explain
A) How not being able to select a game mode became a plausible idea (I suppose picking between all three modes we have can be a bit daunting sometimes...)
B) Were we intentionally not told or did this seem like such a minor change that it wasn't even considered?
I bought a merc pack to celebrate the armour changes...maybe this is just toxic forums being toxic and in two hours ill be pleasantly surprised? |
Drogan Reeth
Free Trade Corp
60
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 19:38:00 -
[64] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:If you did matchmaking by gear it would have been simpler tbh
Basic vs basic for example
Just my 2 pennies
Are you dumb? How is the game gonna know what suit you will choose before you pick it?!
You going to make it so suits cant be changed when you die and when you go to a supply depot? Take away half the game cause you wanna implement some ******** match making? |
Guilbert 515
United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION
16
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 19:39:00 -
[65] - Quote
So your saying, if i want to play a quick match of ambush because i dont have the time to play a full match of skirmish i eventually enter a match of skirmish to completely waste my time and rage quit the game... Whats the point? |
Cass Caul
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
67
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 19:40:00 -
[66] - Quote
This isn't a toxic forum. We're being angry and analytical. |
Provolonee
Undefined Risk DARKSTAR ARMY
112
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 19:48:00 -
[67] - Quote
im getting right into matches. about 20 seconds or so. USA west coast. Queing solo, all modes. The players seem balanced, yet to see a pubstomp ultra squad in about 10 matches. Im at 14mil SP, if that makes a difference. Things are looking good from my perspective.
Most games have had Unbalanced numbers, that does need to be addressed. might fix its self once more people have updated. as well as being able to specify a game mode. I like the random draw if it means quick games. But you need to be able to select your own game mode.%100 of the time. Having that choice removed is a game breaker for a lot of play styles. Some simply just do not work in certain game modes.
|
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
1178
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 19:51:00 -
[68] - Quote
I haven't played yet, but by the sounds of it, this new matchmaking system is KZ3 all over again.
I used to love spending upwards of 45 minuets to find a decent match in that game, and sticking players in a mode they didn't chose is the icing on the cake.
Just implement squad-free modes already. That is all that is needed anyway. Squads vs other squads, no squads vs no squads... simple, yet an extremely powerful and balanced solution. Squads vs no squads is the root of about 95% of the unbalance in this game. |
Temba Fusrodah
Ganksters Inc Drake Ashigaru
18
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 19:53:00 -
[69] - Quote
OMG CCP you completely screwed the pooch on this one!
The new UI changes very attractive. In game graphic improvements also good.
Taking as long to get into a match (and not even the one I selected) as it takes to play the match horrible. Multiple "Scotty" messages.
Whoever had the idea to take "Choice" away from players should be terminated, epic fail!
CCP imagine the outrage if you pulled some BS like this in EVE. I go to my agent to get a distribution mission and instead get sent on a Null Sec security mission. You got to be kidding me!
I am not generally a mean spirited guy but some heads should roll for this. The game is limping along in it's infancy and then you totally upend gameplay in this fashion. Leadership of the Dust 514 DEVs should be hauled in and read the riot act! These changes make me a staunch supporter want to not log in anymore.
I only hope you QUICKLY reverse this BS! |
Inmate 309849
Cheesehead Inc.
0
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 19:54:00 -
[70] - Quote
The Factional Contracts are messed up too. I have Minmatar and Gallente checked and 4 out of 5 Merc battles it has put me on Caldari or Amarr side. Please check into that also. |
|
Annabandak Mercery
Knights Of Ender
17
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 19:58:00 -
[71] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:If you did matchmaking by gear it would have been simpler tbh
Basic vs basic for example
Just my 2 pennies
wat makes ppl stop chaning gear in battle and start proto stomping again?
|
GTA V FTW
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
60
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 20:03:00 -
[72] - Quote
Quote:Why don't I get the game mode I selected? You can now choose multiple game modes however this will not always gaurentee you get one of those modes. The selection is used in 2 ways, we first build groups of players who have similar preferences of game mode, region and ranking. The second step is to use everyone's preferences to perform a vote on which mode to play. We will be tuning how effectively this works over the coming days so you should see some improvement in how often you get your selected modes.
CCP this needs to be hot fixed during the next downtime, seriously WTF were you all thinking? |
Silas Swakhammer
GamersForChrist Orion Empire
101
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 20:11:00 -
[73] - Quote
CCP Logibro wrote:Scotty used to be the docking manager for all stations in EVE. He has a new job in matchmaking but if he doesn't pull up his socks we might just fire him pretty soon.
|
Pvt Numnutz
Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State
161
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 20:15:00 -
[74] - Quote
Why is everyone saying you can't choose game mode? Just hit square...............
I love the new matchmaking screen. Scotty was a little slow, but when I got into the game and it showed me exactly where I'm fighting I started clapping. So cool to see where I'm fighting! |
war Dialer
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
37
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 20:17:00 -
[75] - Quote
Reav Hannari wrote:Maffia- Thug wrote:Reav Hannari wrote:Orca Amsel wrote:Do you guys even test these things before you give it to us? Hard to test a big system like that unless they spend many engineer hours creating some sort of simulator. We'll just have to endure a few days of them tweaking the parameters while they dial it in. I'd rather provide live testing and tuning than waste engineering time that could be spent creating game content. Well said sir. Although, most gamers stand points, especially one's that knows nothing nor cares about coding, they just want it to work first time around. I understand their POV but I also understand the coders POV as well. You sir, have said all of this in one simple paragraph. KUDOS!! Quote:I don't always test, but when I do, I do it in production. Sometimes this is actually a legitimate process when dealing with big, complex systems and when able to adjust parameters on the fly. Sometimes.
If only there was a job field for testing games....?
Also - NEVER a legitimate process. That's why DEVs have a sys-ops team to tell them NO.
CCP - When you deploy something and there is a problem, you should revert the changes. Please consider rolling back the revision until the issues are fixed.
* Please do not use us as free game testers. * |
Sam Booty
Rebel Raiders Inc.
7
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 20:20:00 -
[76] - Quote
It seems clear that CCP didn't test this patch properly. So the best thing would be to revert to 1.3 while they thoroughly test 1.4 and give everybody 500.000 SP to compensate.
|
Flint Beastgood III
GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention
73
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 20:23:00 -
[77] - Quote
You can always CANCEL as soon as soon as you see the (about-to-load) game mode if you don't wanna play it, provided it doesn't load you straight in without giving you a chance. I haven't encountered any issue with matchmaking since I noticed this. |
lrian Locust
DUST University Ivy League
50
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 20:29:00 -
[78] - Quote
Just got annihilated: 3 noobs against a squad of 6 protobears. That wasn't a match, that was a massacre! |
war Dialer
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
42
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 20:33:00 -
[79] - Quote
Flint Beastgood III wrote:You can always CANCEL as soon as soon as you see the (about-to-load) game mode if you don't wanna play it, provided it doesn't load you straight in without giving you a chance. I haven't encountered any issue with matchmaking since I noticed this.
You should not have to take action to prevent having a bad time in a game you play for fun. This is a bad feature that needs to be reconsidered.
Please consider the fact that we are spending our free time on this game. If it requires work to enjoy, we will most likely take our time elsewhere. |
Temba Fusrodah
Ganksters Inc Drake Ashigaru
19
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 20:44:00 -
[80] - Quote
CCP Nullarbor wrote:Hi All- Just want to write down a few notes about what we changed in 1.4 in relation to joining a battle and explain some of the questions you might have. So in 1.4 alongside a new battle finder we have rewritten the matchmaking system, that is the logic that decides what battle you join and who you are playing with. There are a number of things that we are trying to optimize in this step, for example:
- Find you your preferred selection of game mode
- Reduce the network latency between you and the server
- Match you against similarly skilled players
- Reduce the waiting time it takes to find a battle
- Reduce the number of partially filled battles
- Reduce how often you join a battle already in progress
Allow me to score the results of your efforts "optimize" CCP Nullarbor
#1 Fail, you have taken away my selection and turned it into a ballot option. #2 Below Average, now when finally you enter a game there is no time left to join or form a squad. #3 Fail, now my attempts to train noobs will have them removed from my squad. This really sucks for corp game play. #4 Fail, in fact Epic Fail "Scotty" messages are a poor substitute for game play. #5 Fail, players leave battles they did not select almost immediately, all you have changed is the starting number. #6 Incomplete, because of the huge time delay I've given up on playing today so I was not placed into any in progress games.
This is indeed a sad score for something that looks so great and could play so great. In vernacular of American baseball, "A swing and a miss!" CCP keep your eyes on the ball before you strike out for all of us.
|
|
Rogatien Merc
Red Star. EoN.
956
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 20:46:00 -
[81] - Quote
CCP Nullarbor wrote:The second step is to use everyone's preferences to perform a vote on which mode to play. We will be tuning how effectively this works over the coming days so you should see some improvement in how often you get your selected modes. Are you ******* serious? |
Guilbert 515
United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION
16
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 20:50:00 -
[82] - Quote
war Dialer wrote:Flint Beastgood III wrote:You can always CANCEL as soon as soon as you see the (about-to-load) game mode if you don't wanna play it, provided it doesn't load you straight in without giving you a chance. I haven't encountered any issue with matchmaking since I noticed this. You should not have to take action to prevent having a bad time in a game you play for fun. This is a bad feature that needs to be reconsidered. Please consider the fact that we are spending our free time on this game. If it requires work to enjoy, we will most likely take our time elsewhere.
Exactely, i just spend 4 hours for 20 minutes left to download 1.4 and thought of playing a couple of quick ambush matches to check out the new patch, back to topic, finding out that i probably have to spend hours just to enter a match leave until i actually get into an ambush match makes me feel like going to bed right away, well my boss at work will be happy about the new changes in dust, and i just wasted a lot of time and feel pre frustrated about these kind of unannounced and unexpected changes in match making.
Hopefully by tomorrow this nightmare will be resetted. |
Crimson Cerberes
Hammer Of Light Covenant of the Phoenix Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 21:12:00 -
[83] - Quote
Who really thought grouping people and then voting was a good idea? I mean really.
Group everyone that wans to play skirmish, then do matchmaking based on that. I guarantee it is faster and more accurate.
Oh and fire your game designer who thought of such a needlessly complex way to do this. I am pretty sure he just cost you way more than he is worth. |
FATPrincess - XOXO
Shining Flame Amarr Empire
501
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 21:23:00 -
[84] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:If you did matchmaking by gear it would have been simpler tbh
Basic vs basic for example
Just my 2 pennies
lol, no. Too many variables (ie. I use STD Caldari with a proto Flaylock). Squads vs squads is the best option, if they reduce squads to 4 members like before, for 16 vs 16.
-XOXO |
Dimmu Borgir II
Consolidated Dust
59
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 22:14:00 -
[85] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:If you did matchmaking by gear it would have been simpler tbh
Basic vs basic for example
Just my 2 pennies
But i use a variety of suits in any one given match, how the hell would they balance it for the 19 different suits i have?? |
Kensa Marine
The Guardians 910
0
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 22:19:00 -
[86] - Quote
Raiff Basdek wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:STABBEY wrote:Its broken I click on it and 5-10secs later it just puts me back on the battlefinder screen I just started getting this too. It took 4 tries before it lasted more than 5 seconds, and it got to 12 then stopped again. Hasn't broken 10 seconds again since. EDIT: RIght after posting that, I made it to 30 seconds before getting dropped back to the battle finder... only this time I'm supposedly in a team? Seriously? You need to relog. It just wont work now. Has happened to me twice so far.
BS! stop telling people to lkog out and log in!
That does not work. |
Vin Vicious
Capital Acquisitions LLC Public Disorder.
316
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 22:20:00 -
[87] - Quote
Should of made it based on KDR or squad avg KDR 2.00 and up, elites. 2.00 an below, noob room |
Vin Vicious
Capital Acquisitions LLC Public Disorder.
316
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 22:21:00 -
[88] - Quote
FATPrincess - XOXO wrote:
lol, no. Too many variables (ie. I use STD Caldari with a proto Flaylock). Squads vs squads is the best option, if they reduce squads to 4 members like before, for 16 vs 16.
-XOXO
Or this |
Absolute Idiom II
No Free Pass
605
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 22:24:00 -
[89] - Quote
Vin Vicious wrote:Should of made it based on KDR or squad avg KDR 2.00 and up, elites. 2.00 an below, noob room
2 things:
1) The pair of words you are looking for are: "should have". 2) How is KDR relevant for support classes like logis or scouts who're not always focused on kills. My KDR is awful but as a logi idgaf |
IAmDuncanIdaho II
The Southern Legion The Umbra Combine
32
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 22:35:00 -
[90] - Quote
I barely played a game today. Kept trying to join, kept just "undoing" the join command. Faffing about, couple games I got into were a proto-stomp and an empty map with a few blue-berries.
I can't be arsed with this, for the first time ever the idea is in my head that I will walk away for a bit (read: months) and come back later, see if anything is worth doing. Trust me I am *not* going to do this, but thought is there. I still like this game....it's just broken right now. Really disappointing.
And this voting for game mode thing? No. Undo it. |
|
Thumb Green
Novashift
374
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 22:37:00 -
[91] - Quote
I just wanted to say the matchmaking we have now is fubar. Went an entire match of dom with 4 people on one team and 2 on the other and another match with 16 people on one team and 6 on the other. Still getting matches with stacked squads on one side vs teams of randoms. Can't believe I'm typing this but I prefer the way it was before 1.4. |
howard sanchez
DUST University Ivy League
693
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 22:43:00 -
[92] - Quote
IAmDuncanIdaho II wrote:I barely played a game today. Kept trying to join, kept just "undoing" the join command. Faffing about, couple games I got into were a proto-stomp and an empty map with a few blue-berries.
I can't be arsed with this, for the first time ever the idea is in my head that I will walk away for a bit (read: months) and come back later, see if anything is worth doing. Trust me I am *not* going to do this, but thought is there. I still like this game....it's just broken right now. Really disappointing.
And this voting for game mode thing? No. Undo it. Wanna know what that feeling is like, Duncan? It's like when, after waiting ages for a solid hit of high-end quality smack, it turns out they've got the weakest, grungiest dribbling crap you've ever laid eyes on. So pissed! Gonna quit doing this stuff Right Now! Now...not again..evah.....just this one more time
Dust514. You don't hafta like it. Just do it |
Crash Monster
Snipers Anonymous
1285
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 22:50:00 -
[93] - Quote
I still can't see the effort put into an "AI" for matchmaking being worth it.
Just let people "graduate" out of a training mode when they have enough isk to buy their mercenary license. If you ever get enough people into the game add a high tier that is much harder to get a license for.
Dead simple. Hard to screw up. Leaves time for creating new maps and other fun things. |
Wombat in combat
TeamPlayers EoN.
80
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 22:53:00 -
[94] - Quote
CCP Nullarbor wrote:Why don't I get the game mode I selected? You can now choose multiple game modes however this will not always gaurentee you get one of those modes. This is very bad. Maybe you want to do a quick 7-15 minute ambush match before you do something else. Instead it can potentially queue you up for a 30 min Skirmish match. We no longer have the control we used to have. |
Moonracer2000
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
676
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 22:54:00 -
[95] - Quote
1. It seems clear that most people are not into the whole "vote" system. Myself included.
2. Can we get details on how you "Match [us] against similarly skilled players"? I'm honestly curious how you are going about this as it is a very complicated task. |
Reaper Skordeman
The Reaper Crew PMC
104
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 22:58:00 -
[96] - Quote
What is the point of giving me a filter that doesn't even work.
1. We want a working Match-Making System. 2. We want to play what we select, No Voting, No Randomization. I would rather wait for my game mode than play one I hate. 3. Please separate Ambush and Ambush OMS. I loved OMS but there's a chance I'll end up in Ambush which I hate. |
Vectar Locke
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
225
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 23:39:00 -
[97] - Quote
This is down right comical. Did you think that game mode was a vague 'preference' and not an absolute? I'm laughing so hard right now my ribs hurt.
Was this one person going off rogue and implementing this? Or did you all sit around a table and collectively decide "this is not a horrible decision, at all." |
Vin Vicious
Capital Acquisitions LLC Public Disorder.
317
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 00:07:00 -
[98] - Quote
Absolute Idiom II wrote:Vin Vicious wrote:Should of made it based on KDR or squad avg KDR 2.00 and up, elites. 2.00 an below, noob room 2 things: 1) The pair of words you are looking for are: "should have". 2) How is KDR relevant for support classes like logis or scouts who're not always focused on kills. My KDR is awful but as a logi idgaf
1) I am not writing a fcuking book, so my grammar can be how ever I please
2) if you can not get 2 kills to your every death you should consider a different role |
Crash Monster
Snipers Anonymous
1287
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 00:34:00 -
[99] - Quote
Cancelling when you get a game mode you don't like seems like it is hanging... though perhaps it is just taking forever. |
Crash Monster
Snipers Anonymous
1287
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 00:50:00 -
[100] - Quote
Rogatien Merc wrote:CCP Nullarbor wrote:The second step is to use everyone's preferences to perform a vote on which mode to play. We will be tuning how effectively this works over the coming days so you should see some improvement in how often you get your selected modes. Are you ******* serious?
I'm going to go out on a limb and call CCP innovative. However, as we often see, being innovative also means getting things wrong a lot.
CCP, if you want to let people pick a random game style then put in a random selection -- don't just randomly decide some people will have to play a game they don't want to play.
Somebody in your organization needs to step back from the theoretical best way to do sh*t and do things in a way that is simple, effective, and does what people want. So called high-tech is not always the answer... Scotty the AI indeed. |
|
Absolute Idiom II
No Free Pass
613
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 00:58:00 -
[101] - Quote
Vin Vicious wrote:Absolute Idiom II wrote:Vin Vicious wrote:Should of made it based on KDR or squad avg KDR 2.00 and up, elites. 2.00 an below, noob room 2 things: 1) The pair of words you are looking for are: "should have". 2) How is KDR relevant for support classes like logis or scouts who're not always focused on kills. My KDR is awful but as a logi idgaf 1) I am not writing a fcuking book, so my grammar can be how ever I please 2) if you can not get 2 kills to your every death you should consider a different role
> thinks communication skills are only for books
lol
> thinks that support classes should have a kdr above 2.0, and should consider other roles if they do not
like what: assault, heavy or tank?
Go back to school and learn some more logic. And some 3rd grade English. |
|
CCP Nullarbor
C C P C C P Alliance
2340
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 01:21:00 -
[102] - Quote
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=106848&find=unread
So our matchmaking went a bit rogue today and did basically none of the things I said it would. We have taken Scotty out the back for a good talking too and he's ready to start the day fresh and get the job done as of downtime Wednesday.
As a quick FYI because I've seen a few comments like "why don't you test this beforehand?". Obviously matchmaking is pretty tricky to test without the huge numbers of players, so we have a system of robots that simulate thousand of players connecting and joining battles. Unfortunately it looks like there was something wrong with our test simulation because it did not perform the same today on TQ as it did during testing.
The good news is we now have a heap of detailed logs to try to replicate what we saw today to help us run more accurate tests in the future.
Thanks for all the helpful comments and feedback today. |
|
Absolute Idiom II
No Free Pass
613
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 01:23:00 -
[103] - Quote
Godspeed Nullarbor. Fix this and then players can focus on all the good that 1.4 had brought. |
HEAD- HUNTER-GEO
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
12
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 01:32:00 -
[104] - Quote
Yes i will admit i love what 1.4 did guns work good now ,Hit detection is great and i love the active scaner now ,all so the new maps r greatttttttttttttttttttttt thanks ccp once matchmaking is fixed we will be happy gamers!! |
Thorn Badblood
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
17
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 01:51:00 -
[105] - Quote
Can we add a match making system to EVE too?
I thought this was New Eden, a harsh universe. |
postmanclark2
Black Phoenix Mercenaries
20
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 02:38:00 -
[106] - Quote
CCP Nullarbor wrote: Why don't I get the game mode I selected? You can now choose multiple game modes however this will not always gaurentee you get one of those modes. The selection is used in 2 ways, we first build groups of players who have similar preferences of game mode, region and ranking. The second step is to use everyone's preferences to perform a vote on which mode to play. We will be tuning how effectively this works over the coming days so you should see some improvement in how often you get your selected modes.
Do CCP know how to make an FPS?
What game mode, is the first fricking criterion. You should base the first part of the matchmaking, on what people want to play. If I am soloing, I do not want to play domination or skirmish, where I get frustrated with bluebelles. I'd prefer to play ambush, where it doesn't need any teamwork to play.
Nothing can ruin this game, more than this matchmaking section. Go back to the old matchmaking, it was faster and you got to play what you wanted. You gives a kitten about unmatched teams anymore, with this kind of rubbish. |
KalOfTheRathi
Black Phoenix Mercenaries
629
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 02:48:00 -
[107] - Quote
postmanclark2 wrote:Do CCP know how to make an FPS? Ah ... Nope.
|
TV Repair Guy
Molon Labe. RISE of LEGION
43
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 03:00:00 -
[108] - Quote
The vote system is bad, and I prefer the old system of matchmaking. Bad players will rage about team imbalance and needing SP tiered shelter from everyone no matter what, but now we have to deal with long wait times and half your squad not deploying into a match.
I can't log in anymore, but I did enjoy the updates to TACnet, audio/visuals and shiny new menus. I've read the new maps are fun. Just junk the matchmaking. |
ironman1979
R3GULATORS
1
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 05:25:00 -
[109] - Quote
[quote=Brush Master]I have not played it yet but I can tell you for certain that I have players that do not like to play ambush. If you match making is putting them into such maps, they are going to be very unhappy. They need to be filters, not votes. This game is a joke now we can't even squad up and play together are whole corp is wanting to quit because they like domination and we keeping getting every thing but that and this game is full of bugs we liked it better the way it was they have it a mess now that's all I have to say good luck dust |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
1203
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 09:49:00 -
[110] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:If you did matchmaking by gear it would have been simpler tbh
Basic vs basic for example
Just my 2 pennies
How the **** do any of you not understand this? do you have the IQ of a banana?
Its simple
You have each gamemode which then has 3 matchmaking options
Skirmish - Basic vs basic, adv vs adv, proto vs proto for example
Now because basic/adv/proto is decided by meta levels 1-3,4-6,7-9 it means the game can easily recognize what is on everyones suit
So if you are in basic vs basic ambush and your suit has a meta level 4 (adv) item on it then the whole suit is invalid thus you cannot spawn in it when in game because of the meta level, but if you take it off and replace with a basic item 1-3 meta then you can spawn in it provided the entire fitting is basic and between 1-3 meta level
|
|
Dnaizohd Orlenaard
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 09:49:00 -
[111] - Quote
Scotty! Jesus, man!
I'm sorry you guys, but I just had to do it |
Sam Booty
Rebel Raiders Inc.
9
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 10:30:00 -
[112] - Quote
I don't agree with this type of matchmaking by skills or something. It is better to have some good and some bad games than all bad. You should just fill games up as people arrive as before and according to their preferences. If you want to really improve this game, don't allow vehicles to be to heavily armored (yellow LAVs are a bad joke), punish people who only want to run people over (maybe introducing stronger AV grenades), improve maps and improve spawning so that you have some invincibility during 5 seconds or so (this to give you chances when the enemy is just surrounding your uplink).
When I started playing I got killed easily because I had bad dropsuit and weapons so I have now bad K/D ratio. Now I was improving my K/D ratio because I have better dropsuit and weapons but since you changed the rules again I will never improve my K/D. So others have improved their skills and K/D at my expense and now I will not benefit of the same.
In conclusion, if you match everyone up really nice there is no point for skills just give everyone the same suit and weapons too. |
Rogatien Merc
Red Star. EoN.
968
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 12:06:00 -
[113] - Quote
Getting people into well matched games should be secondary to getting people into games at all. |
Sana Rayya
WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL
167
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 12:25:00 -
[114] - Quote
Rogatien Merc wrote:Getting people into well matched games should be secondary to getting people into games at all.
QFT.
I only played four or five games yesterday because I was utterly disgusted by the new matchmaking system.
Unless the patch today greatly shortens the wait times and eliminates bugs (esp. the team chat bug which prevents you from queueing for about 5 minutes), I can't see myself playing this game at all after I cap out this week. It's just not worth the headache.
I would much rather roll back to the previous system. You got the occasional protostomp but at least it was over with quickly, and you could wait a bit so you didn't queue in with those protostompers again. Now I have to wait 5+ minutes only to get queued into a game where it's just me on my team and no one on the enemy team? No thanks, I'll go play a game that works. |
dustwaffle
Ill Omens
443
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 12:28:00 -
[115] - Quote
So, any word from people who've played? Is the battle finder/matchmaking fixed yet? |
Sam Booty
Rebel Raiders Inc.
9
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 13:13:00 -
[116] - Quote
dustwaffle wrote:So, any word from people who've played? Is the battle finder/matchmaking fixed yet?
Yes. When I logged on today there was a new patch 3.09 (about 30 Mb) and everything was going well. The battle finder only took about 5 seconds to get me in a match which was good. I was really pleased again and the matches were OK since I was adapting to new maps which look good.
Unfortunately after playing about 4 games, the battle finder stopped working (about 10 min ago). I even logged out and in again but nothing.
|
Rinzler XVII
Forsaken Immortals Top Men.
56
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 13:13:00 -
[117] - Quote
TV Repair Guy wrote:The vote system is bad, and I prefer the old system of matchmaking. Bad players will rage about team imbalance and needing SP tiered shelter from everyone no matter what, but now we have to deal with long wait times and half your squad not deploying into a match.
I can't log in anymore, but I did enjoy the updates to TACnet, audio/visuals and shiny new menus. I've read the new maps are fun. Just junk the matchmaking.
New players mothertrucker .. new players .. this is the main reason for a better matchmaking system .. you may just want new players and fairly new players just out of academy to be your opponents so you can be happy about going 15-0 but keeping you happy at the expense of .. lets say 5 players per game putting their control pad down and deleting the game makes no sense .. what exactly is your issue with balanced games ??? CCP may have failed miserably at implementing it but as an idea it is desperately needed to not only attract players to this game but keep them .. you may be happy with a high KD/R on a game with 4k players but I'd rather be an average player with an average KD/R on a game with 400,000 players .. more players=less waiting times it's simple logic and if you still don;t get it then you my friend are an idiot |
George Moros
WarRavens League of Infamy
75
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 19:49:00 -
[118] - Quote
dustwaffle wrote:So, any word from people who've played? Is the battle finder/matchmaking fixed yet?
I just played some 7-8 pub matches... The "Searching for battle" period never lasted longer than 10 seconds, and each and every time I got the match I actually selected I want (domination). Also, both teams were mostly full before the battle started, or filled up quickly after. This part is definitely fixed and works perfectly.
As for matchmaking itself... it's hard to tell. Since my char is neither a complete noob nor a proto-god, I can't tell from just playing a couple of games. Subjectively, it felt like battles were more even matched than before, but don't take this as rock solid, objective assessment.
Regardless, matchmaking works much, much better than yesterday. |
First Prophet
Unkn0wn Killers
923
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 20:40:00 -
[119] - Quote
Scotty's goin' nuts. |
lrian Locust
DUST University Ivy League
53
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 20:43:00 -
[120] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
So if you are in basic vs basic ambush and your suit has a meta level 4 (adv) item on it then the whole suit is invalid thus you cannot spawn in it when in game because of the meta level, but if you take it off and replace with a basic item 1-3 meta then you can spawn in it provided the entire fitting is basic and between 1-3 meta level
I thought Dust and New Eden were about choice? This would mean that if I have a basic suit, I can't use any of my proto weapons? That's idiotic.
It would be better to add all the meta levels of the suit, modules and equipment, and base matchmaking on that. Even that could be imbalanced, if players increase all their passive skills and use militia equipment to stomp newberries with more speed, less sway, increased damage, less detection, etc. |
|
lrian Locust
DUST University Ivy League
54
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 20:46:00 -
[121] - Quote
I hated matchmaking yesterday, to the point that I almost gave up on Dust.
But today's been great! Even matches, little waiting time, full teams, no AFK'ers and I joined the match types I wanted to. 6x in a row.
I sincerely hope that the matchmaking will allow Dust to keep more new players interested and increase the player base. |
The Terminator T-1000
The Praetorian Legionary
18
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 21:18:00 -
[122] - Quote
First of all, I did not ask for a better matchmaking so I can say that I don't like this new matchmaking. I also want to join a battle ASAP. I don't like having to wait for a long time. To me, more than 90 seconds is a long time to wait.
In addition, the only way to get better is by playing against people that are better than you. That applies to everything in life! |
war Dialer
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
48
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 22:30:00 -
[123] - Quote
I'm not sure if you all are playing the same game. Currently matchmaking is STILL broken. Squads do not all get put into the same match, games are starting with clone reserves depleted, and we LOST content with this release.
CCP - Please revert changes. Accept that this deployment was not properly tested. |
Karl Koekwaus
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
159
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 23:04:00 -
[124] - Quote
Played some matches today, didn't have to wait longer than 20 seconds for a match to start. Teams were evenly matched it seemed. I had more fun in dust today than in a long time <3 |
Temba Fusrodah
Ganksters Inc Drake Ashigaru
26
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 23:23:00 -
[125] - Quote
Tried the Matchmaking again today .... tossed first into an in progress game but it was at least the type of game I wanted. Next I got multiple Scotty messages, and then finally a match, ugh! not the kind I wanted. This process continued with me being put into the type match I prefer only about one in seven attempts. So I gave up public contracts and switched to FW.
For the record I really like the option to select the faction I will accept contracts from, good job!
Faction warfare matches went well, I am enjoying the new buildings and maps. Additionally my daughter who is fresh out of the rookie academy was able to deploy with our squad in FW but not in public contracts.
Second day was not quite so horrible as the first, however I would hate to think I am isolated to FW to consistently get the matches I want and a squad of my own choosing. |
|
CCP Nullarbor
C C P C C P Alliance
2362
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 23:33:00 -
[126] - Quote
Temba Fusrodah wrote:Tried the Matchmaking again today .... tossed first into an in progress game but it was at least the type of game I wanted. Next I got multiple Scotty messages, and then finally a match, ugh! not the kind I wanted. This process continued with me being put into the type match I prefer only about one in seven attempts. So I gave up public contracts and switched to FW. For the record I really like the option to select the faction I will accept contracts from, good job! Faction warfare matches went well, I am enjoying the new buildings and maps. Additionally my daughter who is fresh out of the rookie academy was able to deploy with our squad in FW but not in public contracts. Second day was not quite so horrible as the first, however I would hate to think I am isolated to FW to consistently get the matches I want and a squad of my own choosing.
I will have a look into this, it should not be possible to be joining the incorrect game modes. Can you maybe try toggling all of your options off, close the options window, reopen the window and pick them again? See if that puts you in the right battle type.
Also when you were playing public contracts were you in a squad? If so, were you the squad leader or following a different squad leader into battle? |
|
|
CCP Nullarbor
C C P C C P Alliance
2362
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 23:36:00 -
[127] - Quote
war Dialer wrote:I'm not sure if you all are playing the same game. Currently matchmaking is STILL broken. Squads do not all get put into the same match, games are starting with clone reserves depleted, and we LOST content with this release.
CCP - Please revert changes. Accept that this deployment was not properly tested.
We have people tracking down the issue with the whole squad not getting into battle, that's actually a separate problem from the matchmaking going haywire but we will get it fixed asap. We also have on our todo list to prevent you from joining battles which are about to finish, part of that work was completed this release but its not full hooked up yet so we will do that hopefully in the next.
Thanks for the feedback. |
|
crazy space 1
Unkn0wn Killers
1664
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 01:03:00 -
[128] - Quote
also what happen to the big supply depot socket... it seems to be gone, you hyped us up so much for that map! It came out without bing added to aything but one map and now it's gone?
aljwheasudhap blargh I WANT TO FIGHT IN IT |
Rinzler XVII
Forsaken Immortals Top Men.
66
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 17:23:00 -
[129] - Quote
Nope still not working properly i tested out your new system on an alt with 521k sp with a kd/r of 0.5 (i purposefully made sure i didn;t have a high KD/R) and 1st game out of academy was v a full squad of ppl in proto gear ... 2nd game .. same .. 3rd game .. same .. i mean seriously what are the criteria you're using because it clearly doesn;t work |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
1885
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 18:00:00 -
[130] - Quote
I've been playing against a lot more groups today....so it seems much improved. The kicking out of queues is the only thing but aside from that, matchmaking is much, much better |
|
George Moros
WarRavens League of Infamy
79
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 21:48:00 -
[131] - Quote
After my yesterday's post that was full of praise for the battle finder fix, I now have to start whining. I don't know what (if anything) you changed today with battle finder, but I got some very annoying crap to report.
The "searching for battle" phase now takes much longer than yesterday (on average). I had some fights where I waited longer than a minute to start the "waiting for deployment" phase. But the most annoying part is matchmaking itself. In one fight, It was 2 on one side and seven on the other (guess which side I was in), and it stayed that way for the entire match. The other fight, it was 7 of us against literally NOONE. Again, for the entire match! I mean, c'mon! |
|
CCP Nullarbor
C C P C C P Alliance
2367
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 00:53:00 -
[132] - Quote
George Moros wrote:After my yesterday's post that was full of praise for the battle finder fix, I now have to start whining. I don't know what (if anything) you changed today with battle finder, but I got some very annoying crap to report.
The "searching for battle" phase now takes much longer than yesterday (on average). I had some fights where I waited longer than a minute to start the "waiting for deployment" phase. But the most annoying part is matchmaking itself. In one fight, It was 2 on one side and seven on the other (guess which side I was in), and it stayed that way for the entire match. The other fight, it was 7 of us against literally NOONE. Again, for the entire match! I mean, c'mon!
This is a side effect of the other bug we are tracking down which is people having trouble joining the battle and which then creates an imbalance. I'm hoping to have a fix deployed for this early next week.
Depending on your region, game mode selection and squad size though you should expect it could take anywhere up to 3 minutes to find a match. We're obviously trying to optimize this so that it is as quick as possible but sometimes you just have to wait because there is no one ready to play against at the time. |
|
Temba Fusrodah
Ganksters Inc Drake Ashigaru
32
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 01:02:00 -
[133] - Quote
CCP Nullarbor wrote:Temba Fusrodah wrote:Tried the Matchmaking again today .... tossed first into an in progress game but it was at least the type of game I wanted. Next I got multiple Scotty messages, and then finally a match, ugh! not the kind I wanted. This process continued with me being put into the type match I prefer only about one in seven attempts. So I gave up public contracts and switched to FW. For the record I really like the option to select the faction I will accept contracts from, good job! Faction warfare matches went well, I am enjoying the new buildings and maps. Additionally my daughter who is fresh out of the rookie academy was able to deploy with our squad in FW but not in public contracts. Second day was not quite so horrible as the first, however I would hate to think I am isolated to FW to consistently get the matches I want and a squad of my own choosing. I will have a look into this, it should not be possible to be joining the incorrect game modes. Can you maybe try toggling all of your options off, close the options window, reopen the window and pick them again? See if that puts you in the right battle type. Also when you were playing public contracts were you in a squad? If so, were you the squad leader or following a different squad leader into battle? Day 3, I double checked my options when selecting public contracts, today I was not put into anything I did not request!!!!
The DEVs must have been programming their little fingers down to the bone. Did not get a chance to test if a team mate of lower skills would not deploy in public contract matches today, as no noobs were online with us.
|
castba
Penguin's March
104
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 01:28:00 -
[134] - Quote
Whilst I have not played today, the matches I was in yesterday were all reasonably close. Much more enjoyable.
Only issue is that Scotty has an issue when first selecting a FW battle, but I just select it again and we ate deploying within 10 seconds with 12-16 on each side for most games (Australian playing in Euro server-have not tried the US, Asia or oceanic servers yet)
Overall very happy with what has been done Nullabor. Thank you. |
|
CCP Nullarbor
C C P C C P Alliance
2373
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 01:34:00 -
[135] - Quote
castba wrote:Whilst I have not played today, the matches I was in yesterday were all reasonably close. Much more enjoyable.
Only issue is that Scotty has an issue when first selecting a FW battle, but I just select it again and we ate deploying within 10 seconds with 12-16 on each side for most games (Australian playing in Euro server-have not tried the US, Asia or oceanic servers yet)
Overall very happy with what has been done Nullabor. Thank you.
I submitted another fix specifically for Scotty message in faction warfare today. It will be deployed on Monday, hopefully that fixes up what you were seeing today. |
|
Temba Fusrodah
Ganksters Inc Drake Ashigaru
32
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 01:39:00 -
[136] - Quote
I was placed in a match today where it was two against ten, and I was one of the two. We took a good pounding but held on until the MCC blew. They didn't really press their advantage until late realizing they could just overwhelm us with swarm launchers as we battled back their dropship,Hav, and Lav attacks.
In a strange way the challenge fighting on in the face of sure defeat was motivating. Needless to say I risked no expensive dropsuits in this match, lol. |
Raz Sidona
M.T.A.C Assault Operations Command
15
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 03:03:00 -
[137] - Quote
castba wrote:Whilst I have not played today, the matches I was in yesterday were all reasonably close. Much more enjoyable.
Only issue is that Scotty has an issue when first selecting a FW battle, but I just select it again and we ate deploying within 10 seconds with 12-16 on each side for most games (Australian playing in Euro server-have not tried the US, Asia or oceanic servers yet)
Overall very happy with what has been done Nullabor. Thank you.
Ive had the exact opposite experience with the matchmaking. I have yet to see even in youtube a balanced 1.4 match. Every single one i have seen or been in has one side pub stomping the other. Reading the patch notes I was excited for matchmaking cause i hoped pub stomping would stop but its only worse cause now every match is a pubstomp. |
SponkSponkSponk
The Southern Legion The Umbra Combine
291
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 05:50:00 -
[138] - Quote
Raz Sidona wrote:Ive had the exact opposite experience with the matchmaking. I have yet to see even in youtube a balanced 1.4 match. Every single one i have seen or been in has one side pub stomping the other. Reading the patch notes I was excited for matchmaking cause i hoped pub stomping would stop but its only worse cause now every match is a pubstomp.
I had two ambushes last night where full squads plus hangers-on beat each other to a pulp.
Both matches ended with the winning team on <3 clones.
They were great games, btw. |
IAmDuncanIdaho II
The Southern Legion The Umbra Combine
34
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 06:54:00 -
[139] - Quote
Raz Sidona wrote:castba wrote:Whilst I have not played today, the matches I was in yesterday were all reasonably close. Much more enjoyable.
Only issue is that Scotty has an issue when first selecting a FW battle, but I just select it again and we ate deploying within 10 seconds with 12-16 on each side for most games (Australian playing in Euro server-have not tried the US, Asia or oceanic servers yet)
Overall very happy with what has been done Nullabor. Thank you. Ive had the exact opposite experience with the matchmaking. I have yet to see even in youtube a balanced 1.4 match. Every single one i have seen or been in has one side pub stomping the other. Reading the patch notes I was excited for matchmaking cause i hoped pub stomping would stop but its only worse cause now every match is a pubstomp.
Could this be one of those things where if stuff works as expected, you don't feel the need to tell everyone?
Personally I played a bunch of games last night, and there were minor issues that didn't really detract too much, so massive improvements have been made :)
Thanks CCP |
L0s3
GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention
0
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 13:13:00 -
[140] - Quote
One of the most irritating factors of the new battle system is that it is directly conflicting with the skill point event that i was looking forward to participating in (as convoluted as it was). However, Since the 1.4 update I've only literally played 3 games after the many squad drops which means the Aurum bought augmentations that I've paid for... Are virtually useless. Gee thanks CCP. It's incredibly difficult to explain why this game is so great when things like this happen after myself, friends/coworkers spent hard earned money on something they aren't even able to use and enjoy. I'm sure hoping Nullabor can get a handle on this quickly as my Augmentation is soon running out and i see no real reason to waste money on a game i'm unable to play. |
|
BLUE WAFFLE TASTY
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
3
|
Posted - 2013.09.07 04:31:00 -
[141] - Quote
Thumb Green wrote:I just wanted to say the matchmaking we have now is fubar. Went an entire match of dom with 4 people on one team and 2 on the other and another match with 16 people on one team and 6 on the other. Still getting matches with stacked squads on one side vs teams of randoms. Can't believe I'm typing this but I prefer the way it was before 1.4.
Edit. Oh, and this "voting" thing you got going on. Horrid idea, If I want to play domination, I WANT TO PLAY DOMINATION NOT AMBUSH; and if I want to play ambush, I WANT TO PLAY AMBUSH NOT GET PUT IN SKIRMISH.
Edit 2: Honestly CCP I know it's your game and most of us are playing it for free but it might be a good thing to run these brilliant idea by your player base before you implement them. It'll save you time and hassle. i totally agree...matchmaking previous to 1.4 was almost perfect..everyone got in, everyone had fun, and the tranfers between match and quarters were excellent. now i always end up with a second team chat, cant join the squad im the LEADER of in battle, dropping members, and the battles are so screwed i played 1vs 12 against STB......... PLEASE CHANGE IT BACK.........this update is so outta wack i dont even feel like logging in for all the free sp u could give me |
SUNNY THE NINJA
Immortal Retribution
13
|
Posted - 2013.09.07 07:22:00 -
[142] - Quote
CCP Nullarbor wrote:
Match you against similarly skilled players
Is this why I've been sucking a lot recently? |
CharCharOdell
Shining Flame Amarr Empire
616
|
Posted - 2013.09.07 16:15:00 -
[143] - Quote
Fix the glitch where part of my squad won't make it into battle and I'll call 1.4 a total success. |
Croned
The Generals EoN.
376
|
Posted - 2013.09.07 17:05:00 -
[144] - Quote
Why CCP screwed up matchmaking: They were trying to compensate for a low player base.
What CCP needs to do to increase the player base: Finish the effing game!
People want an economy like EVE. The want to see PC more expansive and accessable like EVE. The want complete racial variants of weapons, maps, and dropsuits. As the game gets more and more repetitive, more and more people leave, and CPP starts cutting corners with things like matchmaking. |
Magnus Amadeuss
DUST University Ivy League
31
|
Posted - 2013.09.08 18:08:00 -
[145] - Quote
Sometimes when queing for a match Skotty flips out and kicks me from the search, but the team icon pops up and then from there on in nothing but problems.
I have even relogged and completely shut down the PS3 only to get back on to experience the same problems.
It has been getting progressively more frequent too.
Seems like I can cause it if I hit cancel immediately after I do a search for contracts. |
BLUE WAFFLE TASTY
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
4
|
Posted - 2013.09.09 05:02:00 -
[146] - Quote
CCP Nullarbor wrote:Hi All- Just want to write down a few notes about what we changed in 1.4 in relation to joining a battle and explain some of the questions you might have. So in 1.4 alongside a new battle finder we have rewritten the matchmaking system, that is the logic that decides what battle you join and who you are playing with. There are a number of things that we are trying to optimize in this step, for example:
- Find you your preferred selection of game mode
- Reduce the network latency between you and the server
- Match you against similarly skilled players
- Reduce the waiting time it takes to find a battle
- Reduce the number of partially filled battles
- Reduce how often you join a battle already in progress
And now on with some questions: Why don't I get the game mode I selected?You can now choose multiple game modes however this will not always gaurentee you get one of those modes. The selection is used in 2 ways, we first build groups of players who have similar preferences of game mode, region and ranking. The second step is to use everyone's preferences to perform a vote on which mode to play. We will be tuning how effectively this works over the coming days so you should see some improvement in how often you get your selected modes.We have heard your feedback on this and have adjusted the matching so that game mode is a hard requirement. You can still pick multiple game modes and this will get you into battle quicker.The teams are not balanced / fullThis is a known issue, we are working on a fix right now.With some exceptions during low PCU times this should now be working much better. We will continue to work on this though, particular with balancing squads in battles.Matchmaking is taking too long? / Why do I get some message about a guy called Scotty?This is a big new system with a lot of parameters that need careful tweaking. We are aware of a couple of issues already and are working on fixing them in the coming days. We will also be carefully monitoring the health of the matchmaking queues including waiting times and how balanced the battles are, then adjusting settings accordingly. For now, if you get a Scotty message just click join again. I have a developer blog in the works covering a lot of these changes in more detail which we will post once things have stabilized and we have some time to produce pretty graphs and such. If you have any questions or feedback please reply to this thread. Thanks for your patience and I hope you enjoy the rest of Uprising 1.4.
|
BLUE WAFFLE TASTY
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
4
|
Posted - 2013.09.09 05:08:00 -
[147] - Quote
ok, so ive created an alt, with the expectation that i will be placed in battle with players similarly skilled, to try your system. in my first game from academy, and the following two games, i have been placed with all proto players. also many others have tried this system and found it to be severely lacking. how can you expect anyine to stay on this game if matchmaking is so poor that i have to play guys with 10-20 million sp , and not compete at all. this matchmaking is a joke. will this system ever be fixed? im sure "newbs" would rather wait a few extra seconds than get smoked all the time. shoulda just left matchmaking alone, it was fine the way it was .....one of the few things that was good. |
Sana Rayya
WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL
175
|
Posted - 2013.09.09 12:26:00 -
[148] - Quote
I'd be fine with rolling over to the previous battlefinder system if it got rid of the Scotty/Team Chat bugs. The inability to get into a game and/or dropping players from a squad at nearly each deployment is a much bigger problem than the occasional proto stomp. |
Dante Vento
Firefly Shipping co.
37
|
Posted - 2013.09.09 20:45:00 -
[149] - Quote
How exactly does it "match" you with those of "similar" skill? What are the criteria? I ask as I've got a friend who, despite playing alone on a 700sp character, is constantly being put against proto-weapons on proto-suits. So I'm curious as to what they consider "similar" skill. |
Tallen Ellecon
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
730
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 20:51:00 -
[150] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Beren Hurin wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:If you did matchmaking by gear it would have been simpler tbh
Basic vs basic for example
Just my 2 pennies Why is this still a thing? What does it look at all of your 30 possible fits to see what you'd fight with? Or your most popular fit? Or what your skills would allow? Are you then forced to only use basic? And then basic/STD suits or weapons too? What if you are a vehicle user, but you have basic suits and ADV vehicles? Can you only take ADV vehicles in? Its not hard Nothing over meta level 3, anything on your fit over meta level 3 is invalid in the match for basic vs basic I said for example, so basics vs basic, adv vs adv, proto bs proto and basic/adv/proto is by meta level How is it so hard to understand?
Not everyone wears the same suits all the time. I have multiple tiers of fittings because even though I can afford to wear proto, I usually choose not to. |
|
JP Acuna
RoyalSquad514
11
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 21:41:00 -
[151] - Quote
Matchmaking is NOT working at all.
I always get in the weak team against all-proto guys who SMASH us from the beginning. It's very unbearable to be all day losing and dying like that, losing all uplinks and being cast out from the map completely. And it's all the time, all the time!!! It never puts me in a good team, teams are NEVER balanced, it's so frustrating and finally i only want to leave those horrible battles, but i don't because it sucks even more when you're put in a match that's already lost, and I don't want that for anyone.
The "hot-fix" only fixed the switched game mode preferences, part of the issue of people getting left out of battle and uneven teams (in quantity), but the whole point of the matchmaking is still not there, it doesn't exist at all.
I have a lot more complaints, but i'll look for the right threat to put them right now.
Please fix this game. |
Hellkeizer
The Avutora Complex
81
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 04:08:00 -
[152] - Quote
JP Acuna wrote:Matchmaking is NOT working at all.
I always get in the weak team against all-proto guys who SMASH us from the beginning. It's very unbearable to be all day losing and dying like that, losing all uplinks and being cast out from the map completely. And it's all the time, all the time!!! It never puts me in a good team, teams are NEVER balanced, it's so frustrating and finally i only want to leave those horrible battles, but i don't because it sucks even more when you're put in a match that's already lost, and I don't want that for anyone.
The "hot-fix" only fixed the switched game mode preferences, part of the issue of people getting left out of battle and uneven teams (in quantity), but the whole point of the matchmaking is still not there, it doesn't exist at all.
I have a lot more complaints, but i'll look for the right threat to put them right now.
Please fix this game. Yea could we have an ETA on when it's going to be fixed? The constant team unbalance is making me not want to play anymore |
Temba Fusrodah
Ganksters Inc Drake Ashigaru
63
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 12:57:00 -
[153] - Quote
I was kidda hoping the ass kickings that has been handed out recently was due to more people logging in for consecutive day sp bonuses.
To be honest I've lost more clones this week then I did all last month, kd ratio is going to take a slump.
It's a combination of the new maps, which all seem to favor either up close ambush style slugfests or HAV roams. Neither of which is my preferred way to play. I was skulking around a new map and trying to be low profile to not get scanned as a sniper and the game said it was going to kick me for non-activity... wtf! ... that has never happened to me before, and I have played since Beta.
So yeah i'd like to see the balance returned to matches instead of getting pounded just about every time out of the gate, because it is affecting my desire to log in and play tbh. |
Crimson Cerberes
Hammer Of Light Covenant of the Phoenix Alliance
42
|
Posted - 2013.09.13 02:56:00 -
[154] - Quote
So every single game has been an utter stomp today and yesterday. If this is your idea of any type of matchmaking I do not know what to tell you.
It has been so bad that most times its a race to see if the total dominance in null-cannons can kill the team before the team clones out, and it is almost always a close call.
|
The Terminator T-1000
The Praetorian Legionary
37
|
Posted - 2013.09.13 22:39:00 -
[155] - Quote
Sana Rayya wrote:I'd be fine with rolling over to the previous battlefinder system if it got rid of the Scotty/Team Chat bugs. The inability to get into a game and/or dropping players from a squad at nearly each deployment is a much bigger problem than the occasional proto stomp. Me too.
Matchmaking is still broken.
People are still being dropped from the squad. |
Rei Shepard
Spectre II
596
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 14:11:00 -
[156] - Quote
CCP Nullarbor wrote:Hi All- Just want to write down a few notes about what we changed in 1.4 in relation to joining a battle and explain some of the questions you might have. So in 1.4 alongside a new battle finder we have rewritten the matchmaking system, that is the logic that decides what battle you join and who you are playing with. There are a number of things that we are trying to optimize in this step, for example:
- Find you your preferred selection of game mode
- Reduce the network latency between you and the server
Quote:- Match you against similarly skilled players
- Reduce the waiting time it takes to find a battle
- Reduce the number of partially filled battles
- Reduce how often you join a battle already in progress
I keep getting setup against at least 1 to 2 full teams, does this mean the game considers me capable of taking all of them on?
I mean the guys i spawn with get atleast a score of 0/10 to 0/15 against these guys, so basically all my blueberries are useless most of the fight, except for when they eat a bullet meant for me. We arrive at a hackpoint, with 7-8 berries on my side, i turn around and they evaporate ...where the frack did they go ? ...oh ...they were killed by the 5 guys i just killed...
Its undending of how many matches i come out of with 20/3 or 30/5 or something simular as the only guy who went positive in the match, and no i dont consider 9/7 as a positive score.
While i love an awsome challange at all times, there is very little what you can do against "teamwork", and by "teamwork" i mean zerg any berry you see and kill it, with as many people at the same time.
Sure i can take out 3 guys in a zerg, hell sometimes its pretty close, but my gun has finite amount of rounds and it overheats (Imp Scrambler) so eventually someone in the zerg kills me or when you think ...wooot got em all...a straggler rears the corner and lucky shots you.
Hell sometimes the guy you killed first is back...
Baseline: Matchmaking isnt working, it feels just like 1.1,1.2 and1.3 where one side rolls the other side or vice versa, its been since the first week in chromo that battles ended with 1 clone diffrence, now those were awsome battles.
Right now its either, roll or get rolled. |
Quil Evrything
DUST University Ivy League
155
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 06:58:00 -
[157] - Quote
Another "matchmaking is BADLY broken": thread.
i got put in a skirmish. orignally, 5 against 7 or something. Where the other team had 5 on a squad. nothing on our side.
Then our side got up to 7.. and the other side got up to 10.
WITH ANOTHER SQUAD.
So we have a 5 squad, teamed up with a 3-squad... plus 2 randoms.. against 7 random non-squadded people.
and those squads were all CORP squads. GOOD players.
Matchmaking very, VERY broken.
|
Mr-Lube
s i n g u l a r i t y
0
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 06:55:00 -
[158] - Quote
Alright as far as I'm concerned this game in broken and unplayable. 95% of all matches I try to play are over 50% over already. (this was from a 12 hr marathon period) and I can't join any squads as they are already deployed in battle. I think of all the time and money i sunk into this game and it is now worthless to me. KDR and win/loss ratio mean nothing anymore with the broken matchmaking because there is no fair chance to use my skills from the start of the match. Beta was better than this garbage. |
MAD MAX 514
The dyst0pian Corporation
20
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 02:28:00 -
[159] - Quote
So I graduated the academy with 5mil sp just to get thrown up against proto pub stompers? How was the matchmaking working there?
|
Dante Vento
Firefly Shipping co.
40
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 20:21:00 -
[160] - Quote
MAD MAX 514 wrote:So I graduated the academy with 5mil sp just to get thrown up against proto pub stompers? How was the matchmaking working there?
You graduated with 5 mil? Did you just AFK the whole time?
MATCHMAKING IS BROKEN! 4 Randoms vs 16 with 2 squads of 4
This needed to be fixed last week. Fix it or give us what we had before. |
|
Temba Fusrodah
Ganksters Inc Drake Ashigaru
65
|
Posted - 2013.09.24 00:43:00 -
[161] - Quote
Second day of my boycott ...... screw it! ...... the bonus skill points are a small compensation for the horribly unbalanced matches .... so another day I choose not to play ....... sadly does not sound like anything has been fixed ..... maybe I'll be in a mood to get pub stomped tomorrow, but not today ..... too bad other games don't have the appeal of Dust 514, or that Dust 514 use to have.
This badly broken matchmaking might end up being the cure for my DUST514 addiction, way to go CCP! |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page] |