Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
903
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:14:00 -
[1] - Quote
Lately I've been getting into it with Kujo because one of his members goes 20+ using the melee exploit. I argue this is cheating as it's a not intended feature used to win PC matches. He claims Exploiting is not cheating therefor, acceptable.
So I'm at a loss since we can't come to a conclusion. So I'm asking General Discussion. Is exploiting/glitching in PC considered cheating? I just want to finally lay this topic to rest and know more clearly which of us is right. |
JL3Eleven
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
655
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:15:00 -
[2] - Quote
It's not a foul unless the referee calls it. |
TheAmazing FlyingPig
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
2940
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:17:00 -
[3] - Quote
I'd say yes, but the game encourages doing anything to win, so...
... Iunno. |
Coleman Gray
GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention
545
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:19:00 -
[4] - Quote
Yes, yes it is cheating lol, it's shouldn't happen or exist, besides, if people need to glitch and exploit then it shows how good they are really |
Nocturnal Soul
Immortal Retribution
539
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:26:00 -
[5] - Quote
Come on if the guy gets that close to you he deserves the kill |
Chances Ghost
Inf4m0us
488
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:27:00 -
[6] - Quote
see the problem is we have to look at everything equally
so the mele glitch is on par with the invisability glitch.
and the novaknife charge sprint, invisable swarms (rendering glitch), nanite injector invulnerability, stacking afterburners on a dropship. and everything else thats a "glitch"
would all have to be concidered exploits and cheating
with identical consequences
currently the consequences are non exsistant. |
hooc order
Deep Space Republic Top Men.
892
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:28:00 -
[7] - Quote
Glitching and/or using an exploit is cheating.
But i do not think the debate over sprint-melee-clearing being a glitch/exploit is resolved.
My personal opinion is i am leaning toward it being an exploit...all be it a pretty small one.
You have to do some fairly complicated stuff at the exact right time to get it to work and it is not as if a person speced out and geared out for melee is not going to do a crap load of damage anyway. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
903
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:28:00 -
[8] - Quote
Nocturnal Soul wrote:Come on if the guy gets that close to you he deserves the kill Explain? Far as I know it's called CQC for a reason - you get close. And with shield tanking + speed mods with hit detection it shouldn't be hard at all to get close. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
903
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:33:00 -
[9] - Quote
Just to clarify on hooc's post:
DJINN Kujo wrote: This is simply an 'exploit', it's an in game mechanic that you utilize a repetition of the same actions to get the exact response out of it. So in turn it's an exploit, not a glitch. Just being honest. :)
AE's CEO has already called this an exploit.
And it's true there's many exploits - but how many of them are used in PC?
It seems AE is clearly cheating and won't admit to it. |
Kira Lannister
Ancient Exiles
1119
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:33:00 -
[10] - Quote
I know it's like if your getting meleed to death its like what scrubbery is occurring if you let someone get that close to you?
The best part the qq crowd has to say is "well when they sneak up on a heavy it is an insta gank!"
The words are funny coming from an assault player crying about the glitch. GOTTA GET GOOD PEEPS! |
|
Nocturnal Soul
Immortal Retribution
540
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:35:00 -
[11] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Nocturnal Soul wrote:Come on if the guy gets that close to you he deserves the kill Explain? Far as I know it's called CQC for a reason - you get close. And with shield tanking + speed mods with hit detection it shouldn't be hard at all to get close. The thing is its just not as game breaking as the invisible glitch you candidate survive if you spot him first. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
903
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:35:00 -
[12] - Quote
Kira Lannister wrote:I know it's like if your getting meleed to death its like what scrubbery is occurring if you let someone get that close to you?
The best part the qq crowd has to say is "well when they sneak up on a heavy it is an insta gank!"
The words are funny coming from an assault player crying about the glitch. GOTTA GET GOOD PEEPS! I'm trying to understand this logic. So, Close Quarter Combat... isn't close? There's no corners in city? There's no way possible to get up on someone? Even if they shield tank with speed mods? |
Skipper Jones
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
683
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:35:00 -
[13] - Quote
Cheating.
I'm not saying she's a bad player, but really? You have to use glitches to be able to rack up kills. It doesn't really say anything good about you. If it can't be stopped then who cares?. IMO it's cheating. But is she gonna stop because I think it's wrong. No.
CCP will just have to fix it. Until then, she will cheat her way to the top. It's funny to see people justify it though. |
Chances Ghost
Inf4m0us
488
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:37:00 -
[14] - Quote
a glitch is something that happens in the code that produces a result that wazsnt intended
an exploit is when someone takes a glitch and recreates it to gain an advantage
learn the definitions in this context people
and exploit IS a glitch, its just what you call a glitch thats being used to gain an advantage... |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
903
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:37:00 -
[15] - Quote
Nocturnal Soul wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Nocturnal Soul wrote:Come on if the guy gets that close to you he deserves the kill Explain? Far as I know it's called CQC for a reason - you get close. And with shield tanking + speed mods with hit detection it shouldn't be hard at all to get close. The thing is its just not as game breaking as the invisible glitch you candidate survive if you spot him first. Far as I know invisible glitch isn't possible in PC - or no one has abused it. AE is clearing abusing an exploit. Is that not cheating? That's all I'm asking.
|
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
903
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:39:00 -
[16] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:a glitch is something that happens in the code that produces a result that wazsnt intended
an exploit is when someone takes a glitch and recreates it to gain an advantage
learn the definitions in this context people
and exploit IS a glitch, its just what you call a glitch thats being used to gain an advantage... Thanks for the clarification. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1803
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:39:00 -
[17] - Quote
I personally think its cheating but it will be treated the same way they treat afk.
|
Chances Ghost
Inf4m0us
491
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:40:00 -
[18] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:a glitch is something that happens in the code that produces a result that wazsnt intended
an exploit is when someone takes a glitch and recreates it to gain an advantage
learn the definitions in this context people
and exploit IS a glitch, its just what you call a glitch thats being used to gain an advantage... Thanks for the clarification.
and so a glitch isnt cheating, it wasnt done on purpose and it wasnt done for an advantage
an exploit however was done expressly to cheat |
hooc order
Deep Space Republic Top Men.
892
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:41:00 -
[19] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Just to clarify on hooc's post: DJINN Kujo wrote: This is simply an 'exploit', it's an in game mechanic that you utilize a repetition of the same actions to get the exact response out of it. So in turn it's an exploit, not a glitch. Just being honest. :)
AE's CEO has already called this an exploit. And it's true there's many exploits - but how many of them are used in PC? It seems AE is clearly cheating and won't admit to it.
AE does not get to choose if it is an exploit or not. CCP does.
We know for a fact that CCP does now know what they are doing. A reasonable person might see it and think. "Oh yeah CCP screwed up or did not think about it." But how does anyone know they did not think about or that they did screw up. For all we know they thought. "yeah we want super fast melee attacks and we do it by using sprint to clear the attack"
For all we know it is working as CCP intended. |
Skipper Jones
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
683
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:41:00 -
[20] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:a glitch is something that happens in the code that produces a result that wazsnt intended
an exploit is when someone takes a glitch and recreates it to gain an advantage
learn the definitions in this context people
and exploit IS a glitch, its just what you call a glitch thats being used to gain an advantage...
Truth.
Do you really think they intended for the melee to used and abused in that way?
CCP-"Yeah guys let's make it so that you can continually melee people to death in a rapid succession. **** guns! Let's settle this with the butt of our guns and our elbows" |
|
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
903
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:42:00 -
[21] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:a glitch is something that happens in the code that produces a result that wazsnt intended
an exploit is when someone takes a glitch and recreates it to gain an advantage
learn the definitions in this context people
and exploit IS a glitch, its just what you call a glitch thats being used to gain an advantage... Thanks for the clarification. and so a glitch isnt cheating, it wasnt done on purpose and it wasnt done for an advantage an exploit however was done expressly to cheat Thanks again - Kujo has already admitted this is an exploit he's allowing to happen to help win PC matches and doesn't believe it to be cheating. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
903
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:43:00 -
[22] - Quote
hooc order wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Just to clarify on hooc's post: DJINN Kujo wrote: This is simply an 'exploit', it's an in game mechanic that you utilize a repetition of the same actions to get the exact response out of it. So in turn it's an exploit, not a glitch. Just being honest. :)
AE's CEO has already called this an exploit. And it's true there's many exploits - but how many of them are used in PC? It seems AE is clearly cheating and won't admit to it. AE does not get to choose if it is an exploit or not. CCP does. We know for a fact that CCP does now know what they are doing. A reasonable person might see it and think. "Oh yeah CCP screwed up or did not think about it." But how does anyone know they did not think about or that they did screw up. For all we know they thought. "yeah we want super fast melee attacks and we do it by using sprint to clear the attack" For all we know it is working as CCP intended. Then why are there shotguns? |
Skipper Jones
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
683
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:46:00 -
[23] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:a glitch is something that happens in the code that produces a result that wazsnt intended
an exploit is when someone takes a glitch and recreates it to gain an advantage
learn the definitions in this context people
and exploit IS a glitch, its just what you call a glitch thats being used to gain an advantage... Thanks for the clarification. and so a glitch isnt cheating, it wasnt done on purpose and it wasnt done for an advantage an exploit however was done expressly to cheat
Exactly.
Like the glitch on Line harvest where you can go inside the box at C. I see people (myself included) try to hide in that box to get some easy sneaky kills. That is cheating. |
Surt gods end
Demon Ronin
860
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:51:00 -
[24] - Quote
FPS has it's shares of glitches and exploit abusers, always has. (and just flat out cheaters) But coming out to use any of these on some FPS games well.... Haha. you think hate mail in this game is the worse you will get?
*Some people take competitive FPS a little too serious*
Yeah. Tho they are the ones that smear the game more then the cheaters.
Anyway, this has been going on since beta. nothing new. K/D doesn't matter here. So all the crazy stuff that leaks in RL in other FPS games doesn't happen here. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
903
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:52:00 -
[25] - Quote
Surt gods end wrote:FPS has it's shares of glitches and exploit abusers, always has. (and just flat out cheaters) But coming out to use any of these on some FPS games well.... Haha. you think hate mail in this game is the worse you will get?
*Some people take competitive FPS a little too serious*
Yeah. Tho they are the ones that smear the game more then the cheaters.
Anyway, this has been going on since beta. nothing new. K/D doesn't matter here. So all the crazy stuff that leaks in RL in other FPS games doesn't happen here. uh, sure. But this isn't much on my topic. Is glitching/exploiting in PC cheating? |
Coleman Gray
GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention
546
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:53:00 -
[26] - Quote
Surt gods end wrote:FPS has it's shares of glitches and exploit abusers, always has. (and just flat out cheaters) But coming out to use any of these on some FPS games well.... Haha. you think hate mail in this game is the worse you will get?
*Some people take competitive FPS a little too serious*
Yeah. Tho they are the ones that smear the game more then the cheaters.
Anyway, this has been going on since beta. nothing new. K/D doesn't matter here. So all the crazy stuff that leaks in RL in other FPS games doesn't happen here.
Ya hear about the guy who killed a child over a game in CoD? |
Chances Ghost
Inf4m0us
493
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:56:00 -
[27] - Quote
the melee animation clipping is a glitch
its caused by clipping the animation of the melee attack
so it is unintended gameplay
when re-created and used agressivly its an exploit of a glitch
useing a glitch to gain an unfair advantage.
its simple, it cant even be dabated.
its an exploit plain and simple, if it wasnt then this is how melee would have been coded in the first place, wich it isnt.
|
hooc order
Deep Space Republic Top Men.
892
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:56:00 -
[28] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:hooc order wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Just to clarify on hooc's post: DJINN Kujo wrote: This is simply an 'exploit', it's an in game mechanic that you utilize a repetition of the same actions to get the exact response out of it. So in turn it's an exploit, not a glitch. Just being honest. :)
AE's CEO has already called this an exploit. And it's true there's many exploits - but how many of them are used in PC? It seems AE is clearly cheating and won't admit to it. AE does not get to choose if it is an exploit or not. CCP does. We know for a fact that CCP does now know what they are doing. A reasonable person might see it and think. "Oh yeah CCP screwed up or did not think about it." But how does anyone know they did not think about or that they did screw up. For all we know they thought. "yeah we want super fast melee attacks and we do it by using sprint to clear the attack" For all we know it is working as CCP intended. Then why are there shotguns?
I said it is possible that CCP is ******** on this one....that would make them ******** about shot guns as well.
Anyway i do not want to get to far off the path. My personal opinion is that this is an unintended glitch and people who use it are exploiting a glitch and are therefor cheating. I am only saying above that i do not know for a fact that my opinion is correct. |
danny12343331
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
150
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:57:00 -
[29] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Lately I've been getting into it with Kujo because one of his members goes 20+ using the melee exploit. I argue this is cheating as it's a not intended feature used to win PC matches. He claims Exploiting is not cheating therefor, acceptable.
So I'm at a loss since we can't come to a conclusion. So I'm asking General Discussion. Is exploiting/glitching in PC considered cheating? I just want to finally lay this topic to rest and know more clearly which of us is right.
Well we would have won in the tourny if it had not been that melee glitch.... So many hacks that could have gone off. but that exploit just stopped it all. |
Surt gods end
Demon Ronin
860
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:59:00 -
[30] - Quote
Coleman Gray wrote:Surt gods end wrote:FPS has it's shares of glitches and exploit abusers, always has. (and just flat out cheaters) But coming out to use any of these on some FPS games well.... Haha. you think hate mail in this game is the worse you will get?
*Some people take competitive FPS a little too serious*
Yeah. Tho they are the ones that smear the game more then the cheaters.
Anyway, this has been going on since beta. nothing new. K/D doesn't matter here. So all the crazy stuff that leaks in RL in other FPS games doesn't happen here. Ya hear about the guy who killed a child over a game in CoD?
Dude.. I'm 31. I've been playing FPS since I was 15. It's 80% of my gaming diet. I've seen a lot of crazy ****.. and when resistance, and vegas 2 was in MLG. That's the craziest I've seen. 4chan was then hunting grounds for RL revenge. so was myspace.
Man.. kids. |
|
Surt gods end
Demon Ronin
860
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 06:02:00 -
[31] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Surt gods end wrote:FPS has it's shares of glitches and exploit abusers, always has. (and just flat out cheaters) But coming out to use any of these on some FPS games well.... Haha. you think hate mail in this game is the worse you will get?
*Some people take competitive FPS a little too serious*
Yeah. Tho they are the ones that smear the game more then the cheaters.
Anyway, this has been going on since beta. nothing new. K/D doesn't matter here. So all the crazy stuff that leaks in RL in other FPS games doesn't happen here. uh, sure. But this isn't much on my topic. Is glitching/exploiting in PC cheating?
In dust? it ain't cheating. its exploiting. which is a **** thing to do, but not cheating. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
904
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 06:03:00 -
[32] - Quote
Surt gods end wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Surt gods end wrote:FPS has it's shares of glitches and exploit abusers, always has. (and just flat out cheaters) But coming out to use any of these on some FPS games well.... Haha. you think hate mail in this game is the worse you will get?
*Some people take competitive FPS a little too serious*
Yeah. Tho they are the ones that smear the game more then the cheaters.
Anyway, this has been going on since beta. nothing new. K/D doesn't matter here. So all the crazy stuff that leaks in RL in other FPS games doesn't happen here. uh, sure. But this isn't much on my topic. Is glitching/exploiting in PC cheating? In dust? it ain't cheating. its exploiting. which is a **** thing to do, but not cheating. Explain how it's not cheating? |
Kira Lannister
Ancient Exiles
1120
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 06:06:00 -
[33] - Quote
Takes skill to melee someone dood. If it was cheating every tom di ck and harry would be doing it. Honestly if your getting sucker punched you need to get good and stop crying because they would shotty you to death any way.
|
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
904
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 06:09:00 -
[34] - Quote
Kira Lannister wrote:Takes skill to melee someone dood. If it was cheating every tom di ck and harry would be doing it. Honestly if your getting sucker punched you need to get good and stop crying because they would shotty you to death any way.
I really doubt he'd do half as well with a shotty - your own shottys prove that.
And what skill? Do you not know how this glitch works? You can literally walk around spamming melee 100 hits a second and kill anything that comes close without fear of missing. Just takes a KB/M so not everyone can replicate it. But does that make it less of an exploit? And is exploiting cheating?
You've yet to answer the question. All you're saying is, 'get good' |
Surt gods end
Demon Ronin
860
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 06:11:00 -
[35] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Surt gods end wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Surt gods end wrote:FPS has it's shares of glitches and exploit abusers, always has. (and just flat out cheaters) But coming out to use any of these on some FPS games well.... Haha. you think hate mail in this game is the worse you will get?
*Some people take competitive FPS a little too serious*
Yeah. Tho they are the ones that smear the game more then the cheaters.
Anyway, this has been going on since beta. nothing new. K/D doesn't matter here. So all the crazy stuff that leaks in RL in other FPS games doesn't happen here. uh, sure. But this isn't much on my topic. Is glitching/exploiting in PC cheating? In dust? it ain't cheating. its exploiting. which is a **** thing to do, but not cheating. Explain how it's not cheating?
Because if exploiting is cheating.. then everyone would be cheating. CCP still can't code this game worth it's damn. from closed beta to now. can you count all the exploits? I can't. too many. and still new ones that are gonna pop up.
cheating makes it so there is no counter. exploits can still be evaded or countered. One gives you an edge. the other is close to game breaking in how you almost can go with out dying.
LAG SWITCH? cheating. |
Kira Lannister
Ancient Exiles
1120
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 06:11:00 -
[36] - Quote
GET GOOD *RIPS OFF SHIRT*
Im sorry my amarrian brother. Lets pray this cheater gets the whipping he deserves. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
904
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 06:12:00 -
[37] - Quote
Surt gods end wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Surt gods end wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Surt gods end wrote:FPS has it's shares of glitches and exploit abusers, always has. (and just flat out cheaters) But coming out to use any of these on some FPS games well.... Haha. you think hate mail in this game is the worse you will get?
*Some people take competitive FPS a little too serious*
Yeah. Tho they are the ones that smear the game more then the cheaters.
Anyway, this has been going on since beta. nothing new. K/D doesn't matter here. So all the crazy stuff that leaks in RL in other FPS games doesn't happen here. uh, sure. But this isn't much on my topic. Is glitching/exploiting in PC cheating? In dust? it ain't cheating. its exploiting. which is a **** thing to do, but not cheating. Explain how it's not cheating? Because if exploiting is cheating.. then everyone would be cheating. CCP still can't code this game worth it's damn. from closed beta to now. can you count all the exploits? I can't. too many. and still new ones that are gonna pop up. cheating makes it so there is no counter. exploits can still be evaded or countered. One gives you an edge. the other is close to game breaking in how you almost can go with out dying. LAG SWITCH? cheating. Do you remember when the warriors used to rep MCC to get easy WP and SP? People called that exploiting. Sniper glitch - exploiting. So I know what you're getting at. But were these things abused in PC to gain an advantage? And if a corp is knowingly doing so to win PC matches. - is it cheating? |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
904
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 06:13:00 -
[38] - Quote
Kira Lannister wrote:GET GOOD *RIPS OFF SHIRT*
Im sorry my amarrian brother. Lets pray this cheater gets the whipping he deserves. lol not sure if sarcasm. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
1270
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 06:19:00 -
[39] - Quote
glitches are glitches. exploiting is where there is a know way to do glitch and it not normal part of game play. say you get infinte ammo by cycling guns while jumping, that would be exploitative to use and therefor cheating till said glitch is fixed. the rendering glitch is not something that is based off of the user but on background processes in game and therefor not exploited if used as there is no way to force this glitch to happen. LAG switches.. totally exploiting, melee glitch is exploiting. |
Chances Ghost
Inf4m0us
493
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 06:24:00 -
[40] - Quote
ladwar wrote:glitches are glitches. exploiting is where there is a know way to do glitch and it not normal part of game play. say you get infinte ammo by cycling guns while jumping, that would be exploitative to use and therefor cheating till said glitch is fixed. the rendering glitch is not something that is based off of the user but on background processes in game and therefor not exploited if used as there is no way to force this glitch to happen. LAG switches.. totally exploiting, melee glitch is exploiting.
there IS a way to force the rendering glitch
;)
a few very very effective ways to do it
you just have to understand x/y/z fighting and do some testing with friends to get to know the ranges and positions
aka if you put in an hour of work you can render yourself nearly permanantly invisable at range. |
|
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1804
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 06:36:00 -
[41] - Quote
I doubt this will ever be a problem in pubs, but due to the very CQC nature of PC this exploit really sucks. I couldn't believe how bad it was until I had to face it... still not sure how to beat someone sprinting at you with 2 kin cats... hit detection is so bad its almost impossible to kill them in time. Once they are within about 4m of you the aim assist kicks on and you're dead.
I dunno, its bad... really bad.
But hey.. FF14 head start is up!
|
Himiko Kuronaga
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
1323
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 06:48:00 -
[42] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Lately I've been getting into it with Kujo because one of his members goes 20+ using the melee exploit. I argue this is cheating as it's a not intended feature used to win PC matches. He claims Exploiting is not cheating therefor, acceptable.
So I'm at a loss since we can't come to a conclusion. So I'm asking General Discussion. Is exploiting/glitching in PC considered cheating? I just want to finally lay this topic to rest and know more clearly which of us is right.
It comes down to two things. Community perception, and developer perception.
In fighting games, the use of all glitches is considered fair play, even if the glitch gives an overwhelming advantage. This is because fighting games move so fast that the use of glitches can't really be actively policed. Also because it's bred into the community mentality. When you go into an arcade and put your quarter in and someone uses a bunch of glitches to beat you, what are you going to do about it? Not a damn thing, that's what. the game doesn't care, your quarter is gone. The guy running the arcade likely doesn't give a **** either, to him the game is the game.
The only exceptions to this are absolutely game-breaking glitches that stall the match out, and even then, it's up for debate depending on the tournament organizer.
All-in-all, this creates a community perception that glitches are fine, and anyone who cries "exploit" is just acting like a little girl who doesn't have what it takes to win.
On the developer end, very few developers regularly update their fighting game. This has changed recently, but there is usually a cutoff point where people just have to deal with the game as it is. And they are not going to police a game, ever. So this reinforces the community perception that its OK.
In FPS games, we do not come from an arcade background. This gives us license to ***** and complain like 12 year old girls a lot more. We also have had the liberty of player-run servers for a long time and the ability to kick individuals who **** us off by doing **** we feel degrades the competitive experience. This has created a community perception that glitches are exploits, and should be dealt with because it is in our power to do so.
On the developer end of the spectrum, the game is classified as an MMO so it is going to get constant attention from the developers. They make it a point to police the game to an extent, and it is expected that they do so in exchange for the business many of us bring them. There are constantly new bugs and glitches cropping up in every update, so its unavoidable that some are used even if its accidental. The severity of the use is what is open to interpretation.
It is most definitely a glitch, and it can most definitely be "exploited" to get the win. And it is used constantly in that fashion. Nobody really wants to lose their character because they violated the EULA, so there are rules outside of the games code that must be followed to an extent. Assuming, of course, CCP is actually willing to step in and do the job they are supposed to be doing.
If not, then it is entirely acceptable for us to exploit it back.
The ball is in your court on that one, CCP. |
Surt gods end
Demon Ronin
860
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 06:54:00 -
[43] - Quote
You tube was always the source for exploiting and glitching and flat out cheating. kids couldn't help but post their **** there. lol
anyway, last time I checked PC was objective battles. Is it really the exploit thats giving them an edge to win, or them winning cause of exploit? The army with the higher ground holds an edge in the battle field. also the army with the most archers. or the one guy in the army carrying a gun to sword battle.
They all give an edge, but don't guarantee a win. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
906
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 06:55:00 -
[44] - Quote
Surt gods end wrote:You tube was always the source for exploiting and glitching and flat out cheating. kids couldn't help but post their **** there. lol
anyway, last time I checked PC was objective battles. Is it really the exploit thats giving them an edge to win, or them winning cause of exploit? The army with the higher ground holds an edge in the battle field. also the army with the most archers. or the one guy in the army carrying a gun to sword battle.
They all give an edge, but don't guarantee a win. Are you saying objectives are on the high ground? Because melee glitch pretty much can insta stop all hacks - even more so if you make a suit centered around the glitch itself with increased speed. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
906
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 06:56:00 -
[45] - Quote
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Lately I've been getting into it with Kujo because one of his members goes 20+ using the melee exploit. I argue this is cheating as it's a not intended feature used to win PC matches. He claims Exploiting is not cheating therefor, acceptable.
So I'm at a loss since we can't come to a conclusion. So I'm asking General Discussion. Is exploiting/glitching in PC considered cheating? I just want to finally lay this topic to rest and know more clearly which of us is right. It comes down to two things. Community perception, and developer perception. In fighting games, the use of all glitches is considered fair play, even if the glitch gives an overwhelming advantage. This is because fighting games move so fast that the use of glitches can't really be actively policed. Also because it's bred into the community mentality. When you go into an arcade and put your quarter in and someone uses a bunch of glitches to beat you, what are you going to do about it? Not a damn thing, that's what. the game doesn't care, your quarter is gone. The guy running the arcade likely doesn't give a **** either, to him the game is the game. The only exceptions to this are absolutely game-breaking glitches that stall the match out, and even then, it's up for debate depending on the tournament organizer. All-in-all, this creates a community perception that glitches are fine, and anyone who cries "exploit" is just acting like a little girl who doesn't have what it takes to win. On the developer end, very few developers regularly update their fighting game. This has changed recently, but there is usually a cutoff point where people just have to deal with the game as it is. And they are not going to police a game, ever. So this reinforces the community perception that its OK. In FPS games, we do not come from an arcade background. This gives us license to ***** and complain like 12 year old girls a lot more. We also have had the liberty of player-run servers for a long time and the ability to kick individuals who **** us off by doing **** we feel degrades the competitive experience. This has created a community perception that glitches are exploits, and should be dealt with because it is in our power to do so. On the developer end of the spectrum, the game is classified as an MMO so it is going to get constant attention from the developers. They make it a point to police the game to an extent, and it is expected that they do so in exchange for the business many of us bring them. There are constantly new bugs and glitches cropping up in every update, so its unavoidable that some are used even if its accidental. The severity of the use is what is open to interpretation. It is most definitely a glitch, and it can most definitely be "exploited" to get the win. And it is used constantly in that fashion. Nobody really wants to lose their character because they violated the EULA, so there are rules outside of the games code that must be followed to an extent. Assuming, of course, CCP is actually willing to step in and do the job they are supposed to be doing. If not, then it is entirely acceptable for us to exploit it back. The ball is in your court on that one, CCP. So do you believe the use of exploits/glitches is considered cheating or not? Do you condone like AE the use of such exploitations in PC? |
JL3Eleven
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
661
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:01:00 -
[46] - Quote
Would MD's not be an effective counter? |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
646
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:02:00 -
[47] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Lately I've been getting into it with Kujo because one of his members goes 20+ using the melee exploit. I argue this is cheating as it's a not intended feature used to win PC matches. He claims Exploiting is not cheating therefor, acceptable.
So I'm at a loss since we can't come to a conclusion. So I'm asking General Discussion. Is exploiting/glitching in PC considered cheating? I just want to finally lay this topic to rest and know more clearly which of us is right. A baseball player takes roids and gets homerun record its only cheating if he gets caught..perfomance enhancing drugs are banned yet people still take them and don't get caught..would I do it? Hell yeah the best athletes do it so you have to aswell to compete |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
906
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:03:00 -
[48] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Lately I've been getting into it with Kujo because one of his members goes 20+ using the melee exploit. I argue this is cheating as it's a not intended feature used to win PC matches. He claims Exploiting is not cheating therefor, acceptable.
So I'm at a loss since we can't come to a conclusion. So I'm asking General Discussion. Is exploiting/glitching in PC considered cheating? I just want to finally lay this topic to rest and know more clearly which of us is right. A baseball player takes roids and gets homerun record its only cheating if he gets caught..perfomance enhancing drugs are banned yet people still take them and don't get caught..would I do it? Hell yeah the best athletes do it so you have to aswell to compete Since AE got caught and there's even a video of it on the war room - does that mean you agree AE is cheating? |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
906
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:04:00 -
[49] - Quote
JL3Eleven wrote:Would MD's not be an effective counter? Are you saying everyone should use an MD? lol |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
646
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:04:00 -
[50] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Himiko Kuronaga wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Lately I've been getting into it with Kujo because one of his members goes 20+ using the melee exploit. I argue this is cheating as it's a not intended feature used to win PC matches. He claims Exploiting is not cheating therefor, acceptable.
So I'm at a loss since we can't come to a conclusion. So I'm asking General Discussion. Is exploiting/glitching in PC considered cheating? I just want to finally lay this topic to rest and know more clearly which of us is right. It comes down to two things. Community perception, and developer perception. In fighting games, the use of all glitches is considered fair play, even if the glitch gives an overwhelming advantage. This is because fighting games move so fast that the use of glitches can't really be actively policed. Also because it's bred into the community mentality. When you go into an arcade and put your quarter in and someone uses a bunch of glitches to beat you, what are you going to do about it? Not a damn thing, that's what. the game doesn't care, your quarter is gone. The guy running the arcade likely doesn't give a **** either, to him the game is the game. The only exceptions to this are absolutely game-breaking glitches that stall the match out, and even then, it's up for debate depending on the tournament organizer. All-in-all, this creates a community perception that glitches are fine, and anyone who cries "exploit" is just acting like a little girl who doesn't have what it takes to win. On the developer end, very few developers regularly update their fighting game. This has changed recently, but there is usually a cutoff point where people just have to deal with the game as it is. And they are not going to police a game, ever. So this reinforces the community perception that its OK. In FPS games, we do not come from an arcade background. This gives us license to ***** and complain like 12 year old girls a lot more. We also have had the liberty of player-run servers for a long time and the ability to kick individuals who **** us off by doing **** we feel degrades the competitive experience. This has created a community perception that glitches are exploits, and should be dealt with because it is in our power to do so. On the developer end of the spectrum, the game is classified as an MMO so it is going to get constant attention from the developers. They make it a point to police the game to an extent, and it is expected that they do so in exchange for the business many of us bring them. There are constantly new bugs and glitches cropping up in every update, so its unavoidable that some are used even if its accidental. The severity of the use is what is open to interpretation. It is most definitely a glitch, and it can most definitely be "exploited" to get the win. And it is used constantly in that fashion. Nobody really wants to lose their character because they violated the EULA, so there are rules outside of the games code that must be followed to an extent. Assuming, of course, CCP is actually willing to step in and do the job they are supposed to be doing. If not, then it is entirely acceptable for us to exploit it back. The ball is in your court on that one, CCP. So do you believe the use of exploits/glitches is considered cheating or not? Do you condone like AE the use of such exploitations in PC? Better to do it in pc than pubs..do it in pubs and people won't comeback |
|
Kira Lannister
Ancient Exiles
1121
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:05:00 -
[51] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Lately I've been getting into it with Kujo because one of his members goes 20+ using the melee exploit. I argue this is cheating as it's a not intended feature used to win PC matches. He claims Exploiting is not cheating therefor, acceptable.
So I'm at a loss since we can't come to a conclusion. So I'm asking General Discussion. Is exploiting/glitching in PC considered cheating? I just want to finally lay this topic to rest and know more clearly which of us is right. A baseball player takes roids and gets homerun record its only cheating if he gets caught..perfomance enhancing drugs are banned yet people still take them and don't get caught..would I do it? Hell yeah the best athletes do it so you have to aswell to compete Since AE got caught and there's even a video of it on the war room - does that mean you agree AE is cheating?
Photoshop. All of it.
|
Surt gods end
Demon Ronin
860
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:07:00 -
[52] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Surt gods end wrote:You tube was always the source for exploiting and glitching and flat out cheating. kids couldn't help but post their **** there. lol
anyway, last time I checked PC was objective battles. Is it really the exploit thats giving them an edge to win, or them winning cause of exploit? The army with the higher ground holds an edge in the battle field. also the army with the most archers. or the one guy in the army carrying a gun to sword battle.
They all give an edge, but don't guarantee a win. Are you saying objectives are on the high ground? Because melee glitch pretty much can insta stop all hacks - even more so if you make a suit centered around the glitch itself with increased speed.
My POV is that it's not. It comes with the fact that if your hacking I can OHK with any attack. (shotty. RE. smg. nade) Your hacking so it comes with that risk. Is that exploit more then when I place my RE in the objective to where it becomes invisible?
I've long been doing that. Am I cheating? or using a exploit? (blame yourselves ccp) |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
646
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:08:00 -
[53] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Lately I've been getting into it with Kujo because one of his members goes 20+ using the melee exploit. I argue this is cheating as it's a not intended feature used to win PC matches. He claims Exploiting is not cheating therefor, acceptable.
So I'm at a loss since we can't come to a conclusion. So I'm asking General Discussion. Is exploiting/glitching in PC considered cheating? I just want to finally lay this topic to rest and know more clearly which of us is right. A baseball player takes roids and gets homerun record its only cheating if he gets caught..perfomance enhancing drugs are banned yet people still take them and don't get caught..would I do it? Hell yeah the best athletes do it so you have to aswell to compete Since AE got caught and there's even a video of it on the war room - does that mean you agree AE is cheating? I'd say so but there will always be cheaters/exploiters I understand real life reasons but in video games I only understand cheating in zombies..I guess its an exploit as its ccp's fault and I find it cheating but that's just my opinion |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
907
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:15:00 -
[54] - Quote
Wait - it's CCP's fault YOU guys exploit? It's a choice - you chose to cheat. How is it any simpler then that? I understand peoples want to troll pubs - but it's PC. It's suppose to be competitive matches between two teams skill. AE has been degrading to whoever exploits best. |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
4095
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:16:00 -
[55] - Quote
Kira Lannister wrote:Takes skill to melee someone dood. If it was cheating every tom di ck and harry would be doing it. Honestly if your getting sucker punched you need to get good and stop crying because they would shotty you to death any way.
funny how ppl say "get good" when they're goin negative or barely breaking even/positive when the person using the exploit carrying them, typical DUST community and these ppl suppose to be "competitive" players this game is funny lol. |
JL3Eleven
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
662
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:18:00 -
[56] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:Would MD's not be an effective counter? Are you saying everyone should use an MD? lol
I believe I asked if the MD was an effective counter. As I believe it would be. hint hint.
|
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
3511
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:22:00 -
[57] - Quote
CCP acknowledged that it's not working as intended and stated they'll fix it in 1.5...maybe.
Clearly it's not working as intended...unless OHK was a thing in this game with the melee like lolCoD.
Everyone knows it. Everyone knows it's an exploit being abused. People that don't want to admit it are the people defending this crap
But hey, anything to win right? Cheating is all part of fair, fun games...o wait....
Honestly though, I have no respect for people like that. They're pathetic. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
908
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:22:00 -
[58] - Quote
JL3Eleven wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:Would MD's not be an effective counter? Are you saying everyone should use an MD? lol I believe I asked if the MD was an effective counter. As I believe it would be. hint hint. There's no hint. A shield stack suit would take 3-4 shots 2 at the least. That's plenty of time for the AE exploiter to zone in on you and kill you.
There is no real counter to this other then do it yourself and hope your punches land first. |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
646
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:23:00 -
[59] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Wait - it's CCP's fault YOU guys exploit? It's a choice - you chose to cheat. How is it any simpler then that? I understand peoples want to troll pubs - but it's PC. It's suppose to be competitive matches between two teams skill. AE has been degrading to whoever exploits best. They could have fixed it by now they could start suspending accounts, at the end of the day its on ccp yes the player has a choice but that's only cuz ccp is allowing it |
Sgt Buttscratch
G I A N T EoN.
670
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:24:00 -
[60] - Quote
using an exploit to gain an advantage is cheating, sugar coat it all you want. cheating. |
|
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
646
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:26:00 -
[61] - Quote
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:CCP acknowledged that it's not working as intended and stated they'll fix it in 1.5...maybe. Clearly it's not working as intended...unless OHK was a thing in this game with the melee like lolCoD. Everyone knows it. Everyone knows it's an exploit being abused. People that don't want to admit it are the people defending this crap But hey, anything to win right? Cheating is all part of fair, fun games...o wait.... Honestly though, I have no respect for people like that. They're pathetic. Can a great athelete who is natural beat a great athlete on roids? No so the other athlete starts taking roids so he can be the best again..I agree the exploit is abused and cheating but its also on ccp |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
3511
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:26:00 -
[62] - Quote
Surt gods end wrote: My POV is that it's not. It comes with the fact that if your hacking I can OHK with any attack. (shotty. RE. smg. nade) Your hacking so it comes with that risk. Is that exploit more then when I place my RE in the objective to where it becomes invisible?
I've long been doing that. Am I cheating? or using a exploit? (blame yourselves ccp)
you can OHK with nades, SMG and shotguns? ... lol???
RE's are countered by flux.
When someone runs through gunfire and hits you once, abusing an exploit built into the game that's not working as intended, it's cheating. |
Surt gods end
Demon Ronin
860
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:29:00 -
[63] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Wait - it's CCP's fault YOU guys exploit? It's a choice - you chose to cheat. How is it any simpler then that? I understand peoples want to troll pubs - but it's PC. It's suppose to be competitive matches between two teams skill. AE has been degrading to whoever exploits best.
Hey, hey now. Is it my fault that where I want to throw my RE on objective also makes em disappear?
*but knowing they disappear you still throw them there..*
WAIT A SECOND! Don't turn this on me... Sota's the one melee people to death!
**
I also kill them with my shotty. doesn't that count towards me not abusing it too much? |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
3513
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:31:00 -
[64] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:CCP acknowledged that it's not working as intended and stated they'll fix it in 1.5...maybe. Clearly it's not working as intended...unless OHK was a thing in this game with the melee like lolCoD. Everyone knows it. Everyone knows it's an exploit being abused. People that don't want to admit it are the people defending this crap But hey, anything to win right? Cheating is all part of fair, fun games...o wait.... Honestly though, I have no respect for people like that. They're pathetic. Can a great athelete who is natural beat a great athlete on roids? No so the other athlete starts taking roids so he can be the best again..I agree the exploit is abused and cheating but its also on ccp
athletes get tested...especially after winning an important event. Tbh, if you wanna get technical, cuz I know a thing or two in this field, athletes on a professional lvl get tested often by their sporting body or their Olympic Committee depending who's funding the athlete.
Cheating is not something that is taken lightly. Maybe in American sports like Baseball and NFL.
So while agree CCP is to blame, but the player knows what he's doing, just like athletes know that taking PED's is wrong.
CCP comes like a sporting federation NOT testing their athletes, so they're free to take drugs. |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
646
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:31:00 -
[65] - Quote
This is why I went back to bf3 no exploits or cheaters that I'm aware of..cod is filled with shotgun campers so that game is lame |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
646
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:33:00 -
[66] - Quote
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:CCP acknowledged that it's not working as intended and stated they'll fix it in 1.5...maybe. Clearly it's not working as intended...unless OHK was a thing in this game with the melee like lolCoD. Everyone knows it. Everyone knows it's an exploit being abused. People that don't want to admit it are the people defending this crap But hey, anything to win right? Cheating is all part of fair, fun games...o wait.... Honestly though, I have no respect for people like that. They're pathetic. Can a great athelete who is natural beat a great athlete on roids? No so the other athlete starts taking roids so he can be the best again..I agree the exploit is abused and cheating but its also on ccp athletes get tested...especially after winning an important event. Tbh, if you wanna get technical, cuz I know a thing or two in this field, athletes on a professional lvl get tested often by their sporting body or their Olympic Committee depending who's funding the athlete. Cheating is not something that is taken lightly. Maybe in American sports like Baseball and NFL. So while agree CCP is to blame, but the player knows what he's doing, just like athletes know that taking PED's is wrong. CCP comes like a sporting federation NOT testing their athletes, so they're free to take drugs. That was beautiful |
echo47
Sebiestor Field Sappers Minmatar Republic
43
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:33:00 -
[67] - Quote
These exploits are known, and they still exist, and I would never take advantage.
They haven't been fixed yet so they must be ok.
If a player does it and benefits from it, its reported and proven why don't the devs remove kills and isk earned. Or suspend the player. If that is too much work then fix it already. |
Kira Lannister
Ancient Exiles
1121
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:34:00 -
[68] - Quote
All these tears are making me hard. |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
3513
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:35:00 -
[69] - Quote
echo47 wrote:These exploits are known, and they still exist, and I would never take advantage.
They haven't been fixed yet so they must be ok.
If a player does it and benefits from it, its reported and proven why don't the devs remove kills and isk earned. Or suspend the player. If that is too much work then fix it already.
cuz CCP... they don't give a **** |
Kira Lannister
Ancient Exiles
1121
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:36:00 -
[70] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:Kira Lannister wrote:Takes skill to melee someone dood. If it was cheating every tom di ck and harry would be doing it. Honestly if your getting sucker punched you need to get good and stop crying because they would shotty you to death any way.
funny how ppl say "get good" when they're goin negative or barely breaking even/positive when the person using the exploit carrying them, typical DUST community and these ppl suppose to be "competitive" players this game is funny lol.
I'll poison your roti. I don't play brah. |
|
Surt gods end
Demon Ronin
860
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:36:00 -
[71] - Quote
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Surt gods end wrote: My POV is that it's not. It comes with the fact that if your hacking I can OHK with any attack. (shotty. RE. smg. nade) Your hacking so it comes with that risk. Is that exploit more then when I place my RE in the objective to where it becomes invisible?
I've long been doing that. Am I cheating? or using a exploit? (blame yourselves ccp)
you can OHK with nades, SMG and shotguns? ... lol??? RE's are countered by flux. When someone runs through gunfire and hits you once, abusing an exploit built into the game that's not working as intended, it's cheating.
Nades.. sometimes. but mostly on militia. Shotty? hells yeah! SMG? come on dude, ish and six sin on prof 5? tho i miss my cala.
Thing is your hacking, so that lets me get close enough to smell what just ate. nothing at that range escapes. Re? I can be half a mile away. |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
3513
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:36:00 -
[72] - Quote
Kira Lannister wrote:All these tears are making me hard.
gotta admit, your trolling is better than your gungame |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
908
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:37:00 -
[73] - Quote
Surt gods end wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Surt gods end wrote: My POV is that it's not. It comes with the fact that if your hacking I can OHK with any attack. (shotty. RE. smg. nade) Your hacking so it comes with that risk. Is that exploit more then when I place my RE in the objective to where it becomes invisible?
I've long been doing that. Am I cheating? or using a exploit? (blame yourselves ccp)
you can OHK with nades, SMG and shotguns? ... lol??? RE's are countered by flux. When someone runs through gunfire and hits you once, abusing an exploit built into the game that's not working as intended, it's cheating. Nades.. sometimes. but mostly on militia. Shotty? hells yeah! SMG? come on dude, ish and six sin on prof 5? tho i miss my cala. Thing is your hacking, so that lets me get close enough to smell what just ate. nothing at that range escapes. Re? I can be half a mile away. I'm a heavy - no shotgun with stacked dmg mods can one shot me. Oh - but melee glitch can! |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
3514
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:39:00 -
[74] - Quote
Surt gods end wrote:Nades.. sometimes. but mostly on militia. Shotty? hells yeah! SMG? come on dude, ish and six sin on prof 5? tho i miss my cala. Thing is your hacking, so that lets me get close enough to smell what just ate. nothing at that range escapes. Re? I can be half a mile away.
Nades don't OHK my heavy suit. Shotty does not OHK my heavy suit. SMG's do what, 80 dmg a bullet? So no.
RE's do what, 1800 dmg for basic? They're suppose to OHK.
Melee? 150? Upgrade all the melee stuff and w/e...maybe get up to 400-500 dmg? I don't know i'm just guessing.
THAT OHK's me. Know why? The exploit makes the user melee 3-4 times in a second.... maybe more times? So that OHK every suit.
|
GRIM GEAR
The Enclave Syndicate Dark Taboo
14
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:40:00 -
[75] - Quote
I came across someone using the melee glitch I had over 700 shield/armour combined and got 1 hit koed by a minmatar medium frame twice in the same battle. I think the perpetrators name was Dumpoo or Dengru something along those lines anyway, the sad thing was that he/she barely went positive; must of been an npc corporation blueberry. |
Kira Lannister
Ancient Exiles
1121
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:40:00 -
[76] - Quote
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Kira Lannister wrote:All these tears are making me hard. gotta admit, your trolling is better than your gungame
Got punched in da eye dood? Here is a patch.
Much betters! |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
3514
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:42:00 -
[77] - Quote
Kira Lannister wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Kira Lannister wrote:All these tears are making me hard. gotta admit, your trolling is better than your gungame Got punched in da eye dood? Here is a patch. Much betters!
meh |
Surt gods end
Demon Ronin
860
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:42:00 -
[78] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Surt gods end wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Surt gods end wrote: My POV is that it's not. It comes with the fact that if your hacking I can OHK with any attack. (shotty. RE. smg. nade) Your hacking so it comes with that risk. Is that exploit more then when I place my RE in the objective to where it becomes invisible?
I've long been doing that. Am I cheating? or using a exploit? (blame yourselves ccp)
you can OHK with nades, SMG and shotguns? ... lol??? RE's are countered by flux. When someone runs through gunfire and hits you once, abusing an exploit built into the game that's not working as intended, it's cheating. Nades.. sometimes. but mostly on militia. Shotty? hells yeah! SMG? come on dude, ish and six sin on prof 5? tho i miss my cala. Thing is your hacking, so that lets me get close enough to smell what just ate. nothing at that range escapes. Re? I can be half a mile away. I'm a heavy - no shotgun with stacked dmg mods can one shot me. Oh - but melee glitch can!
But without the glitch can his melee still OHK? I mean if your hacking and he melee you. I'll admit heavy can't be OHK with shotty. But neither can they escape my blasts. my militia shotty rips armor like it's nothing. and never mind the proto breach. I take that one out only when the Minnesota vikings are playing. (come on ponder!) |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
908
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:42:00 -
[79] - Quote
Kira Lannister wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Kira Lannister wrote:All these tears are making me hard. gotta admit, your trolling is better than your gungame Got punched in da eye dood? Here is a patch. Much betters! So does all this trolling mean you support AE cheating in PC? |
Another Heavy SOB
Pure Innocence. EoN.
558
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:43:00 -
[80] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Wait - it's CCP's fault YOU guys exploit? It's a choice - you chose to cheat. How is it any simpler then that? I understand peoples want to troll pubs - but it's PC. It's suppose to be competitive matches between two teams skill. AE has been degrading to whoever exploits best. They could have fixed it by now they could start suspending accounts, at the end of the day its on ccp yes the player has a choice but that's only cuz ccp is allowing it
But your Honor the Banker left the vault open, It's his fault I walked out with millions! I'm not a thief! |
|
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
908
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:45:00 -
[81] - Quote
Surt gods end wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Surt gods end wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Surt gods end wrote: My POV is that it's not. It comes with the fact that if your hacking I can OHK with any attack. (shotty. RE. smg. nade) Your hacking so it comes with that risk. Is that exploit more then when I place my RE in the objective to where it becomes invisible?
I've long been doing that. Am I cheating? or using a exploit? (blame yourselves ccp)
you can OHK with nades, SMG and shotguns? ... lol??? RE's are countered by flux. When someone runs through gunfire and hits you once, abusing an exploit built into the game that's not working as intended, it's cheating. Nades.. sometimes. but mostly on militia. Shotty? hells yeah! SMG? come on dude, ish and six sin on prof 5? tho i miss my cala. Thing is your hacking, so that lets me get close enough to smell what just ate. nothing at that range escapes. Re? I can be half a mile away. I'm a heavy - no shotgun with stacked dmg mods can one shot me. Oh - but melee glitch can! But without the glitch can his melee still OHK? I mean if your hacking and he melee you. I'll admit heavy can't be OHK. But neither can they escape my blasts. my militia shotty rips armor like it's nothing. and never mind the proto breach. I take that one out only when the Minnesota vikings are playing. (come on ponder!) The problem with your replys is your focusing on the fact someone is hacking then killed for it. With this glitch - you could be doing anything and you'll still be OHK by it. It's inevitable. It takes teamwork ... to kill a scout suit. Shotguns would never be so effective - and no explosive including MD's. There's nothing you've said that makes any logical sense why melee OHK at this incredible speed is okay. |
Kira Lannister
Ancient Exiles
1121
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:45:00 -
[82] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Kira Lannister wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Kira Lannister wrote:All these tears are making me hard. gotta admit, your trolling is better than your gungame Got punched in da eye dood? Here is a patch. Much betters! So does all this trolling mean you support AE cheating in PC?
What does AE mean?
|
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
908
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:46:00 -
[83] - Quote
Kira Lannister wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Kira Lannister wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Kira Lannister wrote:All these tears are making me hard. gotta admit, your trolling is better than your gungame Got punched in da eye dood? Here is a patch. Much betters! So does all this trolling mean you support AE cheating in PC? What does AE mean? Ancient Exiles. Your corp, silly. |
GRIM GEAR
The Enclave Syndicate Dark Taboo
14
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:46:00 -
[84] - Quote
Kira Lannister wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Kira Lannister wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Kira Lannister wrote:All these tears are making me hard. gotta admit, your trolling is better than your gungame Got punched in da eye dood? Here is a patch. Much betters! So does all this trolling mean you support AE cheating in PC? What does AE mean? Could it be the arse end of something? |
Kira Lannister
Ancient Exiles
1121
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:47:00 -
[85] - Quote
TEE HEE!
:D
R3 L3 R3 L3 |
Kira Lannister
Ancient Exiles
1122
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:51:00 -
[86] - Quote
I need more wine. White wine. :[
*realizes the forum game is funner than the actual game* |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
909
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:53:00 -
[87] - Quote
Kira Lannister wrote:I need more wine. White wine. :[
*realizes the forum game is funner than the actual game* Ikr?
Shame you belong to a corp that cheats to win in PC. |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
646
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:54:00 -
[88] - Quote
What does AE mean?
[/quote] Ass Eaters. Your corp, silly. [/quote] Fixed bro beans |
hooc order
Deep Space Republic Top Men.
892
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:55:00 -
[89] - Quote
Kira Lannister wrote:I need more wine. White wine. :[
*realizes the forum game is funner than the actual game*
Took you long enough. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1804
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:56:00 -
[90] - Quote
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:echo47 wrote:These exploits are known, and they still exist, and I would never take advantage.
They haven't been fixed yet so they must be ok.
If a player does it and benefits from it, its reported and proven why don't the devs remove kills and isk earned. Or suspend the player. If that is too much work then fix it already. cuz CCP... they don't give a ****
CCPDGAF... New mottos for Dust. |
|
Seymor Krelborn
DUST University Ivy League
612
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 08:03:00 -
[91] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Lately I've been getting into it with Kujo because one of his members goes 20+ using the melee exploit. I argue this is cheating as it's a not intended feature used to win PC matches. He claims Exploiting is not cheating therefor, acceptable.
So I'm at a loss since we can't come to a conclusion. So I'm asking General Discussion. Is exploiting/glitching in PC considered cheating? I just want to finally lay this topic to rest and know more clearly which of us is right.
in and of itself exploits are not cheating, but they are cheap moves to use. they don't do the exploiter any justice either, considering if and when an exploit is fixed, they lose that crutch, possibly effecting they're overall performance in a match. my corp frowns upon its members using exploits, we are out right told not to use them and if we discover one to immediately report it to CCP.
I think the only times an exploit would be cheating is, if both teams before a match agree not to use it, and if CCP were to tell us until its fixed not to use it.
other than that its just dirty tricks and cheap shots imho....
|
Blake Kingston
Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation
59
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 08:04:00 -
[92] - Quote
I do X. I am not a bad person. Therefore X cannot be cheating.
No one is ever the bad guy. |
Kira Lannister
Ancient Exiles
1122
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 08:09:00 -
[93] - Quote
*SNIFFS QUAFE OFF HIS GOLDEN WARBAGE TABLE*
SAY HALLO TO DA BAD GUY!
*Melee Exploits* |
Surt gods end
Demon Ronin
860
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 08:10:00 -
[94] - Quote
@sota @ lance
I see.... my bad. I guess misunderstood there. Speed ninjas with elbows of death huh? you should have said that earlier.
**
what? I get what your talking about now tho. Met one of those before. killed him with trap RE. but yeah.. I've seen them. the fact that they don't have "AMMO" kinda makes it cheating. They are not decreasing in anything. might as well they hit a lag switch. |
I-Shayz-I
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
695
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 09:08:00 -
[95] - Quote
There's two types of exploits:
A. Using a glitch that abuses the mechanics of the game, giving you the advantage against other players that you wouldn't have without it. In this example, it's being used in PC to win battles, and those battles might not have been won without that exploit. Another example is the invisible glitch. This is cheating.
B. Using a combination of items or tactics, giving you an unfair advantage over other players that was unforseen by the developers. Examples of this were the Tac AR, Caldari Logistics, Flaylock pistol, Contact grenades, Dropship Missiles, etc. Like previously mentioned, this is unfair, but not cheating, because players using them are only doing so because they are "the best".
Exploiting in a game is OK as long as you are not using it to: A. Win, causing someone else to lose B. Affect another player in a way that wasn't planned
It's perfectly fine though to do things that only help yourself and don't affect others, like the fast reload thing or the repair tool exploit. It only becomes a problem when you use those extra warpoints to drop 5 orbitals on the other team by yourself, and the DEVs might not like it either.
But say in a game like Borderlands or Pac Man where you're not playing competitively, feel free to do whatever you like. |
Avinash Decker
Seykal Expeditionary Group Minmatar Republic
64
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 09:28:00 -
[96] - Quote
I guess it doesn't matter what the community considers it because its going to get fixed anyway . https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=34746&p=3 |
General John Ripper
The Generals EoN.
2014
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 09:28:00 -
[97] - Quote
I-Shayz-I wrote:There's two types of exploits:
A. Using a glitch that abuses the mechanics of the game, giving you the advantage against other players that you wouldn't have without it. In this example, it's being used in PC to win battles, and those battles might not have been won without that exploit. Another example is the invisible glitch. This is cheating.
B. Using a combination of items or tactics, giving you an unfair advantage over other players that was unforseen by the developers. Examples of this were the Tac AR, Caldari Logistics, Flaylock pistol, Contact grenades, Dropship Missiles, etc. Like previously mentioned, this is unfair, but not cheating, because players using them are only doing so because they are "the best".
Exploiting in a game is OK as long as you are not using it to: A. Win, causing someone else to lose B. Affect another player in a way that wasn't planned
It's perfectly fine though to do things that only help yourself and don't affect others, like the fast reload thing or the repair tool exploit. It only becomes a problem when you use those extra warpoints to drop 5 orbitals on the other team by yourself, and the DEVs might not like it either.
But say in a game like Borderlands or Pac Man where you're not playing competitively, feel free to do whatever you like. this |
Panther Alpha
DarkWingsss
929
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 09:30:00 -
[98] - Quote
Anything that give you an "Unfair" advantage, that is outside the parameters that the Developers intended, is CHEATING. ;
- Exploits - Glitches - Hacks - Hardware / Software Modifications
They all are considered Cheats, and are a Bannable offence... well... in "most" games. |
HowDidThatTaste
Ancient Exiles
3557
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 11:41:00 -
[99] - Quote
Well im pretty sure using a LAV to run people over is glitch as well. mainly because even ccp has posted patch notes to the effect that they are changing it. so to continue to use it would fall under your definition of cheating? |
Chances Ghost
Inf4m0us
498
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 11:47:00 -
[100] - Quote
HowDidThatTaste wrote:Well im pretty sure using a LAV to run people over is glitch as well. mainly because even ccp has posted patch notes to the effect that they are changing it. so to continue to use it would fall under your definition of cheating?
explaoiting a game mechanic isnt quite the same as exploiting a glitch
it isnt a glitch that LAVs can run people over, it was purposly coded that way
its a glitch that you can melee 10x int he span of a regular melee by clipping the animation because it was codded specifically NOT to alow you to melee 10x a second
exploiting mechanics would be LAV murder taxi, MCC AFK farming,
exploiting glitches would be invisablke shotgunner, melee
ones cheating, the other just isnt fair play
war isnt fair so you cant blame people for exploiting mechanics
but we CAN blame people for exploiting glitches in the code
as everyone did when the infamous invisable shotgunners were running around |
|
Chances Ghost
Inf4m0us
498
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 11:49:00 -
[101] - Quote
Panther Alpha wrote:Anything that give you an "Unfair" advantage, that is outside the parameters that the Developers intended, is CHEATING. ; - Exploits - Glitches - Hacks - Hardware / Software Modifications They all are considered Cheats, and are a Bannable offence... well... in "most" games.
glitches are things that happen unintentionally, and therefore arnt cheating
exploits are when somone uses a glitch or mechanic to gain an unfair advantage and ARE cheating.
its all about intent
if you intended to cause the glitch then your cheating, if it happens accidently and you cant replicate it, then how the hell are you using it to your advantage? |
Chances Ghost
Inf4m0us
498
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 11:51:00 -
[102] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Lately I've been getting into it with Kujo because one of his members goes 20+ using the melee exploit. I argue this is cheating as it's a not intended feature used to win PC matches. He claims Exploiting is not cheating therefor, acceptable.
So I'm at a loss since we can't come to a conclusion. So I'm asking General Discussion. Is exploiting/glitching in PC considered cheating? I just want to finally lay this topic to rest and know more clearly which of us is right. in and of itself exploits are not cheating, but they are cheap moves to use. they don't do the exploiter any justice either, considering if and when an exploit is fixed, they lose that crutch, possibly effecting they're overall performance in a match. my corp frowns upon its members using exploits, we are out right told not to use them and if we discover one to immediately report it to CCP. I think the only times an exploit would be cheating is, if both teams before a match agree not to use it, and if CCP were to tell us until its fixed not to use it. other than that its just dirty tricks and cheap shots imho....
so the infamous invisable shotgunners wont cheating because nobody told them they wernt aloud to? |
Another Heavy SOB
Pure Innocence. EoN.
561
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 12:05:00 -
[103] - Quote
Really not trying to be a **** here I just see it so often I cannot continue without saying something....
It's spelled invisible...
Oh and interesting use of the word "Infamous" there... |
Chances Ghost
Inf4m0us
500
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 12:07:00 -
[104] - Quote
Another Heavy SOB wrote:Really not trying to be a **** here I just see it so often I cannot continue without saying something.... It's spelled invisible... Oh and interesting use of the word "Infamous" there...
its no secret
and i dont speel gud :P i have better things to pay attention to then red squaggly lines on my computer moniter.
red squiggly lines cant tell me what to do, they arnt the boss of me :P |
Another Heavy SOB
Pure Innocence. EoN.
561
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 12:15:00 -
[105] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:Another Heavy SOB wrote:Really not trying to be a **** here I just see it so often I cannot continue without saying something.... It's spelled invisible... Oh and interesting use of the word "Infamous" there... its no secret and i dont speel gud :P i have better things to pay attention to then red squaggly lines on my computer moniter. red squiggly lines cant tell me what to do, they arnt the boss of me :P
I can see your point I guess but why not just use an auto correct program?
You have good idea's from time to time and people will tend to take you a bit more seriously the better you can articulate your point..
|
Chances Ghost
Inf4m0us
500
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 12:40:00 -
[106] - Quote
Another Heavy SOB wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:Another Heavy SOB wrote:Really not trying to be a **** here I just see it so often I cannot continue without saying something.... It's spelled invisible... Oh and interesting use of the word "Infamous" there... its no secret and i dont speel gud :P i have better things to pay attention to then red squaggly lines on my computer moniter. red squiggly lines cant tell me what to do, they arnt the boss of me :P I can see your point I guess but why not just use an auto correct program? You have good idea's from time to time and people will tend to take you a bit more seriously the better you can articulate your point..
articulating my point is quite possably the one thing in this world i cant do.
the people who want to talk and listen, and debate, question things, and have good conversations always do.
everyone else wasnt going to no matter how things are written |
Seymor Krelborn
DUST University Ivy League
614
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 12:55:00 -
[107] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Lately I've been getting into it with Kujo because one of his members goes 20+ using the melee exploit. I argue this is cheating as it's a not intended feature used to win PC matches. He claims Exploiting is not cheating therefor, acceptable.
So I'm at a loss since we can't come to a conclusion. So I'm asking General Discussion. Is exploiting/glitching in PC considered cheating? I just want to finally lay this topic to rest and know more clearly which of us is right. in and of itself exploits are not cheating, but they are cheap moves to use. they don't do the exploiter any justice either, considering if and when an exploit is fixed, they lose that crutch, possibly effecting they're overall performance in a match. my corp frowns upon its members using exploits, we are out right told not to use them and if we discover one to immediately report it to CCP. I think the only times an exploit would be cheating is, if both teams before a match agree not to use it, and if CCP were to tell us until its fixed not to use it. other than that its just dirty tricks and cheap shots imho.... so the infamous invisable shotgunners wont cheating because nobody told them they wernt aloud to?
I have seen people get this glitch by pure accident... perhaps im just uninformed but im not aware of a way to accurately reproduce it... if its accidental then no it isn't cheating if its intentional then its certainly very cheap to use this, but as I said it doesn't do the exploiter any good, because once fixed they once again have to rely on skill, which they have not been practicing by using such an egregious glitch and therefore suffer from its use. its cheap and its dirty and it does nobody any good, but rising to the level of cheating, imho id say no. |
Chances Ghost
Inf4m0us
500
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 12:57:00 -
[108] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Lately I've been getting into it with Kujo because one of his members goes 20+ using the melee exploit. I argue this is cheating as it's a not intended feature used to win PC matches. He claims Exploiting is not cheating therefor, acceptable.
So I'm at a loss since we can't come to a conclusion. So I'm asking General Discussion. Is exploiting/glitching in PC considered cheating? I just want to finally lay this topic to rest and know more clearly which of us is right. in and of itself exploits are not cheating, but they are cheap moves to use. they don't do the exploiter any justice either, considering if and when an exploit is fixed, they lose that crutch, possibly effecting they're overall performance in a match. my corp frowns upon its members using exploits, we are out right told not to use them and if we discover one to immediately report it to CCP. I think the only times an exploit would be cheating is, if both teams before a match agree not to use it, and if CCP were to tell us until its fixed not to use it. other than that its just dirty tricks and cheap shots imho.... so the infamous invisable shotgunners wont cheating because nobody told them they wernt aloud to? I have seen people get this glitch by pure accident... perhaps im just uninformed but im not aware of a way to accurately reproduce it... if its accidental then no it isn't cheating if its intentional then its certainly very cheap to use this, but as I said it doesn't do the exploiter any good, because once fixed they once again have to rely on skill, which they have not been practicing by using such an egregious glitch and therefore suffer from its use. its cheap and its dirty and it does nobody any good, but rising to the level of cheating, imho id say no.
you can say no all you want, that doesnt change the fact that its cheating
what exactly WOULD be cheating to you if not being invisable |
Seymor Krelborn
DUST University Ivy League
614
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 13:10:00 -
[109] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Lately I've been getting into it with Kujo because one of his members goes 20+ using the melee exploit. I argue this is cheating as it's a not intended feature used to win PC matches. He claims Exploiting is not cheating therefor, acceptable.
So I'm at a loss since we can't come to a conclusion. So I'm asking General Discussion. Is exploiting/glitching in PC considered cheating? I just want to finally lay this topic to rest and know more clearly which of us is right. in and of itself exploits are not cheating, but they are cheap moves to use. they don't do the exploiter any justice either, considering if and when an exploit is fixed, they lose that crutch, possibly effecting they're overall performance in a match. my corp frowns upon its members using exploits, we are out right told not to use them and if we discover one to immediately report it to CCP. I think the only times an exploit would be cheating is, if both teams before a match agree not to use it, and if CCP were to tell us until its fixed not to use it. other than that its just dirty tricks and cheap shots imho.... so the infamous invisable shotgunners wont cheating because nobody told them they wernt aloud to? I have seen people get this glitch by pure accident... perhaps im just uninformed but im not aware of a way to accurately reproduce it... if its accidental then no it isn't cheating if its intentional then its certainly very cheap to use this, but as I said it doesn't do the exploiter any good, because once fixed they once again have to rely on skill, which they have not been practicing by using such an egregious glitch and therefore suffer from its use. its cheap and its dirty and it does nobody any good, but rising to the level of cheating, imho id say no. you can say no all you want, that doesnt change the fact that its cheating what exactly WOULD be cheating to you if not being invisable
im only giving my opinion, as are you, lets not forget that
cheating would be... imo... somehow altering the code of the game, bots for instance, or stealing someones account info and transferring all their isk to your account. game glitches/bugs/exploits are not fun and can be game breaking, but it is technically within the confines of the games mechanics, intentional or not... really CCP makes that call and changes it/ fixes it when needed. |
Chances Ghost
Inf4m0us
500
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 13:15:00 -
[110] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:im only giving my opinion, as are you, lets not forget that cheating would be... imo... somehow altering the code of the game, bots for instance, or stealing someones account info and transferring all their isk to your account. game glitches/bugs/exploits are not fun and can be game breaking, but it is technically within the confines of the games mechanics, intentional or not... really CCP makes that call and changes it/ fixes it when needed.
glitches ARNT within the confines of game mechanics
they are using errors in code
aka altering the code of the game
recreating a glitch is literally a process of creating errors |
|
Seymor Krelborn
DUST University Ivy League
614
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 13:22:00 -
[111] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:im only giving my opinion, as are you, lets not forget that cheating would be... imo... somehow altering the code of the game, bots for instance, or stealing someones account info and transferring all their isk to your account. game glitches/bugs/exploits are not fun and can be game breaking, but it is technically within the confines of the games mechanics, intentional or not... really CCP makes that call and changes it/ fixes it when needed. glitches ARNT within the confines of game mechanics they are using errors in code aka altering the code of the game recreating a glitch is literally a process of creating errors
well I can see your very passionate about this...
as I stated earlier im in a corp that frowns upon the use of exploits and reports them, I also don't use them.
I think they cheapen the game, I don't think it does anyone any good, including the exploiter...
I also don't think it qualifies as cheating, more akin to poor sportsmanship.
we agree on the fact that exploits are bad... we just don't agree on the terminology to classify them... and that's ok |
Chances Ghost
Inf4m0us
502
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 13:31:00 -
[112] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:im only giving my opinion, as are you, lets not forget that cheating would be... imo... somehow altering the code of the game, bots for instance, or stealing someones account info and transferring all their isk to your account. game glitches/bugs/exploits are not fun and can be game breaking, but it is technically within the confines of the games mechanics, intentional or not... really CCP makes that call and changes it/ fixes it when needed. glitches ARNT within the confines of game mechanics they are using errors in code aka altering the code of the game recreating a glitch is literally a process of creating errors well I can see your very passionate about this... as I stated earlier im in a corp that frowns upon the use of exploits and reports them, I also don't use them. I think they cheapen the game, I don't think it does anyone any good, including the exploiter... I also don't think it qualifies as cheating, more akin to poor sportsmanship. we agree on the fact that exploits are bad... we just don't agree on the terminology to classify them... and that's ok
you cant really redefine what a word means... thats what dictionaries are for
to you it seems its impossable to cheat in an online game outside of breaking the law.....
yes, at least half the things you mentioned as cheating are in fact felonies
so do you have a middle ground where theres a level of cheating that isnt crime? |
Nemo Bluntz
TeamPlayers EoN.
435
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 13:48:00 -
[113] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:see the problem is we have to look at everything equally
so the mele glitch is on par with the invisability glitch.
and the novaknife charge sprint, invisable swarms (rendering glitch), nanite injector invulnerability, stacking afterburners on a dropship. and everything else thats a "glitch"
would all have to be concidered exploits and cheating
with identical consequences
currently the consequences are non exsistant.
Hell no we don't have to look at everything equally.
Things that happen, not by the player's fault, but they the game's at random shouldn't be viewed the same way as a player who intentionally exploits a glitch.
Come on, now. |
Reav Hannari
Red Rock Outriders
1027
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 13:49:00 -
[114] - Quote
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:In fighting games, the use of all glitches is considered fair play, even if the glitch gives an overwhelming advantage. This is because fighting games move so fast that the use of glitches can't really be actively policed. Also because it's bred into the community mentality.
...
All-in-all, this creates a community perception that glitches are fine, and anyone who cries "exploit" is just acting like a little girl who doesn't have what it takes to win.
On the developer end, very few developers regularly update their fighting game. This has changed recently, but there is usually a cutoff point where people just have to deal with the game as it is. And they are not going to police a game, ever. So this reinforces the community perception that its OK.
...
It is most definitely a glitch, and it can most definitely be "exploited" to get the win. And it is used constantly in that fashion. Nobody really wants to lose their character because they violated the EULA, so there are rules outside of the games code that must be followed to an extent. Assuming, of course, CCP is actually willing to step in and do the job they are supposed to be doing.
If not, then it is entirely acceptable for us to exploit it back.
The ball is in your court on that one, CCP.
TL;DR: You know its wrong. Do the right thing before the community turns to absolute crap.
The long version: You seem to be arguing both sides here or I'm not reading enough into it. Either way, I'll put my opinion out there on your points because they are important.
A glitch is a defect that allows for actions unintended by the developer. To exploit that glitch is cheating. You are taking advantage of that defect inside the find-fix-deploy cycle of the developer to your advantage.
A portion of the community may exploit that defect because it gives them an advantage. It makes them feel special. To say it's not being policed by the developer therefore it's OK is justifying it for yourself. If you mugged someone on the street and took their wallet and the police didn't see it happen is it still a crime? Yes. The criminal exploited the fact that the police can't be everywhere and see everything to break and law and someone else paid the price.
If a game sinks into a pit of exploits and cheating then I don't want to be a part of that community and I'll find some other activity to spend my time and money on. To keep a community healthy its in the best interest of the players to police themselves. Corp leaders should do a leader's job and encourage their members to not exploit glitches. Prominent players, video bloggers, and forum heroes should voice their distain of exploiting glitches. Even better, when glitches are found they should be reported through channels that don't broadcast the glitch to everyone to give the developer a better chance to find, fix and deploy the fix before it ruins the game.
The good news is that the majority of this community does seem to distain exploits. I hope it stays that way. |
shaman oga
Nexus Balusa Horizon DARKSTAR ARMY
477
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 14:02:00 -
[115] - Quote
issues of semantics
|
Chances Ghost
Inf4m0us
504
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 14:04:00 -
[116] - Quote
shaman oga wrote:issues of semantics
no its not
its an issue of people not having the common sence to look words up in a dictionary to define their meaning and instead they keep making their own up
then they argue about their own imaginary definitions as if theirs is the correct one when really they are arguing different topics entirely because nobodys using the actual meanings of the words
i blame poor education |
Seymor Krelborn
DUST University Ivy League
614
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 14:07:00 -
[117] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:im only giving my opinion, as are you, lets not forget that cheating would be... imo... somehow altering the code of the game, bots for instance, or stealing someones account info and transferring all their isk to your account. game glitches/bugs/exploits are not fun and can be game breaking, but it is technically within the confines of the games mechanics, intentional or not... really CCP makes that call and changes it/ fixes it when needed. glitches ARNT within the confines of game mechanics they are using errors in code aka altering the code of the game recreating a glitch is literally a process of creating errors well I can see your very passionate about this... as I stated earlier im in a corp that frowns upon the use of exploits and reports them, I also don't use them. I think they cheapen the game, I don't think it does anyone any good, including the exploiter... I also don't think it qualifies as cheating, more akin to poor sportsmanship. we agree on the fact that exploits are bad... we just don't agree on the terminology to classify them... and that's ok you cant really redefine what a word means... thats what dictionaries are for to you it seems its impossable to cheat in an online game outside of breaking the law..... yes, at least half the things you mentioned as cheating are in fact felonies so do you have a middle ground where theres a level of cheating that isnt crime?
it seems unless I agree with you completely im wrong....I didn't try to redefine the word cheating... im adding my opinion to what I think constitutes cheating in dust... ive already given you my parameters on this, if I gave you 10 more examples you would give me 10 more reasons why im wrong... like I said you are entitled to your opinion, I respect it, I just disagree.
|
Reav Hannari
Red Rock Outriders
1027
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 14:08:00 -
[118] - Quote
shaman oga wrote:issues of semantics
Let's see where semantics might come in:
cheating: act dishonestly or unfairly in order to gain an advantage, esp. in a game or examination
exploit: use (a situation or person) in an unfair or selfish way
glitch: a sudden, usually temporary malfunction or irregularity of equipment
Seems pretty straight forward to me. |
Chances Ghost
Inf4m0us
505
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 14:10:00 -
[119] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:im only giving my opinion, as are you, lets not forget that cheating would be... imo... somehow altering the code of the game, bots for instance, or stealing someones account info and transferring all their isk to your account. game glitches/bugs/exploits are not fun and can be game breaking, but it is technically within the confines of the games mechanics, intentional or not... really CCP makes that call and changes it/ fixes it when needed. glitches ARNT within the confines of game mechanics they are using errors in code aka altering the code of the game recreating a glitch is literally a process of creating errors well I can see your very passionate about this... as I stated earlier im in a corp that frowns upon the use of exploits and reports them, I also don't use them. I think they cheapen the game, I don't think it does anyone any good, including the exploiter... I also don't think it qualifies as cheating, more akin to poor sportsmanship. we agree on the fact that exploits are bad... we just don't agree on the terminology to classify them... and that's ok you cant really redefine what a word means... thats what dictionaries are for to you it seems its impossable to cheat in an online game outside of breaking the law..... yes, at least half the things you mentioned as cheating are in fact felonies so do you have a middle ground where theres a level of cheating that isnt crime? it seems unless I agree with you completely im wrong....I didn't try to redefine the word cheating... im adding my opinion to what I think constitutes cheating in dust... ive already given you my parameters on this, if I gave you 10 more examples you would give me 10 more reasons why im wrong... like I said you are entitled to your opinion, I respect it, I just disagree.
your actually correct
you will always be wrong because you cant actually have an opinion about the definition of a word...
thats why there are definitions in the first place... so they have a consistant meaning in order to convey complex ideas
hence why making up your own definitions tends to cause people to looka t you funny and tell you your wrong |
Chances Ghost
Inf4m0us
505
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 14:14:00 -
[120] - Quote
Reav Hannari wrote:shaman oga wrote:issues of semantics
Let's see where semantics might come in: cheating: act dishonestly or unfairly in order to gain an advantage, esp. in a game or examination exploit: use (a situation or person) in an unfair or selfish way glitch: a sudden, usually temporary malfunction or irregularity of equipment Seems pretty straight forward to me.
thank god your here
so lets put this to rest
an exploit in this circumstance is the use of a a sudden, usually temporary malfunction or irregularity of equipment used in an unfair or selfish way to unfairly in order to gain an advantage
thats cheating in this context...
so the question isnt weather melee glitch is cheating but weather that ******* sentance describes the mele glitch
wich it does
and so BY DEFINITION its cheating |
|
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
918
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 14:18:00 -
[121] - Quote
HowDidThatTaste wrote:Well im pretty sure using a LAV to run people over is glitch as well. mainly because even ccp has posted patch notes to the effect that they are changing it. so to continue to use it would fall under your definition of cheating? Probably the dumbest thing you've ever posted Taste. I'm ashamed to know you're defending melee glitching in PC matches. Thought you better then that. |
Chances Ghost
Inf4m0us
507
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 14:28:00 -
[122] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:HowDidThatTaste wrote:Well im pretty sure using a LAV to run people over is glitch as well. mainly because even ccp has posted patch notes to the effect that they are changing it. so to continue to use it would fall under your definition of cheating? Probably the dumbest thing you've ever posted Taste. I'm ashamed to know you're defending melee glitching in PC matches. Thought you better then that.
worst part is that it isnt a glitch... it was programmed that way on purpose |
Seymor Krelborn
DUST University Ivy League
615
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 14:32:00 -
[123] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:[quote=Seymor Krelborn] well I can see your very passionate about this... as I stated earlier im in a corp that frowns upon the use of exploits and reports them, I also don't use them. I think they cheapen the game, I don't think it does anyone any good, including the exploiter... I also don't think it qualifies as cheating, more akin to poor sportsmanship. we agree on the fact that exploits are bad... we just don't agree on the terminology to classify them... and that's ok you cant really redefine what a word means... thats what dictionaries are for to you it seems its impossable to cheat in an online game outside of breaking the law..... yes, at least half the things you mentioned as cheating are in fact felonies so do you have a middle ground where theres a level of cheating that isnt crime? it seems unless I agree with you completely im wrong....I didn't try to redefine the word cheating... im adding my opinion to what I think constitutes cheating in dust... ive already given you my parameters on this, if I gave you 10 more examples you would give me 10 more reasons why im wrong... like I said you are entitled to your opinion, I respect it, I just disagree. your actually correct you will always be wrong because you cant actually have an opinion about the definition of a word... thats why there are definitions in the first place... so they have a consistant meaning in order to convey complex ideas hence why making up your own definitions tends to cause people to looka t you funny and tell you your wrong
lol disagreeing with me by agreeing with me... your troll parents raised a fine troll
I realize now you don't actually have an opinion, youre just trying to sustain yourself with troll tear jelly.
I now find you amusing... bravo! |
Chances Ghost
Inf4m0us
507
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 14:37:00 -
[124] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:lol disagreeing with me by agreeing with me... your troll parents raised a fine troll I realize now you don't actually have an opinion, youre just trying to sustain yourself with troll tear jelly. I now find you amusing... bravo!
i was saying yes, unless you compeltly agree with me then your wrong...
because thats how definitions work
i can say its my opinion that an orange is large, green and has a red center then walk around in topics about oranges with my new "opinions" on "oranges" everyone would look at me like im a complete idiot and try to tell me what an orange really is
thats whats happening here... it doesnt matter what your opinion on what an orange is because its a ******* orange not a watermelon so stop walking aroudn calling watermelons oranges and expecting people to respect your new definition |
Seymor Krelborn
DUST University Ivy League
615
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 14:41:00 -
[125] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:lol disagreeing with me by agreeing with me... your troll parents raised a fine troll I realize now you don't actually have an opinion, youre just trying to sustain yourself with troll tear jelly. I now find you amusing... bravo! i was saying yes, unless you compeltly agree with me then your wrong... because thats how definitions work i can say its my opinion that an orange is large, green and has a red center then walk around in topics about oranges with my new "opinions" on "oranges" everyone would look at me like im a complete idiot and try to tell me what an orange really is thats whats happening here... it doesnt matter what your opinion on what an orange is because its a ******* orange not a watermelon so stop walking aroudn calling watermelons oranges and expecting people to respect your new definition
lol you are adorable... I like oranges |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
921
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 14:47:00 -
[126] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:lol disagreeing with me by agreeing with me... your troll parents raised a fine troll I realize now you don't actually have an opinion, youre just trying to sustain yourself with troll tear jelly. I now find you amusing... bravo! i was saying yes, unless you compeltly agree with me then your wrong... because thats how definitions work i can say its my opinion that an orange is large, green and has a red center then walk around in topics about oranges with my new "opinions" on "oranges" everyone would look at me like im a complete idiot and try to tell me what an orange really is thats whats happening here... it doesnt matter what your opinion on what an orange is because its a ******* orange not a watermelon so stop walking aroudn calling watermelons oranges and expecting people to respect your new definition lol you are adorable... I like oranges Can you stop your BS? You gave your 'opinion' and someone disagrees with it using a definition - so you call them a troll because of how he asserts it. Just move a long - you don't consider using not intended game mechanics cheating in PC. We got it. |
Seymor Krelborn
DUST University Ivy League
615
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 14:49:00 -
[127] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:lol disagreeing with me by agreeing with me... your troll parents raised a fine troll I realize now you don't actually have an opinion, youre just trying to sustain yourself with troll tear jelly. I now find you amusing... bravo! i was saying yes, unless you compeltly agree with me then your wrong... because thats how definitions work i can say its my opinion that an orange is large, green and has a red center then walk around in topics about oranges with my new "opinions" on "oranges" everyone would look at me like im a complete idiot and try to tell me what an orange really is thats whats happening here... it doesnt matter what your opinion on what an orange is because its a ******* orange not a watermelon so stop walking aroudn calling watermelons oranges and expecting people to respect your new definition lol you are adorable... I like oranges Can you stop your BS? You gave your 'opinion' and someone disagrees with it using a definition - so you call them a troll because of how he asserts it. Just move a long - you don't consider using not intended game mechanics cheating in PC. We got it.
didn't realize he needed a knight in shining armor... I was being civil, I stated my opinion and he turned into a troll... obviously because you agree with him you attack me... that's ok, ive seen how much trolling you do on these forums so youre just gonna have to deal with me. HTFU |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
922
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 14:56:00 -
[128] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:lol disagreeing with me by agreeing with me... your troll parents raised a fine troll I realize now you don't actually have an opinion, youre just trying to sustain yourself with troll tear jelly. I now find you amusing... bravo! i was saying yes, unless you compeltly agree with me then your wrong... because thats how definitions work i can say its my opinion that an orange is large, green and has a red center then walk around in topics about oranges with my new "opinions" on "oranges" everyone would look at me like im a complete idiot and try to tell me what an orange really is thats whats happening here... it doesnt matter what your opinion on what an orange is because its a ******* orange not a watermelon so stop walking aroudn calling watermelons oranges and expecting people to respect your new definition lol you are adorable... I like oranges Can you stop your BS? You gave your 'opinion' and someone disagrees with it using a definition - so you call them a troll because of how he asserts it. Just move a long - you don't consider using not intended game mechanics cheating in PC. We got it. didn't realize he needed a knight in shining armor... I was being civil, I stated my opinion and he turned into a troll... obviously because you agree with him you attack me... that's ok, ive seen how much trolling you do on these forums so youre just gonna have to deal with me. HTFU That's cute - he may of been a troll but at least he kept logical. The BS I'm asking you to stop are one lined insults that are out of subject just to defend your opinion. Keep on subject or stfu. If you feel you're right then you don't need to respond to every little thing - regardless if he's using definitions and you just opinions. |
Chances Ghost
Inf4m0us
511
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 15:09:00 -
[129] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote: That's cute - he may of been a troll but at least he kept logical. The BS I'm asking you to stop are one lined insults that are out of subject just to defend your opinion. Keep on subject or stfu. If you feel you're right then you don't need to respond to every little thing - regardless if he's using definitions and you just opinions.
the beutiful thing about facts is, it doesnt matter if you dont agree with them... they are still true |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
922
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 15:12:00 -
[130] - Quote
Anywho - I got what I was looking for. Over 15 people agree this is indeed cheating - the minority say it's not but still a frown-able act.
It's clear AE is abusing mechanics and defend it without any logic whatsoever other then, "But intended game mechanics are cheap enough - so what's the problem with glitching?"
So there you go Kujo - you're cheating to win PC matches. Pure and simple. |
|
GTA-V FTW
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
351
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 15:20:00 -
[131] - Quote
LOL at seven pages of bacon over broken stuff in a broken game. CCP sucks so who gives a fucks. Besides PC is a joke. |
THEDRiZZLE Aqua teen
KNIGHTZ OF THE ROUND
85
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 15:25:00 -
[132] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Lately I've been getting into it with Kujo because one of his members goes 20+ using the melee exploit. I argue this is cheating as it's a not intended feature used to win PC matches. He claims Exploiting is not cheating therefor, acceptable.
So I'm at a loss since we can't come to a conclusion. So I'm asking General Discussion. Is exploiting/glitching in PC considered cheating? I just want to finally lay this topic to rest and know more clearly which of us is right. Why do you think i left ancient exiles i dont like how kujo does it id rather work with midgrade corps then deal with thebs anymore its hellstorm 2.0 |
Rynoceros
Rise of Old Dudes
566
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 15:32:00 -
[133] - Quote
If they didn't want me to bounce that turtle off of that staircase on level 3-2, 2000x then they wouldn't have implemented that weird flag thing counting system. |
Seymor Krelborn
DUST University Ivy League
615
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 15:33:00 -
[134] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote: That's cute - he may of been a troll but at least he kept logical. The BS I'm asking you to stop are one lined insults that are out of subject just to defend your opinion. Keep on subject or stfu. If you feel you're right then you don't need to respond to every little thing - regardless if he's using definitions and you just opinions.
the beutiful thing about facts is, it doesnt matter if you dont agree with them... they are still true
Do you two wear each others underwear as well? |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
924
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 15:34:00 -
[135] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote: That's cute - he may of been a troll but at least he kept logical. The BS I'm asking you to stop are one lined insults that are out of subject just to defend your opinion. Keep on subject or stfu. If you feel you're right then you don't need to respond to every little thing - regardless if he's using definitions and you just opinions.
the beutiful thing about facts is, it doesnt matter if you dont agree with them... they are still true Do you two wear each others underwear as well? Are you still trying? I wasn't even trolling you - just telling you to get logical or stfu. Poor kids these days get offended so easily. I blame bad parenting - they're not willing to beat there kids. |
Skyhound Solbrave
Rough Riders..
200
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 15:56:00 -
[136] - Quote
Out of all honesty, who cares? It doesn't matter if it's cheating or not, he is still exploiting a glitch and CCP has policies against that.
Quote:a. Investigation shows that a player has employed the use of an exploit tactic despite a public announcement being made to alert players they will be banned for using it.
e. A player renders himself invulnerable through the use of a bug.
c. Is aware of an exploitable bug and fails to report it to Game Masters and/or distributes the information to other players.
If Kujo is teaching his corp mates how to do it or if CCP has or will say something about the exploit; he's sacked. Just record some proof that he's doing and send it in. I'm doing it for major corp members that do the invisibility glitch. |
Ludvig Enraga
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
413
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 16:03:00 -
[137] - Quote
I think it's not cheating. Most other PVP games - if someone gets a jump on you in CQC you are dead: melee, shotgun - does not matter. Seems fair that a guy should get his kills if he can close in onto players reliably for CQC.
No question, the mechanics are broken. However, if turbo controllers for TacAR were not a cheat, neither is this. |
Seymor Krelborn
DUST University Ivy League
615
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 16:05:00 -
[138] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote: That's cute - he may of been a troll but at least he kept logical. The BS I'm asking you to stop are one lined insults that are out of subject just to defend your opinion. Keep on subject or stfu. If you feel you're right then you don't need to respond to every little thing - regardless if he's using definitions and you just opinions.
the beutiful thing about facts is, it doesnt matter if you dont agree with them... they are still true Do you two wear each others underwear as well? Are you still trying? I wasn't even trolling you - just telling you to get logical or stfu. Poor kids these days get offended so easily. I blame bad parenting - they're not willing to beat there kids.
lol.. I don't have to try. the fact you feel the need to continue to respond to me tells me I have done, not tried. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
931
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 16:05:00 -
[139] - Quote
Ludvig Enraga wrote:I think it's not cheating. Most other PVP games - if someone gets a jump on you in CQC you are dead: melee, shotgun - does not matter. Seems fair that a guy should get his kills if he can close in onto players reliably for CQC.
No question, the mechanics are broken. However, if turbo controllers for TacAR were not a cheat, neither is this. Fair point - but melee is a known 'glitch' the turbo controller was not considered a glitch. It was something that that special controller enabled. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
931
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 16:07:00 -
[140] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote: That's cute - he may of been a troll but at least he kept logical. The BS I'm asking you to stop are one lined insults that are out of subject just to defend your opinion. Keep on subject or stfu. If you feel you're right then you don't need to respond to every little thing - regardless if he's using definitions and you just opinions.
the beutiful thing about facts is, it doesnt matter if you dont agree with them... they are still true Do you two wear each others underwear as well? Are you still trying? I wasn't even trolling you - just telling you to get logical or stfu. Poor kids these days get offended so easily. I blame bad parenting - they're not willing to beat there kids. lol.. I don't have to try. the fact you feel the need to continue to respond to me tells me I have done, not tried. Same logic works on you... |
|
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1811
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 16:09:00 -
[141] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Anywho - I got what I was looking for. Over 15 people agree this is indeed cheating - the minority say it's not but still a frown-able act.
It's clear AE is abusing mechanics and defend it without any logic whatsoever other then, "But intended game mechanics are cheap enough - so what's the problem with glitching?"
So there you go Kujo - you're cheating to win PC matches. Pure and simple.
Amen brotha, the sad part is they know they couldn't beat us without Arirana using this cheat. That's why they defend it so vehemently. |
TunRa
Gravity Prone EoN.
77
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 16:10:00 -
[142] - Quote
Skipper Jones wrote: Exactly.
Like the glitch on Line harvest where you can go inside the box at C. I see people (myself included) try to hide in that box to get some easy sneaky kills. That is cheating.
No. I only do that to **** off the enemy team and see how many of them I can get to surround the box trying to kill me |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers EoN.
1811
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 16:10:00 -
[143] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Ludvig Enraga wrote:I think it's not cheating. Most other PVP games - if someone gets a jump on you in CQC you are dead: melee, shotgun - does not matter. Seems fair that a guy should get his kills if he can close in onto players reliably for CQC.
No question, the mechanics are broken. However, if turbo controllers for TacAR were not a cheat, neither is this. Fair point - but melee is a known 'glitch' the turbo controller was not considered a glitch. It was something that that special controller enabled.
It wasnt a glitch but it was considered and exploit and cheating. Pretty sure it violated EULA too. |
TheAmazing FlyingPig
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
2942
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 16:10:00 -
[144] - Quote
Wtf was the gun called in Unreal... It was a melee gun that pumped the other guy with pressurized gas and blew them up.
Jackhammer? Can't remember. We need one though. |
Seymor Krelborn
DUST University Ivy League
615
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 16:11:00 -
[145] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:
the beutiful thing about facts is, it doesnt matter if you dont agree with them... they are still true
Do you two wear each others underwear as well? Are you still trying? I wasn't even trolling you - just telling you to get logical or stfu. Poor kids these days get offended so easily. I blame bad parenting - they're not willing to beat there kids. lol.. I don't have to try. the fact you feel the need to continue to respond to me tells me I have done, not tried. Same logic works on you...
I would have to disagree |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
931
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 16:12:00 -
[146] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:I would have to disagree Double standard on yourself, eh? Because I see you continue to respond also... |
Seymor Krelborn
DUST University Ivy League
616
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 16:23:00 -
[147] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:I would have to disagree Double standard on yourself, eh? Because I see you continue to respond also...
its because im lonely and have no real personal connections with anyone, and this relationship you and I have begun is something I really need in my life. |
Maximus Stryker
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
593
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 16:23:00 -
[148] - Quote
TL;DR the thread
Is Alldin using his LLAV to rep himself all over the map a glitch? An exploit? Cheating?
Was the backpack reload in HALO: Combat Evolved a glitch? An exploit? Cheating? Some considered this a necessary skill to be used regularly by the 'pros'. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
931
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 16:26:00 -
[149] - Quote
Maximus Stryker wrote:TL;DR the thread
Is Alldin using his LLAV to rep himself all over the map a glitch? An exploit? Cheating?
Was the backpack reload in HALO: Combat Evolved a glitch? An exploit? Cheating? Some considered this a necessary skill to be used regularly by the 'pros'. Now you're defending cheating in PC because CCP was dumb enough to allow in-seat repping? It's not like Aladin won matches for his side doing it - AE is with melee glitching.
Wait - you are Titus right? Lol I think I may have you confused with someone. |
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
3142
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 16:49:00 -
[150] - Quote
Exploiting is cheating, but it's apparently what all the "pros" do in PC. |
|
sammus420
Goonfeet Top Men.
303
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 16:53:00 -
[151] - Quote
There is no such thing as cheating in war, adapt or die. |
HowDidThatTaste
Ancient Exiles
3557
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 17:23:00 -
[152] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:HowDidThatTaste wrote:Well im pretty sure using a LAV to run people over is glitch as well. mainly because even ccp has posted patch notes to the effect that they are changing it. so to continue to use it would fall under your definition of cheating? Probably the dumbest thing you've ever posted Taste. I'm ashamed to know you're defending melee glitching in PC matches. Thought you better then that.
Well forum troll I'm not sure you actually read my post cause I said nothing about defending anyone I was offering information based on your logic if ccp considers something is bad for the game and decide to change it for example flaylocks, contact nades etc that these were not things ccp wants in the game. Using this logic we know there will be a change incoming to the lav so would that mean to continue to use it would be cheating?
I have never cared what others do I have been here since the very beginning and I understand that there is always something crazy going on and I choose the HTFU path. I don't come to the forums and cry my little heart out and accuse people of cheating- not my style Pop. However I also know you just want to stir the pot and this is your way of pulling people into your troll threads.
I'm glad you think this one post is dumb becasue you have thousands of posts I think are dumb- however I understand its your way of enjoying dust so I don't need to publicly judge you like you do others. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
941
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 17:32:00 -
[153] - Quote
HowDidThatTaste wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:HowDidThatTaste wrote:Well im pretty sure using a LAV to run people over is glitch as well. mainly because even ccp has posted patch notes to the effect that they are changing it. so to continue to use it would fall under your definition of cheating? Probably the dumbest thing you've ever posted Taste. I'm ashamed to know you're defending melee glitching in PC matches. Thought you better then that. Well forum troll I'm not sure you actually read my post cause I said nothing about defending anyone I was offering information based on your logic if ccp considers something is bad for the game and decide to change it for example flaylocks, contact nades etc that these were not things ccp wants in the game. Using this logic we know there will be a change incoming to the lav so would that mean to continue to use it would be cheating? I have never cared what others do I have been here since the very beginning and I understand that there is always something crazy going on and I choose the HTFU path. I don't come to the forums and cry my little heart out and accuse people of cheating- not my style Pop. However I also know you just want to stir the pot and this is your way of pulling people into your troll threads. I'm glad you think this one post is dumb becasue you have thousands of posts I think are dumb- however I understand its your way of enjoying dust so I don't need to publicly judge you like you do others. How considerate - you just forgot one thing. The point of the thread was to ask people if they consider this cheating or not. your 'information' suggests using LAV's is cheating if melee glitching is - is that not an obvious defense of abusing mechanics in PC?
Frankly - every single AE has side stepped the question completely and brought up something else instead to move away from the fact your corp is cheating to win PC.
Do you - or do you not condone the use of melee glitching in PC? |
Viktor Zokas
High-Damage
281
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 17:42:00 -
[154] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Lately I've been getting into it with Kujo because one of his members goes 20+ using the melee exploit. I argue this is cheating as it's a not intended feature used to win PC matches. He claims Exploiting is not cheating therefor, acceptable.
So I'm at a loss since we can't come to a conclusion. So I'm asking General Discussion. Is exploiting/glitching in PC considered cheating? I just want to finally lay this topic to rest and know more clearly which of us is right.
Cheating is having an unfair advantage over the other player.
Exploiting is using a mechanic that isn't suppose to be used in that way to your advantage, everyone can use it.
The real question you should ask 'can you be banned for either?'.
The answer to the question I made you ask is : Yes. Report him, get him banned. Or Blackmail him, then get him banned. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
941
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 17:48:00 -
[155] - Quote
There is now video proof AE has been using the melee glitch in tournament matches - SyN has already complained about it - and now there's evidence. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6H52yHy1Dk&feature=youtu.be |
Ivat Stark
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
2
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 17:50:00 -
[156] - Quote
It is cheating. But, does a cheater cares. |
HowDidThatTaste
Ancient Exiles
3557
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 17:51:00 -
[157] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:HowDidThatTaste wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:HowDidThatTaste wrote:Well im pretty sure using a LAV to run people over is glitch as well. mainly because even ccp has posted patch notes to the effect that they are changing it. so to continue to use it would fall under your definition of cheating? Probably the dumbest thing you've ever posted Taste. I'm ashamed to know you're defending melee glitching in PC matches. Thought you better then that. Well forum troll I'm not sure you actually read my post cause I said nothing about defending anyone I was offering information based on your logic if ccp considers something is bad for the game and decide to change it for example flaylocks, contact nades etc that these were not things ccp wants in the game. Using this logic we know there will be a change incoming to the lav so would that mean to continue to use it would be cheating? I have never cared what others do I have been here since the very beginning and I understand that there is always something crazy going on and I choose the HTFU path. I don't come to the forums and cry my little heart out and accuse people of cheating- not my style Pop. However I also know you just want to stir the pot and this is your way of pulling people into your troll threads. I'm glad you think this one post is dumb becasue you have thousands of posts I think are dumb- however I understand its your way of enjoying dust so I don't need to publicly judge you like you do others. How considerate - you just forgot one thing. The point of the thread was to ask people if they consider this cheating or not. your 'information' suggests using LAV's is cheating if melee glitching is - is that not an obvious defense of abusing mechanics in PC? Frankly - every single AE has side stepped the question completely and brought up something else instead to move away from the fact your corp is cheating to win PC. Do you - or do you not condone the use of melee glitching in PC?
Your making a supposition that is incorrect the real question is is melee glitching "cheating" and who makes that determination? You? if CCP determines its cheating then it most certainly should not be allowed. Have they made this statement anywhere?
Can everyone repeat this melee action? Except you the most unlikely moral police have deemed to call it cheating what happened to HTFU? if it bothers you so much skill into yourself. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
941
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 17:55:00 -
[158] - Quote
HowDidThatTaste wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:HowDidThatTaste wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:HowDidThatTaste wrote:Well im pretty sure using a LAV to run people over is glitch as well. mainly because even ccp has posted patch notes to the effect that they are changing it. so to continue to use it would fall under your definition of cheating? Probably the dumbest thing you've ever posted Taste. I'm ashamed to know you're defending melee glitching in PC matches. Thought you better then that. Well forum troll I'm not sure you actually read my post cause I said nothing about defending anyone I was offering information based on your logic if ccp considers something is bad for the game and decide to change it for example flaylocks, contact nades etc that these were not things ccp wants in the game. Using this logic we know there will be a change incoming to the lav so would that mean to continue to use it would be cheating? I have never cared what others do I have been here since the very beginning and I understand that there is always something crazy going on and I choose the HTFU path. I don't come to the forums and cry my little heart out and accuse people of cheating- not my style Pop. However I also know you just want to stir the pot and this is your way of pulling people into your troll threads. I'm glad you think this one post is dumb becasue you have thousands of posts I think are dumb- however I understand its your way of enjoying dust so I don't need to publicly judge you like you do others. How considerate - you just forgot one thing. The point of the thread was to ask people if they consider this cheating or not. your 'information' suggests using LAV's is cheating if melee glitching is - is that not an obvious defense of abusing mechanics in PC? Frankly - every single AE has side stepped the question completely and brought up something else instead to move away from the fact your corp is cheating to win PC. Do you - or do you not condone the use of melee glitching in PC? Your making a supposition that is incorrect the real question is is melee glitching "cheating" and who makes that determination? You? if CCP determines its cheating then it most certainly should not be allowed. Have they made this statement anywhere? Can everyone repeat this melee action? Except you the most unlikely moral police have deemed to call it cheating what happened to HTFU? if it bothers you so much skill into yourself. Only KB/M users can do it. And it's a weak statement to say no one gets to judge but CCP - they've already fixing it 1.5. But does it make it right to abuse a glitch to win PCs? You've still yet to answer the question. And using gear as intended isn't a 'glitch' like your claim with LAVs or MD' or flaylocks - they were intended. This is not. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
941
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 18:04:00 -
[159] - Quote
I think some of you need to understand something - this glitch is impossible to deal with in city. Taste can side-step because he doesn't deal with it every day when going up against AE - I have to. It's an instant one shot kill that I can do nothing about if I don't get a flux in. All I can do is dmg him enough and pray someone gets the assist - I'm doomed in each encounter. This isnt LLAV's that proto AV can handle, it's not MD that still takes at least 3 rounds to kill you, it's an instant OHK to a suit with more then 1300 health can't take Just for kicks I put on a suit with stacked armor mods - still insta kill. A shotgun isn't nearly as effective - and that's a heavy killer. This is a straight up glitch abused by AE To gain an advantage and go so far as to abuse it in tournament matches.
I didn't make this thread to get justice - I made it to better understand the communities opinion on the matter. and it's been made clear - it's cheating. |
Vrain Matari
ZionTCD
753
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 18:37:00 -
[160] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Lately I've been getting into it with Kujo because one of his members goes 20+ using the melee exploit. I argue this is cheating as it's a not intended feature used to win PC matches. He claims Exploiting is not cheating therefor, acceptable.
So I'm at a loss since we can't come to a conclusion. So I'm asking General Discussion. Is exploiting/glitching in PC considered cheating? I just want to finally lay this topic to rest and know more clearly which of us is right. I look at it this way: since we're still in beta, it all just part of the testing so that DUST will be ready for a public release. And reviews. ;) |
|
Maximus Stryker
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
593
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 12:55:00 -
[161] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Maximus Stryker wrote:TL;DR the thread
Is Alldin using his LLAV to rep himself all over the map a glitch? An exploit? Cheating?
Was the backpack reload in HALO: Combat Evolved a glitch? An exploit? Cheating? Some considered this a necessary skill to be used regularly by the 'pros'. Now you're defending cheating in PC because CCP was dumb enough to allow in-seat repping? It's not like Aladin won matches for his side doing it - AE is with melee glitching. Wait - you are Titus right? Lol I think I may have you confused with someone. I am not defending cheating nor do I think cheating should be allowed. Ever.
I am, however, simply providing a few other examples to help further the debate on whether or not exploiting in game mechanics that give someone an advantage is considered cheating. Are some exploits viewed as a skill while others are viewed as cheating?
|
NAV HIV
The Generals EoN.
367
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 13:49:00 -
[162] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Lately I've been getting into it with Kujo because one of his members goes 20+ using the melee exploit. I argue this is cheating as it's a not intended feature used to win PC matches. He claims Exploiting is not cheating therefor, acceptable.
So I'm at a loss since we can't come to a conclusion. So I'm asking General Discussion. Is exploiting/glitching in PC considered cheating? I just want to finally lay this topic to rest and know more clearly which of us is right.
Gotta say, Shameful |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
1250
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 13:56:00 -
[163] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Lately I've been getting into it with Kujo because one of his members goes 20+ using the melee exploit. I argue this is cheating as it's a not intended feature used to win PC matches. He claims Exploiting is not cheating therefor, acceptable.
So I'm at a loss since we can't come to a conclusion. So I'm asking General Discussion. Is exploiting/glitching in PC considered cheating? I just want to finally lay this topic to rest and know more clearly which of us is right.
Exploiting in-game mechanics demonstrates the need for those mechanics to be reworked. AFK farming or LLAV murder taxis are regular exploits.
However: exploiting a malfunction in mechanics, I.e. glitches, is cheating. The melee & invisibility exploits are cheating. |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
1251
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 14:01:00 -
[164] - Quote
sammus420 wrote:There is no such thing as cheating in war, adapt or die.
As fun as it might be to absorb ourselves with the drama of the meta game, this isn't war, it's a game. |
Sigberct Amni
Goonfeet Top Men.
92
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 14:15:00 -
[165] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:sammus420 wrote:There is no such thing as cheating in war, adapt or die. As fun as it might be to absorb ourselves with the drama of the meta game, this isn't war, it's a game. Right, and using that logic why are you so quick to get all morality about it? CHEATING is the huge buzzword in video games that people jump to when they want to convince others that something is 'bad' in the evil or wrong moral sense of the word.
It's a game. It has no analogues to real life morality and comparisons to such are stupid. Find a bug or an exploit, report it and move the **** on. Or make multiple threads about it on the forums I guess. |
Protected Void
STRONG-ARMED BANDITS
66
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 14:35:00 -
[166] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:HowDidThatTaste wrote:Well im pretty sure using a LAV to run people over is glitch as well. mainly because even ccp has posted patch notes to the effect that they are changing it. so to continue to use it would fall under your definition of cheating? Probably the dumbest thing you've ever posted Taste. I'm ashamed to know you're defending melee glitching in PC matches. Thought you better then that. worst part is that it isnt a glitch... it was programmed that way on purpose
I might be imagining this, but I seem to recall having read that the extreme effectiveness of ramming people with LAVs is a glitch. Ie: they were programmed to do *some* damage, but a glitch makes the victim get stuck on the bumper of the car, dealing the crash damage many times over, extremely fast. |
Protected Void
STRONG-ARMED BANDITS
67
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 14:39:00 -
[167] - Quote
One more vote for the exploitation of the melee glitch being cheating from me. Also, it completely deprives anyone doing it of bragging rights. You may have won the match technically, but you've lost in every other sense. |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
1251
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 14:40:00 -
[168] - Quote
Sigberct Amni wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:sammus420 wrote:There is no such thing as cheating in war, adapt or die. As fun as it might be to absorb ourselves with the drama of the meta game, this isn't war, it's a game. Right, and using that logic why are you so quick to get all morality about it? CHEATING is the huge buzzword in video games that people jump to when they want to convince others that something is 'bad' in the evil or wrong moral sense of the word. It's a game. It has no analogues to real life morality and comparisons to such are stupid. Find a bug or an exploit, report it and move the **** on. Or make multiple threads about it on the forums I guess.
Games have no analogues to real life? Cheating is not a matter of morality?
What on earth are you taking about? The intention of this thread is to discuss the nature of a particular glitch/exploit/cheat. How can it be reported if there shouldn't be a discussion on whether or not there is something to be reported?
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
1076
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 14:42:00 -
[169] - Quote
Using proto AV against basic vehicles is cheating then in PC matches
|
Cy Clone1
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
242
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 14:49:00 -
[170] - Quote
unlike the most other glitches in the game, like invisible swarms, the melee and invisible character are controllable you don't have to do them. So yeah its as if you are cheating..... your cheating your corp, squad mates the other team, and...... your cheating yourself how will you ever know how bad you are if its masked by exploits, but we still will. Thanks |
|
Sigberct Amni
Goonfeet Top Men.
92
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 14:52:00 -
[171] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote: The intention of this thread is to discuss the nature of a particular glitch/exploit/cheat. How can it be reported if there shouldn't be a discussion on whether or not there is something to be reported?
Reread the title of the thread. If that isn't a statement about the morality of this glitch, then what is it? A question about whether or not to report it...? Really?
Are saying that you believe CCP still needs a report about the fact that this melee thing happens? Five threads in GD, 10 pages in this thread plus an unknown amount of emails sent to CCP isn't enough? |
Mortedeamor
Internal Rebellion
167
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 14:56:00 -
[172] - Quote
in competition like pc or a tourney knowingly using an exploit to win glitching whatever you want to call it is foul and i would consider it in cheating. in pubs not so much abusing specific op items and gear in dust because ccp mucked up is not cheating but repeatedly firing my swarm in invisible mode in a pc i would consider cheating. you will never see an invisible swarm from me anywhere but pubs. intentionally using exploits like that stains the name of that corp. if they cant beat tp with organized structured teamwork than its not a win. CHEATERS IN COMPETITION SUCH AS PC AND TOURNEY'S SHOULD BE BANNED |
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1037
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 14:58:00 -
[173] - Quote
gonna go with yes if it's not an intended game machanic so using it to your advantage is indeed cheating.
just like the old bugs such as putting REs in places that can't be distroyed or that bug where you could stay in the null cannon and not be killed , it's an unfair advantage.
also if it wan't we wouldn't call them exploits |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
1251
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 15:45:00 -
[174] - Quote
Sigberct Amni wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote: The intention of this thread is to discuss the nature of a particular glitch/exploit/cheat. How can it be reported if there shouldn't be a discussion on whether or not there is something to be reported?
Reread the title of the thread. If that isn't a statement about the morality of this glitch, then what is it? A question about whether or not to report it...? Really? Are saying that you believe CCP still needs a report about the fact that this melee thing happens? Five threads in GD, 10 pages in this thread plus an unknown amount of emails sent to CCP isn't enough?
If you don't think the conversation should be had, why contribute to it?
There are consequences to using these exploits, and whether those consequences come from CCP or the community depends largely upon conversations like this. You seem to be objecting to the fact that multiple people care enough about an aspect of the game to make a thread about it. I'm sorry they couldn't all meet beforehand and arrange to only make one thread to appease you. |
Zaria Min Deir
Ancient Exiles
97
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 16:57:00 -
[175] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Nocturnal Soul wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Nocturnal Soul wrote:Come on if the guy gets that close to you he deserves the kill Explain? Far as I know it's called CQC for a reason - you get close. And with shield tanking + speed mods with hit detection it shouldn't be hard at all to get close. The thing is its just not as game breaking as the invisible glitch you candidate survive if you spot him first. Far as I know invisible glitch isn't possible in PC - or no one has abused it. Is possible -- has been (ab)used. Gotta say, trying to take an objective with an invisible heavy guarding it was, interesting?
|
Ludvig Enraga
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
422
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 00:41:00 -
[176] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Ludvig Enraga wrote:I think it's not cheating. Most other PVP games - if someone gets a jump on you in CQC you are dead: melee, shotgun - does not matter. Seems fair that a guy should get his kills if he can close in onto players reliably for CQC.
No question, the mechanics are broken. However, if turbo controllers for TacAR were not a cheat, neither is this. Fair point - but melee is a known 'glitch' the turbo controller was not considered a glitch. It was something that that special controller enabled.
Sure it's a glitch and TAR turbo was not a glitch but both were an exploit. But it's not even the core of my point. Getting up close into someone's face to do melee still brings a lot of risk. A good melee optimized player should be able to kill with melee. If someone uses precious high slots for stims, they deserve the ability to kill in CQC. It's actually sad that melee specialists are an oximoron unless they are glitching because of high things were designed by CCP.
All these thougths are completely apart from whether or not this is a violation of CCP policy and deserves a penalty. It seems to me that this glitch still requires a lot of skill if it's successfully used against strong oponents. And there are a lot of 'legitimate' crotches in the game that, on the other hand, require no skill to be good. |
Marston VC
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
702
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 00:50:00 -
[177] - Quote
Nocturnal Soul wrote:Come on if the guy gets that close to you he deserves the kill
Cuz its that easy to hit a scout or an assault suit using kenetic mods right??? (especially with this game's stellar hit detection?). It might be a bit easier then you think bud...... |
Marston VC
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
702
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 00:55:00 -
[178] - Quote
Ludvig Enraga wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Ludvig Enraga wrote:I think it's not cheating. Most other PVP games - if someone gets a jump on you in CQC you are dead: melee, shotgun - does not matter. Seems fair that a guy should get his kills if he can close in onto players reliably for CQC.
No question, the mechanics are broken. However, if turbo controllers for TacAR were not a cheat, neither is this. Fair point - but melee is a known 'glitch' the turbo controller was not considered a glitch. It was something that that special controller enabled. Sure it's a glitch and TAR turbo was not a glitch but both were an exploit. But it's not even the core of my point. Getting up close into someone's face to do melee still brings a lot of risk. A good melee optimized player should be able to kill with melee. If someone uses precious high slots for stims, they deserve the ability to kill in CQC. It's actually sad that melee specialists are an oximoron unless they are glitching because of high things were designed by CCP. All these thougths are completely apart from whether or not this is a violation of CCP policy and deserves a penalty. It seems to me that this glitch still requires a lot of skill if it's successfully used against strong oponents. And there are a lot of 'legitimate' crotches in the game that, on the other hand, require no skill to be good.
Yeah..... I don't care how specced into you are, you can deal 600+ damage in just an instance, and it doesn't even have any real appeal to it..... Now lets say they introduced energized katanas into this game as a primary weapon or something. I think it would be bad ass to see somebody going beserk slashing around, cutting people in half (and more importantly, having set intervals of around a second between each hit). As it stands right now, this "melee" system involves somebody chest humping you with the butt of their gun so fast that it just ruptures the clones heart as fast as the person in question can hit the melee button. That's not "deserved" its an exploit. Deserved in my mind would be them using the nova knives! |
Michael Arck
sephiroth clones D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
656
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 00:56:00 -
[179] - Quote
If you played safety before, you would understand |
gargantuise aaron
Sanguine Knights
115
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 01:26:00 -
[180] - Quote
Its a glitch, it was unintended and due to an error in programing us allowed to happen, it should be punished 1st warning secobd 1 day ban then 2,4,8,16,32,64,128 etc but glitches like stacking are some what unavoidable considering to get a desired build you use certain modules that just don't work correctly Or invisible swarm forge may or may not be intentional considering its easy to use,and not using it means not using intended available distance
All in all if a glitch / exploit is avoidable without requiring you to go out of the way or its something you have to go out of your way to do it should gace punished use But if its unavoidable not punished |
|
gargantuise aaron
Sanguine Knights
115
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 01:30:00 -
[181] - Quote
But ibhave tried this once, mainly because I thought I was being troled and wantes to check, but yeah it takes minimal ability and even freebie suits can annihilate with it |
Leadfoot10
Molon Labe.
25
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 02:09:00 -
[182] - Quote
One word: cheating |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: [one page] |