Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
sammus420
Goonfeet Top Men.
303
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 16:53:00 -
[151] - Quote
There is no such thing as cheating in war, adapt or die. |
HowDidThatTaste
Ancient Exiles
3557
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 17:23:00 -
[152] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:HowDidThatTaste wrote:Well im pretty sure using a LAV to run people over is glitch as well. mainly because even ccp has posted patch notes to the effect that they are changing it. so to continue to use it would fall under your definition of cheating? Probably the dumbest thing you've ever posted Taste. I'm ashamed to know you're defending melee glitching in PC matches. Thought you better then that.
Well forum troll I'm not sure you actually read my post cause I said nothing about defending anyone I was offering information based on your logic if ccp considers something is bad for the game and decide to change it for example flaylocks, contact nades etc that these were not things ccp wants in the game. Using this logic we know there will be a change incoming to the lav so would that mean to continue to use it would be cheating?
I have never cared what others do I have been here since the very beginning and I understand that there is always something crazy going on and I choose the HTFU path. I don't come to the forums and cry my little heart out and accuse people of cheating- not my style Pop. However I also know you just want to stir the pot and this is your way of pulling people into your troll threads.
I'm glad you think this one post is dumb becasue you have thousands of posts I think are dumb- however I understand its your way of enjoying dust so I don't need to publicly judge you like you do others. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
941
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 17:32:00 -
[153] - Quote
HowDidThatTaste wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:HowDidThatTaste wrote:Well im pretty sure using a LAV to run people over is glitch as well. mainly because even ccp has posted patch notes to the effect that they are changing it. so to continue to use it would fall under your definition of cheating? Probably the dumbest thing you've ever posted Taste. I'm ashamed to know you're defending melee glitching in PC matches. Thought you better then that. Well forum troll I'm not sure you actually read my post cause I said nothing about defending anyone I was offering information based on your logic if ccp considers something is bad for the game and decide to change it for example flaylocks, contact nades etc that these were not things ccp wants in the game. Using this logic we know there will be a change incoming to the lav so would that mean to continue to use it would be cheating? I have never cared what others do I have been here since the very beginning and I understand that there is always something crazy going on and I choose the HTFU path. I don't come to the forums and cry my little heart out and accuse people of cheating- not my style Pop. However I also know you just want to stir the pot and this is your way of pulling people into your troll threads. I'm glad you think this one post is dumb becasue you have thousands of posts I think are dumb- however I understand its your way of enjoying dust so I don't need to publicly judge you like you do others. How considerate - you just forgot one thing. The point of the thread was to ask people if they consider this cheating or not. your 'information' suggests using LAV's is cheating if melee glitching is - is that not an obvious defense of abusing mechanics in PC?
Frankly - every single AE has side stepped the question completely and brought up something else instead to move away from the fact your corp is cheating to win PC.
Do you - or do you not condone the use of melee glitching in PC? |
Viktor Zokas
High-Damage
281
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 17:42:00 -
[154] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Lately I've been getting into it with Kujo because one of his members goes 20+ using the melee exploit. I argue this is cheating as it's a not intended feature used to win PC matches. He claims Exploiting is not cheating therefor, acceptable.
So I'm at a loss since we can't come to a conclusion. So I'm asking General Discussion. Is exploiting/glitching in PC considered cheating? I just want to finally lay this topic to rest and know more clearly which of us is right.
Cheating is having an unfair advantage over the other player.
Exploiting is using a mechanic that isn't suppose to be used in that way to your advantage, everyone can use it.
The real question you should ask 'can you be banned for either?'.
The answer to the question I made you ask is : Yes. Report him, get him banned. Or Blackmail him, then get him banned. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
941
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 17:48:00 -
[155] - Quote
There is now video proof AE has been using the melee glitch in tournament matches - SyN has already complained about it - and now there's evidence. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6H52yHy1Dk&feature=youtu.be |
Ivat Stark
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
2
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 17:50:00 -
[156] - Quote
It is cheating. But, does a cheater cares. |
HowDidThatTaste
Ancient Exiles
3557
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 17:51:00 -
[157] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:HowDidThatTaste wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:HowDidThatTaste wrote:Well im pretty sure using a LAV to run people over is glitch as well. mainly because even ccp has posted patch notes to the effect that they are changing it. so to continue to use it would fall under your definition of cheating? Probably the dumbest thing you've ever posted Taste. I'm ashamed to know you're defending melee glitching in PC matches. Thought you better then that. Well forum troll I'm not sure you actually read my post cause I said nothing about defending anyone I was offering information based on your logic if ccp considers something is bad for the game and decide to change it for example flaylocks, contact nades etc that these were not things ccp wants in the game. Using this logic we know there will be a change incoming to the lav so would that mean to continue to use it would be cheating? I have never cared what others do I have been here since the very beginning and I understand that there is always something crazy going on and I choose the HTFU path. I don't come to the forums and cry my little heart out and accuse people of cheating- not my style Pop. However I also know you just want to stir the pot and this is your way of pulling people into your troll threads. I'm glad you think this one post is dumb becasue you have thousands of posts I think are dumb- however I understand its your way of enjoying dust so I don't need to publicly judge you like you do others. How considerate - you just forgot one thing. The point of the thread was to ask people if they consider this cheating or not. your 'information' suggests using LAV's is cheating if melee glitching is - is that not an obvious defense of abusing mechanics in PC? Frankly - every single AE has side stepped the question completely and brought up something else instead to move away from the fact your corp is cheating to win PC. Do you - or do you not condone the use of melee glitching in PC?
Your making a supposition that is incorrect the real question is is melee glitching "cheating" and who makes that determination? You? if CCP determines its cheating then it most certainly should not be allowed. Have they made this statement anywhere?
Can everyone repeat this melee action? Except you the most unlikely moral police have deemed to call it cheating what happened to HTFU? if it bothers you so much skill into yourself. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
941
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 17:55:00 -
[158] - Quote
HowDidThatTaste wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:HowDidThatTaste wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:HowDidThatTaste wrote:Well im pretty sure using a LAV to run people over is glitch as well. mainly because even ccp has posted patch notes to the effect that they are changing it. so to continue to use it would fall under your definition of cheating? Probably the dumbest thing you've ever posted Taste. I'm ashamed to know you're defending melee glitching in PC matches. Thought you better then that. Well forum troll I'm not sure you actually read my post cause I said nothing about defending anyone I was offering information based on your logic if ccp considers something is bad for the game and decide to change it for example flaylocks, contact nades etc that these were not things ccp wants in the game. Using this logic we know there will be a change incoming to the lav so would that mean to continue to use it would be cheating? I have never cared what others do I have been here since the very beginning and I understand that there is always something crazy going on and I choose the HTFU path. I don't come to the forums and cry my little heart out and accuse people of cheating- not my style Pop. However I also know you just want to stir the pot and this is your way of pulling people into your troll threads. I'm glad you think this one post is dumb becasue you have thousands of posts I think are dumb- however I understand its your way of enjoying dust so I don't need to publicly judge you like you do others. How considerate - you just forgot one thing. The point of the thread was to ask people if they consider this cheating or not. your 'information' suggests using LAV's is cheating if melee glitching is - is that not an obvious defense of abusing mechanics in PC? Frankly - every single AE has side stepped the question completely and brought up something else instead to move away from the fact your corp is cheating to win PC. Do you - or do you not condone the use of melee glitching in PC? Your making a supposition that is incorrect the real question is is melee glitching "cheating" and who makes that determination? You? if CCP determines its cheating then it most certainly should not be allowed. Have they made this statement anywhere? Can everyone repeat this melee action? Except you the most unlikely moral police have deemed to call it cheating what happened to HTFU? if it bothers you so much skill into yourself. Only KB/M users can do it. And it's a weak statement to say no one gets to judge but CCP - they've already fixing it 1.5. But does it make it right to abuse a glitch to win PCs? You've still yet to answer the question. And using gear as intended isn't a 'glitch' like your claim with LAVs or MD' or flaylocks - they were intended. This is not. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
941
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 18:04:00 -
[159] - Quote
I think some of you need to understand something - this glitch is impossible to deal with in city. Taste can side-step because he doesn't deal with it every day when going up against AE - I have to. It's an instant one shot kill that I can do nothing about if I don't get a flux in. All I can do is dmg him enough and pray someone gets the assist - I'm doomed in each encounter. This isnt LLAV's that proto AV can handle, it's not MD that still takes at least 3 rounds to kill you, it's an instant OHK to a suit with more then 1300 health can't take Just for kicks I put on a suit with stacked armor mods - still insta kill. A shotgun isn't nearly as effective - and that's a heavy killer. This is a straight up glitch abused by AE To gain an advantage and go so far as to abuse it in tournament matches.
I didn't make this thread to get justice - I made it to better understand the communities opinion on the matter. and it's been made clear - it's cheating. |
Vrain Matari
ZionTCD
753
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 18:37:00 -
[160] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Lately I've been getting into it with Kujo because one of his members goes 20+ using the melee exploit. I argue this is cheating as it's a not intended feature used to win PC matches. He claims Exploiting is not cheating therefor, acceptable.
So I'm at a loss since we can't come to a conclusion. So I'm asking General Discussion. Is exploiting/glitching in PC considered cheating? I just want to finally lay this topic to rest and know more clearly which of us is right. I look at it this way: since we're still in beta, it all just part of the testing so that DUST will be ready for a public release. And reviews. ;) |
|
Maximus Stryker
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
593
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 12:55:00 -
[161] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Maximus Stryker wrote:TL;DR the thread
Is Alldin using his LLAV to rep himself all over the map a glitch? An exploit? Cheating?
Was the backpack reload in HALO: Combat Evolved a glitch? An exploit? Cheating? Some considered this a necessary skill to be used regularly by the 'pros'. Now you're defending cheating in PC because CCP was dumb enough to allow in-seat repping? It's not like Aladin won matches for his side doing it - AE is with melee glitching. Wait - you are Titus right? Lol I think I may have you confused with someone. I am not defending cheating nor do I think cheating should be allowed. Ever.
I am, however, simply providing a few other examples to help further the debate on whether or not exploiting in game mechanics that give someone an advantage is considered cheating. Are some exploits viewed as a skill while others are viewed as cheating?
|
NAV HIV
The Generals EoN.
367
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 13:49:00 -
[162] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Lately I've been getting into it with Kujo because one of his members goes 20+ using the melee exploit. I argue this is cheating as it's a not intended feature used to win PC matches. He claims Exploiting is not cheating therefor, acceptable.
So I'm at a loss since we can't come to a conclusion. So I'm asking General Discussion. Is exploiting/glitching in PC considered cheating? I just want to finally lay this topic to rest and know more clearly which of us is right.
Gotta say, Shameful |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
1250
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 13:56:00 -
[163] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Lately I've been getting into it with Kujo because one of his members goes 20+ using the melee exploit. I argue this is cheating as it's a not intended feature used to win PC matches. He claims Exploiting is not cheating therefor, acceptable.
So I'm at a loss since we can't come to a conclusion. So I'm asking General Discussion. Is exploiting/glitching in PC considered cheating? I just want to finally lay this topic to rest and know more clearly which of us is right.
Exploiting in-game mechanics demonstrates the need for those mechanics to be reworked. AFK farming or LLAV murder taxis are regular exploits.
However: exploiting a malfunction in mechanics, I.e. glitches, is cheating. The melee & invisibility exploits are cheating. |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
1251
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 14:01:00 -
[164] - Quote
sammus420 wrote:There is no such thing as cheating in war, adapt or die.
As fun as it might be to absorb ourselves with the drama of the meta game, this isn't war, it's a game. |
Sigberct Amni
Goonfeet Top Men.
92
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 14:15:00 -
[165] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:sammus420 wrote:There is no such thing as cheating in war, adapt or die. As fun as it might be to absorb ourselves with the drama of the meta game, this isn't war, it's a game. Right, and using that logic why are you so quick to get all morality about it? CHEATING is the huge buzzword in video games that people jump to when they want to convince others that something is 'bad' in the evil or wrong moral sense of the word.
It's a game. It has no analogues to real life morality and comparisons to such are stupid. Find a bug or an exploit, report it and move the **** on. Or make multiple threads about it on the forums I guess. |
Protected Void
STRONG-ARMED BANDITS
66
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 14:35:00 -
[166] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:HowDidThatTaste wrote:Well im pretty sure using a LAV to run people over is glitch as well. mainly because even ccp has posted patch notes to the effect that they are changing it. so to continue to use it would fall under your definition of cheating? Probably the dumbest thing you've ever posted Taste. I'm ashamed to know you're defending melee glitching in PC matches. Thought you better then that. worst part is that it isnt a glitch... it was programmed that way on purpose
I might be imagining this, but I seem to recall having read that the extreme effectiveness of ramming people with LAVs is a glitch. Ie: they were programmed to do *some* damage, but a glitch makes the victim get stuck on the bumper of the car, dealing the crash damage many times over, extremely fast. |
Protected Void
STRONG-ARMED BANDITS
67
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 14:39:00 -
[167] - Quote
One more vote for the exploitation of the melee glitch being cheating from me. Also, it completely deprives anyone doing it of bragging rights. You may have won the match technically, but you've lost in every other sense. |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
1251
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 14:40:00 -
[168] - Quote
Sigberct Amni wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:sammus420 wrote:There is no such thing as cheating in war, adapt or die. As fun as it might be to absorb ourselves with the drama of the meta game, this isn't war, it's a game. Right, and using that logic why are you so quick to get all morality about it? CHEATING is the huge buzzword in video games that people jump to when they want to convince others that something is 'bad' in the evil or wrong moral sense of the word. It's a game. It has no analogues to real life morality and comparisons to such are stupid. Find a bug or an exploit, report it and move the **** on. Or make multiple threads about it on the forums I guess.
Games have no analogues to real life? Cheating is not a matter of morality?
What on earth are you taking about? The intention of this thread is to discuss the nature of a particular glitch/exploit/cheat. How can it be reported if there shouldn't be a discussion on whether or not there is something to be reported?
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
1076
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 14:42:00 -
[169] - Quote
Using proto AV against basic vehicles is cheating then in PC matches
|
Cy Clone1
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
242
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 14:49:00 -
[170] - Quote
unlike the most other glitches in the game, like invisible swarms, the melee and invisible character are controllable you don't have to do them. So yeah its as if you are cheating..... your cheating your corp, squad mates the other team, and...... your cheating yourself how will you ever know how bad you are if its masked by exploits, but we still will. Thanks |
|
Sigberct Amni
Goonfeet Top Men.
92
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 14:52:00 -
[171] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote: The intention of this thread is to discuss the nature of a particular glitch/exploit/cheat. How can it be reported if there shouldn't be a discussion on whether or not there is something to be reported?
Reread the title of the thread. If that isn't a statement about the morality of this glitch, then what is it? A question about whether or not to report it...? Really?
Are saying that you believe CCP still needs a report about the fact that this melee thing happens? Five threads in GD, 10 pages in this thread plus an unknown amount of emails sent to CCP isn't enough? |
Mortedeamor
Internal Rebellion
167
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 14:56:00 -
[172] - Quote
in competition like pc or a tourney knowingly using an exploit to win glitching whatever you want to call it is foul and i would consider it in cheating. in pubs not so much abusing specific op items and gear in dust because ccp mucked up is not cheating but repeatedly firing my swarm in invisible mode in a pc i would consider cheating. you will never see an invisible swarm from me anywhere but pubs. intentionally using exploits like that stains the name of that corp. if they cant beat tp with organized structured teamwork than its not a win. CHEATERS IN COMPETITION SUCH AS PC AND TOURNEY'S SHOULD BE BANNED |
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1037
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 14:58:00 -
[173] - Quote
gonna go with yes if it's not an intended game machanic so using it to your advantage is indeed cheating.
just like the old bugs such as putting REs in places that can't be distroyed or that bug where you could stay in the null cannon and not be killed , it's an unfair advantage.
also if it wan't we wouldn't call them exploits |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
1251
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 15:45:00 -
[174] - Quote
Sigberct Amni wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote: The intention of this thread is to discuss the nature of a particular glitch/exploit/cheat. How can it be reported if there shouldn't be a discussion on whether or not there is something to be reported?
Reread the title of the thread. If that isn't a statement about the morality of this glitch, then what is it? A question about whether or not to report it...? Really? Are saying that you believe CCP still needs a report about the fact that this melee thing happens? Five threads in GD, 10 pages in this thread plus an unknown amount of emails sent to CCP isn't enough?
If you don't think the conversation should be had, why contribute to it?
There are consequences to using these exploits, and whether those consequences come from CCP or the community depends largely upon conversations like this. You seem to be objecting to the fact that multiple people care enough about an aspect of the game to make a thread about it. I'm sorry they couldn't all meet beforehand and arrange to only make one thread to appease you. |
Zaria Min Deir
Ancient Exiles
97
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 16:57:00 -
[175] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Nocturnal Soul wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Nocturnal Soul wrote:Come on if the guy gets that close to you he deserves the kill Explain? Far as I know it's called CQC for a reason - you get close. And with shield tanking + speed mods with hit detection it shouldn't be hard at all to get close. The thing is its just not as game breaking as the invisible glitch you candidate survive if you spot him first. Far as I know invisible glitch isn't possible in PC - or no one has abused it. Is possible -- has been (ab)used. Gotta say, trying to take an objective with an invisible heavy guarding it was, interesting?
|
Ludvig Enraga
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
422
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 00:41:00 -
[176] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Ludvig Enraga wrote:I think it's not cheating. Most other PVP games - if someone gets a jump on you in CQC you are dead: melee, shotgun - does not matter. Seems fair that a guy should get his kills if he can close in onto players reliably for CQC.
No question, the mechanics are broken. However, if turbo controllers for TacAR were not a cheat, neither is this. Fair point - but melee is a known 'glitch' the turbo controller was not considered a glitch. It was something that that special controller enabled.
Sure it's a glitch and TAR turbo was not a glitch but both were an exploit. But it's not even the core of my point. Getting up close into someone's face to do melee still brings a lot of risk. A good melee optimized player should be able to kill with melee. If someone uses precious high slots for stims, they deserve the ability to kill in CQC. It's actually sad that melee specialists are an oximoron unless they are glitching because of high things were designed by CCP.
All these thougths are completely apart from whether or not this is a violation of CCP policy and deserves a penalty. It seems to me that this glitch still requires a lot of skill if it's successfully used against strong oponents. And there are a lot of 'legitimate' crotches in the game that, on the other hand, require no skill to be good. |
Marston VC
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
702
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 00:50:00 -
[177] - Quote
Nocturnal Soul wrote:Come on if the guy gets that close to you he deserves the kill
Cuz its that easy to hit a scout or an assault suit using kenetic mods right??? (especially with this game's stellar hit detection?). It might be a bit easier then you think bud...... |
Marston VC
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
702
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 00:55:00 -
[178] - Quote
Ludvig Enraga wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Ludvig Enraga wrote:I think it's not cheating. Most other PVP games - if someone gets a jump on you in CQC you are dead: melee, shotgun - does not matter. Seems fair that a guy should get his kills if he can close in onto players reliably for CQC.
No question, the mechanics are broken. However, if turbo controllers for TacAR were not a cheat, neither is this. Fair point - but melee is a known 'glitch' the turbo controller was not considered a glitch. It was something that that special controller enabled. Sure it's a glitch and TAR turbo was not a glitch but both were an exploit. But it's not even the core of my point. Getting up close into someone's face to do melee still brings a lot of risk. A good melee optimized player should be able to kill with melee. If someone uses precious high slots for stims, they deserve the ability to kill in CQC. It's actually sad that melee specialists are an oximoron unless they are glitching because of high things were designed by CCP. All these thougths are completely apart from whether or not this is a violation of CCP policy and deserves a penalty. It seems to me that this glitch still requires a lot of skill if it's successfully used against strong oponents. And there are a lot of 'legitimate' crotches in the game that, on the other hand, require no skill to be good.
Yeah..... I don't care how specced into you are, you can deal 600+ damage in just an instance, and it doesn't even have any real appeal to it..... Now lets say they introduced energized katanas into this game as a primary weapon or something. I think it would be bad ass to see somebody going beserk slashing around, cutting people in half (and more importantly, having set intervals of around a second between each hit). As it stands right now, this "melee" system involves somebody chest humping you with the butt of their gun so fast that it just ruptures the clones heart as fast as the person in question can hit the melee button. That's not "deserved" its an exploit. Deserved in my mind would be them using the nova knives! |
Michael Arck
sephiroth clones D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
656
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 00:56:00 -
[179] - Quote
If you played safety before, you would understand |
gargantuise aaron
Sanguine Knights
115
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 01:26:00 -
[180] - Quote
Its a glitch, it was unintended and due to an error in programing us allowed to happen, it should be punished 1st warning secobd 1 day ban then 2,4,8,16,32,64,128 etc but glitches like stacking are some what unavoidable considering to get a desired build you use certain modules that just don't work correctly Or invisible swarm forge may or may not be intentional considering its easy to use,and not using it means not using intended available distance
All in all if a glitch / exploit is avoidable without requiring you to go out of the way or its something you have to go out of your way to do it should gace punished use But if its unavoidable not punished |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |