|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
903
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:14:00 -
[1] - Quote
Lately I've been getting into it with Kujo because one of his members goes 20+ using the melee exploit. I argue this is cheating as it's a not intended feature used to win PC matches. He claims Exploiting is not cheating therefor, acceptable.
So I'm at a loss since we can't come to a conclusion. So I'm asking General Discussion. Is exploiting/glitching in PC considered cheating? I just want to finally lay this topic to rest and know more clearly which of us is right. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
903
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:28:00 -
[2] - Quote
Nocturnal Soul wrote:Come on if the guy gets that close to you he deserves the kill Explain? Far as I know it's called CQC for a reason - you get close. And with shield tanking + speed mods with hit detection it shouldn't be hard at all to get close. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
903
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:33:00 -
[3] - Quote
Just to clarify on hooc's post:
DJINN Kujo wrote: This is simply an 'exploit', it's an in game mechanic that you utilize a repetition of the same actions to get the exact response out of it. So in turn it's an exploit, not a glitch. Just being honest. :)
AE's CEO has already called this an exploit.
And it's true there's many exploits - but how many of them are used in PC?
It seems AE is clearly cheating and won't admit to it. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
903
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:35:00 -
[4] - Quote
Kira Lannister wrote:I know it's like if your getting meleed to death its like what scrubbery is occurring if you let someone get that close to you?
The best part the qq crowd has to say is "well when they sneak up on a heavy it is an insta gank!"
The words are funny coming from an assault player crying about the glitch. GOTTA GET GOOD PEEPS! I'm trying to understand this logic. So, Close Quarter Combat... isn't close? There's no corners in city? There's no way possible to get up on someone? Even if they shield tank with speed mods? |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
903
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:37:00 -
[5] - Quote
Nocturnal Soul wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Nocturnal Soul wrote:Come on if the guy gets that close to you he deserves the kill Explain? Far as I know it's called CQC for a reason - you get close. And with shield tanking + speed mods with hit detection it shouldn't be hard at all to get close. The thing is its just not as game breaking as the invisible glitch you candidate survive if you spot him first. Far as I know invisible glitch isn't possible in PC - or no one has abused it. AE is clearing abusing an exploit. Is that not cheating? That's all I'm asking.
|
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
903
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:39:00 -
[6] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:a glitch is something that happens in the code that produces a result that wazsnt intended
an exploit is when someone takes a glitch and recreates it to gain an advantage
learn the definitions in this context people
and exploit IS a glitch, its just what you call a glitch thats being used to gain an advantage... Thanks for the clarification. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
903
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:42:00 -
[7] - Quote
Chances Ghost wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:a glitch is something that happens in the code that produces a result that wazsnt intended
an exploit is when someone takes a glitch and recreates it to gain an advantage
learn the definitions in this context people
and exploit IS a glitch, its just what you call a glitch thats being used to gain an advantage... Thanks for the clarification. and so a glitch isnt cheating, it wasnt done on purpose and it wasnt done for an advantage an exploit however was done expressly to cheat Thanks again - Kujo has already admitted this is an exploit he's allowing to happen to help win PC matches and doesn't believe it to be cheating. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
903
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:43:00 -
[8] - Quote
hooc order wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Just to clarify on hooc's post: DJINN Kujo wrote: This is simply an 'exploit', it's an in game mechanic that you utilize a repetition of the same actions to get the exact response out of it. So in turn it's an exploit, not a glitch. Just being honest. :)
AE's CEO has already called this an exploit. And it's true there's many exploits - but how many of them are used in PC? It seems AE is clearly cheating and won't admit to it. AE does not get to choose if it is an exploit or not. CCP does. We know for a fact that CCP does now know what they are doing. A reasonable person might see it and think. "Oh yeah CCP screwed up or did not think about it." But how does anyone know they did not think about or that they did screw up. For all we know they thought. "yeah we want super fast melee attacks and we do it by using sprint to clear the attack" For all we know it is working as CCP intended. Then why are there shotguns? |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
903
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 05:52:00 -
[9] - Quote
Surt gods end wrote:FPS has it's shares of glitches and exploit abusers, always has. (and just flat out cheaters) But coming out to use any of these on some FPS games well.... Haha. you think hate mail in this game is the worse you will get?
*Some people take competitive FPS a little too serious*
Yeah. Tho they are the ones that smear the game more then the cheaters.
Anyway, this has been going on since beta. nothing new. K/D doesn't matter here. So all the crazy stuff that leaks in RL in other FPS games doesn't happen here. uh, sure. But this isn't much on my topic. Is glitching/exploiting in PC cheating? |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
904
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 06:03:00 -
[10] - Quote
Surt gods end wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Surt gods end wrote:FPS has it's shares of glitches and exploit abusers, always has. (and just flat out cheaters) But coming out to use any of these on some FPS games well.... Haha. you think hate mail in this game is the worse you will get?
*Some people take competitive FPS a little too serious*
Yeah. Tho they are the ones that smear the game more then the cheaters.
Anyway, this has been going on since beta. nothing new. K/D doesn't matter here. So all the crazy stuff that leaks in RL in other FPS games doesn't happen here. uh, sure. But this isn't much on my topic. Is glitching/exploiting in PC cheating? In dust? it ain't cheating. its exploiting. which is a **** thing to do, but not cheating. Explain how it's not cheating? |
|
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
904
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 06:09:00 -
[11] - Quote
Kira Lannister wrote:Takes skill to melee someone dood. If it was cheating every tom di ck and harry would be doing it. Honestly if your getting sucker punched you need to get good and stop crying because they would shotty you to death any way.
I really doubt he'd do half as well with a shotty - your own shottys prove that.
And what skill? Do you not know how this glitch works? You can literally walk around spamming melee 100 hits a second and kill anything that comes close without fear of missing. Just takes a KB/M so not everyone can replicate it. But does that make it less of an exploit? And is exploiting cheating?
You've yet to answer the question. All you're saying is, 'get good' |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
904
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 06:12:00 -
[12] - Quote
Surt gods end wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Surt gods end wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Surt gods end wrote:FPS has it's shares of glitches and exploit abusers, always has. (and just flat out cheaters) But coming out to use any of these on some FPS games well.... Haha. you think hate mail in this game is the worse you will get?
*Some people take competitive FPS a little too serious*
Yeah. Tho they are the ones that smear the game more then the cheaters.
Anyway, this has been going on since beta. nothing new. K/D doesn't matter here. So all the crazy stuff that leaks in RL in other FPS games doesn't happen here. uh, sure. But this isn't much on my topic. Is glitching/exploiting in PC cheating? In dust? it ain't cheating. its exploiting. which is a **** thing to do, but not cheating. Explain how it's not cheating? Because if exploiting is cheating.. then everyone would be cheating. CCP still can't code this game worth it's damn. from closed beta to now. can you count all the exploits? I can't. too many. and still new ones that are gonna pop up. cheating makes it so there is no counter. exploits can still be evaded or countered. One gives you an edge. the other is close to game breaking in how you almost can go with out dying. LAG SWITCH? cheating. Do you remember when the warriors used to rep MCC to get easy WP and SP? People called that exploiting. Sniper glitch - exploiting. So I know what you're getting at. But were these things abused in PC to gain an advantage? And if a corp is knowingly doing so to win PC matches. - is it cheating? |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
904
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 06:13:00 -
[13] - Quote
Kira Lannister wrote:GET GOOD *RIPS OFF SHIRT*
Im sorry my amarrian brother. Lets pray this cheater gets the whipping he deserves. lol not sure if sarcasm. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
906
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 06:55:00 -
[14] - Quote
Surt gods end wrote:You tube was always the source for exploiting and glitching and flat out cheating. kids couldn't help but post their **** there. lol
anyway, last time I checked PC was objective battles. Is it really the exploit thats giving them an edge to win, or them winning cause of exploit? The army with the higher ground holds an edge in the battle field. also the army with the most archers. or the one guy in the army carrying a gun to sword battle.
They all give an edge, but don't guarantee a win. Are you saying objectives are on the high ground? Because melee glitch pretty much can insta stop all hacks - even more so if you make a suit centered around the glitch itself with increased speed. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
906
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 06:56:00 -
[15] - Quote
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Lately I've been getting into it with Kujo because one of his members goes 20+ using the melee exploit. I argue this is cheating as it's a not intended feature used to win PC matches. He claims Exploiting is not cheating therefor, acceptable.
So I'm at a loss since we can't come to a conclusion. So I'm asking General Discussion. Is exploiting/glitching in PC considered cheating? I just want to finally lay this topic to rest and know more clearly which of us is right. It comes down to two things. Community perception, and developer perception. In fighting games, the use of all glitches is considered fair play, even if the glitch gives an overwhelming advantage. This is because fighting games move so fast that the use of glitches can't really be actively policed. Also because it's bred into the community mentality. When you go into an arcade and put your quarter in and someone uses a bunch of glitches to beat you, what are you going to do about it? Not a damn thing, that's what. the game doesn't care, your quarter is gone. The guy running the arcade likely doesn't give a **** either, to him the game is the game. The only exceptions to this are absolutely game-breaking glitches that stall the match out, and even then, it's up for debate depending on the tournament organizer. All-in-all, this creates a community perception that glitches are fine, and anyone who cries "exploit" is just acting like a little girl who doesn't have what it takes to win. On the developer end, very few developers regularly update their fighting game. This has changed recently, but there is usually a cutoff point where people just have to deal with the game as it is. And they are not going to police a game, ever. So this reinforces the community perception that its OK. In FPS games, we do not come from an arcade background. This gives us license to ***** and complain like 12 year old girls a lot more. We also have had the liberty of player-run servers for a long time and the ability to kick individuals who **** us off by doing **** we feel degrades the competitive experience. This has created a community perception that glitches are exploits, and should be dealt with because it is in our power to do so. On the developer end of the spectrum, the game is classified as an MMO so it is going to get constant attention from the developers. They make it a point to police the game to an extent, and it is expected that they do so in exchange for the business many of us bring them. There are constantly new bugs and glitches cropping up in every update, so its unavoidable that some are used even if its accidental. The severity of the use is what is open to interpretation. It is most definitely a glitch, and it can most definitely be "exploited" to get the win. And it is used constantly in that fashion. Nobody really wants to lose their character because they violated the EULA, so there are rules outside of the games code that must be followed to an extent. Assuming, of course, CCP is actually willing to step in and do the job they are supposed to be doing. If not, then it is entirely acceptable for us to exploit it back. The ball is in your court on that one, CCP. So do you believe the use of exploits/glitches is considered cheating or not? Do you condone like AE the use of such exploitations in PC? |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
906
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:03:00 -
[16] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Lately I've been getting into it with Kujo because one of his members goes 20+ using the melee exploit. I argue this is cheating as it's a not intended feature used to win PC matches. He claims Exploiting is not cheating therefor, acceptable.
So I'm at a loss since we can't come to a conclusion. So I'm asking General Discussion. Is exploiting/glitching in PC considered cheating? I just want to finally lay this topic to rest and know more clearly which of us is right. A baseball player takes roids and gets homerun record its only cheating if he gets caught..perfomance enhancing drugs are banned yet people still take them and don't get caught..would I do it? Hell yeah the best athletes do it so you have to aswell to compete Since AE got caught and there's even a video of it on the war room - does that mean you agree AE is cheating? |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
906
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:04:00 -
[17] - Quote
JL3Eleven wrote:Would MD's not be an effective counter? Are you saying everyone should use an MD? lol |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
907
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:15:00 -
[18] - Quote
Wait - it's CCP's fault YOU guys exploit? It's a choice - you chose to cheat. How is it any simpler then that? I understand peoples want to troll pubs - but it's PC. It's suppose to be competitive matches between two teams skill. AE has been degrading to whoever exploits best. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
908
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:22:00 -
[19] - Quote
JL3Eleven wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:Would MD's not be an effective counter? Are you saying everyone should use an MD? lol I believe I asked if the MD was an effective counter. As I believe it would be. hint hint. There's no hint. A shield stack suit would take 3-4 shots 2 at the least. That's plenty of time for the AE exploiter to zone in on you and kill you.
There is no real counter to this other then do it yourself and hope your punches land first. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
908
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:37:00 -
[20] - Quote
Surt gods end wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Surt gods end wrote: My POV is that it's not. It comes with the fact that if your hacking I can OHK with any attack. (shotty. RE. smg. nade) Your hacking so it comes with that risk. Is that exploit more then when I place my RE in the objective to where it becomes invisible?
I've long been doing that. Am I cheating? or using a exploit? (blame yourselves ccp)
you can OHK with nades, SMG and shotguns? ... lol??? RE's are countered by flux. When someone runs through gunfire and hits you once, abusing an exploit built into the game that's not working as intended, it's cheating. Nades.. sometimes. but mostly on militia. Shotty? hells yeah! SMG? come on dude, ish and six sin on prof 5? tho i miss my cala. Thing is your hacking, so that lets me get close enough to smell what just ate. nothing at that range escapes. Re? I can be half a mile away. I'm a heavy - no shotgun with stacked dmg mods can one shot me. Oh - but melee glitch can! |
|
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
908
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:42:00 -
[21] - Quote
Kira Lannister wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Kira Lannister wrote:All these tears are making me hard. gotta admit, your trolling is better than your gungame Got punched in da eye dood? Here is a patch. Much betters! So does all this trolling mean you support AE cheating in PC? |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
908
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:45:00 -
[22] - Quote
Surt gods end wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Surt gods end wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Surt gods end wrote: My POV is that it's not. It comes with the fact that if your hacking I can OHK with any attack. (shotty. RE. smg. nade) Your hacking so it comes with that risk. Is that exploit more then when I place my RE in the objective to where it becomes invisible?
I've long been doing that. Am I cheating? or using a exploit? (blame yourselves ccp)
you can OHK with nades, SMG and shotguns? ... lol??? RE's are countered by flux. When someone runs through gunfire and hits you once, abusing an exploit built into the game that's not working as intended, it's cheating. Nades.. sometimes. but mostly on militia. Shotty? hells yeah! SMG? come on dude, ish and six sin on prof 5? tho i miss my cala. Thing is your hacking, so that lets me get close enough to smell what just ate. nothing at that range escapes. Re? I can be half a mile away. I'm a heavy - no shotgun with stacked dmg mods can one shot me. Oh - but melee glitch can! But without the glitch can his melee still OHK? I mean if your hacking and he melee you. I'll admit heavy can't be OHK. But neither can they escape my blasts. my militia shotty rips armor like it's nothing. and never mind the proto breach. I take that one out only when the Minnesota vikings are playing. (come on ponder!) The problem with your replys is your focusing on the fact someone is hacking then killed for it. With this glitch - you could be doing anything and you'll still be OHK by it. It's inevitable. It takes teamwork ... to kill a scout suit. Shotguns would never be so effective - and no explosive including MD's. There's nothing you've said that makes any logical sense why melee OHK at this incredible speed is okay. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
908
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:46:00 -
[23] - Quote
Kira Lannister wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Kira Lannister wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Kira Lannister wrote:All these tears are making me hard. gotta admit, your trolling is better than your gungame Got punched in da eye dood? Here is a patch. Much betters! So does all this trolling mean you support AE cheating in PC? What does AE mean? Ancient Exiles. Your corp, silly. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
909
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 07:53:00 -
[24] - Quote
Kira Lannister wrote:I need more wine. White wine. :[
*realizes the forum game is funner than the actual game* Ikr?
Shame you belong to a corp that cheats to win in PC. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
918
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 14:18:00 -
[25] - Quote
HowDidThatTaste wrote:Well im pretty sure using a LAV to run people over is glitch as well. mainly because even ccp has posted patch notes to the effect that they are changing it. so to continue to use it would fall under your definition of cheating? Probably the dumbest thing you've ever posted Taste. I'm ashamed to know you're defending melee glitching in PC matches. Thought you better then that. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
921
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 14:47:00 -
[26] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:lol disagreeing with me by agreeing with me... your troll parents raised a fine troll I realize now you don't actually have an opinion, youre just trying to sustain yourself with troll tear jelly. I now find you amusing... bravo! i was saying yes, unless you compeltly agree with me then your wrong... because thats how definitions work i can say its my opinion that an orange is large, green and has a red center then walk around in topics about oranges with my new "opinions" on "oranges" everyone would look at me like im a complete idiot and try to tell me what an orange really is thats whats happening here... it doesnt matter what your opinion on what an orange is because its a ******* orange not a watermelon so stop walking aroudn calling watermelons oranges and expecting people to respect your new definition lol you are adorable... I like oranges Can you stop your BS? You gave your 'opinion' and someone disagrees with it using a definition - so you call them a troll because of how he asserts it. Just move a long - you don't consider using not intended game mechanics cheating in PC. We got it. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
922
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 14:56:00 -
[27] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:lol disagreeing with me by agreeing with me... your troll parents raised a fine troll I realize now you don't actually have an opinion, youre just trying to sustain yourself with troll tear jelly. I now find you amusing... bravo! i was saying yes, unless you compeltly agree with me then your wrong... because thats how definitions work i can say its my opinion that an orange is large, green and has a red center then walk around in topics about oranges with my new "opinions" on "oranges" everyone would look at me like im a complete idiot and try to tell me what an orange really is thats whats happening here... it doesnt matter what your opinion on what an orange is because its a ******* orange not a watermelon so stop walking aroudn calling watermelons oranges and expecting people to respect your new definition lol you are adorable... I like oranges Can you stop your BS? You gave your 'opinion' and someone disagrees with it using a definition - so you call them a troll because of how he asserts it. Just move a long - you don't consider using not intended game mechanics cheating in PC. We got it. didn't realize he needed a knight in shining armor... I was being civil, I stated my opinion and he turned into a troll... obviously because you agree with him you attack me... that's ok, ive seen how much trolling you do on these forums so youre just gonna have to deal with me. HTFU That's cute - he may of been a troll but at least he kept logical. The BS I'm asking you to stop are one lined insults that are out of subject just to defend your opinion. Keep on subject or stfu. If you feel you're right then you don't need to respond to every little thing - regardless if he's using definitions and you just opinions. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
922
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 15:12:00 -
[28] - Quote
Anywho - I got what I was looking for. Over 15 people agree this is indeed cheating - the minority say it's not but still a frown-able act.
It's clear AE is abusing mechanics and defend it without any logic whatsoever other then, "But intended game mechanics are cheap enough - so what's the problem with glitching?"
So there you go Kujo - you're cheating to win PC matches. Pure and simple. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
924
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 15:34:00 -
[29] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote: That's cute - he may of been a troll but at least he kept logical. The BS I'm asking you to stop are one lined insults that are out of subject just to defend your opinion. Keep on subject or stfu. If you feel you're right then you don't need to respond to every little thing - regardless if he's using definitions and you just opinions.
the beutiful thing about facts is, it doesnt matter if you dont agree with them... they are still true Do you two wear each others underwear as well? Are you still trying? I wasn't even trolling you - just telling you to get logical or stfu. Poor kids these days get offended so easily. I blame bad parenting - they're not willing to beat there kids. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
931
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 16:05:00 -
[30] - Quote
Ludvig Enraga wrote:I think it's not cheating. Most other PVP games - if someone gets a jump on you in CQC you are dead: melee, shotgun - does not matter. Seems fair that a guy should get his kills if he can close in onto players reliably for CQC.
No question, the mechanics are broken. However, if turbo controllers for TacAR were not a cheat, neither is this. Fair point - but melee is a known 'glitch' the turbo controller was not considered a glitch. It was something that that special controller enabled. |
|
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
931
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 16:07:00 -
[31] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Seymor Krelborn wrote:Chances Ghost wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote: That's cute - he may of been a troll but at least he kept logical. The BS I'm asking you to stop are one lined insults that are out of subject just to defend your opinion. Keep on subject or stfu. If you feel you're right then you don't need to respond to every little thing - regardless if he's using definitions and you just opinions.
the beutiful thing about facts is, it doesnt matter if you dont agree with them... they are still true Do you two wear each others underwear as well? Are you still trying? I wasn't even trolling you - just telling you to get logical or stfu. Poor kids these days get offended so easily. I blame bad parenting - they're not willing to beat there kids. lol.. I don't have to try. the fact you feel the need to continue to respond to me tells me I have done, not tried. Same logic works on you... |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
931
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 16:12:00 -
[32] - Quote
Seymor Krelborn wrote:I would have to disagree Double standard on yourself, eh? Because I see you continue to respond also... |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
931
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 16:26:00 -
[33] - Quote
Maximus Stryker wrote:TL;DR the thread
Is Alldin using his LLAV to rep himself all over the map a glitch? An exploit? Cheating?
Was the backpack reload in HALO: Combat Evolved a glitch? An exploit? Cheating? Some considered this a necessary skill to be used regularly by the 'pros'. Now you're defending cheating in PC because CCP was dumb enough to allow in-seat repping? It's not like Aladin won matches for his side doing it - AE is with melee glitching.
Wait - you are Titus right? Lol I think I may have you confused with someone. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
941
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 17:32:00 -
[34] - Quote
HowDidThatTaste wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:HowDidThatTaste wrote:Well im pretty sure using a LAV to run people over is glitch as well. mainly because even ccp has posted patch notes to the effect that they are changing it. so to continue to use it would fall under your definition of cheating? Probably the dumbest thing you've ever posted Taste. I'm ashamed to know you're defending melee glitching in PC matches. Thought you better then that. Well forum troll I'm not sure you actually read my post cause I said nothing about defending anyone I was offering information based on your logic if ccp considers something is bad for the game and decide to change it for example flaylocks, contact nades etc that these were not things ccp wants in the game. Using this logic we know there will be a change incoming to the lav so would that mean to continue to use it would be cheating? I have never cared what others do I have been here since the very beginning and I understand that there is always something crazy going on and I choose the HTFU path. I don't come to the forums and cry my little heart out and accuse people of cheating- not my style Pop. However I also know you just want to stir the pot and this is your way of pulling people into your troll threads. I'm glad you think this one post is dumb becasue you have thousands of posts I think are dumb- however I understand its your way of enjoying dust so I don't need to publicly judge you like you do others. How considerate - you just forgot one thing. The point of the thread was to ask people if they consider this cheating or not. your 'information' suggests using LAV's is cheating if melee glitching is - is that not an obvious defense of abusing mechanics in PC?
Frankly - every single AE has side stepped the question completely and brought up something else instead to move away from the fact your corp is cheating to win PC.
Do you - or do you not condone the use of melee glitching in PC? |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
941
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 17:48:00 -
[35] - Quote
There is now video proof AE has been using the melee glitch in tournament matches - SyN has already complained about it - and now there's evidence. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6H52yHy1Dk&feature=youtu.be |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
941
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 17:55:00 -
[36] - Quote
HowDidThatTaste wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:HowDidThatTaste wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:HowDidThatTaste wrote:Well im pretty sure using a LAV to run people over is glitch as well. mainly because even ccp has posted patch notes to the effect that they are changing it. so to continue to use it would fall under your definition of cheating? Probably the dumbest thing you've ever posted Taste. I'm ashamed to know you're defending melee glitching in PC matches. Thought you better then that. Well forum troll I'm not sure you actually read my post cause I said nothing about defending anyone I was offering information based on your logic if ccp considers something is bad for the game and decide to change it for example flaylocks, contact nades etc that these were not things ccp wants in the game. Using this logic we know there will be a change incoming to the lav so would that mean to continue to use it would be cheating? I have never cared what others do I have been here since the very beginning and I understand that there is always something crazy going on and I choose the HTFU path. I don't come to the forums and cry my little heart out and accuse people of cheating- not my style Pop. However I also know you just want to stir the pot and this is your way of pulling people into your troll threads. I'm glad you think this one post is dumb becasue you have thousands of posts I think are dumb- however I understand its your way of enjoying dust so I don't need to publicly judge you like you do others. How considerate - you just forgot one thing. The point of the thread was to ask people if they consider this cheating or not. your 'information' suggests using LAV's is cheating if melee glitching is - is that not an obvious defense of abusing mechanics in PC? Frankly - every single AE has side stepped the question completely and brought up something else instead to move away from the fact your corp is cheating to win PC. Do you - or do you not condone the use of melee glitching in PC? Your making a supposition that is incorrect the real question is is melee glitching "cheating" and who makes that determination? You? if CCP determines its cheating then it most certainly should not be allowed. Have they made this statement anywhere? Can everyone repeat this melee action? Except you the most unlikely moral police have deemed to call it cheating what happened to HTFU? if it bothers you so much skill into yourself. Only KB/M users can do it. And it's a weak statement to say no one gets to judge but CCP - they've already fixing it 1.5. But does it make it right to abuse a glitch to win PCs? You've still yet to answer the question. And using gear as intended isn't a 'glitch' like your claim with LAVs or MD' or flaylocks - they were intended. This is not. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
941
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 18:04:00 -
[37] - Quote
I think some of you need to understand something - this glitch is impossible to deal with in city. Taste can side-step because he doesn't deal with it every day when going up against AE - I have to. It's an instant one shot kill that I can do nothing about if I don't get a flux in. All I can do is dmg him enough and pray someone gets the assist - I'm doomed in each encounter. This isnt LLAV's that proto AV can handle, it's not MD that still takes at least 3 rounds to kill you, it's an instant OHK to a suit with more then 1300 health can't take Just for kicks I put on a suit with stacked armor mods - still insta kill. A shotgun isn't nearly as effective - and that's a heavy killer. This is a straight up glitch abused by AE To gain an advantage and go so far as to abuse it in tournament matches.
I didn't make this thread to get justice - I made it to better understand the communities opinion on the matter. and it's been made clear - it's cheating. |
|
|
|