| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
961. Tiericide - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monty Mole Clone wrote: low genius wrote: every thread like this is totally confused about what tiericide was in eve. it's sad, really. if anybody is confused what this thread is on about take 10 minutes of your life and go and check out ...
- by gbghg - at 2013.08.13 17:35:00
|
962. I BELIEVE THIS GAME SHOULD BE MORE ABOUT TRIAL AND ERRORS. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Someone also once said "here be trolls".
- by gbghg - at 2013.08.13 17:34:00
|
963. Tiericide - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Aka dumbing the game down Aka making the fitting system more complicated https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=97244
- by gbghg - at 2013.08.13 17:33:00
|
964. So why all the grief for using proto? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dunk Mujunk wrote: I'm still pretty new, and i'm still getting a grasp on pretty much every single facet of Dust. I've gone back and forth on what the actual problem is/what to do about it in regards to the Proto issue pretty much since I first...
- by gbghg - at 2013.08.13 02:20:00
|
965. Vehicle Physics. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: Viktor Zokas wrote: Just be happy it wasn't a lightpost. Haven't had to use this in a while. The less that is used the better.
- by gbghg - at 2013.08.13 02:14:00
|
966. Tiericide - in General Discussions [original thread]
Killar-12 wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: Also, again, the idea is to have SUITS have no tiers, not weapons. In this one case, we want to use EVE Online as a model. The ships are all useful on their own now, rather than you just using some as s...
- by gbghg - at 2013.08.13 01:49:00
|
967. I swear some people are ******* stupid...... - in General Discussions [original thread]
ZDub 303 wrote: Ludvig Enraga wrote: ZDub 303 wrote: What about aurum gear? Tiericide sounds like a great model for a subscription based game... but not sure how you would convince people to monetize if there is nothing worthwhile to pur...
- by gbghg - at 2013.08.13 00:36:00
|
968. Vehicle Physics. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Xender17 wrote: (I'm sure most vehicles experience problems as well) HAV- So today my gunnlogi was destroyed by something that can KO it... A freaken staircase. For tanks, turrets are the major flaw of tank physics. It's cool that CCP added ph...
- by gbghg - at 2013.08.13 00:26:00
|
969. The removal of tiers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ludvig Enraga wrote: What, no one realized that we have tiers because it's a f2p game and the company that makes it has to make money? You guys seriously don't see this and talk about balancing through 'tiericide'? Good luck I guess. I'm well...
- by gbghg - at 2013.08.13 00:13:00
|
970. Pictures of new CCP super weapon - in General Discussions [original thread]
The-Errorist wrote: I now present to you all, the Flaylock Rifle! 2 It fire nukes . Check out the mushroom cloud on the top left side of the screen. I want it, it looks badass.
- by gbghg - at 2013.08.12 23:56:00
|
971. The removal of tiers - in General Discussions [original thread]
BGoat wrote: gbghg wrote: They tried balancing titans by ISK in eve, it didn't work. Balancing by ISK is short sighted and fundamentally flawed. Why didn't it work? What is the fundamental flaw? Did it just come down to the biggest corps...
- by gbghg - at 2013.08.12 22:59:00
|
972. The removal of tiers - in General Discussions [original thread]
BGoat wrote: To me, it's simple: Increase the ISK cost of Prototype level gear to a point that significantly prohibits the continuous, uninterrupted use of said gear. I've put many, many hours into this game, so I could finally have access to...
- by gbghg - at 2013.08.12 22:34:00
|
973. Fancy new words-- - in General Discussions [original thread]
+1 for the imagination, personally I still prefer to call them protobears.
- by gbghg - at 2013.08.12 21:06:00
|
974. Come on CCP, tell us what the "Super Secret Mysterious Code" is for! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cody Sietz wrote: OK, what's in DA box. The NDA box?
- by gbghg - at 2013.08.12 20:57:00
|
975. Armor resistance stacking penalty. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Henchmen21 wrote: gbghg wrote: Henchmen21 wrote: Aqil Aegivan wrote: It's not a stacking penalty, but it's like one, sorta. Basically the 15% reduction to damage is taken from the 90% damage potential left after skills. It ensures that...
- by gbghg - at 2013.08.12 20:56:00
|
976. Armor resistance stacking penalty. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Henchmen21 wrote: Aqil Aegivan wrote: It's not a stacking penalty, but it's like one, sorta. Basically the 15% reduction to damage is taken from the 90% damage potential left after skills. It ensures that there is no way to achieve 100% dama...
- by gbghg - at 2013.08.12 20:48:00
|
977. So why all the grief for using proto? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Is there a problem with people running their best gear in instant matches? In of itself I would say no, sometimes it's fun to use your best **** for the sake of it. Is there a problem when said best gear gives you a huge EHP AND DPS advantage? Yes...
- by gbghg - at 2013.08.12 20:40:00
|
978. Vehicle Active Module Wheel selector is reaaaaaallly bad - in General Discussions [original thread]
+1 to hotkeys, plus a activate/deactivate all option would be nice as well.
- by gbghg - at 2013.08.12 20:10:00
|
979. Gallente sucks at aiming - in General Discussions [original thread]
The more the merrier char, the more the merrier. Sides, the calamari gear is rather average, and the amarr tech has a tendency to burn its user (literally). I'll happily stick with my winmatar tech.
- by gbghg - at 2013.08.12 18:17:00
|
980. Did CPM just threaten CCP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I would more say that the CPM threw down the gauntlet, if CCP doesn't take steps after this they'll show that they don't care what the CPM thinks and they'll permanently poison the community against both institutions. In other words the CPM are gi...
- by gbghg - at 2013.08.12 00:13:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |