| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
21. Why I Don't Want Marauders Back. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: A flat upgrade to a solo HAV means AV's either boned once one comes out to play, like a lion playing with its cubs, or alternatively it's rebalanced so's Basic HAVs are stomped, like an ant's nest under the gentle cares...
- by calisk galern - at 2014.06.23 16:27:00
|
22. If we aren't gonna get a fix for the min scout... - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Come up with smart, simple ways to "fix" it, we'll listen. No complete overhaul of skills, or slots. What does it already have, that would make it competitive if it only had a little bit more of. I choose min scout becaus...
- by calisk galern - at 2014.06.23 15:18:00
|
23. Rattati, The Man, how about some sniper love, dude? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Egonz4 wrote: Snipers should be last thing to be buffed......the red line makes them op well your in luck, i'm pretty sure every other piece of equipment, suit, weapon, and vehicle has been addressed since the sniper rifle was last looked at...
- by calisk galern - at 2014.06.23 04:43:00
|
24. since people are saying ADS are op - in General Discussions [original thread]
LUGMOS wrote: Blaster should be better Anti infantry, so yes. My understanding is rails are AV, blasters are AI, and missles are supposed to be ok at both, but not the best. I think small rails should have more direct damage than missles, and...
- by calisk galern - at 2014.06.20 19:15:00
|
25. incubus pilots - in General Discussions [original thread]
i shoot them out of the sky with missiles rather then rails now
- by calisk galern - at 2014.06.20 18:13:00
|
26. So you know..OMS sucks compared to normal. Leave battle - in General Discussions [original thread]
Snake Sellors wrote: i agree that if people don't enjoy going up against tanks they should have the choice, but to be honest I think the main problem is that if people want to attack vehicles they become vulnerable to infantry and vice versa, ...
- by calisk galern - at 2014.06.20 17:37:00
|
27. So all the i win button tankers have now moved to skirm and dom. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: tankers a pretty easy to kill now if you would give it an attempt to try. he's not exactly wrong, tankers really have few tools to fight back against infantry with, rail is the only accurate weapon they have left and ...
- by calisk galern - at 2014.06.20 16:28:00
|
28. So you know..OMS sucks compared to normal. Leave battle - in General Discussions [original thread]
Judge Rhadamanthus wrote: Soraya Xel wrote: Your enjoyment at the time of play will be enhanced if you stop trying to game the system, and just play it. Game the system? What are you going on about? Gaming the system is an exploitation o...
- by calisk galern - at 2014.06.20 14:50:00
|
29. Since There Won't Be a Player Market or "Economy"... - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Can I ask very innocently and honestly, why? Is it just about making ISK? I never considered buying one myself and never use them even if I have them from multiple packs I have bought. Just a couple of thoughts. Which items...
- by calisk galern - at 2014.06.20 14:40:00
|
30. changing shields - in General Discussions [original thread]
Krixus Flux wrote: Shields will always suck compared to armor bro. I never played a game where shields beat out armor or on the same level. shields in eve are great
- by calisk galern - at 2014.06.20 14:14:00
|
31. Wah! My aurum's all used up. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Goro Scornshard wrote: I just finished off the last of it on a booster. Is anyone still buying aurum? Can anyone think of a valid argument to do so? assuming these hot fixes continue and assuming rattati keeps improving the game not destroy...
- by calisk galern - at 2014.06.20 13:40:00
|
32. So you know..OMS sucks compared to normal. Leave battle - in General Discussions [original thread]
RayRay James wrote: calisk galern wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Why on earth would you make the distinction of removing vehicles from non-OMS and keeping them in OMS when they're not even two distinct gamemodes? well back in the day ...
- by calisk galern - at 2014.06.20 13:31:00
|
33. Rifle changes - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Thanks for that analysis. We had an overabundance of RR and CR, hopefully this will make the battlefield more vibrant. If the Amarr changes plus Shield Module buffs make the Scrambler more seen, then that is a success as they...
- by calisk galern - at 2014.06.19 12:55:00
|
34. I know about a secret, game-breaking item that appeared in Bravo... - in General Discussions [original thread]
if your talking about the FW AR it was announced about 10 seconds after the update
- by calisk galern - at 2014.06.18 18:37:00
|
35. Another bad update. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: Dj grammer wrote: If you knew that tanks were due for a neft why not prepare for it? Because over doing it doesn't "FIX" anything. The railgun was OP yes, but only when used in conjunction with damage mods. Other wise, whi...
- by calisk galern - at 2014.06.18 17:36:00
|
36. Another bad update. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: calisk galern wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Oh dear. You can't kill a turret anymore with your cheapass turret? And complaining because the blatantly overpowered damage mods were nerfed? Much scrub. Wow. Als...
- by calisk galern - at 2014.06.18 16:42:00
|
37. Another bad update. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lady MDK wrote: calisk galern wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Highest range should have the lowest damage. physics disagree. This is a game not real life..... Balance and gameplay should come before realism. games disagree as we...
- by calisk galern - at 2014.06.18 16:41:00
|
38. Bravo google doc *INCOMPLETE - in General Discussions [original thread]
Velociraptor antirrhopus wrote: End Is Here wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Why did you think shields were getting buffed? And they did buff them indirectly through the armour nerf. Also, railgun is still beastly. Even in CQC. Maybe y...
- by calisk galern - at 2014.06.18 16:22:00
|
39. Another bad update. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Highest range should have the lowest damage. physics disagree.
- by calisk galern - at 2014.06.18 16:11:00
|
40. Another bad update. - in General Discussions [original thread]
ResistanceGTA wrote: calisk galern wrote: ResistanceGTA wrote: Glyd Path wrote: Congratulations CCP Rattiti, you have accomplished the dubious distinction of devolving to the old style of patches with merely two under your belt. Actual...
- by calisk galern - at 2014.06.18 15:04:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |