| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1161. Vehicle recall time (too much) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Soraya Xel wrote: Infantry already can't swap suits wherever they want, there's limited choices on where to do so, and some maps there are practically no places to do so at all. I can actually agree with this. Infantry are subject to a spe...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.13 22:02:00
|
1162. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1m7G9wnM6gcnNM6oP6mw5oYgHQZF6XYelYh0PTgk72iM/pubhtml 1. Chrome with altered numbers, not finished either Your marauder resistances are set both too high an...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.13 21:58:00
|
1163. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: DarthJT5 wrote: Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Breakin', what about making some vehicle scale "EWAR" (as they call it dust side) with different levels of detection, sensor radii and profiles... Yeah... Say we can implemen...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.13 20:52:00
|
1164. Vehicle recall time (too much) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vulpes Dolosus wrote: Soraya Xel wrote: Vehicle recall time really should be replaced by having to wait for an RDV in the queue to come retrieve it, and haul it off into the air. In the meantime, the current setting is decent. NNNNNNNNNNOO...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.13 19:53:00
|
1165. Are you getting rid of the loyalty store? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Skullmiser Vulcansu wrote: It is a shame that all of the items in the loyalty store had to be removed. I guess that might help reduce one sidedness of some of these matches. Winning has less incentive now. Was that why? It doesn't seem right. I...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.13 19:39:00
|
1166. Officer Weapons ... COLORS :D - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Indy Strizer wrote: Really? More gold? Geezus.... It's like people think the instant something becomes gold colored, it becomes classier or some status symbol, we don't need that. I'd rather be given more gray weapons honestly, I think they'd ...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.13 19:31:00
|
1167. Vehicle recall time (too much) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Atiim wrote: The comparison to Supply Depots and Infantry is skewed, as the vehicle can be recalled in any location that the vehicle has access to, while there are only a few pre-defined locations where Infantry may swap ...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.13 18:59:00
|
1168. Railguns need splash damage - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Rain Da Pain wrote: True Adamance wrote: Lahut K'mar wrote: Get a gunner. Small turrets are there for infantry. Indeed. And Large are for vehicles am I right? Thus if changes are made like this the appropriate destructive force shoul...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.13 10:07:00
|
1169. Small Blasters still suck CCP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: True Adamance wrote: Sgt Kirk wrote: Grimmiers wrote: All small turrets will miss the target while a vehicle is in motion, which is a bug that's been in the game since alpha. I'd be amazed if it ever gets fixed since t...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.13 03:58:00
|
1170. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sir Dukey wrote: True Adamance wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: Oh come one, you seriously can't be sucking up True Adamance Info. It is completely biased from an Armor point of view. I'm only calling the imbalances as I see them and they ar...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.13 03:32:00
|
1171. Lack of AV Parity and AV Balance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sir Dukey wrote: True Adamance wrote: Finn Colman wrote: La Lore Sleipnier wrote: Man, i use python and swarms make a lot of damage, the problem are gunlogis not the weapons. P.D.: swarma are very op now Sorry, could you rephrase th...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.13 02:35:00
|
1172. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sir Dukey wrote: Oh come one, you seriously can't be sucking up True Adamance Info. It is completely biased from an Armor point of view. I'm only calling the imbalances as I see them and they are very obviously there. Whether Shield HAV n...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.13 02:11:00
|
1173. Lack of AV Parity and AV Balance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Finn Colman wrote: La Lore Sleipnier wrote: Man, i use python and swarms make a lot of damage, the problem are gunlogis not the weapons. P.D.: swarma are very op now Sorry, could you rephrase that for me, and elaborate on the part about t...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.13 01:28:00
|
1174. Railguns need splash damage - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lahut K'mar wrote: Get a gunner. Small turrets are there for infantry. Indeed. And Large are for vehicles am I right? Thus if changes are made like this the appropriate destructive force should be applied on the main gun of a tank. Thus Ao...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.13 00:40:00
|
1175. Small Blasters still suck CCP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: Grimmiers wrote: All small turrets will miss the target while a vehicle is in motion, which is a bug that's been in the game since alpha. I'd be amazed if it ever gets fixed since the only vehicles we care about are havs tha...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.13 00:16:00
|
1176. Railguns need splash damage - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Rain Da Pain wrote: So in reality the railgun would have a huge splash probably severing your legs from you body :) but for the sake of balancing a 25% splash would be good. Ccp please say weather it's possible to add or not! Hmmmm likely on...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.13 00:14:00
|
1177. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: True Adamance wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Now imagine carrying supporting infantry from objective to objective while you provide supporting fire and they provide you with a screen against bastards like me who do thing...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.12 23:40:00
|
1178. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Now imagine carrying supporting infantry from objective to objective while you provide supporting fire and they provide you with a screen against bastards like me who do things like shoot you with a forge gun. Honestly ...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.12 23:35:00
|
1179. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Adamance you may approve of this. It would allow a HAV driver to fully coordinate with a squad. Infantry Transport Bay in module theorycrafting Sounds cool. We used to roll in 3 man rapid movement tank squads in Amarr...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.12 23:32:00
|
1180. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: True Adamance wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: added placeholder stats for an officer scrambler lance and militia scrambler lance Does the Scrambler Lance look like t...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.01.12 23:24:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |