| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
2421. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Shadow of War88 wrote: Lol so you would reduce the HAV to a glorified taxi. Scrub move. I can see the headlines already! WANNABCPM Jackal deprives the community of a healthy vehicle dynamic! No he wants to make the HAV a powerful AV platfo...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.30 03:16:00
|
2422. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Shadow of War88 wrote: True Adamance wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: True Adamance wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: Hypothetical, not battle proven concept. Been doing it for months now it rarely fails. got proof? http://www.du...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.30 02:29:00
|
2423. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Shadow of War88 wrote: True Adamance wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: Hypothetical, not battle proven concept. Been doing it for months now it rarely fails. got proof? http://www.dustcharts.com/ cuz clearly 0.H's tank core has bee...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.30 02:19:00
|
2424. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Shadow of War88 wrote: Hypothetical, not battle proven concept. Been doing it for months now it rarely fails.
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.30 02:10:00
|
2425. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Shadow of War88 wrote: True Adamance wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: The Black Jackal wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: are you pushing for a serious buff to small turrets? because that would make ADS OP. Not sure where I mentioned se...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.30 01:50:00
|
2426. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Shadow of War88 wrote: The Black Jackal wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: are you pushing for a serious buff to small turrets? because that would make ADS OP. Not sure where I mentioned serious buff to Small Turrets... the current Small ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.30 01:45:00
|
2427. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The Black Jackal wrote: I played PC from Uprising 1.0 until now. Because YOU haven't seen me, doesn't mean I'm not in PC. That being aside... in PC, you're using a Tank to mow down infantry solo, you SHOULD be able to be killed solo by the v...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.30 01:36:00
|
2428. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Shadow of War88 wrote: True Adamance wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: Im talking about PC and competitive scenarios. I have yet to see you on a competitive level so please refrain your irrelevant comments. Lol thinks PC corp gives h...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.30 01:11:00
|
2429. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Shadow of War88 wrote: Im talking about PC and competitive scenarios. I have yet to see you on a competitive level so please refrain your irrelevant comments. Lol thinks PC corp gives him the right to talk down to other players........
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.30 00:51:00
|
2430. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Shadow of War88 wrote: Harpyja wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: Large blasters are so bad at taking out competent infantry, that your better off using a rifle. They cloak, run, dance in front of you with a forge, jihad jeep you, so on. The...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.30 00:49:00
|
2431. Where's my Federation Reps? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: You know, to be honest, until running Cal FW becomes viable (i.e. not lose 95% of the time), the vehicle department of the FW store needs to be limited as it is right now. Gallente shouldn't have an advantage of using LP items b...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.29 23:37:00
|
2432. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Shadow of War88 wrote: Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Changes I would like to see A passive skill for tighter dispersion and/or nonstupid dispersion decay The rail range buffed and heat build up bu...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.29 23:18:00
|
2433. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Shadow of War88 wrote: Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Changes I would like to see A passive skill for tighter dispersion and/or nonstupid dispersion decay The rail range buffed and heat build up buffed so that it can fire 5 consecutive shots without...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.29 22:05:00
|
2434. Where's my Federation Reps? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Benjamin Ciscko wrote: True Adamance wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: There's a ton of vehicle specific things missing in the faction store, or it's just broken (Federation Maddy is quite literally a AUR one, but with a new name). There's no m...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.29 21:58:00
|
2435. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Shadow of War88 wrote: I am all for sensible changes. 6 OP tanks in ambush was ridiculous and not fun for anyone, but having infantry in proto gear dance 40 meters in front of you while bombarding you with AV and your blaster cant seem to hit s...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.29 21:47:00
|
2436. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Shadow of War88 wrote: True Adamance wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: True Adamance wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: Large blasters are so bad at taking out competent infantry, that your better off using a rifle. They cloak, run, dance ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.29 21:34:00
|
2437. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Shadow of War88 wrote: True Adamance wrote: Shadow of War88 wrote: Large blasters are so bad at taking out competent infantry, that your better off using a rifle. They cloak, run, dance in front of you with a forge, jihad jeep you, so o...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.29 21:14:00
|
2438. {seriously} The vehicle life cycle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Shadow of War88 wrote: Large blasters are so bad at taking out competent infantry, that your better off using a rifle. They cloak, run, dance in front of you with a forge, jihad jeep you, so on. The ISK gap is enormous. These tanks are laugha...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.29 20:57:00
|
2439. Tanking in Hotfix Bravo - A second take - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: I like 1x extender and 2x hardeners, myself, but I'll have to do the EHP calculations :) Okay, so yours has 8833 shield EHP (8k to blasters and rails) while hardened, while mine has 10k (9k to blas...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.29 19:56:00
|
2440. Where's my Federation Reps? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: There's a ton of vehicle specific things missing in the faction store, or it's just broken (Federation Maddy is quite literally a AUR one, but with a new name). There's no modules, no specialist turrets (by the way, Federat...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.28 04:10:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |