| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
261. Triage Hives Should Energize Shields, Not Repair Armor - in General Discussions [original thread]
jordy mack wrote: Jadek Menaheim wrote: Anyone have thought on the idea of energizers (nanohives) temporarily increasing the effectiveness of your low and highslot modules by a factor of 5% ? Sounds like a great reason to stack armor/reps...
- by Texs Red - at 2014.01.26 12:55:00
|
262. Triage Hives Should Energize Shields, Not Repair Armor - in General Discussions [original thread]
I like the idea because then something else could be introduced for stationary armor repairs. I means the race that is supposed to be biggest on armor repairs is ironically the race that failed to invent the nanohive or repair tool. So I say let n...
- by Texs Red - at 2014.01.26 11:53:00
|
263. Minmatar plasma-thrower design - in My DUST 514 [original thread]
Plasma is Gallente Projectiles is Minmatar Rail-tech is Caldari Lasers is Amarr
- by Texs Red - at 2014.01.25 15:04:00
|
264. The Ion Pistol (some problems) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zeylon Rho wrote: At STD level, the Ion pistol charge shot does 350 damage. The damage on a Thales Sniper Rifle is 355. The damage on a "Charge" Sniper Rifle is 322 or so. Both of those are PRO level, and the Ion PRO has a single shot dmg of 38...
- by Texs Red - at 2014.01.25 15:00:00
|
265. The Ion Pistol (some problems) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Also, I realize that there should be 2 types of sidearms: Ones that can be used as weapons by themselves (knives) and ones that are simply backup after running out of ammo (flaylocks) All sidearms should be designed ...
- by Texs Red - at 2014.01.25 04:03:00
|
266. The Ion Pistol (some problems) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lets look at it this way: Bolt Pistol: 54 optimal, 72 effective, 6 shots in the clip, full-auto 891 damage over 2.4 seconds, 371 DPS Ion Pistol: 24 optimal, 42 effective, 12 shots in the clip, single shot 660 damage over 2.16 seconds (or however...
- by Texs Red - at 2014.01.25 02:42:00
|
267. How to improve scanners and profile dampening - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yes, and I am proposing this as an alternative. CCP's idea is to jack up the cool down times to combat active scanner spam but this would diminish that and make profile dampening relevant, which their changes don't address.
- by Texs Red - at 2014.01.23 21:41:00
|
268. How to improve scanners and profile dampening - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pretty much 30 views and nobody has any kind of comment? Nobody has liked it so clearly the idea doesn't have many fans but no body has posted why it is a bad idea either. Can I at least get *some* kind of feed back on the idea?
- by Texs Red - at 2014.01.23 20:59:00
|
269. How to improve scanners and profile dampening - in General Discussions [original thread]
Right now scanning and profile dampening operate at very absolute values. You are either above or below each tier of scanner and it is also irrelevant if you are anything else. I suggest this method of changing scanners vs what CCP has released. H...
- by Texs Red - at 2014.01.23 20:06:00
|
270. Quick lore based Racial weapon question. - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Gallente may to invented rail tech but the Caldari prefer a distanced approach to combat vs the Gallente who like to get up close and personal so they make wider use of it. I am not super in tough with lore but based on ship stats this is wh...
- by Texs Red - at 2014.01.23 01:03:00
|
271. Caldari/Gallente Scouts backwards - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: As for continue talk on the military evolution. How do you deal with a race of people with good jamming? Don't let them know you're there to be jammed in the first place. In FPS terms If other traditional tools exist...
- by Texs Red - at 2014.01.23 00:43:00
|
272. Caldari/Gallente Scouts backwards - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Dunno I damp my caldari assault up he dodges quite a few of the scans. Sensor Dampening is not a form of jamming but a form known as obsurfication, or noise generation or confusion. But that is just the thing, becau...
- by Texs Red - at 2014.01.23 00:35:00
|
273. Caldari/Gallente Scouts backwards - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Stealthed engine signatures, originally did design the stealth plates but did not publish the modules for wide distribution, Lightweight armor systems (Shields are electronically noisy as hell). Shaped hulls increasing r...
- by Texs Red - at 2014.01.23 00:22:00
|
274. Caldari/Gallente Scouts backwards - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Caldari are long range fighters, they rely on information gathering in order to assist their weapon systems. The better informed a caldari is the harder it is to kill them. Jammers are part of their defenses so they can e...
- by Texs Red - at 2014.01.23 00:07:00
|
275. Caldari/Gallente Scouts backwards - in General Discussions [original thread]
If Gallente are denial of information then in EVE why is it the Caldari who get bonuses to jammers (Scorpion) whose counter would be improved sensors?
- by Texs Red - at 2014.01.22 23:56:00
|
276. Caldari/Gallente Scouts backwards - in General Discussions [original thread]
So the Caldari focus on information warfare (denial of information i.e. jamming) The Gallente focus on counter-information warfare (detecting enemies). Therefore shouldn't the Gallente scout be the one that gets the improved scan precision and th...
- by Texs Red - at 2014.01.22 23:19:00
|
277. How to make those profile dampeners even more viable - in General Discussions [original thread]
Some margin of error has already been removed. It just says "No margin for error" regardless if you successfully scanned everyone or not, I have died to many a scout that way. So really you can just removed that message entirely as it makes no dif...
- by Texs Red - at 2014.01.22 23:12:00
|
278. Racial equipment imbalance. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Okay so jammers are caldari. What about a Gallente equipment you put down that boosts passive scan radius and precision within a certain area, say 15 meters? Or perhaps a remote scanner? Set it down and it acts like a passive scanner, downside wo...
- by Texs Red - at 2014.01.22 21:35:00
|
279. Racial equipment imbalance. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Havaru Fox wrote: what is the problem? you got armour suits that you can get from the shop. and without checking it... cant you buy FW plates as well? Those are modules and suits, I am talking about the stuff that goes in the equipment slot...
- by Texs Red - at 2014.01.22 20:37:00
|
280. Racial equipment imbalance. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Reav Hannari wrote: Aren't stasis webifiers Gallente technology? Those would be good for making vehicle traps. Gallente also use sensor dampening but our passive sensors are already extremely short. Since we lack capacitors in our vehicles so...
- by Texs Red - at 2014.01.22 20:09:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |